CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03256396Updated Aug 22, 2019

Intraoperative PEEP Setting During Laparoscopic Gynecologic Surgery

An interventional study of PEEP setting based on esophageal pressure measured in Positive-Pressure Respiration/Methods, Esophagus/Physiopathology and Pleura/Physiopathology, sponsored by Mahidol University. Completed at 1 site in Thailand. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-08-22.

Sponsored by Mahidol University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
44
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The creation of pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopic surgery can have significant effects on the respiratory system including decreased respiratory system compliance, decreased vital capacity and functional residual capacity and atelectasis formation. Intraoperative mechanical ventilation, especially setting of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) has an important role in respiratory management during laparoscopic surgery. The aim of this study is to determine whether setting of PEEP guided by measurement of pleural pressure would improve oxygenation and respiratory system compliance during laparoscopic surgery.

Read the detailed description

As minimally invasive procedure with numerous advantages compared with open surgery, laparoscopic surgery has been substantially performed worldwide. The creation of pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopic surgery, however, can have significant effects on the respiratory system including decreased respiratory system compliance, decreased vital capacity and functional residual capacity and atelectasis formation. These pathophysiologic changes may put patients at risk of postoperative pulmonary complications. Therefore, intraoperative mechanical ventilation, especially setting of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) has an important role in respiratory management during laparoscopic surgery. Nevertheless, there is no consensus on the optimal PEEP level and the best method to set PEEP during laparoscopic surgery. In patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome, PEEP set according to pleural pressure measured by using esophageal balloon catheter significantly has beneficial effects in terms of oxygenation, compliance and possible mortality. The aim of this study is to determine whether setting of PEEP guided by measurement of pleural pressure would improve oxygenation and respiratory system compliance during laparoscopic surgery.

02

Conditions studied

  • Positive-Pressure Respiration/Methods
  • Esophagus/Physiopathology
  • Pleura/Physiopathology
  • Gynecologic Surgical Procedures
  • Laparoscopy
  • Humans
  • Female

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Intraoperative mechanical ventilation
  • Positive-end expiratory pressure
  • Esophageal pressure
  • Transpulmonary pressure
  • Laparoscopic gynecologic surgery
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with age of equal or more than 18 years old undergoing laparoscopic gynecologic surgery with anticipated surgical duration of more than 2 hours

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with ASA physical status of equal or more than 3
  • Patients with significant cardiovascular or respiratory diseases
  • Patients with significant pathological lesion in pharynx and esophagus that preclude placement of esophageal balloon catheter
  • Patients with contraindications for PEEP titration such as increased intracranial pressure or unstable hemodynamic
  • Patients with arrhythmias
  • Patients who refuse to provide written informed consent
  • Patients undergoing surgery with duration of less than 2 hours
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
44 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Group E

    PEEP set according to esophageal pressure measured

    Procedure: PEEP setting based on esophageal pressure measured

  • No intervention
    Group C

    PEEP set at 5 cm H2O

Interventions

  • ProcedurePEEP setting based on esophageal pressure measured

    PEEP is set on the basis of esophageal pressure measurement with the aim to maintain transpulmonary pressure during expiration between 0 and 5 cmH2O

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Difference in PaO2 between Group E and Group C

    Time frame: At 15 minutes after initiation of pneumoperitoneum

  2. Difference in PaO2 between Group E and Group C

    Time frame: At 60 minutes after initiation of pneumoperitoneum

  3. Difference in PaO2 between Group E and Group C

    Time frame: At 30 minutes after arrival in recovery room

Secondary outcomes

  1. Difference in compliance of respiratory system between Group E and Group C

    Time frame: At 15 minutes and 60 minutes after initiation of pneumoperitoneum, and 30 minutes after arrival in recovery room

  2. Difference in alveolar dead space to tidal volume ratio between Group E and Group C

    Time frame: At 15 minutes and 60 minutes after initiation of pneumoperitoneum, and 30 minutes after arrival in recovery room

  3. Difference in hemodynamics between Group E and Group C

    Time frame: At 15 minutes and 60 minutes after initiation of pneumoperitoneum

  4. Proportion of thoracoabdominal transmission of intraabdominal pressure

    Time frame: At 15 minutes and 60 minutes after initiation of pneumoperitoneum

  5. Adverse respiratory events

    Adverse respiratory events define as requirement of oxygen supplement after discharge from the recovery room, episodes of desaturation (SpO2 of less than 90%), now-onset respiratory infection, new infiltration on chest radiograph, or respiratory failure.

    Time frame: During 72 hours postoperatively or until discharge from hospital

  6. Length of hospital stay

    Time frame: Up to 30 days after the operation

06

Study locations

1 site
  • Siriraj Hospital
    Bangkoknoi, Bangkok 10700, Thailand
07

References and documents

Publications

  • Pelosi P, Foti G, Cereda M, Vicardi P, Gattinoni L. Effects of carbon dioxide insufflation for laparoscopic cholecystectomy on the respiratory system. Anaesthesia. 1996 Aug;51(8):744-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1996.tb07888.x. PubMed 8795317 ↗
  • Rauh R, Hemmerling TM, Rist M, Jacobi KE. Influence of pneumoperitoneum and patient positioning on respiratory system compliance. J Clin Anesth. 2001 Aug;13(5):361-5. doi: 10.1016/s0952-8180(01)00286-0. PubMed 11498317 ↗
  • Gallart L, Canet J. Post-operative pulmonary complications: Understanding definitions and risk assessment. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2015 Sep;29(3):315-30. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2015.10.004. Epub 2015 Oct 22. Erratum In: Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2016 Mar;30(1):121-5. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2016.01.004. PubMed 26643097 ↗
  • Valenza F, Chevallard G, Fossali T, Salice V, Pizzocri M, Gattinoni L. Management of mechanical ventilation during laparoscopic surgery. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2010 Jun;24(2):227-41. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2010.02.002. PubMed 20608559 ↗
  • Park SJ, Kim BG, Oh AH, Han SH, Han HS, Ryu JH. Effects of intraoperative protective lung ventilation on postoperative pulmonary complications in patients with laparoscopic surgery: prospective, randomized and controlled trial. Surg Endosc. 2016 Oct;30(10):4598-606. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4797-x. Epub 2016 Feb 19. PubMed 26895920 ↗
  • Talmor D, Sarge T, Malhotra A, O'Donnell CR, Ritz R, Lisbon A, Novack V, Loring SH. Mechanical ventilation guided by esophageal pressure in acute lung injury. N Engl J Med. 2008 Nov 13;359(20):2095-104. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0708638. Epub 2008 Nov 11. PubMed 19001507 ↗
  • Meininger D, Byhahn C, Mierdl S, Westphal K, Zwissler B. Positive end-expiratory pressure improves arterial oxygenation during prolonged pneumoperitoneum. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2005 Jul;49(6):778-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2005.00713.x. PubMed 15954959 ↗
  • Maracaja-Neto LF, Vercosa N, Roncally AC, Giannella A, Bozza FA, Lessa MA. Beneficial effects of high positive end-expiratory pressure in lung respiratory mechanics during laparoscopic surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2009 Feb;53(2):210-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2008.01826.x. PubMed 19175578 ↗
  • Cinnella G, Grasso S, Spadaro S, Rauseo M, Mirabella L, Salatto P, De Capraris A, Nappi L, Greco P, Dambrosio M. Effects of recruitment maneuver and positive end-expiratory pressure on respiratory mechanics and transpulmonary pressure during laparoscopic surgery. Anesthesiology. 2013 Jan;118(1):114-22. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3182746a10. PubMed 23196259 ↗
  • Spadaro S, Karbing DS, Mauri T, Marangoni E, Mojoli F, Valpiani G, Carrieri C, Ragazzi R, Verri M, Rees SE, Volta CA. Effect of positive end-expiratory pressure on pulmonary shunt and dynamic compliance during abdominal surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2016 Jun;116(6):855-61. doi: 10.1093/bja/aew123. PubMed 27199317 ↗
  • Piriyapatsom A, Phetkampang S. Effects of intra-operative positive end-expiratory pressure setting guided by oesophageal pressure measurement on oxygenation and respiratory mechanics during laparoscopic gynaecological surgery: A randomised controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2020 Nov;37(11):1032-1039. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001204. PubMed 32371830 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Aug 19, 2017

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03256396
Lead sponsor
Mahidol University
Responsible party
Annop Piriyapatsom, MD (Lecturer, Department of Anesthesiology, Principal Investigator, Mahidol University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 22, 2017
Start date
Mar 30, 2018
Primary completion
Jun 29, 2018
Completion
Dec 28, 2018
Last update
Aug 22, 2019

Study contacts

Annop Piriyapatsom, MD
principal investigator · Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion