CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT03265496CONCORDEUpdated Mar 17, 2026

Correlation Between Tissue and Plasmatic EGFR in CBNPC With EGFR Mutation or Predictive Factor of EGFR Mutation

An interventional study of Clinical exam and Liquid biopsy in Nsclc, sponsored by Centre Oscar Lambret. Terminated at 2 sites in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-17.

Sponsored by Centre Oscar Lambret · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Why this study was terminated
The number of recruted patient was not sufficient
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
21
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Condorde main objective is to evaluate the correlation between EGFR mutational status determined after tumor biopsy and EGFR mutational status analyzed on ctDNA after liquid biopsy. EGFR status will be assessed by real time PCR (rtPCR), digital PCR (dPCR) and Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) in patients with chemotherapy naive lung carcinoma.

Read the detailed description

Newest therapeutic breakthrough are often based on molecular analysis of tumoral tissue before treatment initiation or after emergence of resistance. Tumoral tissue is commonly obtained by biopsy. However, tumor biopsy is an invasive, scarcely repeatable and costly technics. Moreover, tumor samples, obtained by biopsy, doesn't represent tumor heterogeneity and cannot inform about tumor evolution over time.

Recent improvement have been done in detection and characterization of blood circulating tumoral DNA (ctDNA). ctDNA reach regularly the blood stream after tumoral cell apoptosis or necrosis and could be extract and sequenced by some molecular biology technics such as real time PCR (rtPCR), digital PCR (dPCR) or next generation sequencing (NGS). Interesting, Several studies demonstrate that some genomic alterations of solid cancer can be characterized after sequencing of ctDNA. Other experiments pointed that ctDNA level could be linked to tumor stage and patient prognostic.

These progress lead to the development of a new non invasive method for extraction of ctDNA called liquid biopsy (LB). LB could be useful for monitor tumoral genotype, assess tumor response to treatment and detect residual tumor cells after curative treatment. Moreover LB could be an essential method for study of tumor cells molecular alterations mechanisms during targeted cancer therapies, when clinical resistance occurs.

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most frequently diagnosticated type of lung cancer. Regular first line chemotherapy is based on the use of platinum salts. However, some mutations in the EGFR gene could add sensitivity of NSCLC to tyrosine kinase inhibitors such as gefitinib, erlotinib or afatinib. Consequently, the search for molecular mutations in genome of NSCLC cells is of prior interest for patients with clinically advanced NSCLC.

Recently, some studies demonstrate that mutational EGFR status of NSCLC was sharply correlated between tumoral tissue, obtained by classical biopsy, and ctDNA, collected by liquid biopsy.

These results provide promising data encouraging the use of LB for study of NSCLC ctDNA. However some experimentations are needed to ensure these data.

For that reason, CONCORDE clinical trial will evaluate the correlation between EGFR mutational status determined after tumor biopsy and EGFR mutational status analyzed after liquid biopsy. EGFR status will be assessed by real time PCR (rtPCR), digital PCR (dPCR) and Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) in patients with chemotherapy naive lung carcinoma.

02

Conditions studied

03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • At least 18 years
  • Metastatic lung carcinoma
  • With: - EGFR gene mutation
  • Or at least 2 predictive factors of addictive mutation (Women, non smocking or cessation > 3 years, Asiatic, lung adenocarcinoma)
  • Eligible for 1st line treatment
  • Performance status ≤ 3
  • Available tumor sample or tumor reachable for biopsy
  • With informed and signed consent
  • Affiliation to the National Social Security System

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous radiotherapy treatment in months preceding initials samples
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women
  • Patient not able to give consent or unwilling to provide consent
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
21 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    study procedure

    Clinical exam. Liquid biopsy. Diagnostic exam (biopsy and imagery). 1st line treatment. tumor evaluation. Biopsy

    Procedure: Clinical exam · Procedure: Liquid biopsy · Procedure: Diagnostic exam · Drug: 1st line treatment · Procedure: tumor evaluation · Biological: Biopsy

Interventions

  • ProcedureClinical exam

    Clinical exam is performed before treatment start

  • ProcedureLiquid biopsy

    Liquid biopsy will be performed at baseline and every 3 cycles of chemotherapy until progression disease

  • ProcedureDiagnostic exam

    Diagnostic exam (biopsy and imagery exam) will be performed at baseline if not previously done or incompletely done.

  • Drug1st line treatment

    1st line chemotherapy (chemotherapy or EGFR targeted therapy) will be performed until progression disease.

    Also known as: 1st line chemotherapy

  • Proceduretumor evaluation

    Tumor evaluation will be performed every 3 cycles of chemotherapy

  • BiologicalBiopsy

    Biopsy will be performed at the end of study, after progression disease, if a mutation of EGFR is detected in tumor DNA.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Correlation between EGFR mutational status determined after tumor biopsy and EGFR mutational status analyzed after liquid biopsy. At diagnostic. NGS.

    For patient with mutant EGFR. Evaluate, by next generation sequencing at diagnostic, the correlation between EGFR mutational status determined after tumor biopsy and EGFR mutational status analyzed after liquid biopsy.

    Time frame: Baseline

Secondary outcomes

  1. Correlation between EGFR mutational status determined after tumor biopsy and EGFR mutational status analyzed after liquid biopsy. At diagnostic. rtPCR.

    For patient with mutant EGFR. Evaluate, by real time PCR at diagnostic, the correlation between EGFR mutational status determined after tumor biopsy and EGFR mutational status analyzed after liquid biopsy.

    Time frame: Baseline

  2. Correlation between EGFR mutational status determined after tumor biopsy and EGFR mutational status analyzed after liquid biopsy. At diagnostic. dPCR.

    For patient with mutant EGFR. Evaluate, by digital PCR at diagnostic, the correlation between EGFR mutational status determined after tumor biopsy and EGFR mutational status analyzed after liquid biopsy.

    Time frame: Baseline

  3. Correlation between EGFR mutational status determined after tumor biopsy and EGFR mutational status analyzed after liquid biopsy. At disease progression. NGS.

    For patient with mutant EGFR. Evaluate, by Next Generation Sequencing at disease progression, the correlation between EGFR mutational status determined after tumor biopsy and EGFR mutational status analyzed after liquid biopsy.

    Time frame: From Baseline to disease progression, up to 2 years

  4. Correlation between EGFR mutational status determined after tumor biopsy and EGFR mutational status analyzed after liquid biopsy. At disease progression. rtPCR.

    For patient with mutant EGFR. Evaluate, by rtPCR at disease progression, the correlation between EGFR mutational status determined after tumor biopsy and EGFR mutational status analyzed after liquid biopsy.

    Time frame: From Baseline to disease progression, up to 2 years

  5. Correlation between EGFR mutational status determined after tumor biopsy and EGFR mutational status analyzed after liquid biopsy. At disease progression. dPCR.

    For patient with mutant EGFR. Evaluate, by dPCR at disease progression, the correlation between EGFR mutational status determined after tumor biopsy and EGFR mutational status analyzed after liquid biopsy.

    Time frame: From Baseline to disease progression, up to 2 years

  6. Incidence of oncogenic mutation for patients with predictive factors

    To evaluate the incidence of oncogenic mutations in populations with clinical predictive factors of these mutations.

    Time frame: From Baseline to disease progression, up to 2 years

  7. Predictive value of ctDNA during treatment with EGFR targeting therapy.

    To assess the predictive value of mutant ctDNA during treatment with EGFR targeting therapy.

    Time frame: From Baseline to disease progression, up to 2 years

  8. Mutations on ctDNA and tumor biopsy.

    To search for mutations leading to treatment resistance on ctDNA and tumor biopsy at proved disease progression

    Time frame: From Baseline to disease progression, up to 2 years

Other outcomes

  1. Mutation in ctDNA

    To detect, at early stage, mutations on liquid biopsy. To identify, at early stage, mutations leading to treatment resistance by Next Generation Sequencing.

    Time frame: From Baseline to disease progression, up to 2 years

  2. expression pattern of tumor grade and resistance

    To identify a predictive expression pattern for grade and treatment resistance of tumor by iterative sampling during treatment

    Time frame: From Baseline to disease progression, up to 2 years

06

Study locations

2 sites
  • Centre Oscar Lambret
    Lille, 59020, France
  • CHRU Lille
    Lille, 59037, France
07

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03265496
Lead sponsor
Centre Oscar Lambret
Collaborators
University Hospital, Lille
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 29, 2017
Start date
Jul 7, 2016
Primary completion
Apr 13, 2021
Completion
Apr 13, 2021
Last update
Mar 17, 2026

Study contacts

Kotecki Nuria, MD
principal investigator · Centre Oscar Lambret
Cortot Alexis, Pr
principal investigator · CHRU LILLE

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Mar 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion