ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03255941Updated Apr 13, 2021Results posted

Clinical Study of Depo Provera Comparing Lay Health Workers and Clinically-trained Health Workers

An Early Phase 1 interventional study of DMPA and Sayana Press in Contraception, sponsored by FHI 360. Completed at 1 site in Pakistan. Open to female participants aged 15 Years to 49 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-04-13.

Sponsored by FHI 360 · Early Phase 1, Interventional, and Health services research

Phase
Early Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
460
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
15 Years to 49 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This is a randomized controlled trial comparing lay Lady Health Workers (Lay Health Workers) with Family Welfare Workers (Clinically- trained Health Workers) on quantitative measures of safety and effectiveness of Depo Provera and Sayana Press provision in a clinic setting. This comparative trial will test the non-inferiority hypothesis that Lady Health Workers are just as competent as clinically-trained Family Welfare Workers in screening and counseling first-time injectable users. These first time users will also be randomly assigned to receive intramuscular or subcutaneous injections of DMPA.

Read the detailed description

FHI 360 and Jhpiego in collaboration with USAID, Aga Khan University (AKU) and the Government of Sindh province propose a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to provide evidence that could change current policies in Pakistan that forbid initiation of DMPA by Lady Health Workers (LHWs). Positive findings on the safety and effectiveness of LHW-initiation of DMPA may also prompt the WHO to consider modifying the recommendation for targeted M\&E for lay health worker provision of intramuscular injectable contraceptives. The trial will compare the screening and counseling of (LHWs)-the main lay health worker cadre--with that of Family Welfare Workers (FWWs) who are clinically-trained. The Government of Sindh province also expressed interest in introducing Pfizer's subcutaneous form of Depo Provera, Sayana Press® (SP) in Pakistan, which could simplify administration of injectable contraceptives. As such, an SP arm will be included in the trial, which will be facilitated by relevant training of LHWs and FWWs by Jhpiego and stocks provided by a special USAID procurement, since the registration process for SP in Pakistan is ongoing. A successful RCT demonstrating the non-inferiority of LHWs vis á vis FWWs on first-dose initiation of Depo Provera IM (DMPA IM) and (SP) would facilitate efforts to expand CBA2I in Pakistan, and in turn improve access to family planning services for a potentially large number of underserved women.

02

Conditions studied

  • Contraception

Keywords

  • FWW (Family Welfare Worker)
  • LHW (Lady Health Worker)
  • DMPA (Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate or Depo Provera)
  • DMPA IM (Depo Provera intramuscular injection)
  • SP (Sayana Press subcutaneous injection)
  • Contraception
  • CBA2I (Community-based access to injectables)
  • Sayana (Sayana Press)
  • JHPIEGO (Johns Hopkins Program for International Education in Gynaecology and Obstetrics)
  • Sayana
03

In context

Lead sponsor

FHI 360 is the lead sponsor of 59 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
15 Years to 49 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Women who voluntarily accept DMPA

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Women unable to provide
  • Women with to DMPA
  • Women who are pregnant
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Early Phase 1
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
460 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Clinic Provider - Urban

    Urban Clinic Provider providing DMPA or Sayana Press

    Drug: DMPA · Drug: Sayana Press

  • Active comparator
    Lay Provider - Urban

    Urban Lay Provider providing DMPA or Sayana Press

    Drug: DMPA · Drug: Sayana Press

  • Active comparator
    Clinic Provider- Rural

    Rural Clinic Provider providing DMPA or Sayana Press

    Drug: DMPA · Drug: Sayana Press

  • Active comparator
    Lay Provider- Rural

    Rural Lay Provider providing DMPA or Sayana Press

    Drug: DMPA · Drug: Sayana Press

Interventions

  • DrugDMPA

    The safety and effectiveness of provision of injectable contraception will be compared between providers' screening and counseling for eligibility to use DMPA.

  • The safety and effectiveness of provision of injectable contraception will be compared between providers' screening and counseling for eligibility to use Sayana Press

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants That Were Appropriately Screened for Contraceptive Use

    Number of participants that were appropriately screened for injectable contraceptive use in both rural and urban settings in Pakistan.

    Time frame: 3 months from randomization

  2. Number of Participants That Were Appropriately Counseled for DMPA Use.

    Number of participants that were appropriately counseled by both types of providers in both urban and rural settings.

    Time frame: 3 months from randomization

Secondary outcomes

  1. Proportion of Clients Providers Who Report Satisfaction With the DMPA Method Received From the Provider

    DMPA clients served by both types of providers in both urban and rural settings will report whether or not they were satisfied with the DMPA method provided to them.

    Time frame: 3 months from randomization

  2. Proportion of Clients Who Report Satisfaction With Provider Services

    Clients who received intramuscular or subcutaneous DMPA injections will report whether or not they were satisfied with the services provided to them by their provider.

    Time frame: 3 months from randomization

07

Results

Posted Apr 13, 2021

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneClinic Provider - UrbanLay Provider - UrbanClinic Provider - RuralLay Provider - Rural
Started1771785352
Deemed eligible to receive dmpa1401344846
Completed1391324846
Not completed384656
Withdrew: Not eligible or refused injection374456
Withdrew: Did not complete exit interview1200

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Participants That Were Appropriately Screened for Contraceptive Use

Number of participants that were appropriately screened for injectable contraceptive use in both rural and urban settings in Pakistan.

Time frame:
3 months from randomization
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants That Were Appropriately Screened for Contraceptive Use
ParticipantsClinic Provider - UrbanLay Provider - UrbanClinic Provider - RuralLay Provider - Rural
Screening appropriate1551364951
Screening not appropriate214031
PrimaryNumber of Participants That Were Appropriately Counseled for DMPA Use.

Number of participants that were appropriately counseled by both types of providers in both urban and rural settings.

Time frame:
3 months from randomization
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants That Were Appropriately Counseled for DMPA Use.
ParticipantsClinic Providers - UrbanLay Provider - UrbanClinic Provider - RuralLay Provider - Rural
Counseling appropriate17242429
Counseling not appropriate1601542923
SecondaryProportion of Clients Providers Who Report Satisfaction With the DMPA Method Received From the Provider

DMPA clients served by both types of providers in both urban and rural settings will report whether or not they were satisfied with the DMPA method provided to them.

Time frame:
3 months from randomization
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Proportion of Clients Providers Who Report Satisfaction With the DMPA Method Received From the Provider
ParticipantsDMPA - IM UrbanDMPA - SC - UrbanDMPA-IM RuralDMPA-SC- Rural
Proportion of Clients Providers Who Report Satisfaction With the DMPA Method Received From the Provider1071084142
SecondaryProportion of Clients Who Report Satisfaction With Provider Services

Clients who received intramuscular or subcutaneous DMPA injections will report whether or not they were satisfied with the services provided to them by their provider.

Time frame:
3 months from randomization
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Proportion of Clients Who Report Satisfaction With Provider Services
ParticipantsClinic Provider - UrbanLay Provider- UrbanClinic Provider - RuralLay Provider - Rural
Proportion of Clients Who Report Satisfaction With Provider Services1251124240

Adverse events

Collected over This study was cross-sectional; no adverse events data were collected.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Lay Provider & DMPA———
Lay Provider & Sayana Press———
Clinic Provider & DMPA———
Clinic Provider and Sayana Press———

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)Clinic Provider UrbanLay Provider UrbanClinic Provider RuralLay Provider RuralTotal
Mean28.0 ± 5.427.1 ± 6.030.1 ± 30.129.7 ± 5.228.14 ± 5.6
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Clinic Provider UrbanLay Provider UrbanClinic Provider RuralLay Provider RuralTotal
Female1771785352460
Male00000
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)Clinic Provider UrbanLay Provider UrbanClinic Provider RuralLay Provider RuralTotal
Count of participants————0
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Clinic Provider UrbanLay Provider UrbanClinic Provider RuralLay Provider RuralTotal
Pakistan1771785352460
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Aga Khan University
    Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Mar 2018 to primary completion in Jul 2018, 3 months.

Results were first posted in Apr 2021, 2 years 8 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 19, 2017
First posted
Aug 21, 2017
StartActual
Mar 19, 2018
Primary completionActual
Jul 15, 2018
CompletionActual
Jul 23, 2018
Results first posted
Apr 13, 2021
Last update
Apr 13, 2021
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 13, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03255941
Lead sponsor
FHI 360
Collaborators
Aga Khan University, Jhpiego, United States Agency for International Development (USAID), Population Welfare Department, Government of Sindh, Pakistan
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 21, 2017
Start date
Mar 19, 2018
Primary completion
Jul 15, 2018
Completion
Jul 23, 2018
Results posted
Apr 13, 2021
Last update
Apr 13, 2021

Study contacts

Dawn S Chin-Quee, PhD, MPH
principal investigator · FHI 360

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Medroxyprogesterone Acetate

Start the discussion