ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03267784Updated Sep 10, 2020

Allogeneic ABCB5-positive Stem Cells for Treatment of DFU "Malum Perforans"

A Phase 1/2 interventional study of allo-APZ2-DFU in Diabetic Neuropathic Ulcer, sponsored by RHEACELL GmbH & Co. KG. Completed at 7 sites in Germany. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 85 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-09-10.

Sponsored by RHEACELL GmbH & Co. KG · Phase 1/2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 1/2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
23
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 85 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of this clinical trial is to investigate the efficacy (by monitoring the wound surface area reduction of Diabetic Foot Ulcers) and safety (by monitoring adverse events) of two doses of the allogeneic investigational medicinal product "allo-APZ2-DFU" topically administered to the wound matrix of patients with diabetic neuropathic ulcer.

Read the detailed description

This is an interventional, single arm, phase I/IIa clinical trial to investigate the efficacy and safety of allogeneic ABCB5-positive mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) on wound healing in patients with diabetic neuropathic ulcer. Allogeneic MSCs will be isolated ex vivo and will be expanded in vitro. The Investigational medicinal product (IMP) containing the ABCB5-positive MSCs will then be applied two times (at Visit 3 and six weeks later, at Visit 10) on the wound surface of DFU.

Patients are followed up for efficacy for a period of three months starting after the first IMP application which allows to distinguish actual wound healing from transient wound coverage.

The wound healing process will be documented by standardized photography. The wound size reduction evaluation will start two weeks after the first IMP application. The quality of the wound healing process will be assessed on the basis of formation of granulation tissue, epithelialization and wound exudation.

Pain will be assessed using a numerical rating scale and quality of life will be investigated with standardized and validated questionnaires. To assess long-term safety of allo-APZ2-DFU three follow-up visits at Months 6, 9 and 12 after the first IMP application are included.

02

Conditions studied

  • Diabetic Neuropathic Ulcer

Keywords

  • diabetic neuropathic ulcer
  • ABCB5
  • allogeneic
  • mesenchymal stem cells
  • skin ulcer
  • advanced therapy medicinal product
  • somatic cell therapy
  • phase I/IIa
  • Diabetic Foot Ulcer
03

In context

Skin Ulcer

61 studies on the registry are indexed under Skin Ulcer; 14 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 23 is below the median of 62 across 51 interventional studies indexed under Skin Ulcer.

Browse Skin Ulcer studies →

Lead sponsor

RHEACELL GmbH & Co. KG is the lead sponsor of 11 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 85 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Male or female patients aged 18 to 85 years;
  2. Patients with an existing diagnosis of diabetic mellitus Type 2, evaluated by blood test [] \< 11%) at the Screening visit (Visit 1). The HbA1c value at visit 1 should not vary more than 1.5% (absolute range) compared to a HbA1c value that was previously measured 1 to 6 months before visit 1;
  3. The presence of diabetic neuropathic ulcers "malum perforans" (Grade I and II according to Wagner) at plantar site of the foot diagnosed by ABI ≥0.7, without claudication, or TcPO2 >40 mmHg or doppler ultrasonography (at the discretion of the investigator) to exclude significant arterial diseases and critical limb ischemia, and a diabetic neuropathy test using a 128 Hz vibration tuning fork according to Rydel-Seiffer (as described by Guideline "Nationale Versorgungsleitlinie - Neuropathie bei Diabetes im Erwachsenenalter"). If the ABI is >1.3, an additional doppler ultrasonography must be performed to exclude a PAOD masked by media sclerosis;
  4. At Screening Visit 1 and 2 the wound surface area of the target ulcer should be between 1 and 50 cm2 measured by using a scaled measuring sensor in combination with digital image analysis;
  5. The ulcer's surface area should be (mostly) free from callus or necrotic tissue;
  6. If patients are suffering from two or more ulcers at the same extremity, the target ulcer has to be separated by a minimum bridge of 1 cm of healthy tissue from other ulcers;
  7. Patients are willing and able to wear therapeutic shoes that are especially designed for patients with a diabetic neuropathic foot;
  8. (BMI) between 20 and 45 kg/m²;
  9. Patients understand the nature of the procedure and are providing written prior to any clinical trial procedure;
  10. Women of must have a negative blood pregnancy test at Visit 1;
  11. Women of childbearing potential must be willing to use highly effective methods during the course of the clinical trial.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Presence of acute Charcot foot;
  2. Clinical signs of active osteomyelitis in the last three months;
  3. Active wet gangrenous tissue;
  4. Infection of the target ulcer requiring treatment as judged clinically;
  5. Presence of an ulcer Grade ≥3 according to Wagner on the same foot as target ulcer;
  6. Patients who are currently receiving dialysis;
  7. Peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD) including claudication with need of treatment;
  8. Ulcers due to non-diabetic etiology;
  9. Prior surgical procedures such as bypass or mesh-graft treatment within 2 months prior to IMP application;
  10. Acute deep vein thrombosis (maximum 30 days from diagnosis) or a still untreated deep vein thrombosis;
  11. Any chronic dermatological disorders diagnosed at the investigator's discretion;
  12. Skin disorders, unrelated to the ulcer, that are present adjacent to the target wound;
  13. Treatment of target wound with active wound care agents (e.g. iruxol, local antibiotics or silver dressings), which have not been stopped 14 days before IMP application;
  14. Any within the past 5 years, excluding successfully treated carcinoma in situ, basal cell carcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin without evidence of ;
  15. Current use of medication above Cushing threshold dose (>7.5 mg/d prednisone or equivalent);
  16. Known abuse of alcohol, drugs, or medicinal products;
  17. Patients anticipated to be unwilling or unable to comply with the requirements of the protocol;
  18. Pregnant or lactating women;
  19. Patients infected with the (HIV 1\&2);
  20. Any known allergies to components of the IMP or concomitant medication;
  21. Current or previous (within 30 days of enrollment) treatment with another IMP, or participation and/or under follow-up in another clinical trial;
  22. Evidence of any other medical conditions (such as psychiatric illness, physical examination, or laboratory findings) that may interfere with the planned treatment, affect the patient's compliance, or place the patient at high risk of complications related to the treatment;
  23. Employees of the sponsor, or employees or relatives of the investigator.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(9)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

HbA1c

A blood test of average blood sugar over the past two to three months, given as a percentage or in mmol/mol. 6.5% (48 mmol/mol) or more is the usual threshold for diabetes, normally confirmed by a second test.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
23 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Experimental: allo-APZ2-DFU

    Application of IMP on patients wound

    Biological: allo-APZ2-DFU

Interventions

  • Biologicalallo-APZ2-DFU

    Suspension of ABCB5-positive mesenchymal stem cells

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of wound surface area reduction

    Percentage of wound surface area reduction at Week 12, or last available post-baseline measurement of weeks 4, 6 or 8, if the Week 12 measurement is missing (last observation carried forward \[LOCF\]).

    Time frame: Week 12, or last available post-baseline measurement of weeks 4, 6 or 8 if the Week 12 measurement is missing.

  2. Assessment of adverse event (AE) occurrence

    All AEs occurring during the clinical trial will be registered, documented and evaluated.

    Time frame: Up to 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of wound surface area reduction

    Percentage of wound surface area reduction will be evaluated.

    Time frame: Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12 (without LOCF)

  2. Percentage of invisible and visible wound surface area reduction

    Percentage of invisible and visible wound surface area reduction will be evaluated.

    Time frame: Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12 (without LOCF)

  3. Absolute wound surface area reduction

    Absolute wound surface area reduction will be evaluated.

    Time frame: Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12 (without LOCF)

  4. Absolute invisible and visible wound surface area reduction

    Absolute invisible and visible wound surface area reduction will be evaluated.

    Time frame: Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12 (without LOCF)

  5. Assessment of wound infection

    Wound infection will be evaluated.

    Time frame: Days 1 and 2, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 6.1, 6.2, 6.3, 8 and 12

  6. Time to first complete wound closure

    Time to first complete wound closure will be evaluated.

    Time frame: A priori specification not possible; between baseline and week 12 post baseline

  7. Proportion of patients achieving complete wound closure

    Proportion of patients achieving complete wound closure will be evaluated.

    Time frame: Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12

  8. Time to first 30% reduction of wound surface area

    Time to first 30% reduction of wound surface area will be evaluated.

    Time frame: A priori specification not possible; between baseline and week 12 post baseline

  9. Proportion of patients achieving 30% reduction of wound surface area

    Proportion of patients achieving 30% reduction of wound surface area will be evaluated.

    Time frame: Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12

  10. Assessment of wound exudation, epithelialization and formation of granulation tissue

    Wound exudation, epithelialization and formation of granulation tissue will be evaluated.

    Time frame: Day 0 and Week 6.1 prior IMP-application, at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12

  11. Time to amputation at target leg until Week 12

    Time to amputation at target leg until week 12 will be evaluated.

    Time frame: A priori specification not possible; between baseline and week 12 post baseline

  12. Pain assessment as per numerical rating scale (NRS)

    Pain assessment as per numerical rating scale (NRS) will be evaluated.

    Time frame: At both Screening Visits, at Days 0, 1 and 2 and at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 6.1, 6.2, 6.3, 8 and 12

  13. Assessment of Quality of life (QoL) using the short form 36 (SF-36) questionnaire

    Quality of life (QoL) using the short form 36 (SF-36) questionnaire will be evaluated.

    Time frame: Screening Visit 1, Visit 3, at Weeks 4 and 12

  14. Assessment of Dermatology-specific QoL based on the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) questionnaire

    Dermatology-specific QoL based on the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) questionnaire will be evaluated.

    Time frame: Screening Visit 1, Visit 3, at Weeks 4 and 12

  15. Physical examination and vital signs

    Physical examination and vital signs will be evaluated.

    Time frame: Week 6.1 and Week 12

  16. Time to amputation of target leg until month 12

    Time to amputation of target leg until month 12 will be evaluated.

    Time frame: A priori specification not possible; between baseline and month 12 post baseline

07

Study locations

7 sites
  • Universitätsmedizin Greifswald; Klinik und Poliklinik für Hautkrankheiten
    Greifswald, 17475, Germany
  • St. Josefskrankenhaus Heidelberg GmbH; Klinische Studienabteilung
    Heidelberg, 69115, Germany
  • Diabetologikum Raab, Privatärztliche Facharztpraxis
    Kassel, 34131, Germany
  • pro scientia med im Mare Klinikum, Department Klinische Forschung und Entwicklung
    Kronshagen, 24119, Germany
  • Studienambulanz Leipzig, medamed GmbH
    Leipzig, 04107, Germany
  • Diabetologikum Ludwigshafen, Gemeinschaftspraxis
    Ludwigshafen, 67059, Germany
  • Klinik und Poliklinik für Dermatologie, Venerologie und Allergologie, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg
    Würzburg, 97080, Germany
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Kerstan A, Dieter K, Niebergall-Roth E, Klingele S, Junger M, Hasslacher C, Daeschlein G, Stemler L, Meyer-Pannwitt U, Schubert K, Klausmann G, Raab T, Goebeler M, Kraft K, Esterlechner J, Schroder HM, Sadeghi S, Ballikaya S, Gasser M, Waaga-Gasser AM, Murphy GF, Orgill DP, Frank NY, Ganss C, Scharffetter-Kochanek K, Frank MH, Kluth MA. Translational development of ABCB5+ dermal mesenchymal stem cells for therapeutic induction of angiogenesis in non-healing diabetic foot ulcers. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2022 Sep 5;13(1):455. doi: 10.1186/s13287-022-03156-9. PubMed 36064604 ↗
  • Kerstan A, Niebergall-Roth E, Esterlechner J, Schroder HM, Gasser M, Waaga-Gasser AM, Goebeler M, Rak K, Schrufer P, Endres S, Hagenbusch P, Kraft K, Dieter K, Ballikaya S, Stemler N, Sadeghi S, Tappenbeck N, Murphy GF, Orgill DP, Frank NY, Ganss C, Scharffetter-Kochanek K, Frank MH, Kluth MA. Ex vivo-expanded highly pure ABCB5+ mesenchymal stromal cells as Good Manufacturing Practice-compliant autologous advanced therapy medicinal product for clinical use: process validation and first in-human data. Cytotherapy. 2021 Feb;23(2):165-175. doi: 10.1016/j.jcyt.2020.08.012. Epub 2020 Oct 1. PubMed 33011075 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Nov 2017 to primary completion in Jun 2020, 31 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 17, 2017
First posted
Aug 30, 2017
StartActual
Nov 21, 2017
Primary completionActual
Jun 29, 2020
CompletionActual
Jun 29, 2020
Last update
Sep 10, 2020
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 10, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03267784
Lead sponsor
RHEACELL GmbH & Co. KG
Collaborators
FGK Clinical Research GmbH, Ticeba GmbH, Granzer Regulatory Consulting & Services
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 30, 2017
Start date
Nov 21, 2017
Primary completion
Jun 29, 2020
Completion
Jun 29, 2020
Last update
Sep 10, 2020

Study contacts

Andreas Kerstan, Dr.
principal investigator · Klinik und Poliklinik für Dermatologie, Venerologie und Allergologie, Würzburg, Germany

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion