ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03263416ADHESIPHUpdated Jan 31, 2022

Study Evaluating Treatment Adherence in Patients Treated With Oral Targeted Therapy in Oncology Supported by a Dedicated and Coordinated Follow-up Compared to Standard Follow-up.

An interventional study of Dedicated and coordinated follow-up and Standard follow-up in Metastatic Solid Tumor, sponsored by Institut Claudius Regaud. Completed at 4 sites in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-01-31.

Sponsored by Institut Claudius Regaud · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
186
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-14

Among 542 studies in Neoplasm Metastasis with a site in France — 93 open to participants now, 165 under way, 50 of them phase 3. Neoplasm Metastasis · France.

Enrollment
207th of 477
186 · median 133
Started
2017
with 20 others
No phase
62 of 542
9 open now
Registered
285th of 542
by date

Among the 542 studies in Neoplasm Metastasis with a site in France, this one is the 207th largest by enrollment of the 477 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 21 that started in 2017, is one of 62 with no phase, and was the 285th registered.

Neoplasm Metastasis

4,045 studies on the registry are indexed under Neoplasm Metastasis; 888 are open to participants now.

Browse Neoplasm Metastasis studies →

Open to participants now

93 of the 542 studies in Neoplasm Metastasis with a site in France are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

88 more — sign in →

All 93 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in France have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in France →

Who these studies take

Of the 689 Neoplasm Metastasis studies recruiting now, 536 (78%) set no upper age limit and 97 (14%) stop at 75 or younger; 48 take children under 18; 18 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years and older · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 542 studies in Neoplasm Metastasis with a site in France, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

This is a prospective, comparative, open label, randomized, multicentric study evaluating the benefit of a dedicated and coordinated follow-up on treatment adherence in patients with metastatic solid tumor and starting a first cycle of treatment compared to standard follow-up. A dedicated and coordinated follow-up during the treatment period will be based on a telephone follow-up and a pharmaceutical conciliation.

Patients will be randomized into one of two study arms:

Arm A (Experimental follow-up): coordinated follow-up performed by a dedicated nurse and a pharmaceutical conciliation made by the Center Pharmacist.

Arm B: Standard follow-up during the treatment period.

Patients will be followed during 6 months.

03

Conditions studied

  • Metastatic Solid Tumor

Keywords

  • Metastatic solid tumor
  • Oral Targeted Therapy
  • Treatment adherence
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Patient with a solid tumor and starting a first cycle of oral targeted therapy whatever the treatment line
  2. Age > or = 18 years old
  3. Affiliated to the french social security system
  4. Patient must provide written prior to any study-specific procedure or assessment

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient not available by phone or with no caregiver who can answer the phone for him
  2. Pregnant or breastfeeding women
  3. Any psychological, familial, geographic or social situation, according to the judgment of investigator, potentially preventing the provision of or compliance to study procedure
  4. Patient protected by law
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
186 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Arm A

    Other: Dedicated and coordinated follow-up

  • Other
    Arm B

    Standard

    Other: Standard follow-up

Interventions

  • OtherDedicated and coordinated follow-up

    * Coordinated follow-up performed by a dedicated nurse with consultations (before treatment initiation and during treatment) and a telephone follow-up during treatment period * Pharmaceutical conciliation before treatment initiation made by the Center Pharmacist * Completion of QLQ-C30 and GIRERD questionnaires

  • OtherStandard follow-up

    - Completion of QLQ-C30 and GIRERD questionnaires

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Efficacy: rate of patients who adhere to oral targeted therapy treatment administration.

    This outcome will be assessed by the counting of tablets and the completion of the GIRERD questionnaire by the patient (assessment performed at 1, 3 and 6 months during the treatment)

    Time frame: 6 months per patient

Secondary outcomes

  1. Evaluation of the number of drug adaptations proposed by the Center Pharmacist following the pharmaceutical conciliation

    Time frame: 6 months per patient

  2. Quality of life using the QLQ-C30 questionnaire

    Time frame: 6 months per patient

  3. Safety according to the classification of the Common for Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) V4.03

    Time frame: 6 months per patient

07

Study locations

4 sites
  • Clinique Claude Bernard
    Albi, 81000, France
  • Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal Castres Mazamet
    Castres, 81108, France
  • Clinique Des Cedres
    Cornebarrieu, France
  • Institut Claudius Regaud
    Toulouse, 31059, France
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Jul 2017 to primary completion in Jan 2022, 54 months.

Of 291 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Neoplasm Metastasis, half reached primary completion within 58 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 28 and three quarters within 93. This study's 54 months is close to that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 316 studies reached it within 54 months; a quarter within 28 and three quarters within 91.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 4, 2017
First posted
Aug 28, 2017
StartActual
Jul 24, 2017
Primary completionActual
Jan 25, 2022
CompletionActual
Jan 25, 2022
Last update
Jan 31, 2022
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 31, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03263416
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 28, 2017
Start date
Jul 24, 2017
Primary completion
Jan 25, 2022
Completion
Jan 25, 2022
Last update
Jan 31, 2022

Study contacts

Christine CHEVREAU, MD
principal investigator · Institut Universitaire du Cancer Toulouse Oncopole

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion