ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT03264443HAELUpdated Feb 12, 2020

Hypertension Approaches in the Elderly: a Lifestyle Study

An interventional study of Health education and Combined training in Hypertension, sponsored by Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre. Status unknown at 2 sites in Brazil. Open to participants aged 60 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-02-12.

Sponsored by Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Feb 2020), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
184
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
60 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Two-center randomized, parallel, controlled trial which will compare a pragmatic combined training program with a health education program in 184 older adults with hypertension. This study will last 12 weeks with assessments conducted at baseline, previously to the group allocation, and after interventions. There is a set of secondary outcomes which show clinical importance to the elderly population and are possibly influenced by the tested intervention.

Read the detailed description

The present protocol describes a randomized controlled trial that aims to evaluate blood pressure effects of a pragmatic combined training program, with low equipment needs, in comparison with a health education program. The sample is composed by 184 older adults, divided in two implementation centers. Randomization ratio will be 1:1 and interventions will last 12 weeks, with three weekly sessions for the exercise arm and one to the health education arm. In order to analyze the effects of interventions in a comprehensive way, a range of variables related to ambulatory blood pressure (primary outcome), physical fitness, vascular and autonomous function, together with emotional and cognitive aspects will be evaluated in a pre-post fashion. The study's hypothesis, as well as the sample size calculation and analysis plan, is based on a superiority expectation for the exercise program in comparison with the health education program, especially for the blood pressure control, functional capacity and quality of life. The present study was designed and will be conducted by a multidisciplinary staff and follows ethical and methodological recommendations for clinical trials. It is expected that this multicenter randomized trial will provide scientific evidences with a high applicability to the non-pharmacological management of hypertension in the elderly.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hypertension

Keywords

  • physical activity
  • exercise
  • aging
  • older
03

In context

Hypertension

6,834 studies on the registry are indexed under Hypertension; 971 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 184 is above the median of 90 across 5,095 interventional studies indexed under Hypertension.

Browse Hypertension studies →

Lead sponsor

Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre is the lead sponsor of 456 studies on the registry; 61 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
60 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Hypertension diagnosis (through ambulatory blood pressure monitoring or medication use)
  • Verified ability to exercise
  • Unaltered pharmacological plan within previous 4 weeks
  • Willingness to participate in any of interventions

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability or refusal to give written consent
  • Myocardial infarction, revascularization proceedings, deep vein thrombosis
  • Severe cardiovascular disease (class III or IV heart failure, uncontrolled arrhythmia, unstable angina, or use of implantable defibrillator
  • Chronic pulmonary disease which requires the use of oxygen or steroidal therapy
  • Incidence of cardiovascular event, hospitalization or other severe health-related event during the experimental period
  • High alcohol consumption (over 14 doses per week)
  • Renal disease needing dialysis
  • Language, cognitive or hearing problems
  • Plans of moving to another city during the study
  • Living together with another person enrolled in the study
  • Osteoarticular or muscular injuries or another health conditions which generate inability to carry on the interventions
  • Progressive neurological disorders (Parkinson, multiple sclerosis, etc.)
  • Cancer treatment in the past 2 years
  • A medical report indicating exercise counterindication based cardiopulmonary exercise testing
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
184 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Health education

    Patients will receive weekly lectures on hypertension related topics during 12 weeks.

    Behavioral: Health education

  • Experimental
    Combined training

    Patients will complete 12 weeks of combined training (aerobic + strength exercise, 3x/week) in a pragmatic setup. In order to make the interventions more similar, contents of the health education arm will also be discussed with patients receiving this intervention.

    Behavioral: Combined training

Interventions

  • BehavioralHealth education

    Weekly group lectures (1h each) giving information on patient's best practices to manage hypertension.

  • BehavioralCombined training

    Combined training (aerobic and strength exercises), in moderate intensities (perceived exertion controlled) performed 3x/week (1h) duration with a education component (10') based on the contents of the health intervention.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Ambulatory Blood Pressure

    24h ambulatory blood pressure measured through automatic oscillometric device

    Time frame: Change from baseline 24-hour systolic blood pressure at 12 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Walking distance

    Longest distance walked as assessed by the six-minute walk test

    Time frame: Change from baseline walking distance at 12 weeks

  2. Lower limbs functional capacity

    By using the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), lower-limb mobility will be assess in the following sequence: static standing balance, walking speed and indirect muscle strength

    Time frame: Change from baseline SPPB score at 12 weeks

  3. Cardiorespiratory fitness

    Oxygen consumption at peak (VO2peak) as assessed by maximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing

    Time frame: Change from baseline VO2peak at 12 weeks

  4. Geriatric Depression Symptoms

    15-item depression symptoms scale (GDS-15)

    Time frame: Change from baseline GDS-15 score at 12 weeks

  5. Quality of life (QoL)

    World Health Organization Quality of Life questionnaire

    Time frame: Change from baseline QoL score at 12 weeks

  6. Autonomic function

    Basal and during Stroop Color-Word Conflict Test beat-to-beat blood pressure variability

    Time frame: Change from baseline beat-to-beat blood pressure variability at 12 weeks

  7. Endothelial function, early adaptation

    Flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) assessed through high resolution ultrasonography

    Time frame: Change from baseline FMD at 6 weeks

  8. Endothelial function

    Flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) assessed through high resolution ultrasonography

    Time frame: Change from baseline FMD at 12 weeks

07

Study locations

1 of 2 sites recruiting
  • Universidade Federal de Pelotas
    Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
    Active, not recruiting
  • Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre
    Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Schaun GZ, Alberton CL, Gomes MLB, Santos LP, Bamman MM, Mendes GF, Hafele MS, Andrade LS, Alves L, DE Ataides VA, Carmona MA, Lazaro R, Botton CE, Umpierre D, Pinto SS, Wilhelm EN. Maximal Oxygen Uptake Is Underestimated during Incremental Testing in Hypertensive Older Adults: Findings from the HAEL Study. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2021 Jul 1;53(7):1452-1459. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002598. PubMed 33449605 ↗
  • Umpierre D, Santos LP, Botton CE, Wilhelm EN, Helal L, Schaun GZ, Ferreira GD, De Nardi AT, Pfeifer LO, da Silveira AD, Polanczyk CA, Mendes GF, Tanaka H, Alves L, Galliano L, Pescatello LS, Brizio ML, Bock PM, Campelo P, Moraes RS, Domingues MR, Schaan BD, Alberton CL, Pinto SS; The HAEL Study Group. The "Hypertension Approaches in the Elderly: a Lifestyle study" multicenter, randomized trial (HAEL Study): rationale and methodological protocol. BMC Public Health. 2019 May 29;19(1):657. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6970-3. PubMed 31142294 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Individual participant data after will be shared after trial completion. Data usage will be under the PI's auspices, but restrictions or screenings will not be imposed upon data requests. ABPM data and any deemed relevant support information (sociodemographic, clinical history and allocated groups) will be shared if available.Details regarding the study's design and statistical plan can be obtained consulting the trial's protocol. Data on other outcomes could be requested contacting the PI. Data access will be available after all participants completed the study and will remain accessible for as long as deemed necessary by the study's committee. Data sets, variables' dictionary and statistical analysis description will be made available online upon registration and acceptance of the study team's data sharing terms and policy.

Time frame: The individual participant dataset will become available at a public repository up to six months after the first study publication.

Access criteria: A simple registration will grant access to study datasets. The website for these files is not defined at the time of registration.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Sep 2017 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Aug 2020, 35 months after the start.

Of 1,339 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Hypertension, half reached primary completion within 22 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 42. This study's planned 35 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 1,433 studies reached it within 23 months; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 43.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 22, 2017
First posted
Aug 29, 2017
StartActual
Sep 1, 2017
Primary completionEst.
Aug 2020
CompletionEst.
Aug 2020
Last update
Feb 12, 2020
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 12, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03264443
Collaborators
Federal University of Pelotas
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 29, 2017
Start date
Sep 1, 2017
Primary completion
Aug 2020 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 2020 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 12, 2020

Study contacts

Daniel Umpierre, PhD
Contact
daniel.umpierre@gmail.com
+555133596332
Lucas P Santos, MSc
Contact
lucaspsantos87@gmail.com
+555133596332
Stephanie S Pinto, PhD
study director · Federal University of Pelotas
Daniel Umpierre, PhD
principal investigator · Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Feb 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion