ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT03259204StopLegClotsUpdated Mar 7, 2024

Swedish Multicenter Trial of Outpatient Prevention of Leg Clots

An interventional study of Adjuvant IPC in Achilles Tendon Rupture, Ankle Fractures and Venous Thromboembolism, sponsored by Karolinska University Hospital. Recruiting at 1 site in Sweden. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-03-07.

Sponsored by Karolinska University Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Dec 2024, 1 year 10 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Sep 2018; still recruiting 8 years 2 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1,400
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Lower limb immobilization is associated with high risk of complications, i.e. venous thromboembolism (VTE) and failed healing. Pharmacoprophylaxis of VTE is in leg-immobilized patients, however, low- or non-effective and associated with adverse events. Thus, there is a need for novel treatments.

This study aims to demonstrate in leg immobilized patients who have suffered an ankle fracture (1000 patients) or an Achilles tendon rupture (400 patients) that adjuvant intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) therapy, which targets impaired vascular flow, compared to treatment-as-usual with plaster cast, reduces VTE incidence and improves healing.

Read the detailed description

The proposed intervention, intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) is an evidence-based prevention for VTE in hospitalized patients and used in daily practice. IPC is, however, not currently used on outpatients and it is currently unknown if it reduces the risk of VTE during long term leg-immobilization. Plaster cast and orthosis treatments are currently used in daily practice on Achilles tendon ruptures and ankle fractures. At present there is no consensus about using VTE prophylaxis in leg-immobilized patients. Since pharmacoprophylaxis has shown low- or no VTE preventive effects in leg-immobilization, is not recommended by some guidelines.

Furthermore, since all patients will undergo clinical examinations and have DVT-screening performed with compression Doppler ultrasound (CDU) removal of leg immobilization this will comprise an extra security for the included patients to detect a VTE. If a VTE is detected clinical guidelines will be followed by initiating chemical VTE-treatment.

02

Conditions studied

  • Achilles Tendon Rupture
  • Ankle Fractures
  • Venous Thromboembolism

Keywords

  • Achilles tendon
  • Microdialysis
  • Immobilization
  • Wound healing
  • Intermittent Pneumatic Compression
  • Ultrasonography
03

In context

Ankle Fractures

202 studies on the registry are indexed under Ankle Fractures; 44 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 1,400 is above the median of 90 across 150 interventional studies indexed under Ankle Fractures.

Browse Ankle Fractures studies →

Lead sponsor

Karolinska University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 279 studies on the registry; 55 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Acute unilateral Achilles tendon rupture or isolated Ankle Fracture
  • Treatment starts within 10 days in a hospital setting

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability or refusal to give for participation in the study
  • Inability to comply with the study instructions
  • Known kidney disorder
  • Heart failure with pitting oedema
  • Presence of known
  • Current bleeding disorder
  • Pregnancy
  • Planned follow-up at another hospital
  • Pilon fracture
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Care provider, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
1,400 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Leg Immobilization

    Routine care include that the lower limb will be immobilized in an orthosis or a below-knee plaster cast according to local routines.

  • Experimental
    Adjuvant IPC

    Leg Immobilization with the addition of IPC. Patients will during lower limb immobilization receive bilateral calf IPC.

    Device: Adjuvant IPC

Interventions

  • DeviceAdjuvant IPC

    This IPC-system delivers sequential circumferential compression. The IPC device is mobile and should therefore not restrict patient mobilization, but can be taken off if the patient wants to mobilize independently.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Venous Thromboembolic Events (VTE)

    The primary outcome is VTE defined as symptomatic Deep venous Thrombosis (DVT) or asymptomatic DVTs,or symptomatic pulmonary embolism

    Time frame: Up til the time of removal of leg immobilization, approx. 6-8 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Patient reported Outcome - ATRS

    symptoms will be assessed using the reliable and valid score; the Achilles tendon Total Rupture Score (ATRS)

    Time frame: 6 months and 1 year

  2. Patient reported Outcome - FAOS

    symptoms will be assessed using the reliable and valid score; the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS)

    Time frame: 6 months and 1 year

  3. Patient reported Outcome - OMAS

    symptoms will be assessed using the reliable and valid score; the Olerud-Molander Ankle Score (OMAS)

    Time frame: 6 months and 1 year

  4. Patient reported Outcome - EQ-5D-5L

    symptoms will be assessed using the reliable and valid score; EuroQol Group's questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L).

    Time frame: 6 months and 1 year

  5. Functional outcome - muscular endurance tests (heel-rise)

    Patient leg function will be measured by a validated endurance test (i.e. the heel-rise test) at 1 year post-injury.

    Time frame: 1 year

  6. Callus production

    Microdialysis followed by quantification of procollagens will assess callus production in Achilles tendon healing.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  7. VTE-preventive mechanisms

    VTE-preventive mechanisms will be analyzed at the 6 week visit by assessments of profibrinolysis and coagulation factors as well as by blood-flow quantification .

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  8. Incidence of VTE in patients using low molecular weight heparin(LMWH) with or without adjvant IPC

    Efficacy of LMWH with and without the use of IPC as to prevent VTE will be studied in order to confirm the efficency of a commonly used drug for VTE prophylaxis.

    Time frame: 6-8 weeks

  9. Patient mortality

    Mortality of patients included will be recorded and investigated for cause of death. If the cause of death is VTE, this will be reported. The overall mortality rate in this study is expected to be low. Mortality will be investigated via patient journals at one year after study inclusion, and at 2 years via national mortality register.

    Time frame: 1year and 2 years

  10. Health economic analyses

    Together with Karolinska Institutet, LIME, the trial treatment effects will involve a within-trial evaluation of cost effectiveness integrated into a decision-analytic model of longer run costs and health effects

    Time frame: 2 years

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Arverud ED, Anundsson P, Hardell E, Barreng G, Edman G, Latifi A, Labruto F, Ackermann PW. Ageing, deep vein thrombosis and male gender predict poor outcome after acute Achilles tendon rupture. Bone Joint J. 2016 Dec;98-B(12):1635-1641. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.98B12.BJJ-2016-0008.R1. PubMed 27909125 ↗
  • Domeij-Arverud E, Ackermann PW. Deep Venous Thrombosis and Tendon Healing. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2016;920:221-8. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-33943-6_21. PubMed 27535264 ↗
  • Domeij-Arverud E, Labruto F, Latifi A, Nilsson G, Edman G, Ackermann PW. Intermittent pneumatic compression reduces the risk of deep vein thrombosis during post-operative lower limb immobilisation: a prospective randomised trial of acute ruptures of the Achilles tendon. Bone Joint J. 2015 May;97-B(5):675-80. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.97B5.34581. PubMed 25922463 ↗
  • Abdul Alim M, Domeij-Arverud E, Nilsson G, Edman G, Ackermann PW. Achilles tendon rupture healing is enhanced by intermittent pneumatic compression upregulating collagen type I synthesis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 Jul;26(7):2021-2029. doi: 10.1007/s00167-017-4621-8. Epub 2017 Jul 1. PubMed 28668970 ↗
  • Svedman S, Alkner B, Berg HE, Domeij-Arverud E, Jonsson K, Nilsson Helander K, Ackermann PW. STOP leg clots-Swedish multicentre trial of outpatient prevention of leg clots: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial on the efficacy of intermittent pneumatic compression on venous thromboembolism in lower leg immobilised patients. BMJ Open. 2021 May 20;11(5):e044103. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044103. PubMed 34016662 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Data will be shared on reasonable requests.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Analytic code

Time frame: After completion of the study.

Access criteria: Data will be shared on reasonable requests to the steering committee.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Sep 2018 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2024, 75 months after the start.

Of 69 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Ankle Fractures, half reached primary completion within 44 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 23 and three quarters within 61. This study's planned 75 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 72 studies reached it within 45 months; a quarter within 23 and three quarters within 61.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 16, 2017
First posted
Aug 23, 2017
StartActual
Sep 1, 2018
Primary completionEst.
Dec 31, 2024
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2025
Last update
Mar 7, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 7, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03259204
Collaborators
Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Danderyd Hospital, Stockholm South General Hospital, Uppsala University Hospital, Gävle Hospital, Höglandssjukhuset Eksjö, Norrtälje Hospital, Östersund Hospital, Helsingborgs Hospital, Uddevalla Hospital, Norra Älvsborgs Länssjukhus, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Lugano Regional Hospital, Alingsås Lasarett, University Hospital, Akershus
Responsible party
Paul Ackermann (Professor, MD, PhD, Karolinska University Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 23, 2017
Start date
Sep 1, 2018
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2024 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 7, 2024

Study contacts

Luigi Belcastro, RN
Contact
luigi.belcastro@sll.se
+46724641144
Simon Svedman, MD
Contact
Simon.svedman@ki.se
Paul W Ackermann, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Karolinska University Hospital, 171 76 Stockholm, SWEDEN

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion