ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03262558MEDIASTAPHUpdated Dec 14, 2022

Mediastinitis and Staphylococcus Aureus

An observational study in Surgery, Cardiac and Infection, sponsored by Rennes University Hospital. Completed at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-12-14.

Sponsored by Rennes University Hospital · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
27
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Cardiac surgery with extracorporeal circulation (ECC) yields a deep immune system dysfunction that exposes patients to postoperative infectious complications. Among these, post-operative mediastinitis with Staphylococcus aureus (SA) generates significant morbidity and mortality. Two radically different approaches have been proposed in recent years to reduce the incidence of this complication. A first approach has attempted, without real success, to decrease postoperative immunosuppression. The second, more efficient, consisted of screening and preoperatively treating patients colonized with SA. However, although its incidence has decreased, postoperative mediastinitis remains a terrible nosocomial infection. The authors believe that a thorough analysis of the immunological changes induced by cardiac surgery will initiate active therapeutics to reduce the post-operative immunosuppression phase, thereby decreasing the risk of nosocomial infections. In addition, a study of the interactions between the operated (host) and staphylococcus aureus (pathogenic) immune systems will provide a better understanding of the mechanisms that expose patients to this bacterium.

Read the detailed description

In particular, changes induced by the ECC will be evaluated on:

  • Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase activity (IDO)
  • Apoptosis of lymphocytes and dendritic cells
  • Polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMNs)
  • Myeloid Derived Suppressor Cells (MDSC )

After general anesthesia and arterial catheterization and prior to the start of ECC, blood samples will be taken for flow cytometry studies, for the purification of PMNs and monocytes. The purified PMNs and monocytes will then be used for the measurement of cytokine, phagocytosis and bactericidal production capacities.

The morning following surgery, blood samples will be taken and follow the same process.

02

Conditions studied

  • Surgery, Cardiac
  • Infection

Keywords

  • staphylococcus aureus
  • nosocomial infection
03

In context

Infections

2,093 studies on the registry are indexed under Infections; 364 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 27 is below the median of 300 across 685 observational studies indexed under Infections.

Browse Infections studies →

Lead sponsor

Rennes University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 451 studies on the registry; 51 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients in the aftermath of an ECC for cardiac surgery are investigated to look for the origin of a hypo-reactivity of PMNs and macrophages during exposure to staphylococcus aureus

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients over 18 years of age
  • Patients who require cardiac surgery (valvular and / or coronary) with extracorporeal circulation.

Non inclusion criteria

  • Chronic respiratory diseases,
  • Preoperative left ventricular dysfunction ( \<50%),
  • ( infection, systemic therapy, history of cancer in the year before surgery),
  • Persons subject to legal protection (safeguard of justice, curatorship, guardianship),
  • Persons deprived of liberty.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

LVEF (left ventricular ejection fraction)

The share of blood the heart’s main pumping chamber (the left ventricle) pushes out with each beat, measured by an echocardiogram (heart ultrasound) or a MUGA scan. About 50–70% is normal.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
27 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Patients with ECC

    No intervention

    Other: No intervention

Interventions

  • OtherNo intervention

    Patients will undergo standard clinical routine practice in this indication

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Variation of plasma IDO activity

    IDO activity is evaluated by the Kynurenin / Tryptophan ratio before and after ECC. Enzymatic activities will be measured by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) on pre- and post-operative blood tests

    Time frame: Baseline and the morning following surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Variation of phagocytosis capacity of PMNs

    Comparison before and after ECC

    Time frame: Baseline and the morning following surgery

  2. Variation of bactericidal capacity of PMNs

    Comparison before and after ECC

    Time frame: Baseline and the morning following surgery

  3. Variation of phagocytosis capacity of macrophages

    Comparison before and after ECC

    Time frame: Baseline and the morning following surgery

  4. Variation of bactericidal capacity of macrophages

    Comparison before and after ECC

    Time frame: Baseline and the morning following surgery

  5. Effect of an inhibitor of IDO on phagocytosis capacities of PMNs

    Time frame: The day following surgery

  6. Effect of an inhibitor of IDO on bactericidal capacities of PMNs

    Time frame: The day following surgery

  7. Effect of an inhibitor of IDO on phagocytosis capacities of macrophages

    Time frame: The day following surgery

  8. Effect of an inhibitor of IDO on bactericidal capacities of macrophages

    Time frame: The day following surgery

  9. Quantification of lymphocytic apoptosis before and after the ECC

    Quantification of apoptosis by flow cytometry

    Time frame: Baseline and the morning following surgery

  10. Quantification of lymphocytic apoptosis in the presence of an inhibitor of IDO

    Quantification of apoptosis by flow cytometry

    Time frame: The day following surgery

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Rennes Hospital University
    Rennes, 35033, France
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Jul 2016 to primary completion in Jul 2017, 11 months.

Of 257 non-industry observational studies under Infections, half reached primary completion within 36 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 20 and three quarters within 79. This study's 11 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 295 studies reached it within 35 months; a quarter within 18 and three quarters within 67.

Infections covers many different conditions, not one, so the studies compared here vary widely. Read these figures as a rough guide.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 22, 2017
First posted
Aug 25, 2017
StartActual
Jul 4, 2016
Primary completionActual
Jul 1, 2017
CompletionActual
Sep 29, 2019
Last update
Dec 14, 2022
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 14, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03262558
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 25, 2017
Start date
Jul 4, 2016
Primary completion
Jul 1, 2017
Completion
Sep 29, 2019
Last update
Dec 14, 2022

Study contacts

Jean-Marc TADIE, Md, PhD
study director · CHU Rennes

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion