CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03255382Updated Sep 13, 2019Results posted

A Study to Assess the Efficacy of Risankizumab Compared to FUMADERM® in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis Who Are Naïve to and Candidates for Systemic Therapy

A Phase 3 interventional study of Fumaderm and risankizumab in Psoriasis, sponsored by AbbVie. Completed at 23 sites in Germany. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 79 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-09-13.

Sponsored by AbbVie · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
120
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 79 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous (SC) risankizumab and oral FUMADERM provided as study medication in participants with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis who are naïve to and candidates for systemic therapy.

Read the detailed description

The efficacy analysis was performed in the Intent to Treat (ITT) set which included all participants who were randomized. The safety analysis was performed in the safety set which included all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. No participants were excluded from the efficacy analysis. Three participants in the FUMADERM® group discontinued after randomization prior to receiving any study drug and were thus not included in the safety set.

02

Conditions studied

  • Psoriasis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • ABBV-0066
  • BI 655066
  • risankizumab
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 79 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Have a diagnosis of chronic plaque psoriasis for at least 6 months before the first administration of study drug. Duration since diagnosis may be reported by the participant
  • Participant has stable moderate to severe plaque psoriasis (body surface area [BSA] >10, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index [PASI] >10, and Dermatology Quality of Life Index [DLQI] >10) with or without psoriatic arthritis at Baseline
  • Must be naïve to and candidate for systemic therapy, as assessed by the investigator
  • Participant has an inadequate response, intolerance or contraindication to topical psoriasis treatment

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participants with non-plaque forms of psoriasis
  • Participant has previously received systemic therapy for psoriasis, whether biologic or non-biologic or photochemotherapy
  • Active systemic infection during the last 2 weeks (exception: common cold) prior to screening.
  • Any documented active or suspected malignancy or history of malignancy within 5 years prior to screening, except appropriately treated basal or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin or in situ carcinoma of uterine cervix
  • Participant has any condition or contraindication to Fumaderm that would preclude the patient's participation in the present study
04

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
120 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Risankizumab

    Participants randomized to receive open-label risankizumab 150 mg by subcutaneous injection at Weeks 0, 4, and 16.

    Drug: risankizumab

  • Active comparator
    Fumaderm

    Participants randomized to receive open-label Fumaderm 30 mg administered as a tablet orally once daily from Week 0 to Week 2 and then up to 240 mg, 3 times daily from Week 3 to Week 24 if 90% Improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI90) is not achieved and if tolerability allows.

    Drug: Fumaderm

Interventions

  • DrugFumaderm

    Fumaderm tablet administered orally

  • Drugrisankizumab

    Risankizumab administered by subcutaneous (SC) injection

    Also known as: ABBV-066, BI 655066, SKYRIZI

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants Achieving 90% Improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI90) at Week 24

    The Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) is a composite score based on the degree of effect on body surface area of psoriasis and the extension of erythema (reddening), induration (thickness), desquamation (scaling) of the lesions and area affected as observed on the day of examination. The severity of each sign was assessed using a 5-point scale, where 0=no symptoms, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=marked, 4=very marked. The PASI score ranges from 0 to 72, where 0 indicates no psoriasis and 72 indicates very severe psoriasis. PASI90 is defined as at least a 90% reduction in PASI score compared with the Baseline PASI score. The percent reduction in score is calculated as (PASI score at Baseline - score at follow-up visit) / PASI score at Baseline \* 100. Non-responder imputation (NRI) was used for missing data.

    Time frame: Week 24

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants Achieving 50% Improvement in PASI Score (PASI50) at Week 4

    PASI is a composite score based on the degree of effect on body surface area of psoriasis and the extension of erythema (reddening), induration (thickness), desquamation (scaling) of the lesions and area affected as observed on the day of examination. The severity of each sign was assessed using a 5-point scale, where 0=no symptoms, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=marked, 4=very marked. The PASI score ranges from 0 to 72, where 0 indicates no psoriasis and 72 indicates very severe psoriasis. PASI50 is defined as at least a 50% reduction in PASI score compared with the Baseline PASI score. The percent reduction in score is calculated as (PASI score at Baseline - score at follow-up visit) / PASI score at Baseline \* 100. NRI was used for missing data.

    Time frame: Week 4

  2. Percentage of Participants Achieving 50% Improvement in PASI Score (PASI50) at Week 8

    PASI is a composite score based on the degree of effect on body surface area of psoriasis and the extension of erythema (reddening), induration (thickness), desquamation (scaling) of the lesions and area affected as observed on the day of examination. The severity of each sign was assessed using a 5-point scale, where 0=no symptoms, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=marked, 4=very marked. The PASI score ranges from 0 to 72, where 0 indicates no psoriasis and 72 indicates very severe psoriasis. PASI50 is defined as at least a 50% reduction in PASI score compared with the Baseline PASI score. The percent reduction in score is calculated as (PASI score at Baseline - score at follow-up visit) / PASI score at Baseline \* 100. NRI was used for missing data.

    Time frame: Week 8

  3. Percentage of Participants Achieving 50% Improvement in PASI Score (PASI50) at Week 12

    PASI is a composite score based on the degree of effect on body surface area of psoriasis and the extension of erythema (reddening), induration (thickness), desquamation (scaling) of the lesions and area affected as observed on the day of examination. The severity of each sign was assessed using a 5-point scale, where 0=no symptoms, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=marked, 4=very marked. The PASI score ranges from 0 to 72, where 0 indicates no psoriasis and 72 indicates very severe psoriasis. PASI50 is defined as at least a 50% reduction in PASI score compared with the Baseline PASI score. The percent reduction in score is calculated as (PASI score at Baseline - score at follow-up visit) / PASI score at Baseline \* 100. NRI was used for missing data.

    Time frame: Week 12

  4. Percentage of Participants Achieving 50% Improvement in PASI Score (PASI50) at Week 16

    PASI is a composite score based on the degree of effect on body surface area of psoriasis and the extension of erythema (reddening), induration (thickness), desquamation (scaling) of the lesions and area affected as observed on the day of examination. The severity of each sign was assessed using a 5-point scale, where 0=no symptoms, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=marked, 4=very marked. The PASI score ranges from 0 to 72, where 0 indicates no psoriasis and 72 indicates very severe psoriasis. PASI50 is defined as at least a 50% reduction in PASI score compared with the Baseline PASI score. The percent reduction in score is calculated as (PASI score at Baseline - score at follow-up visit) / PASI score at Baseline \* 100. NRI was used for missing data.

    Time frame: Week 16

  5. Percentage of Participants Achieving 50% Improvement in PASI Score (PASI50) at Week 20

    PASI is a composite score based on the degree of effect on body surface area of psoriasis and the extension of erythema (reddening), induration (thickness), desquamation (scaling) of the lesions and area affected as observed on the day of examination. The severity of each sign was assessed using a 5-point scale, where 0=no symptoms, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=marked, 4=very marked. The PASI score ranges from 0 to 72, where 0 indicates no psoriasis and 72 indicates very severe psoriasis. PASI50 is defined as at least a 50% reduction in PASI score compared with the Baseline PASI score. The percent reduction in score is calculated as (PASI score at Baseline - score at follow-up visit) / PASI score at Baseline \* 100. NRI was used for missing data.

    Time frame: Week 20

  6. Percentage of Participants Achieving 50% Improvement in PASI Score (PASI50) at Week 24

    PASI is a composite score based on the degree of effect on body surface area of psoriasis and the extension of erythema (reddening), induration (thickness), desquamation (scaling) of the lesions and area affected as observed on the day of examination. The severity of each sign was assessed using a 5-point scale, where 0=no symptoms, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=marked, 4=very marked. The PASI score ranges from 0 to 72, where 0 indicates no psoriasis and 72 indicates very severe psoriasis. PASI50 is defined as at least a 50% reduction in PASI score compared with the Baseline PASI score. The percent reduction in score is calculated as (PASI score at Baseline - score at follow-up visit) / PASI score at Baseline \* 100. NRI was used for missing data.

    Time frame: Week 24

  7. Percentage of Participants Achieving 75% Improvement in PASI Score (PASI75) at Week 4

    PASI is a composite score based on the degree of effect on body surface area of psoriasis and the extension of erythema (reddening), induration (thickness), desquamation (scaling) of the lesions and area affected as observed on the day of examination. The severity of each sign was assessed using a 5-point scale, where 0=no symptoms, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=marked, 4=very marked. The PASI score ranges from 0 to 72, where 0 indicates no psoriasis and 72 indicates very severe psoriasis. PASI75 is defined as at least a 75% reduction in PASI score compared with the Baseline PASI score. The percent reduction in score is calculated as (PASI score at Baseline - score at follow-up visit) / PASI score at Baseline \* 100. NRI was used for missing data.

    Time frame: Week 4

  8. Percentage of Participants Achieving 75% Improvement in PASI Score (PASI75) at Week 8

    PASI is a composite score based on the degree of effect on body surface area of psoriasis and the extension of erythema (reddening), induration (thickness), desquamation (scaling) of the lesions and area affected as observed on the day of examination. The severity of each sign was assessed using a 5-point scale, where 0=no symptoms, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=marked, 4=very marked. The PASI score ranges from 0 to 72, where 0 indicates no psoriasis and 72 indicates very severe psoriasis. PASI75 is defined as at least a 75% reduction in PASI score compared with the Baseline PASI score. The percent reduction in score is calculated as (PASI score at Baseline - score at follow-up visit) / PASI score at Baseline \* 100. NRI was used for missing data.

    Time frame: Week 8

  9. Percentage of Participants Achieving 75% Improvement in PASI Score (PASI75) at Week 12

    PASI is a composite score based on the degree of effect on body surface area of psoriasis and the extension of erythema (reddening), induration (thickness), desquamation (scaling) of the lesions and area affected as observed on the day of examination. The severity of each sign was assessed using a 5-point scale, where 0=no symptoms, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=marked, 4=very marked. The PASI score ranges from 0 to 72, where 0 indicates no psoriasis and 72 indicates very severe psoriasis. PASI75 is defined as at least a 75% reduction in PASI score compared with the Baseline PASI score. The percent reduction in score is calculated as (PASI score at Baseline - score at follow-up visit) / PASI score at Baseline \* 100. NRI was used for missing data.

    Time frame: Week 12

  10. Percentage of Participants Achieving 75% Improvement in PASI Score (PASI75) at Week 16

    PASI is a composite score based on the degree of effect on body surface area of psoriasis and the extension of erythema (reddening), induration (thickness), desquamation (scaling) of the lesions and area affected as observed on the day of examination. The severity of each sign was assessed using a 5-point scale, where 0=no symptoms, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=marked, 4=very marked. The PASI score ranges from 0 to 72, where 0 indicates no psoriasis and 72 indicates very severe psoriasis. PASI75 is defined as at least a 75% reduction in PASI score compared with the Baseline PASI score. The percent reduction in score is calculated as (PASI score at Baseline - score at follow-up visit) / PASI score at Baseline \* 100. NRI was used for missing data.

    Time frame: Week 16

  11. Percentage of Participants Achieving 75% Improvement in PASI Score (PASI75) at Week 20

    PASI is a composite score based on the degree of effect on body surface area of psoriasis and the extension of erythema (reddening), induration (thickness), desquamation (scaling) of the lesions and area affected as observed on the day of examination. The severity of each sign was assessed using a 5-point scale, where 0=no symptoms, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=marked, 4=very marked. The PASI score ranges from 0 to 72, where 0 indicates no psoriasis and 72 indicates very severe psoriasis. PASI75 is defined as at least a 75% reduction in PASI score compared with the Baseline PASI score. The percent reduction in score is calculated as (PASI score at Baseline - score at follow-up visit) / PASI score at Baseline \* 100. NRI was used for missing data.

    Time frame: Week 20

  12. Percentage of Participants Achieving 75% Improvement in PASI Score (PASI75) at Week 24

    PASI is a composite score based on the degree of effect on body surface area of psoriasis and the extension of erythema (reddening), induration (thickness), desquamation (scaling) of the lesions and area affected as observed on the day of examination. The severity of each sign was assessed using a 5-point scale, where 0=no symptoms, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=marked, 4=very marked. The PASI score ranges from 0 to 72, where 0 indicates no psoriasis and 72 indicates very severe psoriasis. PASI75 is defined as at least a 75% reduction in PASI score compared with the Baseline PASI score. The percent reduction in score is calculated as (PASI score at Baseline - score at follow-up visit) / PASI score at Baseline \* 100. NRI was used for missing data.

    Time frame: Week 24

  13. Percentage of Participants Achieving 90% Improvement in PASI Score (PASI90) at Week 4

    PASI is a composite score based on the degree of effect on body surface area of psoriasis and the extension of erythema (reddening), induration (thickness), desquamation (scaling) of the lesions and area affected as observed on the day of examination. The severity of each sign was assessed using a 5-point scale, where 0=no symptoms, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=marked, 4=very marked. The PASI score ranges from 0 to 72, where 0 indicates no psoriasis and 72 indicates very severe psoriasis. PASI90 is defined as at least a 90% reduction in PASI score compared with the Baseline PASI score. The percent reduction in score is calculated as (PASI score at Baseline - score at follow-up visit) / PASI score at Baseline \* 100. NRI was used for missing data.

    Time frame: Week 4

  14. Percentage of Participants Achieving 90% Improvement in PASI Score (PASI90) at Week 8

    PASI is a composite score based on the degree of effect on body surface area of psoriasis and the extension of erythema (reddening), induration (thickness), desquamation (scaling) of the lesions and area affected as observed on the day of examination. The severity of each sign was assessed using a 5-point scale, where 0=no symptoms, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=marked, 4=very marked. The PASI score ranges from 0 to 72, where 0 indicates no psoriasis and 72 indicates very severe psoriasis. PASI90 is defined as at least a 90% reduction in PASI score compared with the Baseline PASI score. The percent reduction in score is calculated as (PASI score at Baseline - score at follow-up visit) / PASI score at Baseline \* 100. NRI was used for missing data.

    Time frame: Week 8

  15. Percentage of Participants Achieving 90% Improvement in PASI Score (PASI90) at Week 12

    PASI is a composite score based on the degree of effect on body surface area of psoriasis and the extension of erythema (reddening), induration (thickness), desquamation (scaling) of the lesions and area affected as observed on the day of examination. The severity of each sign was assessed using a 5-point scale, where 0=no symptoms, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=marked, 4=very marked. The PASI score ranges from 0 to 72, where 0 indicates no psoriasis and 72 indicates very severe psoriasis. PASI90 is defined as at least a 90% reduction in PASI score compared with the Baseline PASI score. The percent reduction in score is calculated as (PASI score at Baseline - score at follow-up visit) / PASI score at Baseline \* 100. NRI was used for missing data.

    Time frame: Week 12

  16. Percentage of Participants Achieving 90% Improvement in PASI Score (PASI90) at Week 16

    PASI is a composite score based on the degree of effect on body surface area of psoriasis and the extension of erythema (reddening), induration (thickness), desquamation (scaling) of the lesions and area affected as observed on the day of examination. The severity of each sign was assessed using a 5-point scale, where 0=no symptoms, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=marked, 4=very marked. The PASI score ranges from 0 to 72, where 0 indicates no psoriasis and 72 indicates very severe psoriasis. PASI90 is defined as at least a 90% reduction in PASI score compared with the Baseline PASI score. The percent reduction in score is calculated as (PASI score at Baseline - score at follow-up visit) / PASI score at Baseline \* 100. NRI was used for missing data.

    Time frame: Week 16

  17. Percentage of Participants Achieving 90% Improvement in PASI Score (PASI90) at Week 20

    PASI is a composite score based on the degree of effect on body surface area of psoriasis and the extension of erythema (reddening), induration (thickness), desquamation (scaling) of the lesions and area affected as observed on the day of examination. The severity of each sign was assessed using a 5-point scale, where 0=no symptoms, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=marked, 4=very marked. The PASI score ranges from 0 to 72, where 0 indicates no psoriasis and 72 indicates very severe psoriasis. PASI90 is defined as at least a 90% reduction in PASI score compared with the Baseline PASI score. The percent reduction in score is calculated as (PASI score at Baseline - score at follow-up visit) / PASI score at Baseline \* 100. NRI was used for missing data.

    Time frame: Week 20

  18. Percentage of Participants Achieving 100% Improvement in PASI (PASI100) at Week 4

    PASI is a composite score based on the degree of effect on body surface area of psoriasis and the extension of erythema (reddening), induration (thickness), desquamation (scaling) of the lesions and area affected as observed on the day of examination. The severity of each sign was assessed using a 5-point scale, where 0=no symptoms, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=marked, 4=very marked. The PASI score ranges from 0 to 72, where 0 indicates no psoriasis and 72 indicates very severe psoriasis. PASI100 is defined as 100% reduction in PASI score compared with the Baseline PASI score. The percent reduction in score is calculated as (PASI score at Baseline - score at follow-up visit) / PASI score at Baseline \* 100. NRI was used for missing data.

    Time frame: Week 4

  19. Percentage of Participants Achieving 100% Improvement in PASI (PASI100) at Week 8

    PASI is a composite score based on the degree of effect on body surface area of psoriasis and the extension of erythema (reddening), induration (thickness), desquamation (scaling) of the lesions and area affected as observed on the day of examination. The severity of each sign was assessed using a 5-point scale, where 0=no symptoms, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=marked, 4=very marked. The PASI score ranges from 0 to 72, where 0 indicates no psoriasis and 72 indicates very severe psoriasis. PASI100 is defined as 100% reduction in PASI score compared with the Baseline PASI score. The percent reduction in score is calculated as (PASI score at Baseline - score at follow-up visit) / PASI score at Baseline \* 100. NRI was used for missing data.

    Time frame: Week 8

  20. Percentage of Participants Achieving 100% Improvement in PASI (PASI100) at Week 12

    PASI is a composite score based on the degree of effect on body surface area of psoriasis and the extension of erythema (reddening), induration (thickness), desquamation (scaling) of the lesions and area affected as observed on the day of examination. The severity of each sign was assessed using a 5-point scale, where 0=no symptoms, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=marked, 4=very marked. The PASI score ranges from 0 to 72, where 0 indicates no psoriasis and 72 indicates very severe psoriasis. PASI100 is defined as 100% reduction in PASI score compared with the Baseline PASI score. The percent reduction in score is calculated as (PASI score at Baseline - score at follow-up visit) / PASI score at Baseline \* 100. NRI was used for missing data.

    Time frame: Week 12

  21. Percentage of Participants Achieving 100% Improvement in PASI (PASI100) at Week 16

    PASI is a composite score based on the degree of effect on body surface area of psoriasis and the extension of erythema (reddening), induration (thickness), desquamation (scaling) of the lesions and area affected as observed on the day of examination. The severity of each sign was assessed using a 5-point scale, where 0=no symptoms, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=marked, 4=very marked. The PASI score ranges from 0 to 72, where 0 indicates no psoriasis and 72 indicates very severe psoriasis. PASI100 is defined as 100% reduction in PASI score compared with the Baseline PASI score. The percent reduction in score is calculated as (PASI score at Baseline - score at follow-up visit) / PASI score at Baseline \* 100. NRI was used for missing data.

    Time frame: Week 16

  22. Percentage of Participants Achieving 100% Improvement in PASI (PASI100) at Week 20

    PASI is a composite score based on the degree of effect on body surface area of psoriasis and the extension of erythema (reddening), induration (thickness), desquamation (scaling) of the lesions and area affected as observed on the day of examination. The severity of each sign was assessed using a 5-point scale, where 0=no symptoms, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=marked, 4=very marked. The PASI score ranges from 0 to 72, where 0 indicates no psoriasis and 72 indicates very severe psoriasis. PASI100 is defined as 100% reduction in PASI score compared with the Baseline PASI score. The percent reduction in score is calculated as (PASI score at Baseline - score at follow-up visit) / PASI score at Baseline \* 100. NRI was used for missing data.

    Time frame: Week 20

  23. Percentage of Participants Achieving 100% Improvement in PASI (PASI100) at Week 24

    PASI is a composite score based on the degree of effect on body surface area of psoriasis and the extension of erythema (reddening), induration (thickness), desquamation (scaling) of the lesions and area affected as observed on the day of examination. The severity of each sign was assessed using a 5-point scale, where 0=no symptoms, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=marked, 4=very marked. The PASI score ranges from 0 to 72, where 0 indicates no psoriasis and 72 indicates very severe psoriasis. PASI100 is defined as 100% reduction in PASI score compared with the Baseline PASI score. The percent reduction in score is calculated as (PASI score at Baseline - score at follow-up visit) / PASI score at Baseline \* 100. NRI was used for missing data.

    Time frame: Week 24

  24. Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI): Change From Baseline to Week 4

    PASI is a composite score based on the degree of effect on body surface area of psoriasis and the extension of erythema (reddening), induration (thickness), desquamation (scaling) of the lesions and area affected as observed on the day of examination. The severity of each sign was assessed using a 5-point scale, where 0=no symptoms, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=marked, 4=very marked. The PASI score ranges from 0 to 72, where 0 indicates no psoriasis and 72 indicates very severe psoriasis. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) imputation was used for missing data.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4

  25. PASI: Change From Baseline to Week 8

    PASI is a composite score based on the degree of effect on body surface area of psoriasis and the extension of erythema (reddening), induration (thickness), desquamation (scaling) of the lesions and area affected as observed on the day of examination. The severity of each sign was assessed using a 5-point scale, where 0=no symptoms, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=marked, 4=very marked. The PASI score ranges from 0 to 72, where 0 indicates no psoriasis and 72 indicates very severe psoriasis. LOCF imputation was used for missing data.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 8

  26. PASI: Change From Baseline to Week 12

    PASI is a composite score based on the degree of effect on body surface area of psoriasis and the extension of erythema (reddening), induration (thickness), desquamation (scaling) of the lesions and area affected as observed on the day of examination. The severity of each sign was assessed using a 5-point scale, where 0=no symptoms, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=marked, 4=very marked. The PASI score ranges from 0 to 72, where 0 indicates no psoriasis and 72 indicates very severe psoriasis. LOCF imputation was used for missing data.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

  27. PASI: Change From Baseline to Week 16

    PASI is a composite score based on the degree of effect on body surface area of psoriasis and the extension of erythema (reddening), induration (thickness), desquamation (scaling) of the lesions and area affected as observed on the day of examination. The severity of each sign was assessed using a 5-point scale, where 0=no symptoms, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=marked, 4=very marked. The PASI score ranges from 0 to 72, where 0 indicates no psoriasis and 72 indicates very severe psoriasis. LOCF imputation was used for missing data.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

  28. PASI: Change From Baseline to Week 20

    PASI is a composite score based on the degree of effect on body surface area of psoriasis and the extension of erythema (reddening), induration (thickness), desquamation (scaling) of the lesions and area affected as observed on the day of examination. The severity of each sign was assessed using a 5-point scale, where 0=no symptoms, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=marked, 4=very marked. The PASI score ranges from 0 to 72, where 0 indicates no psoriasis and 72 indicates very severe psoriasis. LOCF imputation was used for missing data.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 20

  29. PASI: Change From Baseline to Week 24

    PASI is a composite score based on the degree of effect on body surface area of psoriasis and the extension of erythema (reddening), induration (thickness), desquamation (scaling) of the lesions and area affected as observed on the day of examination. The severity of each sign was assessed using a 5-point scale, where 0=no symptoms, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=marked, 4=very marked. The PASI score ranges from 0 to 72, where 0 indicates no psoriasis and 72 indicates very severe psoriasis. LOCF imputation was used for missing data.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

  30. Percentage of Participants Achieving Static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) Score of Clear or Almost Clear at Week 4

    The sPGA is an assessment by the investigator of the overall disease severity at the time of evaluation. Erythema (E), induration (I), and desquamation (D) are scored on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (none) to 4 (severe). The sPGA ranges from 0 to 4, and is calculated as Clear (0) = 0 for all three; Almost clear (1) = mean \>0, \<1.5; Mild (2) = mean ≥1.5, \<2.5; Moderate (3) = mean ≥2.5, \<3.5; and Severe (4) = mean ≥3.5. NRI was used for missing data.

    Time frame: Week 4

  31. Percentage of Participants Achieving sPGA Score of Clear or Almost Clear at Week 8

    The sPGA is an assessment by the investigator of the overall disease severity at the time of evaluation. Erythema (E), induration (I), and desquamation (D) are scored on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (none) to 4 (severe). The sPGA ranges from 0 to 4, and is calculated as Clear (0) = 0 for all three; Almost clear (1) = mean \>0, \<1.5; Mild (2) = mean ≥1.5, \<2.5; Moderate (3) = mean ≥2.5, \<3.5; and Severe (4) = mean ≥3.5. NRI was used for missing data.

    Time frame: Week 8

  32. Percentage of Participants Achieving sPGA Score of Clear or Almost Clear at Week 12

    The sPGA is an assessment by the investigator of the overall disease severity at the time of evaluation. Erythema (E), induration (I), and desquamation (D) are scored on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (none) to 4 (severe). The sPGA ranges from 0 to 4, and is calculated as Clear (0) = 0 for all three; Almost clear (1) = mean \>0, \<1.5; Mild (2) = mean ≥1.5, \<2.5; Moderate (3) = mean ≥2.5, \<3.5; and Severe (4) = mean ≥3.5. NRI was used for missing data.

    Time frame: Week 12

  33. Percentage of Participants Achieving sPGA Score of Clear or Almost Clear at Week 16

    The sPGA is an assessment by the investigator of the overall disease severity at the time of evaluation. Erythema (E), induration (I), and desquamation (D) are scored on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (none) to 4 (severe). The sPGA ranges from 0 to 4, and is calculated as Clear (0) = 0 for all three; Almost clear (1) = mean \>0, \<1.5; Mild (2) = mean ≥1.5, \<2.5; Moderate (3) = mean ≥2.5, \<3.5; and Severe (4) = mean ≥3.5. NRI was used for missing data.

    Time frame: Week 16

  34. Percentage of Participants Achieving sPGA Score of Clear or Almost Clear at Week 20

    The sPGA is an assessment by the investigator of the overall disease severity at the time of evaluation. Erythema (E), induration (I), and desquamation (D) are scored on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (none) to 4 (severe). The sPGA ranges from 0 to 4, and is calculated as Clear (0) = 0 for all three; Almost clear (1) = mean \>0, \<1.5; Mild (2) = mean ≥1.5, \<2.5; Moderate (3) = mean ≥2.5, \<3.5; and Severe (4) = mean ≥3.5. NRI was used for missing data.

    Time frame: Week 20

  35. Percentage of Participants Achieving sPGA Score of Clear or Almost Clear at Week 24

    The sPGA is an assessment by the investigator of the overall disease severity at the time of evaluation. Erythema (E), induration (I), and desquamation (D) are scored on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (none) to 4 (severe). The sPGA ranges from 0 to 4, and is calculated as Clear (0) = 0 for all three; Almost clear (1) = mean \>0, \<1.5; Mild (2) = mean ≥1.5, \<2.5; Moderate (3) = mean ≥2.5, \<3.5; and Severe (4) = mean ≥3.5. NRI was used for missing data.

    Time frame: Week 24

  36. Percentage of Participants Achieving sPGA Score of Clear at Week 4

    The sPGA is an assessment by the investigator of the overall disease severity at the time of evaluation. Erythema (E), induration (I), and desquamation (D) are scored on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (none) to 4 (severe). The sPGA ranges from 0 to 4, and is calculated as Clear (0) = 0 for all three; Almost clear (1) = mean \>0, \<1.5; Mild (2) = mean ≥1.5, \<2.5; Moderate (3) = mean ≥2.5, \<3.5; and Severe (4) = mean ≥3.5. NRI was used for missing data.

    Time frame: Week 4

  37. Percentage of Participants Achieving sPGA Score of Clear at Week 8

    The sPGA is an assessment by the investigator of the overall disease severity at the time of evaluation. Erythema (E), induration (I), and desquamation (D) are scored on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (none) to 4 (severe). The sPGA ranges from 0 to 4, and is calculated as Clear (0) = 0 for all three; Almost clear (1) = mean \>0, \<1.5; Mild (2) = mean ≥1.5, \<2.5; Moderate (3) = mean ≥2.5, \<3.5; and Severe (4) = mean ≥3.5. NRI was used for missing data.

    Time frame: Week 8

  38. Percentage of Participants Achieving sPGA Score of Clear at Week 12

    The sPGA is an assessment by the investigator of the overall disease severity at the time of evaluation. Erythema (E), induration (I), and desquamation (D) are scored on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (none) to 4 (severe). The sPGA ranges from 0 to 4, and is calculated as Clear (0) = 0 for all three; Almost clear (1) = mean \>0, \<1.5; Mild (2) = mean ≥1.5, \<2.5; Moderate (3) = mean ≥2.5, \<3.5; and Severe (4) = mean ≥3.5. NRI was used for missing data.

    Time frame: Week 12

  39. Percentage of Participants Achieving sPGA Score of Clear at Week 16

    The sPGA is an assessment by the investigator of the overall disease severity at the time of evaluation. Erythema (E), induration (I), and desquamation (D) are scored on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (none) to 4 (severe). The sPGA ranges from 0 to 4, and is calculated as Clear (0) = 0 for all three; Almost clear (1) = mean \>0, \<1.5; Mild (2) = mean ≥1.5, \<2.5; Moderate (3) = mean ≥2.5, \<3.5; and Severe (4) = mean ≥3.5. NRI was used for missing data.

    Time frame: Week 16

  40. Percentage of Participants Achieving sPGA Score of Clear at Week 20

    The sPGA is an assessment by the investigator of the overall disease severity at the time of evaluation. Erythema (E), induration (I), and desquamation (D) are scored on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (none) to 4 (severe). The sPGA ranges from 0 to 4, and is calculated as Clear (0) = 0 for all three; Almost clear (1) = mean \>0, \<1.5; Mild (2) = mean ≥1.5, \<2.5; Moderate (3) = mean ≥2.5, \<3.5; and Severe (4) = mean ≥3.5. NRI was used for missing data.

    Time frame: Week 20

  41. Percentage of Participants Achieving sPGA Score of Clear at Week 24

    The sPGA is an assessment by the investigator of the overall disease severity at the time of evaluation. Erythema (E), induration (I), and desquamation (D) are scored on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (none) to 4 (severe). The sPGA ranges from 0 to 4, and is calculated as Clear (0) = 0 for all three; Almost clear (1) = mean \>0, \<1.5; Mild (2) = mean ≥1.5, \<2.5; Moderate (3) = mean ≥2.5, \<3.5; and Severe (4) = mean ≥3.5. NRI was used for missing data.

    Time frame: Week 24

  42. Percentage of Participants With Psoriasis Symptoms Scale (PSS) Score of 0 at Week 16

    The PSS asks the participant to rate the severity of symptoms of psoriasis in the last 24 hours (pain, redness, itching, and burning) using a 5-point Likert -type scale ranging from 0 (none) to 4 (very severe). The PSS is calculated by summing the scores of the questions and ranges from 0 to 16, where the higher the score, the greater the severity of psoriasis symptoms. NRI was used for missing data.

    Time frame: Week 16

  43. Percentage of Participants With PSS Score of 0 at Week 24

    The PSS asks the participant to rate the severity of symptoms of psoriasis in the last 24 hours (pain, redness, itching, and burning) using a 5-point Likert -type scale ranging from 0 (none) to 4 (very severe). The PSS is calculated by summing the scores of the questions and ranges from 0 to 16, where the higher the score, the greater the severity of psoriasis symptoms. NRI was used for missing data.

    Time frame: Week 24

  44. PSS Total Score: Change From Baseline to Week 16

    The PSS asks the participant to rate the severity of symptoms of psoriasis in the last 24 hours (pain, redness, itching, and burning) using a 5-point Likert -type scale ranging from 0 (none) to 4 (very severe). The PSS is calculated by summing the scores of the questions and ranges from 0 to 16, where the higher the score, the greater the severity of psoriasis symptoms. LOCF imputation was used for missing data.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

  45. PSS Total Score: Change From Baseline to Week 24

    The PSS asks the participant to rate the severity of symptoms of psoriasis in the last 24 hours (pain, redness, itching, and burning) using a 5-point Likert -type scale ranging from 0 (none) to 4 (very severe). The PSS is calculated by summing the scores of the questions and ranges from 0 to 16, where the higher the score, the greater the severity of psoriasis symptoms. LOCF imputation was used for missing data.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

  46. Summary of Patient Benefit Index (PBI) at Week 16

    The PBI is a patient-reported outcome instrument that assesses the benefit of psoriasis treatment.The PBI assessment consists of 2 steps: before treatment, every participant defines his/her treatment needs according to a standardized list (Patient Needs Questionnaire \[PNQ\]). After treatment, the participant rates the degree of benefits achieved (Patient Benefits Questionnaire \[PBQ\]). 25 items are rated on a 5-point scale with values from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very), allowing for "did not apply to me" (5) and missing. For each treatment goal the PNQ importance is derived by dividing the respective PNQ item by the sum of all PNQ items. The weighted sum of each PBQ item with its respective PNQ importance yields the PBI score. An increase in PBI indicates improvement. LOCF imputation was used for missing data.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

  47. Summary of PBI at Week 24

    The PBI is a patient-reported outcome instrument that assesses the benefit of psoriasis treatment. The PBI is a patient-reported outcome instrument that assesses the benefit of psoriasis treatment.The PBI assessment consists of 2 steps: before treatment, every participant defines his/her treatment needs according to a standardized list (PNQ). After treatment, the participant rates the degree of benefits achieved (PBQ). 25 items are rated on a 5-point scale with values from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very), allowing for "did not apply to me" (5) and missing. For each treatment goal the PNQ importance is derived by dividing the respective PNQ item by the sum of all PNQ items. The weighted sum of each PBQ item with its respective PNQ importance yields the PBI score. An increase in PBI indicates improvement. LOCF imputation was used for missing data.

    Time frame: Baseline Week 24

  48. Clinical Severity of Nail Psoriasis (NAPPA-CLIN) Total Score: Change From Baseline to Week 16

    The NAPPA-CLIN is an investigator assessment used to assess the severity of nail matrix psoriasis (leukonychia, red spots, dots, nail plate crumbling) and psoriasis of the nail bed (oil drop, splinter haemorrhage, subungual hyperkeratosis, onycholysis). NAPPA-CLIN has been developed from the Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score, a nail psoriasis-specific score, which in its original version comprises the assessment of matrix and nail bed involvement in every finger and toe by 2 criteria for each nail. The NAPPA-CLIN is a simplified version of the NAPSI which only assesses the least and the worst involved nail of both hands or both feet respectively. Thus, the NAPPA-CLIN scores for hands or feet range from 0 to 16. A higher score indicates a worse involvement. LOCF imputation was used for missing data.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

  49. NAPPA-CLIN Total Score: Change From Baseline to Week 24

    The NAPPA-CLIN is an investigator assessment used to assess the severity of nail matrix psoriasis (leukonychia, red spots, dots, nail plate crumbling) and psoriasis of the nail bed (oil drop, splinter haemorrhage, subungual hyperkeratosis, onycholysis). NAPPA-CLIN has been developed from the NAPSI score, a nail psoriasis-specific score, which in its original version comprises the assessment of matrix and nail bed involvement in every finger and toe by 2 criteria for each nail. The NAPPA-CLIN is a simplified version of the NAPSI which only assesses the least and the worst involved nail of both hands or both feet respectively. Thus, the NAPPA-CLIN scores for hands or feet range from 0 to 16. A higher score indicates a worse involvement. LOCF imputation was used for missing data.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

  50. Palmoplantar Psoriasis Severity Index (PPASI): Change From Baseline to Week 16

    The PPASI is an assessment by the investigator that provides a numeric scoring for psoriasis affecting the hands and feet with scores ranging from 0 to 72. It is a linear combination of percent of surface area of palms and soles that are affected and the severity of erythema, induration, and desquamation. The higher the score, the greater the severity of psoriasis symptoms. LOCF imputation was used for missing data.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

  51. PPASI: Change From Baseline to Week 24

    The PPASI is an assessment by the investigator that provides a numeric scoring for psoriasis affecting the hands and feet with scores ranging from 0 to 72. It is a linear combination of percent of surface area of palms and soles that are affected and the severity of erythema, induration, and desquamation. The higher the score, the greater the severity of psoriasis symptoms. LOCF imputation was used for missing data.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

  52. Body Surface Area (BSA) Affected by Psoriasis: Change From Baseline to Week 4

    BSA affected by psoriasis was measured by the physician selecting the participant's right or left hand as the measuring device. For purposes of clinical estimation, the total surface of the palm plus 5 digits was to be assumed to be approximately equivalent to 1% BSA. Measurement of the total area of involvement by the physician was aided by imagining if scattered plaques were moved so that they were next to each other and then estimated the total area involved. A decrease in BSA affected by psoriasis indicates improvement. LOCF imputation was used for missing data.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4

  53. BSA Affected by Psoriasis: Change From Baseline to Week 8

    BSA affected by psoriasis was measured by the physician selecting the participant's right or left hand as the measuring device. For purposes of clinical estimation, the total surface of the palm plus 5 digits was to be assumed to be approximately equivalent to 1% BSA. Measurement of the total area of involvement by the physician was aided by imagining if scattered plaques were moved so that they were next to each other and then estimated the total area involved. A decrease in BSA affected by psoriasis indicates improvement. LOCF imputation was used for missing data.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 8

  54. BSA Affected by Psoriasis: Change From Baseline to Week 12

    BSA affected by psoriasis was measured by the physician selecting the participant's right or left hand as the measuring device. For purposes of clinical estimation, the total surface of the palm plus 5 digits was to be assumed to be approximately equivalent to 1% BSA. Measurement of the total area of involvement by the physician was aided by imagining if scattered plaques were moved so that they were next to each other and then estimated the total area involved. A decrease in BSA affected by psoriasis indicates improvement. LOCF imputation was used for missing data.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

  55. BSA Affected by Psoriasis: Change From Baseline to Week 16

    BSA affected by psoriasis was measured by the physician selecting the participant's right or left hand as the measuring device. For purposes of clinical estimation, the total surface of the palm plus 5 digits was to be assumed to be approximately equivalent to 1% BSA. Measurement of the total area of involvement by the physician was aided by imagining if scattered plaques were moved so that they were next to each other and then estimated the total area involved. A decrease in BSA affected by psoriasis indicates improvement. LOCF imputation was used for missing data.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

  56. BSA Affected by Psoriasis: Change From Baseline to Week 20

    BSA affected by psoriasis was measured by the physician selecting the participant's right or left hand as the measuring device. For purposes of clinical estimation, the total surface of the palm plus 5 digits was to be assumed to be approximately equivalent to 1% BSA. Measurement of the total area of involvement by the physician was aided by imagining if scattered plaques were moved so that they were next to each other and then estimated the total area involved. A decrease in BSA affected by psoriasis indicates improvement. LOCF imputation was used for missing data.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 20

  57. BSA Affected by Psoriasis: Change From Baseline to Week 24

    BSA affected by psoriasis was measured by the physician selecting the participant's right or left hand as the measuring device. For purposes of clinical estimation, the total surface of the palm plus 5 digits was to be assumed to be approximately equivalent to 1% BSA. Measurement of the total area of involvement by the physician was aided by imagining if scattered plaques were moved so that they were next to each other and then estimated the total area involved. A decrease in BSA affected by psoriasis indicates improvement. LOCF imputation was used for missing data.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

  58. Short Form Health Survey 36, Version 2 (SF-36 V2) Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score: Change From Baseline to Week 16

    The SF-36 V2 Health determined participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health. Items 1-4 comprise the physical component of the SF-36. Scores on each item were summed and averaged (PCS Score; range = 0-100); a positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. LOCF imputation was used for missing data.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

  59. SF-36 V2 PCS Score: Change From Baseline to Week 24

    The SF-36 V2 Health determined participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health. Items 1-4 comprise the physical component of the SF-36. Scores on each item were summed and averaged (PCS Score; range = 0-100); a positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. LOCF imputation was used for missing data.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

  60. SF-36 V2 Mental Component Summary (MCS) Score: Change From Baseline: to Week 16

    The SF-36 determined participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health. Items 5-8 comprise the mental component of the SF-36. Scores on each item were summed and averaged (MCS Score; range = 0-100); a positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. LOCF imputation was used for missing data.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

  61. SF-36 V2 MCS Score: Change From Baseline to Week 24

    The SF-36 determined participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health. Items 5-8 comprise the mental component of the SF-36. Scores on each item were summed and averaged (MCS Score; range = 0-100); a positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. LOCF imputation was used for missing data.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

  62. Patient's Global Assessment (PtGA): Change From Baseline to Week 16

    The PtGA is a patient-reported outcome instrument to assess the patient's assessment of disease severity. This self-reported measure is used to assess disease activity using a 4-point scale where a higher score indicates a higher level of disease activity. Disease activity is assessed from 0 ("complete disease control") to 3 ("uncontrolled disease"). LOCF imputation was used for missing data.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

  63. PtGA: Change From Baseline to Week 24

    The PtGA is a patient-reported outcome instrument to assess the patient's assessment of disease severity. This self-reported measure is used to assess disease activity using a 4-point scale where a higher score indicates a higher level of disease activity. Disease activity is assessed from 0 ("complete disease control") to 3 ("uncontrolled disease"). LOCF imputation was used for missing data.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

  64. Hospital Anxiety & Depression Scale (HADS) Total Score-Anxiety: Change From Baseline to Week 16

    The HADS was a patient-reported questionnaire used to assess the level of anxiety and depression in the setting of a hospital medical outpatient clinic. The anxiety and depression subscales each have a range from 0-21, higher scores indicated higher levels of anxiety and depression, respectively. LOCF imputation was used for missing data.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

  65. HADS Total Score-Anxiety: Change From Baseline to Week 24

    The HADS was a patient-reported questionnaire used to assess the level of anxiety and depression in the setting of a hospital medical outpatient clinic. The anxiety and depression subscales each have a range from 0-21, higher scores indicated higher levels of anxiety and depression, respectively. LOCF imputation was used for missing data.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

  66. HADS Total Score-Depression: Change From Baseline to Week 16

    The HADS was a patient-reported questionnaire used to assess the level of anxiety and depression in the setting of a hospital medical outpatient clinic. The anxiety and depression subscales each have a range from 0-21, higher scores indicated higher levels of anxiety and depression, respectively. LOCF imputation was used for missing data.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

  67. HADS Total Score-Depression: Change From Baseline to Week 24

    The HADS was a patient-reported questionnaire used to assess the level of anxiety and depression in the setting of a hospital medical outpatient clinic. The anxiety and depression subscales each have a range from 0-21, higher scores indicated higher levels of anxiety and depression, respectively. LOCF imputation was used for missing data.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

  68. Percentage of Participants Achieving Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score of 0 or 1 at Week 16

    The DLQI is a 10-question questionnaire that asks the participant to evaluate the degree that psoriasis has affected their quality of life in the last week and includes 6 domains (symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work and school, personal relationships, and treatment). Responses to each domain are not relevant (0), not at all (0), a little (1), a lot (2), and very much (3). The DLQI is calculated by summing the scores of the questions and ranges from 1 to 30, where 0-1 = no effect on patient's life, 2-5 = small effect, 6-10 = moderate effect, 11-20 = very large effect, and 21-30 = extremely large effect on patient's life. The higher the score, the more the quality of life is impaired. A 5-point change from baseline is considered a clinically important difference. NRI was used for missing data.

    Time frame: Week 16

  69. Percentage of Participants Achieving DLQI Score of 0 or 1 at Week 24

    The DLQI is a 10-question questionnaire that asks the participant to evaluate the degree that psoriasis has affected their quality of life in the last week and includes 6 domains (symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work and school, personal relationships, and treatment). Responses to each domain are not relevant (0), not at all (0), a little (1), a lot (2), and very much (3). The DLQI is calculated by summing the scores of the questions and ranges from 1 to 30, where 0-1 = no effect on patient's life, 2-5 = small effect, 6-10 = moderate effect, 11-20 = very large effect, and 21-30 = extremely large effect on patient's life. The higher the score, the more the quality of life is impaired. A 5-point change from baseline is considered a clinically important difference. NRI was used for missing data.

    Time frame: Week 24

  70. DLQI Total Score: Change From Baseline to Week 16

    The DLQI is a 10-question questionnaire that asks the participant to evaluate the degree that psoriasis has affected their quality of life in the last week and includes 6 domains (symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work and school, personal relationships, and treatment). Responses to each domain are not relevant (0), not at all (0), a little (1), a lot (2), and very much (3). The DLQI is calculated by summing the scores of the questions and ranges from 1 to 30, where 0-1 = no effect on patient's life, 2-5 = small effect, 6-10 = moderate effect, 11-20 = very large effect, and 21-30 = extremely large effect on patient's life. The higher the score, the more the quality of life is impaired. A 5-point change from baseline is considered a clinically important difference. LOCF imputation was used for missing data.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

  71. DLQI: Change From Baseline to Week 24

    The DLQI is a 10-question questionnaire that asks the participant to evaluate the degree that psoriasis has affected their quality of life in the last week and includes 6 domains (symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work and school, personal relationships, and treatment). Responses to each domain are not relevant (0), not at all (0), a little (1), a lot (2), and very much (3). The DLQI is calculated by summing the scores of the questions and ranges from 1 to 30, where 0-1 = no effect on patient's life, 2-5 = small effect, 6-10 = moderate effect, 11-20 = very large effect, and 21-30 = extremely large effect on patient's life. The higher the score, the more the quality of life is impaired. A 5-point change from baseline is considered a clinically important difference. LOCF imputation was used for missing data.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

  72. Psoriasis Scalp Severity Index (PSSI): Change From Baseline at Week 16

    The physician assessed the severity of scalp psoriasis using the PSSI, which consists of an assessment of erythema, induration, and desquamation on a scale from 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) and the percentage of scalp involved on a scale from 0 (0% of scalp involved) to 6 (90-100% of scalp involved). The composite score is calculated as the sum of symptom scores multiplied by the score for the area of scalp involved. The PSSI ranges from 0 (best) to 72 (worst). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. LOCF imputation was used for missing data.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

  73. PSSI: Change From Baseline at Week 24

    The physician assessed the severity of scalp psoriasis using the PSSI, which consists of an assessment of erythema, induration, and desquamation on a scale from 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) and the percentage of scalp involved on a scale from 0 (0% of scalp involved) to 6 (90-100% of scalp involved). The composite score is calculated as the sum of symptom scores multiplied by the score for the area of scalp involved. The PSSI ranges from 0 (best) to 72 (worst). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. LOCF imputation was used for missing data.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

  74. European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D-5L) Total Score: Change From Baseline to Week 16

    The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized non-disease specific instrument for describing and valuing health-related quality of life. The EQ-5D-5L descriptive system comprises 5 dimensions of health (mobility, self -care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) to describe the subject's current health state. Each dimension comprises 5 levels with corresponding numeric scores, where 1 indicates no problems, and 5 indicates extreme problems. A unique EQ-5D-5L health state is defined by combining the numeric level scores for each of the 5 dimensions and the total score is normalized from -0.594 to 1.000, with higher scores representing a better health state. An increase in the EQ-5D-5L total score indicates improvement. LOCF imputation was used for missing data.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

  75. EQ-5D-5L Total Score: Change From Baseline to Week 24

    The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized non-disease specific instrument for describing and valuing health-related quality of life. The EQ-5D-5L descriptive system comprises 5 dimensions of health (mobility, self -care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) to describe the subject's current health state. Each dimension comprises 5 levels with corresponding numeric scores, where 1 indicates no problems, and 5 indicates extreme problems. A unique EQ-5D-5L health state is defined by combining the numeric level scores for each of the 5 dimensions and the total score is normalized from -0.594 to 1.000, with higher scores representing a better health state. An increase in the EQ-5D-5L total score indicates improvement. LOCF imputation was used for missing data.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

  76. EQ-5D-5L Visual Analog Scale (VAS): Change From Baseline to Week 16

    The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized non-disease specific instrument for describing and valuing health-related quality of life. The EQ-5D-5L VAS records the participant's self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale numbered from 100 (best health imagined) to 0 (worst health imagined). The VAS score from the scale is then entered as a number by the participant. This can be used as a quantitative measure of health outcome that reflects the participant's own judgement. An increase in the EQ-5D-5L VAS score indicates improvement. LOCF imputation was used for missing data.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

  77. EQ-5D-5L VAS: Change From Baseline to Week 24

    The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized non-disease specific instrument for describing and valuing health-related quality of life. The EQ-5D-5L VAS records the participant's self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale numbered from 100 (best health imagined) to 0 (worst health imagined). The VAS score from the scale is then entered as a number by the participant. This can be used as a quantitative measure of health outcome that reflects the participant's own judgement. An increase in the EQ-5D-5L VAS score indicates improvement. LOCF imputation was used for missing data.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

  78. Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI): Change From Baseline to Week 16

    The NAPSI score is calculated by summing the scores of all the nails which for each nail are the sum of the nail matrix score and nail bed score. Each of these is scored as 0=none, 1=present in 1/4 nail, 2=present in 2/4 nail, 3=present in 3/4 nail, 4=present in 4/4 nail. Each nail has a matrix score (0-4) and a nail bed score (0-4). The total nail score is the sum of those 2 (nail matrix and nail bed) individual scores (0-8). The sum of the total score of all involved fingernails is then the total NAPSI score. The NAPSI score is calculated only if all questions in the case report form are completed. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. LOCF imputation was used for missing data.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

  79. NAPSI: Change From Baseline to Week 24

    The NAPSI score is calculated by summing the scores of all the nails which for each nail are the sum of the nail matrix score and nail bed score. Each of these is scored as 0=none, 1=present in 1/4 nail, 2=present in 2/4 nail, 3=present in 3/4 nail, 4=present in 4/4 nail. Each nail has a matrix score (0-4) and a nail bed score (0-4). The total nail score is the sum of those 2 (nail matrix and nail bed) individual scores (0-8). The sum of the total score of all involved fingernails is then the total NAPSI score. The NAPSI score is calculated only if all questions in the case report form are completed. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. LOCF imputation was used for missing data.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

  80. Participants With Baseline NAPSI ˃0: Change From Baseline to Week 16

    The NAPSI score is calculated by summing the scores of all the nails which for each nail are the sum of the nail matrix score and nail bed score. Each of these is scored as 0=none, 1=present in 1/4 nail, 2=present in 2/4 nail, 3=present in 3/4 nail, 4=present in 4/4 nail. Each nail has a matrix score (0-4) and a nail bed score (0-4). The total nail score is the sum of those 2 (nail matrix and nail bed) individual scores (0-8). The sum of the total score of all involved fingernails is then the total NAPSI score. The NAPSI score is calculated only if all questions in the case report form are completed. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. LOCF imputation was used for missing data.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

  81. Participants With Baseline NAPSI ˃0: Change From Baseline to Week 24

    The NAPSI score is calculated by summing the scores of all the nails which for each nail are the sum of the nail matrix score and nail bed score. Each of these is scored as 0=none, 1=present in 1/4 nail, 2=present in 2/4 nail, 3=present in 3/4 nail, 4=present in 4/4 nail. Each nail has a matrix score (0-4) and a nail bed score (0-4). The total nail score is the sum of those 2 (nail matrix and nail bed) individual scores (0-8). The sum of the total score of all involved fingernails is then the total NAPSI score. The NAPSI score is calculated only if all questions in the case report form are completed. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. LOCF imputation was used for missing data.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

06

Results

Posted Sep 13, 2019

Participant flow

Intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all participants enrolled in the study (N = 120). Safety analysis set included all participants enrolled in the study and who received at least 1 dose of study drug (N = 117).

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneFumadermRisankizumab
Started6060
Completed4760
Not completed130
Withdrew: Adverse event30
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up20
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject20
Withdrew: Other60

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage of Participants Achieving 90% Improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI90) at Week 24

The Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) is a composite score based on the degree of effect on body surface area of psoriasis and the extension of erythema (reddening), induration (thickness), desquamation (scaling) of the lesions and area affected as observed on the day of examination. The severity of each sign was assessed using a 5-point scale, where 0=no symptoms, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=marked, 4=very marked. The PASI score ranges from 0 to 72, where 0 indicates no psoriasis and 72 indicates very severe psoriasis. PASI90 is defined as at least a 90% reduction in PASI score compared with the Baseline PASI score. The percent reduction in score is calculated as (PASI score at Baseline - score at follow-up visit) / PASI score at Baseline \* 100. Non-responder imputation (NRI) was used for missing data.

Time frame:
Week 24
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving 90% Improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI90) at Week 24
percentage of participantsFumadermRisankizumab
Percentage of Participants Achieving 90% Improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI90) at Week 2410.083.3
Statistical analysis
  • Fumaderm vs Risankizumab · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = < 0.001 · Adjusted percentage difference: 73.3 · 95% CI 61.3 to 85.3
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving 50% Improvement in PASI Score (PASI50) at Week 4

PASI is a composite score based on the degree of effect on body surface area of psoriasis and the extension of erythema (reddening), induration (thickness), desquamation (scaling) of the lesions and area affected as observed on the day of examination. The severity of each sign was assessed using a 5-point scale, where 0=no symptoms, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=marked, 4=very marked. The PASI score ranges from 0 to 72, where 0 indicates no psoriasis and 72 indicates very severe psoriasis. PASI50 is defined as at least a 50% reduction in PASI score compared with the Baseline PASI score. The percent reduction in score is calculated as (PASI score at Baseline - score at follow-up visit) / PASI score at Baseline \* 100. NRI was used for missing data.

Time frame:
Week 4
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving 50% Improvement in PASI Score (PASI50) at Week 4
percentage of participantsFumadermRisankizumab
Percentage of Participants Achieving 50% Improvement in PASI Score (PASI50) at Week 46.753.3
Statistical analysis
  • Fumaderm vs Risankizumab · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = < 0.001 · Adjusted percentage difference: 46.8 · 95% CI 32.8 to 60.8
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving 50% Improvement in PASI Score (PASI50) at Week 8

PASI is a composite score based on the degree of effect on body surface area of psoriasis and the extension of erythema (reddening), induration (thickness), desquamation (scaling) of the lesions and area affected as observed on the day of examination. The severity of each sign was assessed using a 5-point scale, where 0=no symptoms, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=marked, 4=very marked. The PASI score ranges from 0 to 72, where 0 indicates no psoriasis and 72 indicates very severe psoriasis. PASI50 is defined as at least a 50% reduction in PASI score compared with the Baseline PASI score. The percent reduction in score is calculated as (PASI score at Baseline - score at follow-up visit) / PASI score at Baseline \* 100. NRI was used for missing data.

Time frame:
Week 8
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving 50% Improvement in PASI Score (PASI50) at Week 8
percentage of participantsFumadermRisankizumab
Percentage of Participants Achieving 50% Improvement in PASI Score (PASI50) at Week 828.391.7
Statistical analysis
  • Fumaderm vs Risankizumab · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = < 0.001 · Adjusted percentage difference: 63.4 · 95% CI 50.2 to 76.6
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving 50% Improvement in PASI Score (PASI50) at Week 12

PASI is a composite score based on the degree of effect on body surface area of psoriasis and the extension of erythema (reddening), induration (thickness), desquamation (scaling) of the lesions and area affected as observed on the day of examination. The severity of each sign was assessed using a 5-point scale, where 0=no symptoms, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=marked, 4=very marked. The PASI score ranges from 0 to 72, where 0 indicates no psoriasis and 72 indicates very severe psoriasis. PASI50 is defined as at least a 50% reduction in PASI score compared with the Baseline PASI score. The percent reduction in score is calculated as (PASI score at Baseline - score at follow-up visit) / PASI score at Baseline \* 100. NRI was used for missing data.

Time frame:
Week 12
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving 50% Improvement in PASI Score (PASI50) at Week 12
percentage of participantsFumadermRisankizumab
Percentage of Participants Achieving 50% Improvement in PASI Score (PASI50) at Week 1246.7100
Statistical analysis
  • Fumaderm vs Risankizumab · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = < 0.001 · Adjusted percentage difference: 53.1 · 95% CI 40.4 to 65.7
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving 50% Improvement in PASI Score (PASI50) at Week 16

PASI is a composite score based on the degree of effect on body surface area of psoriasis and the extension of erythema (reddening), induration (thickness), desquamation (scaling) of the lesions and area affected as observed on the day of examination. The severity of each sign was assessed using a 5-point scale, where 0=no symptoms, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=marked, 4=very marked. The PASI score ranges from 0 to 72, where 0 indicates no psoriasis and 72 indicates very severe psoriasis. PASI50 is defined as at least a 50% reduction in PASI score compared with the Baseline PASI score. The percent reduction in score is calculated as (PASI score at Baseline - score at follow-up visit) / PASI score at Baseline \* 100. NRI was used for missing data.

Time frame:
Week 16
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving 50% Improvement in PASI Score (PASI50) at Week 16
percentage of participantsFumadermRisankizumab
Percentage of Participants Achieving 50% Improvement in PASI Score (PASI50) at Week 1660.0100
Statistical analysis
  • Fumaderm vs Risankizumab · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = < 0.001 · Adjusted percentage difference: 39.6 · 95% CI 27.3 to 51.9
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving 50% Improvement in PASI Score (PASI50) at Week 20

PASI is a composite score based on the degree of effect on body surface area of psoriasis and the extension of erythema (reddening), induration (thickness), desquamation (scaling) of the lesions and area affected as observed on the day of examination. The severity of each sign was assessed using a 5-point scale, where 0=no symptoms, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=marked, 4=very marked. The PASI score ranges from 0 to 72, where 0 indicates no psoriasis and 72 indicates very severe psoriasis. PASI50 is defined as at least a 50% reduction in PASI score compared with the Baseline PASI score. The percent reduction in score is calculated as (PASI score at Baseline - score at follow-up visit) / PASI score at Baseline \* 100. NRI was used for missing data.

Time frame:
Week 20
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving 50% Improvement in PASI Score (PASI50) at Week 20
percentage of participantsFumadermRisankizumab
Percentage of Participants Achieving 50% Improvement in PASI Score (PASI50) at Week 2063.3100
Statistical analysis
  • Fumaderm vs Risankizumab · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = < 0.001 · Adjusted percentage difference: 36.3 · 95% CI 24.1 to 48.5
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving 50% Improvement in PASI Score (PASI50) at Week 24

PASI is a composite score based on the degree of effect on body surface area of psoriasis and the extension of erythema (reddening), induration (thickness), desquamation (scaling) of the lesions and area affected as observed on the day of examination. The severity of each sign was assessed using a 5-point scale, where 0=no symptoms, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=marked, 4=very marked. The PASI score ranges from 0 to 72, where 0 indicates no psoriasis and 72 indicates very severe psoriasis. PASI50 is defined as at least a 50% reduction in PASI score compared with the Baseline PASI score. The percent reduction in score is calculated as (PASI score at Baseline - score at follow-up visit) / PASI score at Baseline \* 100. NRI was used for missing data.

Time frame:
Week 24
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving 50% Improvement in PASI Score (PASI50) at Week 24
percentage of participantsFumadermRisankizumab
Percentage of Participants Achieving 50% Improvement in PASI Score (PASI50) at Week 2453.3100
Statistical analysis
  • Fumaderm vs Risankizumab · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = < 0.001 · Adjusted percentage difference: 46.4 · 95% CI 33.7 to 59.0
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving 75% Improvement in PASI Score (PASI75) at Week 4

PASI is a composite score based on the degree of effect on body surface area of psoriasis and the extension of erythema (reddening), induration (thickness), desquamation (scaling) of the lesions and area affected as observed on the day of examination. The severity of each sign was assessed using a 5-point scale, where 0=no symptoms, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=marked, 4=very marked. The PASI score ranges from 0 to 72, where 0 indicates no psoriasis and 72 indicates very severe psoriasis. PASI75 is defined as at least a 75% reduction in PASI score compared with the Baseline PASI score. The percent reduction in score is calculated as (PASI score at Baseline - score at follow-up visit) / PASI score at Baseline \* 100. NRI was used for missing data.

Time frame:
Week 4
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving 75% Improvement in PASI Score (PASI75) at Week 4
percentage of participantsFumadermRisankizumab
Percentage of Participants Achieving 75% Improvement in PASI Score (PASI75) at Week 43.313.3
Statistical analysis
  • Fumaderm vs Risankizumab · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.047 · Adjusted percentage difference: 9.9 · 95% CI 0.1 to 19.7
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving 75% Improvement in PASI Score (PASI75) at Week 8

PASI is a composite score based on the degree of effect on body surface area of psoriasis and the extension of erythema (reddening), induration (thickness), desquamation (scaling) of the lesions and area affected as observed on the day of examination. The severity of each sign was assessed using a 5-point scale, where 0=no symptoms, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=marked, 4=very marked. The PASI score ranges from 0 to 72, where 0 indicates no psoriasis and 72 indicates very severe psoriasis. PASI75 is defined as at least a 75% reduction in PASI score compared with the Baseline PASI score. The percent reduction in score is calculated as (PASI score at Baseline - score at follow-up visit) / PASI score at Baseline \* 100. NRI was used for missing data.

Time frame:
Week 8
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving 75% Improvement in PASI Score (PASI75) at Week 8
percentage of participantsFumadermRisankizumab
Percentage of Participants Achieving 75% Improvement in PASI Score (PASI75) at Week 88.375.0
Statistical analysis
  • Fumaderm vs Risankizumab · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = < 0.001 · Adjusted percentage difference: 66.6 · 95% CI 53.8 to 79.5
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving 75% Improvement in PASI Score (PASI75) at Week 12

PASI is a composite score based on the degree of effect on body surface area of psoriasis and the extension of erythema (reddening), induration (thickness), desquamation (scaling) of the lesions and area affected as observed on the day of examination. The severity of each sign was assessed using a 5-point scale, where 0=no symptoms, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=marked, 4=very marked. The PASI score ranges from 0 to 72, where 0 indicates no psoriasis and 72 indicates very severe psoriasis. PASI75 is defined as at least a 75% reduction in PASI score compared with the Baseline PASI score. The percent reduction in score is calculated as (PASI score at Baseline - score at follow-up visit) / PASI score at Baseline \* 100. NRI was used for missing data.

Time frame:
Week 12
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving 75% Improvement in PASI Score (PASI75) at Week 12
percentage of participantsFumadermRisankizumab
Percentage of Participants Achieving 75% Improvement in PASI Score (PASI75) at Week 1220.086.7
Statistical analysis
  • Fumaderm vs Risankizumab · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = < 0.001 · Adjusted percentage difference: 66.6 · 95% CI 53.3 to 79.9
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving 75% Improvement in PASI Score (PASI75) at Week 16

PASI is a composite score based on the degree of effect on body surface area of psoriasis and the extension of erythema (reddening), induration (thickness), desquamation (scaling) of the lesions and area affected as observed on the day of examination. The severity of each sign was assessed using a 5-point scale, where 0=no symptoms, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=marked, 4=very marked. The PASI score ranges from 0 to 72, where 0 indicates no psoriasis and 72 indicates very severe psoriasis. PASI75 is defined as at least a 75% reduction in PASI score compared with the Baseline PASI score. The percent reduction in score is calculated as (PASI score at Baseline - score at follow-up visit) / PASI score at Baseline \* 100. NRI was used for missing data.

Time frame:
Week 16
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving 75% Improvement in PASI Score (PASI75) at Week 16
percentage of participantsFumadermRisankizumab
Percentage of Participants Achieving 75% Improvement in PASI Score (PASI75) at Week 1626.793.3
Statistical analysis
  • Fumaderm vs Risankizumab · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = < 0.001 · Adjusted percentage difference: 66.6 · 95% CI 53.8 to 79.5
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving 75% Improvement in PASI Score (PASI75) at Week 20

PASI is a composite score based on the degree of effect on body surface area of psoriasis and the extension of erythema (reddening), induration (thickness), desquamation (scaling) of the lesions and area affected as observed on the day of examination. The severity of each sign was assessed using a 5-point scale, where 0=no symptoms, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=marked, 4=very marked. The PASI score ranges from 0 to 72, where 0 indicates no psoriasis and 72 indicates very severe psoriasis. PASI75 is defined as at least a 75% reduction in PASI score compared with the Baseline PASI score. The percent reduction in score is calculated as (PASI score at Baseline - score at follow-up visit) / PASI score at Baseline \* 100. NRI was used for missing data.

Time frame:
Week 20
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving 75% Improvement in PASI Score (PASI75) at Week 20
percentage of participantsFumadermRisankizumab
Percentage of Participants Achieving 75% Improvement in PASI Score (PASI75) at Week 2038.395.0
Statistical analysis
  • Fumaderm vs Risankizumab · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = < 0.001 · Adjusted percentage difference: 56.5 · 95% CI 43.0 to 70.0
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving 75% Improvement in PASI Score (PASI75) at Week 24

PASI is a composite score based on the degree of effect on body surface area of psoriasis and the extension of erythema (reddening), induration (thickness), desquamation (scaling) of the lesions and area affected as observed on the day of examination. The severity of each sign was assessed using a 5-point scale, where 0=no symptoms, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=marked, 4=very marked. The PASI score ranges from 0 to 72, where 0 indicates no psoriasis and 72 indicates very severe psoriasis. PASI75 is defined as at least a 75% reduction in PASI score compared with the Baseline PASI score. The percent reduction in score is calculated as (PASI score at Baseline - score at follow-up visit) / PASI score at Baseline \* 100. NRI was used for missing data.

Time frame:
Week 24
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving 75% Improvement in PASI Score (PASI75) at Week 24
percentage of participantsFumadermRisankizumab
Percentage of Participants Achieving 75% Improvement in PASI Score (PASI75) at Week 2433.398.3
Statistical analysis
  • Fumaderm vs Risankizumab · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = < 0.001 · Adjusted percentage difference: 64.8 · 95% CI 52.5 to 77.2
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving 90% Improvement in PASI Score (PASI90) at Week 4

PASI is a composite score based on the degree of effect on body surface area of psoriasis and the extension of erythema (reddening), induration (thickness), desquamation (scaling) of the lesions and area affected as observed on the day of examination. The severity of each sign was assessed using a 5-point scale, where 0=no symptoms, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=marked, 4=very marked. The PASI score ranges from 0 to 72, where 0 indicates no psoriasis and 72 indicates very severe psoriasis. PASI90 is defined as at least a 90% reduction in PASI score compared with the Baseline PASI score. The percent reduction in score is calculated as (PASI score at Baseline - score at follow-up visit) / PASI score at Baseline \* 100. NRI was used for missing data.

Time frame:
Week 4
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving 90% Improvement in PASI Score (PASI90) at Week 4
percentage of participantsFumadermRisankizumab
Percentage of Participants Achieving 90% Improvement in PASI Score (PASI90) at Week 401.7
Statistical analysis
  • Fumaderm vs Risankizumab · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.392 · Adjusted percentage difference: 1.7 · 95% CI -2.1 to 5.4
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving 90% Improvement in PASI Score (PASI90) at Week 8

PASI is a composite score based on the degree of effect on body surface area of psoriasis and the extension of erythema (reddening), induration (thickness), desquamation (scaling) of the lesions and area affected as observed on the day of examination. The severity of each sign was assessed using a 5-point scale, where 0=no symptoms, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=marked, 4=very marked. The PASI score ranges from 0 to 72, where 0 indicates no psoriasis and 72 indicates very severe psoriasis. PASI90 is defined as at least a 90% reduction in PASI score compared with the Baseline PASI score. The percent reduction in score is calculated as (PASI score at Baseline - score at follow-up visit) / PASI score at Baseline \* 100. NRI was used for missing data.

Time frame:
Week 8
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving 90% Improvement in PASI Score (PASI90) at Week 8
percentage of participantsFumadermRisankizumab
Percentage of Participants Achieving 90% Improvement in PASI Score (PASI90) at Week 81.738.3
Statistical analysis
  • Fumaderm vs Risankizumab · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = < 0.001 · Adjusted percentage difference: 36.6 · 95% CI 23.8 to 49.3
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving 90% Improvement in PASI Score (PASI90) at Week 12

PASI is a composite score based on the degree of effect on body surface area of psoriasis and the extension of erythema (reddening), induration (thickness), desquamation (scaling) of the lesions and area affected as observed on the day of examination. The severity of each sign was assessed using a 5-point scale, where 0=no symptoms, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=marked, 4=very marked. The PASI score ranges from 0 to 72, where 0 indicates no psoriasis and 72 indicates very severe psoriasis. PASI90 is defined as at least a 90% reduction in PASI score compared with the Baseline PASI score. The percent reduction in score is calculated as (PASI score at Baseline - score at follow-up visit) / PASI score at Baseline \* 100. NRI was used for missing data.

Time frame:
Week 12
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving 90% Improvement in PASI Score (PASI90) at Week 12
percentage of participantsFumadermRisankizumab
Percentage of Participants Achieving 90% Improvement in PASI Score (PASI90) at Week 125.061.7
Statistical analysis
  • Fumaderm vs Risankizumab · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = < 0.001 · Adjusted percentage difference: 56.6 · 95% CI 43.2 to 70.0
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving 90% Improvement in PASI Score (PASI90) at Week 16

PASI is a composite score based on the degree of effect on body surface area of psoriasis and the extension of erythema (reddening), induration (thickness), desquamation (scaling) of the lesions and area affected as observed on the day of examination. The severity of each sign was assessed using a 5-point scale, where 0=no symptoms, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=marked, 4=very marked. The PASI score ranges from 0 to 72, where 0 indicates no psoriasis and 72 indicates very severe psoriasis. PASI90 is defined as at least a 90% reduction in PASI score compared with the Baseline PASI score. The percent reduction in score is calculated as (PASI score at Baseline - score at follow-up visit) / PASI score at Baseline \* 100. NRI was used for missing data.

Time frame:
Week 16
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving 90% Improvement in PASI Score (PASI90) at Week 16
percentage of participantsFumadermRisankizumab
Percentage of Participants Achieving 90% Improvement in PASI Score (PASI90) at Week 1611.776.7
Statistical analysis
  • Fumaderm vs Risankizumab · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = < 0.001 · Adjusted percentage difference: 64.9 · 95% CI 51.5 to 78.3
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving 90% Improvement in PASI Score (PASI90) at Week 20

PASI is a composite score based on the degree of effect on body surface area of psoriasis and the extension of erythema (reddening), induration (thickness), desquamation (scaling) of the lesions and area affected as observed on the day of examination. The severity of each sign was assessed using a 5-point scale, where 0=no symptoms, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=marked, 4=very marked. The PASI score ranges from 0 to 72, where 0 indicates no psoriasis and 72 indicates very severe psoriasis. PASI90 is defined as at least a 90% reduction in PASI score compared with the Baseline PASI score. The percent reduction in score is calculated as (PASI score at Baseline - score at follow-up visit) / PASI score at Baseline \* 100. NRI was used for missing data.

Time frame:
Week 20
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving 90% Improvement in PASI Score (PASI90) at Week 20
percentage of participantsFumadermRisankizumab
Percentage of Participants Achieving 90% Improvement in PASI Score (PASI90) at Week 2016.783.3
Statistical analysis
  • Fumaderm vs Risankizumab · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = < 0.001 · Adjusted percentage difference: 66.6 · 95% CI 53.3 to 79.8
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving 100% Improvement in PASI (PASI100) at Week 4

PASI is a composite score based on the degree of effect on body surface area of psoriasis and the extension of erythema (reddening), induration (thickness), desquamation (scaling) of the lesions and area affected as observed on the day of examination. The severity of each sign was assessed using a 5-point scale, where 0=no symptoms, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=marked, 4=very marked. The PASI score ranges from 0 to 72, where 0 indicates no psoriasis and 72 indicates very severe psoriasis. PASI100 is defined as 100% reduction in PASI score compared with the Baseline PASI score. The percent reduction in score is calculated as (PASI score at Baseline - score at follow-up visit) / PASI score at Baseline \* 100. NRI was used for missing data.

Time frame:
Week 4
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving 100% Improvement in PASI (PASI100) at Week 4
percentage of participantsFumadermRisankizumab
Percentage of Participants Achieving 100% Improvement in PASI (PASI100) at Week 400
Statistical analysis
  • Fumaderm vs Risankizumab · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.991 · Adjusted percentage difference: 0.0 · 95% CI -2.0 to 2.1
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving 100% Improvement in PASI (PASI100) at Week 8

PASI is a composite score based on the degree of effect on body surface area of psoriasis and the extension of erythema (reddening), induration (thickness), desquamation (scaling) of the lesions and area affected as observed on the day of examination. The severity of each sign was assessed using a 5-point scale, where 0=no symptoms, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=marked, 4=very marked. The PASI score ranges from 0 to 72, where 0 indicates no psoriasis and 72 indicates very severe psoriasis. PASI100 is defined as 100% reduction in PASI score compared with the Baseline PASI score. The percent reduction in score is calculated as (PASI score at Baseline - score at follow-up visit) / PASI score at Baseline \* 100. NRI was used for missing data.

Time frame:
Week 8
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving 100% Improvement in PASI (PASI100) at Week 8
percentage of participantsFumadermRisankizumab
Percentage of Participants Achieving 100% Improvement in PASI (PASI100) at Week 81.75.0
Statistical analysis
  • Fumaderm vs Risankizumab · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.323 · Adjusted percentage difference: 3.3 · 95% CI -3.2 to 9.8
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving 100% Improvement in PASI (PASI100) at Week 12

PASI is a composite score based on the degree of effect on body surface area of psoriasis and the extension of erythema (reddening), induration (thickness), desquamation (scaling) of the lesions and area affected as observed on the day of examination. The severity of each sign was assessed using a 5-point scale, where 0=no symptoms, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=marked, 4=very marked. The PASI score ranges from 0 to 72, where 0 indicates no psoriasis and 72 indicates very severe psoriasis. PASI100 is defined as 100% reduction in PASI score compared with the Baseline PASI score. The percent reduction in score is calculated as (PASI score at Baseline - score at follow-up visit) / PASI score at Baseline \* 100. NRI was used for missing data.

Time frame:
Week 12
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving 100% Improvement in PASI (PASI100) at Week 12
percentage of participantsFumadermRisankizumab
Percentage of Participants Achieving 100% Improvement in PASI (PASI100) at Week 121.723.3
Statistical analysis
  • Fumaderm vs Risankizumab · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = < 0.001 · Adjusted percentage difference: 21.5 · 95% CI 10.4 to 32.6
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving 100% Improvement in PASI (PASI100) at Week 16

PASI is a composite score based on the degree of effect on body surface area of psoriasis and the extension of erythema (reddening), induration (thickness), desquamation (scaling) of the lesions and area affected as observed on the day of examination. The severity of each sign was assessed using a 5-point scale, where 0=no symptoms, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=marked, 4=very marked. The PASI score ranges from 0 to 72, where 0 indicates no psoriasis and 72 indicates very severe psoriasis. PASI100 is defined as 100% reduction in PASI score compared with the Baseline PASI score. The percent reduction in score is calculated as (PASI score at Baseline - score at follow-up visit) / PASI score at Baseline \* 100. NRI was used for missing data.

Time frame:
Week 16
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving 100% Improvement in PASI (PASI100) at Week 16
percentage of participantsFumadermRisankizumab
Percentage of Participants Achieving 100% Improvement in PASI (PASI100) at Week 161.735.0
Statistical analysis
  • Fumaderm vs Risankizumab · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = < 0.001 · Adjusted percentage difference: 33.1 · 95% CI 20.7 to 45.5
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving 100% Improvement in PASI (PASI100) at Week 20

PASI is a composite score based on the degree of effect on body surface area of psoriasis and the extension of erythema (reddening), induration (thickness), desquamation (scaling) of the lesions and area affected as observed on the day of examination. The severity of each sign was assessed using a 5-point scale, where 0=no symptoms, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=marked, 4=very marked. The PASI score ranges from 0 to 72, where 0 indicates no psoriasis and 72 indicates very severe psoriasis. PASI100 is defined as 100% reduction in PASI score compared with the Baseline PASI score. The percent reduction in score is calculated as (PASI score at Baseline - score at follow-up visit) / PASI score at Baseline \* 100. NRI was used for missing data.

Time frame:
Week 20
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving 100% Improvement in PASI (PASI100) at Week 20
percentage of participantsFumadermRisankizumab
Percentage of Participants Achieving 100% Improvement in PASI (PASI100) at Week 206.748.3
Statistical analysis
  • Fumaderm vs Risankizumab · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = < 0.001 · Adjusted percentage difference: 41.3 · 95% CI 27.3 to 55.3
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving 100% Improvement in PASI (PASI100) at Week 24

PASI is a composite score based on the degree of effect on body surface area of psoriasis and the extension of erythema (reddening), induration (thickness), desquamation (scaling) of the lesions and area affected as observed on the day of examination. The severity of each sign was assessed using a 5-point scale, where 0=no symptoms, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=marked, 4=very marked. The PASI score ranges from 0 to 72, where 0 indicates no psoriasis and 72 indicates very severe psoriasis. PASI100 is defined as 100% reduction in PASI score compared with the Baseline PASI score. The percent reduction in score is calculated as (PASI score at Baseline - score at follow-up visit) / PASI score at Baseline \* 100. NRI was used for missing data.

Time frame:
Week 24
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving 100% Improvement in PASI (PASI100) at Week 24
percentage of participantsFumadermRisankizumab
Percentage of Participants Achieving 100% Improvement in PASI (PASI100) at Week 245.050.0
Statistical analysis
  • Fumaderm vs Risankizumab · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = < 0.001 · Adjusted percentage difference: 44.7 · 95% CI 30.9 to 58.5
SecondaryPsoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI): Change From Baseline to Week 4

PASI is a composite score based on the degree of effect on body surface area of psoriasis and the extension of erythema (reddening), induration (thickness), desquamation (scaling) of the lesions and area affected as observed on the day of examination. The severity of each sign was assessed using a 5-point scale, where 0=no symptoms, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=marked, 4=very marked. The PASI score ranges from 0 to 72, where 0 indicates no psoriasis and 72 indicates very severe psoriasis. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) imputation was used for missing data.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 4
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI): Change From Baseline to Week 4
units on a scaleFumadermRisankizumab
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI): Change From Baseline to Week 4-2.37 ± 0.669-9.56 ± 0.673
Statistical analysis
  • Fumaderm vs Risankizumab · ANCOVA · p = < 0.001 · Least squares mean difference: -7.19 · 95% CI -8.82 to -5.56
SecondaryPASI: Change From Baseline to Week 8

PASI is a composite score based on the degree of effect on body surface area of psoriasis and the extension of erythema (reddening), induration (thickness), desquamation (scaling) of the lesions and area affected as observed on the day of examination. The severity of each sign was assessed using a 5-point scale, where 0=no symptoms, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=marked, 4=very marked. The PASI score ranges from 0 to 72, where 0 indicates no psoriasis and 72 indicates very severe psoriasis. LOCF imputation was used for missing data.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 8
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
PASI: Change From Baseline to Week 8
units on a scaleFumadermRisankizumab
PASI: Change From Baseline to Week 8-5.61 ± 0.759-15.18 ± 0.763
Statistical analysis
  • Fumaderm vs Risankizumab · ANCOVA · p = < 0.001 · Least squares mean difference: -9.58 · 95% CI -11.43 to -7.72
SecondaryPASI: Change From Baseline to Week 12

PASI is a composite score based on the degree of effect on body surface area of psoriasis and the extension of erythema (reddening), induration (thickness), desquamation (scaling) of the lesions and area affected as observed on the day of examination. The severity of each sign was assessed using a 5-point scale, where 0=no symptoms, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=marked, 4=very marked. The PASI score ranges from 0 to 72, where 0 indicates no psoriasis and 72 indicates very severe psoriasis. LOCF imputation was used for missing data.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
PASI: Change From Baseline to Week 12
units on a scaleFumadermRisankizumab
PASI: Change From Baseline to Week 12-7.69 ± 0.788-16.49 ± 0.793
Statistical analysis
  • Fumaderm vs Risankizumab · ANCOVA · p = < 0.001 · Least squares mean difference: -8.80 · 95% CI -10.72 to -6.87
SecondaryPASI: Change From Baseline to Week 16

PASI is a composite score based on the degree of effect on body surface area of psoriasis and the extension of erythema (reddening), induration (thickness), desquamation (scaling) of the lesions and area affected as observed on the day of examination. The severity of each sign was assessed using a 5-point scale, where 0=no symptoms, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=marked, 4=very marked. The PASI score ranges from 0 to 72, where 0 indicates no psoriasis and 72 indicates very severe psoriasis. LOCF imputation was used for missing data.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 16
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
PASI: Change From Baseline to Week 16
units on a scaleFumadermRisankizumab
PASI: Change From Baseline to Week 16-9.11 ± 0.777-16.89 ± 0.782
Statistical analysis
  • Fumaderm vs Risankizumab · ANCOVA · p = < 0.001 · Least squares mean difference: -7.78 · 95% CI -9.68 to -5.88
SecondaryPASI: Change From Baseline to Week 20

PASI is a composite score based on the degree of effect on body surface area of psoriasis and the extension of erythema (reddening), induration (thickness), desquamation (scaling) of the lesions and area affected as observed on the day of examination. The severity of each sign was assessed using a 5-point scale, where 0=no symptoms, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=marked, 4=very marked. The PASI score ranges from 0 to 72, where 0 indicates no psoriasis and 72 indicates very severe psoriasis. LOCF imputation was used for missing data.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 20
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
PASI: Change From Baseline to Week 20
units on a scaleFumadermRisankizumab
PASI: Change From Baseline to Week 20-9.46 ± 0.894-17.35 ± 0.899
Statistical analysis
  • Fumaderm vs Risankizumab · ANCOVA · p = < 0.001 · Least squares mean difference: -7.89 · 95% CI -10.07 to -5.71
SecondaryPASI: Change From Baseline to Week 24

PASI is a composite score based on the degree of effect on body surface area of psoriasis and the extension of erythema (reddening), induration (thickness), desquamation (scaling) of the lesions and area affected as observed on the day of examination. The severity of each sign was assessed using a 5-point scale, where 0=no symptoms, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=marked, 4=very marked. The PASI score ranges from 0 to 72, where 0 indicates no psoriasis and 72 indicates very severe psoriasis. LOCF imputation was used for missing data.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 24
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
PASI: Change From Baseline to Week 24
units on a scaleFumadermRisankizumab
PASI: Change From Baseline to Week 24-9.31 ± 0.953-17.69 ± 0.959
Statistical analysis
  • Fumaderm vs Risankizumab · ANCOVA · p = < 0.001 · Least squares mean difference: -8.39 · 95% CI -10.71 to -6.06
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving Static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) Score of Clear or Almost Clear at Week 4

The sPGA is an assessment by the investigator of the overall disease severity at the time of evaluation. Erythema (E), induration (I), and desquamation (D) are scored on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (none) to 4 (severe). The sPGA ranges from 0 to 4, and is calculated as Clear (0) = 0 for all three; Almost clear (1) = mean \>0, \<1.5; Mild (2) = mean ≥1.5, \<2.5; Moderate (3) = mean ≥2.5, \<3.5; and Severe (4) = mean ≥3.5. NRI was used for missing data.

Time frame:
Week 4
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving Static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) Score of Clear or Almost Clear at Week 4
percentage of participantsFumadermRisankizumab
Percentage of Participants Achieving Static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) Score of Clear or Almost Clear at Week 43.333.3
Statistical analysis
  • Fumaderm vs Risankizumab · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = < 0.001 · Adjusted percentage difference: 29.7 · 95% CI 17.1 to 42.4
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving sPGA Score of Clear or Almost Clear at Week 8

The sPGA is an assessment by the investigator of the overall disease severity at the time of evaluation. Erythema (E), induration (I), and desquamation (D) are scored on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (none) to 4 (severe). The sPGA ranges from 0 to 4, and is calculated as Clear (0) = 0 for all three; Almost clear (1) = mean \>0, \<1.5; Mild (2) = mean ≥1.5, \<2.5; Moderate (3) = mean ≥2.5, \<3.5; and Severe (4) = mean ≥3.5. NRI was used for missing data.

Time frame:
Week 8
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving sPGA Score of Clear or Almost Clear at Week 8
percentage of participantsFumadermRisankizumab
Percentage of Participants Achieving sPGA Score of Clear or Almost Clear at Week 815.081.7
Statistical analysis
  • Fumaderm vs Risankizumab · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = < 0.001 · Adjusted percentage difference: 66.7 · 95% CI 53.4 to 80.0
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving sPGA Score of Clear or Almost Clear at Week 12

The sPGA is an assessment by the investigator of the overall disease severity at the time of evaluation. Erythema (E), induration (I), and desquamation (D) are scored on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (none) to 4 (severe). The sPGA ranges from 0 to 4, and is calculated as Clear (0) = 0 for all three; Almost clear (1) = mean \>0, \<1.5; Mild (2) = mean ≥1.5, \<2.5; Moderate (3) = mean ≥2.5, \<3.5; and Severe (4) = mean ≥3.5. NRI was used for missing data.

Time frame:
Week 12
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving sPGA Score of Clear or Almost Clear at Week 12
percentage of participantsFumadermRisankizumab
Percentage of Participants Achieving sPGA Score of Clear or Almost Clear at Week 1233.390.0
Statistical analysis
  • Fumaderm vs Risankizumab · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = < 0.001 · Adjusted percentage difference: 56.8 · 95% CI 42.7 to 70.8
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving sPGA Score of Clear or Almost Clear at Week 16

The sPGA is an assessment by the investigator of the overall disease severity at the time of evaluation. Erythema (E), induration (I), and desquamation (D) are scored on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (none) to 4 (severe). The sPGA ranges from 0 to 4, and is calculated as Clear (0) = 0 for all three; Almost clear (1) = mean \>0, \<1.5; Mild (2) = mean ≥1.5, \<2.5; Moderate (3) = mean ≥2.5, \<3.5; and Severe (4) = mean ≥3.5. NRI was used for missing data.

Time frame:
Week 16
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving sPGA Score of Clear or Almost Clear at Week 16
percentage of participantsFumadermRisankizumab
Percentage of Participants Achieving sPGA Score of Clear or Almost Clear at Week 1631.791.7
Statistical analysis
  • Fumaderm vs Risankizumab · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = < 0.001 · Adjusted percentage difference: 59.9 · 95% CI 46.3 to 73.6
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving sPGA Score of Clear or Almost Clear at Week 20

The sPGA is an assessment by the investigator of the overall disease severity at the time of evaluation. Erythema (E), induration (I), and desquamation (D) are scored on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (none) to 4 (severe). The sPGA ranges from 0 to 4, and is calculated as Clear (0) = 0 for all three; Almost clear (1) = mean \>0, \<1.5; Mild (2) = mean ≥1.5, \<2.5; Moderate (3) = mean ≥2.5, \<3.5; and Severe (4) = mean ≥3.5. NRI was used for missing data.

Time frame:
Week 20
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving sPGA Score of Clear or Almost Clear at Week 20
percentage of participantsFumadermRisankizumab
Percentage of Participants Achieving sPGA Score of Clear or Almost Clear at Week 2048.393.3
Statistical analysis
  • Fumaderm vs Risankizumab · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = < 0.001 · Adjusted percentage difference: 44.9 · 95% CI 30.8 to 59.1
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving sPGA Score of Clear or Almost Clear at Week 24

The sPGA is an assessment by the investigator of the overall disease severity at the time of evaluation. Erythema (E), induration (I), and desquamation (D) are scored on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (none) to 4 (severe). The sPGA ranges from 0 to 4, and is calculated as Clear (0) = 0 for all three; Almost clear (1) = mean \>0, \<1.5; Mild (2) = mean ≥1.5, \<2.5; Moderate (3) = mean ≥2.5, \<3.5; and Severe (4) = mean ≥3.5. NRI was used for missing data.

Time frame:
Week 24
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving sPGA Score of Clear or Almost Clear at Week 24
percentage of participantsFumadermRisankizumab
Percentage of Participants Achieving sPGA Score of Clear or Almost Clear at Week 2438.393.3
Statistical analysis
  • Fumaderm vs Risankizumab · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = < 0.001 · Adjusted percentage difference: 55.0 · 95% CI 41.2 to 68.8
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving sPGA Score of Clear at Week 4

The sPGA is an assessment by the investigator of the overall disease severity at the time of evaluation. Erythema (E), induration (I), and desquamation (D) are scored on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (none) to 4 (severe). The sPGA ranges from 0 to 4, and is calculated as Clear (0) = 0 for all three; Almost clear (1) = mean \>0, \<1.5; Mild (2) = mean ≥1.5, \<2.5; Moderate (3) = mean ≥2.5, \<3.5; and Severe (4) = mean ≥3.5. NRI was used for missing data.

Time frame:
Week 4
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving sPGA Score of Clear at Week 4
percentage of participantsFumadermRisankizumab
Percentage of Participants Achieving sPGA Score of Clear at Week 401.7
Statistical analysis
  • Fumaderm vs Risankizumab · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.392 · Adjusted percentage difference: 1.7 · 95% CI -2.1 to 5.4
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving sPGA Score of Clear at Week 8

The sPGA is an assessment by the investigator of the overall disease severity at the time of evaluation. Erythema (E), induration (I), and desquamation (D) are scored on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (none) to 4 (severe). The sPGA ranges from 0 to 4, and is calculated as Clear (0) = 0 for all three; Almost clear (1) = mean \>0, \<1.5; Mild (2) = mean ≥1.5, \<2.5; Moderate (3) = mean ≥2.5, \<3.5; and Severe (4) = mean ≥3.5. NRI was used for missing data.

Time frame:
Week 8
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving sPGA Score of Clear at Week 8
percentage of participantsFumadermRisankizumab
Percentage of Participants Achieving sPGA Score of Clear at Week 81.710.0
Statistical analysis
  • Fumaderm vs Risankizumab · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.048 · Adjusted percentage difference: 8.4 · 95% CI 0.1 to 16.7
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving sPGA Score of Clear at Week 12

The sPGA is an assessment by the investigator of the overall disease severity at the time of evaluation. Erythema (E), induration (I), and desquamation (D) are scored on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (none) to 4 (severe). The sPGA ranges from 0 to 4, and is calculated as Clear (0) = 0 for all three; Almost clear (1) = mean \>0, \<1.5; Mild (2) = mean ≥1.5, \<2.5; Moderate (3) = mean ≥2.5, \<3.5; and Severe (4) = mean ≥3.5. NRI was used for missing data.

Time frame:
Week 12
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving sPGA Score of Clear at Week 12
percentage of participantsFumadermRisankizumab
Percentage of Participants Achieving sPGA Score of Clear at Week 123.321.7
Statistical analysis
  • Fumaderm vs Risankizumab · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.001 · Adjusted percentage difference: 18.3 · 95% CI 7.1 to 29.5
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving sPGA Score of Clear at Week 16

The sPGA is an assessment by the investigator of the overall disease severity at the time of evaluation. Erythema (E), induration (I), and desquamation (D) are scored on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (none) to 4 (severe). The sPGA ranges from 0 to 4, and is calculated as Clear (0) = 0 for all three; Almost clear (1) = mean \>0, \<1.5; Mild (2) = mean ≥1.5, \<2.5; Moderate (3) = mean ≥2.5, \<3.5; and Severe (4) = mean ≥3.5. NRI was used for missing data.

Time frame:
Week 16
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving sPGA Score of Clear at Week 16
percentage of participantsFumadermRisankizumab
Percentage of Participants Achieving sPGA Score of Clear at Week 163.336.7
Statistical analysis
  • Fumaderm vs Risankizumab · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = < 0.001 · Adjusted percentage difference: 33.0 · 95% CI 20.2 to 45.9
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving sPGA Score of Clear at Week 20

The sPGA is an assessment by the investigator of the overall disease severity at the time of evaluation. Erythema (E), induration (I), and desquamation (D) are scored on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (none) to 4 (severe). The sPGA ranges from 0 to 4, and is calculated as Clear (0) = 0 for all three; Almost clear (1) = mean \>0, \<1.5; Mild (2) = mean ≥1.5, \<2.5; Moderate (3) = mean ≥2.5, \<3.5; and Severe (4) = mean ≥3.5. NRI was used for missing data.

Time frame:
Week 20
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving sPGA Score of Clear at Week 20
percentage of participantsFumadermRisankizumab
Percentage of Participants Achieving sPGA Score of Clear at Week 206.748.3
Statistical analysis
  • Fumaderm vs Risankizumab · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = < 0.001 · Adjusted percentage difference: 41.3 · 95% CI 27.3 to 55.3
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving sPGA Score of Clear at Week 24

The sPGA is an assessment by the investigator of the overall disease severity at the time of evaluation. Erythema (E), induration (I), and desquamation (D) are scored on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (none) to 4 (severe). The sPGA ranges from 0 to 4, and is calculated as Clear (0) = 0 for all three; Almost clear (1) = mean \>0, \<1.5; Mild (2) = mean ≥1.5, \<2.5; Moderate (3) = mean ≥2.5, \<3.5; and Severe (4) = mean ≥3.5. NRI was used for missing data.

Time frame:
Week 24
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving sPGA Score of Clear at Week 24
percentage of participantsFumadermRisankizumab
Percentage of Participants Achieving sPGA Score of Clear at Week 245.051.7
Statistical analysis
  • Fumaderm vs Risankizumab · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = < 0.001 · Adjusted percentage difference: 46.4 · 95% CI 32.6 to 60.1
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Psoriasis Symptoms Scale (PSS) Score of 0 at Week 16

The PSS asks the participant to rate the severity of symptoms of psoriasis in the last 24 hours (pain, redness, itching, and burning) using a 5-point Likert -type scale ranging from 0 (none) to 4 (very severe). The PSS is calculated by summing the scores of the questions and ranges from 0 to 16, where the higher the score, the greater the severity of psoriasis symptoms. NRI was used for missing data.

Time frame:
Week 16
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Psoriasis Symptoms Scale (PSS) Score of 0 at Week 16
percentage of participantsFumadermRisankizumab
Percentage of Participants With Psoriasis Symptoms Scale (PSS) Score of 0 at Week 165.025.0
Statistical analysis
  • Fumaderm vs Risankizumab · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.001 · Adjusted percentage difference: 19.8 · 95% CI 7.6 to 31.9
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With PSS Score of 0 at Week 24

The PSS asks the participant to rate the severity of symptoms of psoriasis in the last 24 hours (pain, redness, itching, and burning) using a 5-point Likert -type scale ranging from 0 (none) to 4 (very severe). The PSS is calculated by summing the scores of the questions and ranges from 0 to 16, where the higher the score, the greater the severity of psoriasis symptoms. NRI was used for missing data.

Time frame:
Week 24
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With PSS Score of 0 at Week 24
percentage of participantsFumadermRisankizumab
Percentage of Participants With PSS Score of 0 at Week 243.341.7
Statistical analysis
  • Fumaderm vs Risankizumab · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = < 0.001 · Adjusted percentage difference: 38.3 · 95% CI 25.0 to 51.5
SecondaryPSS Total Score: Change From Baseline to Week 16

The PSS asks the participant to rate the severity of symptoms of psoriasis in the last 24 hours (pain, redness, itching, and burning) using a 5-point Likert -type scale ranging from 0 (none) to 4 (very severe). The PSS is calculated by summing the scores of the questions and ranges from 0 to 16, where the higher the score, the greater the severity of psoriasis symptoms. LOCF imputation was used for missing data.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 16
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
PSS Total Score: Change From Baseline to Week 16
units on a scaleFumadermRisankizumab
PSS Total Score: Change From Baseline to Week 16-5.5 ± 0.52-8.7 ± 0.51
Statistical analysis
  • Fumaderm vs Risankizumab · van Elteren test · p = < 0.001 · Least squares mean difference: -3.2 · 95% CI -4.5 to -2.0
SecondaryPSS Total Score: Change From Baseline to Week 24

The PSS asks the participant to rate the severity of symptoms of psoriasis in the last 24 hours (pain, redness, itching, and burning) using a 5-point Likert -type scale ranging from 0 (none) to 4 (very severe). The PSS is calculated by summing the scores of the questions and ranges from 0 to 16, where the higher the score, the greater the severity of psoriasis symptoms. LOCF imputation was used for missing data.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 24
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
PSS Total Score: Change From Baseline to Week 24
units on a scaleFumadermRisankizumab
PSS Total Score: Change From Baseline to Week 24-5.6 ± 0.49-9.5 ± 0.48
Statistical analysis
  • Fumaderm vs Risankizumab · van Elteren test · p = < 0.001 · Least squares mean difference: -3.9 · 95% CI -5.1 to -2.7
SecondarySummary of Patient Benefit Index (PBI) at Week 16

The PBI is a patient-reported outcome instrument that assesses the benefit of psoriasis treatment.The PBI assessment consists of 2 steps: before treatment, every participant defines his/her treatment needs according to a standardized list (Patient Needs Questionnaire \[PNQ\]). After treatment, the participant rates the degree of benefits achieved (Patient Benefits Questionnaire \[PBQ\]). 25 items are rated on a 5-point scale with values from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very), allowing for "did not apply to me" (5) and missing. For each treatment goal the PNQ importance is derived by dividing the respective PNQ item by the sum of all PNQ items. The weighted sum of each PBQ item with its respective PNQ importance yields the PBI score. An increase in PBI indicates improvement. LOCF imputation was used for missing data.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 16
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Summary of Patient Benefit Index (PBI) at Week 16
units on a scaleFumadermRisankizumab
Summary of Patient Benefit Index (PBI) at Week 161.970 ± 1.19713.118 ± 0.8246
Statistical analysis
  • Fumaderm vs Risankizumab · ANCOVA · p = < 0.001 · Least squares mean difference: 1.146 · 95% CI 0.764 to 1.528
SecondarySummary of PBI at Week 24

The PBI is a patient-reported outcome instrument that assesses the benefit of psoriasis treatment. The PBI is a patient-reported outcome instrument that assesses the benefit of psoriasis treatment.The PBI assessment consists of 2 steps: before treatment, every participant defines his/her treatment needs according to a standardized list (PNQ). After treatment, the participant rates the degree of benefits achieved (PBQ). 25 items are rated on a 5-point scale with values from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very), allowing for "did not apply to me" (5) and missing. For each treatment goal the PNQ importance is derived by dividing the respective PNQ item by the sum of all PNQ items. The weighted sum of each PBQ item with its respective PNQ importance yields the PBI score. An increase in PBI indicates improvement. LOCF imputation was used for missing data.

Time frame:
Baseline Week 24
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Summary of PBI at Week 24
units on a scaleFumadermRisankizumab
Summary of PBI at Week 241.997 ± 1.27103.316 ± 0.7487
Statistical analysis
  • Fumaderm vs Risankizumab · ANCOVA · p = < 0.001 · Least squares mean difference: 1.320 · 95% CI 0.936 to 1.704
SecondaryClinical Severity of Nail Psoriasis (NAPPA-CLIN) Total Score: Change From Baseline to Week 16

The NAPPA-CLIN is an investigator assessment used to assess the severity of nail matrix psoriasis (leukonychia, red spots, dots, nail plate crumbling) and psoriasis of the nail bed (oil drop, splinter haemorrhage, subungual hyperkeratosis, onycholysis). NAPPA-CLIN has been developed from the Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score, a nail psoriasis-specific score, which in its original version comprises the assessment of matrix and nail bed involvement in every finger and toe by 2 criteria for each nail. The NAPPA-CLIN is a simplified version of the NAPSI which only assesses the least and the worst involved nail of both hands or both feet respectively. Thus, the NAPPA-CLIN scores for hands or feet range from 0 to 16. A higher score indicates a worse involvement. LOCF imputation was used for missing data.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 16
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Clinical Severity of Nail Psoriasis (NAPPA-CLIN) Total Score: Change From Baseline to Week 16
units on a scaleFumadermRisankizumab
Clinical Severity of Nail Psoriasis (NAPPA-CLIN) Total Score: Change From Baseline to Week 16-0.4 ± 0.51-2.7 ± 0.51
Statistical analysis
  • Fumaderm vs Risankizumab · ANCOVA · p = < 0.001 · Least squares mean difference: -2.3 · 95% CI -3.6 to -1.1
SecondaryNAPPA-CLIN Total Score: Change From Baseline to Week 24

The NAPPA-CLIN is an investigator assessment used to assess the severity of nail matrix psoriasis (leukonychia, red spots, dots, nail plate crumbling) and psoriasis of the nail bed (oil drop, splinter haemorrhage, subungual hyperkeratosis, onycholysis). NAPPA-CLIN has been developed from the NAPSI score, a nail psoriasis-specific score, which in its original version comprises the assessment of matrix and nail bed involvement in every finger and toe by 2 criteria for each nail. The NAPPA-CLIN is a simplified version of the NAPSI which only assesses the least and the worst involved nail of both hands or both feet respectively. Thus, the NAPPA-CLIN scores for hands or feet range from 0 to 16. A higher score indicates a worse involvement. LOCF imputation was used for missing data.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 24
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
NAPPA-CLIN Total Score: Change From Baseline to Week 24
units on a scaleFumadermRisankizumab
NAPPA-CLIN Total Score: Change From Baseline to Week 24-0.7 ± 0.53-3.7 ± 0.54
Statistical analysis
  • Fumaderm vs Risankizumab · ANCOVA · p = < 0.001 · Least squares mean difference: -3.0 · 95% CI -4.3 to -1.6
SecondaryPalmoplantar Psoriasis Severity Index (PPASI): Change From Baseline to Week 16

The PPASI is an assessment by the investigator that provides a numeric scoring for psoriasis affecting the hands and feet with scores ranging from 0 to 72. It is a linear combination of percent of surface area of palms and soles that are affected and the severity of erythema, induration, and desquamation. The higher the score, the greater the severity of psoriasis symptoms. LOCF imputation was used for missing data.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 16
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Palmoplantar Psoriasis Severity Index (PPASI): Change From Baseline to Week 16
units on a scaleFumadermRisankizumab
Palmoplantar Psoriasis Severity Index (PPASI): Change From Baseline to Week 16-0.76 ± 0.251-1.04 ± 0.249
Statistical analysis
  • Fumaderm vs Risankizumab · ANCOVA · p = 0.352 · Least squares mean difference: -0.29 · 95% CI -0.90 to 0.32
SecondaryPPASI: Change From Baseline to Week 24

The PPASI is an assessment by the investigator that provides a numeric scoring for psoriasis affecting the hands and feet with scores ranging from 0 to 72. It is a linear combination of percent of surface area of palms and soles that are affected and the severity of erythema, induration, and desquamation. The higher the score, the greater the severity of psoriasis symptoms. LOCF imputation was used for missing data.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 24
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
PPASI: Change From Baseline to Week 24
units on a scaleFumadermRisankizumab
PPASI: Change From Baseline to Week 24-0.87 ± 0.242-1.17 ± 0.240
Statistical analysis
  • Fumaderm vs Risankizumab · ANCOVA · p = 0.315 · Least squares mean difference: -0.30 · 95% CI -0.88 to 0.29
SecondaryBody Surface Area (BSA) Affected by Psoriasis: Change From Baseline to Week 4

BSA affected by psoriasis was measured by the physician selecting the participant's right or left hand as the measuring device. For purposes of clinical estimation, the total surface of the palm plus 5 digits was to be assumed to be approximately equivalent to 1% BSA. Measurement of the total area of involvement by the physician was aided by imagining if scattered plaques were moved so that they were next to each other and then estimated the total area involved. A decrease in BSA affected by psoriasis indicates improvement. LOCF imputation was used for missing data.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 4
Reported as:
Least squares mean · percentage estimated body surface area
Body Surface Area (BSA) Affected by Psoriasis: Change From Baseline to Week 4
percentage estimated body surface areaFumadermRisankizumab
Body Surface Area (BSA) Affected by Psoriasis: Change From Baseline to Week 4-0.3 ± 0.86-5.2 ± 0.86
Statistical analysis
  • Fumaderm vs Risankizumab · ANCOVA · p = < 0.001 · Least squares mean difference: -4.8 · 95% CI -6.9 to -2.7
SecondaryBSA Affected by Psoriasis: Change From Baseline to Week 8

BSA affected by psoriasis was measured by the physician selecting the participant's right or left hand as the measuring device. For purposes of clinical estimation, the total surface of the palm plus 5 digits was to be assumed to be approximately equivalent to 1% BSA. Measurement of the total area of involvement by the physician was aided by imagining if scattered plaques were moved so that they were next to each other and then estimated the total area involved. A decrease in BSA affected by psoriasis indicates improvement. LOCF imputation was used for missing data.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 8
Reported as:
Least squares mean · percentage estimated body surface area
BSA Affected by Psoriasis: Change From Baseline to Week 8
percentage estimated body surface areaFumadermRisankizumab
BSA Affected by Psoriasis: Change From Baseline to Week 8-3.5 ± 1.33-12.8 ± 1.33
Statistical analysis
  • Fumaderm vs Risankizumab · ANCOVA · p = < 0.001 · Least squares mean difference: -9.3 · 95% CI -12.6 to -6.1
SecondaryBSA Affected by Psoriasis: Change From Baseline to Week 12

BSA affected by psoriasis was measured by the physician selecting the participant's right or left hand as the measuring device. For purposes of clinical estimation, the total surface of the palm plus 5 digits was to be assumed to be approximately equivalent to 1% BSA. Measurement of the total area of involvement by the physician was aided by imagining if scattered plaques were moved so that they were next to each other and then estimated the total area involved. A decrease in BSA affected by psoriasis indicates improvement. LOCF imputation was used for missing data.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · percentage estimated body surface area
BSA Affected by Psoriasis: Change From Baseline to Week 12
percentage estimated body surface areaFumadermRisankizumab
BSA Affected by Psoriasis: Change From Baseline to Week 12-6.0 ± 1.22-16.2 ± 1.23
Statistical analysis
  • Fumaderm vs Risankizumab · ANCOVA · p = < 0.001 · Least squares mean difference: -10.2 · 95% CI -13.2 to -7.2
SecondaryBSA Affected by Psoriasis: Change From Baseline to Week 16

BSA affected by psoriasis was measured by the physician selecting the participant's right or left hand as the measuring device. For purposes of clinical estimation, the total surface of the palm plus 5 digits was to be assumed to be approximately equivalent to 1% BSA. Measurement of the total area of involvement by the physician was aided by imagining if scattered plaques were moved so that they were next to each other and then estimated the total area involved. A decrease in BSA affected by psoriasis indicates improvement. LOCF imputation was used for missing data.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 16
Reported as:
Least squares mean · percentage estimated body surface area
BSA Affected by Psoriasis: Change From Baseline to Week 16
percentage estimated body surface areaFumadermRisankizumab
BSA Affected by Psoriasis: Change From Baseline to Week 16-8.2 ± 1.22-18.0 ± 1.22
Statistical analysis
  • Fumaderm vs Risankizumab · ANCOVA · p = < 0.001 · Least squares mean difference: -9.8 · 95% CI -12.8 to -6.8
SecondaryBSA Affected by Psoriasis: Change From Baseline to Week 20

BSA affected by psoriasis was measured by the physician selecting the participant's right or left hand as the measuring device. For purposes of clinical estimation, the total surface of the palm plus 5 digits was to be assumed to be approximately equivalent to 1% BSA. Measurement of the total area of involvement by the physician was aided by imagining if scattered plaques were moved so that they were next to each other and then estimated the total area involved. A decrease in BSA affected by psoriasis indicates improvement. LOCF imputation was used for missing data.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 20
Reported as:
Least squares mean · percentage estimated body surface area
BSA Affected by Psoriasis: Change From Baseline to Week 20
percentage estimated body surface areaFumadermRisankizumab
BSA Affected by Psoriasis: Change From Baseline to Week 20-9.7 ± 1.13-19.3 ± 1.13
Statistical analysis
  • Fumaderm vs Risankizumab · ANCOVA · p = < 0.001 · Least squares mean difference: -9.6 · 95% CI -12.4 to -6.8
SecondaryBSA Affected by Psoriasis: Change From Baseline to Week 24

BSA affected by psoriasis was measured by the physician selecting the participant's right or left hand as the measuring device. For purposes of clinical estimation, the total surface of the palm plus 5 digits was to be assumed to be approximately equivalent to 1% BSA. Measurement of the total area of involvement by the physician was aided by imagining if scattered plaques were moved so that they were next to each other and then estimated the total area involved. A decrease in BSA affected by psoriasis indicates improvement. LOCF imputation was used for missing data.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 24
Reported as:
Least squares mean · percentage estimated body surface area
BSA Affected by Psoriasis: Change From Baseline to Week 24
percentage estimated body surface areaFumadermRisankizumab
BSA Affected by Psoriasis: Change From Baseline to Week 24-9.8 ± 1.19-19.8 ± 1.19
Statistical analysis
  • Fumaderm vs Risankizumab · ANCOVA · p = < 0.001 · Least squares mean difference: -10.0 · 95% CI -12.9 to -7.1
SecondaryShort Form Health Survey 36, Version 2 (SF-36 V2) Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score: Change From Baseline to Week 16

The SF-36 V2 Health determined participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health. Items 1-4 comprise the physical component of the SF-36. Scores on each item were summed and averaged (PCS Score; range = 0-100); a positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. LOCF imputation was used for missing data.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 16
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Short Form Health Survey 36, Version 2 (SF-36 V2) Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score: Change From Baseline to Week 16
units on a scaleFumadermRisankizumab
Short Form Health Survey 36, Version 2 (SF-36 V2) Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score: Change From Baseline to Week 162.87 ± 1.1537.36 ± 1.135
Statistical analysis
  • Fumaderm vs Risankizumab · ANCOVA · p = 0.002 · Least squares mean difference: 4.49 · 95% CI 1.74 to 7.23
SecondarySF-36 V2 PCS Score: Change From Baseline to Week 24

The SF-36 V2 Health determined participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health. Items 1-4 comprise the physical component of the SF-36. Scores on each item were summed and averaged (PCS Score; range = 0-100); a positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. LOCF imputation was used for missing data.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 24
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
SF-36 V2 PCS Score: Change From Baseline to Week 24
units on a scaleFumadermRisankizumab
SF-36 V2 PCS Score: Change From Baseline to Week 243.68 ± 1.1048.31 ± 1.083
Statistical analysis
  • Fumaderm vs Risankizumab · ANCOVA · p = < 0.001 · Least squares mean difference: 4.63 · 95% CI 2.01 to 7.25
SecondarySF-36 V2 Mental Component Summary (MCS) Score: Change From Baseline: to Week 16

The SF-36 determined participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health. Items 5-8 comprise the mental component of the SF-36. Scores on each item were summed and averaged (MCS Score; range = 0-100); a positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. LOCF imputation was used for missing data.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 16
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
SF-36 V2 Mental Component Summary (MCS) Score: Change From Baseline: to Week 16
units on a scaleFumadermRisankizumab
SF-36 V2 Mental Component Summary (MCS) Score: Change From Baseline: to Week 164.20 ± 1.49310.86 ± 1.472
Statistical analysis
  • Fumaderm vs Risankizumab · ANCOVA · p = < 0.001 · Least squares mean difference: 6.66 · 95% CI 3.11 to 10.20
SecondarySF-36 V2 MCS Score: Change From Baseline to Week 24

The SF-36 determined participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health. Items 5-8 comprise the mental component of the SF-36. Scores on each item were summed and averaged (MCS Score; range = 0-100); a positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. LOCF imputation was used for missing data.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 24
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
SF-36 V2 MCS Score: Change From Baseline to Week 24
units on a scaleFumadermRisankizumab
SF-36 V2 MCS Score: Change From Baseline to Week 243.56 ± 1.49411.41 ± 1.470
Statistical analysis
  • Fumaderm vs Risankizumab · ANCOVA · p = < 0.001 · Least squares mean difference: 7.85 · 95% CI 4.31 to 11.38
SecondaryPatient's Global Assessment (PtGA): Change From Baseline to Week 16

The PtGA is a patient-reported outcome instrument to assess the patient's assessment of disease severity. This self-reported measure is used to assess disease activity using a 4-point scale where a higher score indicates a higher level of disease activity. Disease activity is assessed from 0 ("complete disease control") to 3 ("uncontrolled disease"). LOCF imputation was used for missing data.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 16
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Patient's Global Assessment (PtGA): Change From Baseline to Week 16
units on a scaleFumadermRisankizumab
Patient's Global Assessment (PtGA): Change From Baseline to Week 16-1.0 ± 0.11-1.9 ± 0.11
Statistical analysis
  • Fumaderm vs Risankizumab · ANCOVA · p = < 0.001 · Least squares mean difference: -1.0 · 95% CI -1.2 to -0.7
SecondaryPtGA: Change From Baseline to Week 24

The PtGA is a patient-reported outcome instrument to assess the patient's assessment of disease severity. This self-reported measure is used to assess disease activity using a 4-point scale where a higher score indicates a higher level of disease activity. Disease activity is assessed from 0 ("complete disease control") to 3 ("uncontrolled disease"). LOCF imputation was used for missing data.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 24
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
PtGA: Change From Baseline to Week 24
units on a scaleFumadermRisankizumab
PtGA: Change From Baseline to Week 24-1.0 ± 0.11-2.0 ± 0.11
Statistical analysis
  • Fumaderm vs Risankizumab · ANCOVA · p = < 0.001 · Least squares mean difference: -1.0 · 95% CI -1.3 to -0.8
SecondaryHospital Anxiety & Depression Scale (HADS) Total Score-Anxiety: Change From Baseline to Week 16

The HADS was a patient-reported questionnaire used to assess the level of anxiety and depression in the setting of a hospital medical outpatient clinic. The anxiety and depression subscales each have a range from 0-21, higher scores indicated higher levels of anxiety and depression, respectively. LOCF imputation was used for missing data.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 16
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Hospital Anxiety & Depression Scale (HADS) Total Score-Anxiety: Change From Baseline to Week 16
units on a scaleFumadermRisankizumab
Hospital Anxiety & Depression Scale (HADS) Total Score-Anxiety: Change From Baseline to Week 16-2.2 ± 0.48-4.3 ± 0.47
Statistical analysis
  • Fumaderm vs Risankizumab · ANCOVA · p = < 0.001 · Least squares mean difference: -2.0 · 95% CI -3.2 to -0.9
SecondaryHADS Total Score-Anxiety: Change From Baseline to Week 24

The HADS was a patient-reported questionnaire used to assess the level of anxiety and depression in the setting of a hospital medical outpatient clinic. The anxiety and depression subscales each have a range from 0-21, higher scores indicated higher levels of anxiety and depression, respectively. LOCF imputation was used for missing data.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 24
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
HADS Total Score-Anxiety: Change From Baseline to Week 24
units on a scaleFumadermRisankizumab
HADS Total Score-Anxiety: Change From Baseline to Week 24-1.8 ± 0.49-4.0 ± 0.48
Statistical analysis
  • Fumaderm vs Risankizumab · ANCOVA · p = < 0.001 · Least squares mean difference: -2.3 · 95% CI -3.5 to -1.1
SecondaryHADS Total Score-Depression: Change From Baseline to Week 16

The HADS was a patient-reported questionnaire used to assess the level of anxiety and depression in the setting of a hospital medical outpatient clinic. The anxiety and depression subscales each have a range from 0-21, higher scores indicated higher levels of anxiety and depression, respectively. LOCF imputation was used for missing data.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 16
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
HADS Total Score-Depression: Change From Baseline to Week 16
units on a scaleFumadermRisankizumab
HADS Total Score-Depression: Change From Baseline to Week 16-1.8 ± 0.50-4.9 ± 0.50
Statistical analysis
  • Fumaderm vs Risankizumab · ANCOVA · p = < 0.001 · Least squares mean difference: -3.1 · 95% CI -4.3 to -1.9
SecondaryHADS Total Score-Depression: Change From Baseline to Week 24

The HADS was a patient-reported questionnaire used to assess the level of anxiety and depression in the setting of a hospital medical outpatient clinic. The anxiety and depression subscales each have a range from 0-21, higher scores indicated higher levels of anxiety and depression, respectively. LOCF imputation was used for missing data.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 24
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
HADS Total Score-Depression: Change From Baseline to Week 24
units on a scaleFumadermRisankizumab
HADS Total Score-Depression: Change From Baseline to Week 24-1.7 ± 0.54-4.8 ± 0.53
Statistical analysis
  • Fumaderm vs Risankizumab · ANCOVA · p = < 0.001 · Least squares mean difference: -3.1 · 95% CI -4.4 to -1.8
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score of 0 or 1 at Week 16

The DLQI is a 10-question questionnaire that asks the participant to evaluate the degree that psoriasis has affected their quality of life in the last week and includes 6 domains (symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work and school, personal relationships, and treatment). Responses to each domain are not relevant (0), not at all (0), a little (1), a lot (2), and very much (3). The DLQI is calculated by summing the scores of the questions and ranges from 1 to 30, where 0-1 = no effect on patient's life, 2-5 = small effect, 6-10 = moderate effect, 11-20 = very large effect, and 21-30 = extremely large effect on patient's life. The higher the score, the more the quality of life is impaired. A 5-point change from baseline is considered a clinically important difference. NRI was used for missing data.

Time frame:
Week 16
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score of 0 or 1 at Week 16
percentage of participantsFumadermRisankizumab
Percentage of Participants Achieving Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score of 0 or 1 at Week 1610.048.3
Statistical analysis
  • Fumaderm vs Risankizumab · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = < 0.001 · Adjusted percentage difference: 38.3 · 95% CI 23.6 to 53.1
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving DLQI Score of 0 or 1 at Week 24

The DLQI is a 10-question questionnaire that asks the participant to evaluate the degree that psoriasis has affected their quality of life in the last week and includes 6 domains (symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work and school, personal relationships, and treatment). Responses to each domain are not relevant (0), not at all (0), a little (1), a lot (2), and very much (3). The DLQI is calculated by summing the scores of the questions and ranges from 1 to 30, where 0-1 = no effect on patient's life, 2-5 = small effect, 6-10 = moderate effect, 11-20 = very large effect, and 21-30 = extremely large effect on patient's life. The higher the score, the more the quality of life is impaired. A 5-point change from baseline is considered a clinically important difference. NRI was used for missing data.

Time frame:
Week 24
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving DLQI Score of 0 or 1 at Week 24
percentage of participantsFumadermRisankizumab
Percentage of Participants Achieving DLQI Score of 0 or 1 at Week 2410.066.7
Statistical analysis
  • Fumaderm vs Risankizumab · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = < 0.001 · Adjusted percentage difference: 56.8 · 95% CI 42.7 to 70.9
SecondaryDLQI Total Score: Change From Baseline to Week 16

The DLQI is a 10-question questionnaire that asks the participant to evaluate the degree that psoriasis has affected their quality of life in the last week and includes 6 domains (symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work and school, personal relationships, and treatment). Responses to each domain are not relevant (0), not at all (0), a little (1), a lot (2), and very much (3). The DLQI is calculated by summing the scores of the questions and ranges from 1 to 30, where 0-1 = no effect on patient's life, 2-5 = small effect, 6-10 = moderate effect, 11-20 = very large effect, and 21-30 = extremely large effect on patient's life. The higher the score, the more the quality of life is impaired. A 5-point change from baseline is considered a clinically important difference. LOCF imputation was used for missing data.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 16
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
DLQI Total Score: Change From Baseline to Week 16
units on a scaleFumadermRisankizumab
DLQI Total Score: Change From Baseline to Week 16-9.7 ± 0.94-17.0 ± 0.94
Statistical analysis
  • Fumaderm vs Risankizumab · ANCOVA · p = < 0.001 · Least squares mean difference: -7.4 · 95% CI -9.6 to -5.1
SecondaryDLQI: Change From Baseline to Week 24

The DLQI is a 10-question questionnaire that asks the participant to evaluate the degree that psoriasis has affected their quality of life in the last week and includes 6 domains (symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work and school, personal relationships, and treatment). Responses to each domain are not relevant (0), not at all (0), a little (1), a lot (2), and very much (3). The DLQI is calculated by summing the scores of the questions and ranges from 1 to 30, where 0-1 = no effect on patient's life, 2-5 = small effect, 6-10 = moderate effect, 11-20 = very large effect, and 21-30 = extremely large effect on patient's life. The higher the score, the more the quality of life is impaired. A 5-point change from baseline is considered a clinically important difference. LOCF imputation was used for missing data.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 24
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
DLQI: Change From Baseline to Week 24
units on a scaleFumadermRisankizumab
DLQI: Change From Baseline to Week 24-11.2 ± 0.87-18.8 ± 0.87
Statistical analysis
  • Fumaderm vs Risankizumab · ANCOVA · p = < 0.001 · Least squares mean difference: -7.6 · 95% CI -9.7 to -5.5
SecondaryPsoriasis Scalp Severity Index (PSSI): Change From Baseline at Week 16

The physician assessed the severity of scalp psoriasis using the PSSI, which consists of an assessment of erythema, induration, and desquamation on a scale from 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) and the percentage of scalp involved on a scale from 0 (0% of scalp involved) to 6 (90-100% of scalp involved). The composite score is calculated as the sum of symptom scores multiplied by the score for the area of scalp involved. The PSSI ranges from 0 (best) to 72 (worst). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. LOCF imputation was used for missing data.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 16
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Psoriasis Scalp Severity Index (PSSI): Change From Baseline at Week 16
units on a scaleFumadermRisankizumab
Psoriasis Scalp Severity Index (PSSI): Change From Baseline at Week 16-14.6 ± 1.01-21.2 ± 1.01
Statistical analysis
  • Fumaderm vs Risankizumab · ANCOVA · p = < 0.001 · Least squares mean difference: -6.6 · 95% CI -9.0 to -4.1
SecondaryPSSI: Change From Baseline at Week 24

The physician assessed the severity of scalp psoriasis using the PSSI, which consists of an assessment of erythema, induration, and desquamation on a scale from 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) and the percentage of scalp involved on a scale from 0 (0% of scalp involved) to 6 (90-100% of scalp involved). The composite score is calculated as the sum of symptom scores multiplied by the score for the area of scalp involved. The PSSI ranges from 0 (best) to 72 (worst). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. LOCF imputation was used for missing data.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 24
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
PSSI: Change From Baseline at Week 24
units on a scaleFumadermRisankizumab
PSSI: Change From Baseline at Week 24-13.9 ± 1.25-22.0 ± 1.25
Statistical analysis
  • Fumaderm vs Risankizumab · ANCOVA · p = < 0.001 · Least squares mean difference: -8.1 · 95% CI -11.1 to -5.0
SecondaryEuropean Quality of Life 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D-5L) Total Score: Change From Baseline to Week 16

The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized non-disease specific instrument for describing and valuing health-related quality of life. The EQ-5D-5L descriptive system comprises 5 dimensions of health (mobility, self -care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) to describe the subject's current health state. Each dimension comprises 5 levels with corresponding numeric scores, where 1 indicates no problems, and 5 indicates extreme problems. A unique EQ-5D-5L health state is defined by combining the numeric level scores for each of the 5 dimensions and the total score is normalized from -0.594 to 1.000, with higher scores representing a better health state. An increase in the EQ-5D-5L total score indicates improvement. LOCF imputation was used for missing data.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 16
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D-5L) Total Score: Change From Baseline to Week 16
units on a scaleFumadermRisankizumab
European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D-5L) Total Score: Change From Baseline to Week 160.083 ± 0.01790.171 ± 0.0176
Statistical analysis
  • Fumaderm vs Risankizumab · ANCOVA · p = < 0.001 · Least squares mean difference: 0.087 · 95% CI 0.045 to 0.130
SecondaryEQ-5D-5L Total Score: Change From Baseline to Week 24

The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized non-disease specific instrument for describing and valuing health-related quality of life. The EQ-5D-5L descriptive system comprises 5 dimensions of health (mobility, self -care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) to describe the subject's current health state. Each dimension comprises 5 levels with corresponding numeric scores, where 1 indicates no problems, and 5 indicates extreme problems. A unique EQ-5D-5L health state is defined by combining the numeric level scores for each of the 5 dimensions and the total score is normalized from -0.594 to 1.000, with higher scores representing a better health state. An increase in the EQ-5D-5L total score indicates improvement. LOCF imputation was used for missing data.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 24
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
EQ-5D-5L Total Score: Change From Baseline to Week 24
units on a scaleFumadermRisankizumab
EQ-5D-5L Total Score: Change From Baseline to Week 240.106 ± 0.01550.165 ± 0.0152
Statistical analysis
  • Fumaderm vs Risankizumab · ANCOVA · p = 0.002 · Least squares mean difference: 0.059 · 95% CI 0.022 to 0.096
SecondaryEQ-5D-5L Visual Analog Scale (VAS): Change From Baseline to Week 16

The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized non-disease specific instrument for describing and valuing health-related quality of life. The EQ-5D-5L VAS records the participant's self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale numbered from 100 (best health imagined) to 0 (worst health imagined). The VAS score from the scale is then entered as a number by the participant. This can be used as a quantitative measure of health outcome that reflects the participant's own judgement. An increase in the EQ-5D-5L VAS score indicates improvement. LOCF imputation was used for missing data.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 16
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
EQ-5D-5L Visual Analog Scale (VAS): Change From Baseline to Week 16
units on a scaleFumadermRisankizumab
EQ-5D-5L Visual Analog Scale (VAS): Change From Baseline to Week 1611.0 ± 2.3226.0 ± 2.28
Statistical analysis
  • Fumaderm vs Risankizumab · ANCOVA · p = < 0.001 · Least squares mean difference: 14.9 · 95% CI 9.4 to 20.5
SecondaryEQ-5D-5L VAS: Change From Baseline to Week 24

The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized non-disease specific instrument for describing and valuing health-related quality of life. The EQ-5D-5L VAS records the participant's self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale numbered from 100 (best health imagined) to 0 (worst health imagined). The VAS score from the scale is then entered as a number by the participant. This can be used as a quantitative measure of health outcome that reflects the participant's own judgement. An increase in the EQ-5D-5L VAS score indicates improvement. LOCF imputation was used for missing data.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 24
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
EQ-5D-5L VAS: Change From Baseline to Week 24
units on a scaleFumadermRisankizumab
EQ-5D-5L VAS: Change From Baseline to Week 2411.6 ± 2.2928.4 ± 2.23
Statistical analysis
  • Fumaderm vs Risankizumab · ANCOVA · p = < 0.001 · Least squares mean difference: 16.8 · 95% CI 11.4 to 22.2
SecondaryNail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI): Change From Baseline to Week 16

The NAPSI score is calculated by summing the scores of all the nails which for each nail are the sum of the nail matrix score and nail bed score. Each of these is scored as 0=none, 1=present in 1/4 nail, 2=present in 2/4 nail, 3=present in 3/4 nail, 4=present in 4/4 nail. Each nail has a matrix score (0-4) and a nail bed score (0-4). The total nail score is the sum of those 2 (nail matrix and nail bed) individual scores (0-8). The sum of the total score of all involved fingernails is then the total NAPSI score. The NAPSI score is calculated only if all questions in the case report form are completed. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. LOCF imputation was used for missing data.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 16
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI): Change From Baseline to Week 16
units on a scaleFumadermRisankizumab
Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI): Change From Baseline to Week 16-2.2 ± 2.13-13.6 ± 2.14
Statistical analysis
  • Fumaderm vs Risankizumab · ANCOVA · p = < 0.001 · Least squares mean difference: -11.4 · 95% CI -16.6 to -6.2
SecondaryNAPSI: Change From Baseline to Week 24

The NAPSI score is calculated by summing the scores of all the nails which for each nail are the sum of the nail matrix score and nail bed score. Each of these is scored as 0=none, 1=present in 1/4 nail, 2=present in 2/4 nail, 3=present in 3/4 nail, 4=present in 4/4 nail. Each nail has a matrix score (0-4) and a nail bed score (0-4). The total nail score is the sum of those 2 (nail matrix and nail bed) individual scores (0-8). The sum of the total score of all involved fingernails is then the total NAPSI score. The NAPSI score is calculated only if all questions in the case report form are completed. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. LOCF imputation was used for missing data.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 24
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
NAPSI: Change From Baseline to Week 24
units on a scaleFumadermRisankizumab
NAPSI: Change From Baseline to Week 24-4.4 ± 2.18-18.1 ± 2.19
Statistical analysis
  • Fumaderm vs Risankizumab · ANCOVA · p = < 0.001 · Least squares mean difference: -13.7 · 95% CI -19.1 to -8.4
SecondaryParticipants With Baseline NAPSI ˃0: Change From Baseline to Week 16

The NAPSI score is calculated by summing the scores of all the nails which for each nail are the sum of the nail matrix score and nail bed score. Each of these is scored as 0=none, 1=present in 1/4 nail, 2=present in 2/4 nail, 3=present in 3/4 nail, 4=present in 4/4 nail. Each nail has a matrix score (0-4) and a nail bed score (0-4). The total nail score is the sum of those 2 (nail matrix and nail bed) individual scores (0-8). The sum of the total score of all involved fingernails is then the total NAPSI score. The NAPSI score is calculated only if all questions in the case report form are completed. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. LOCF imputation was used for missing data.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 16
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Participants With Baseline NAPSI ˃0: Change From Baseline to Week 16
units on a scaleFumadermRisankizumab
Participants With Baseline NAPSI ˃0: Change From Baseline to Week 16-4.2 ± 3.11-21.4 ± 2.86
Statistical analysis
  • Fumaderm vs Risankizumab · ANCOVA · p = < 0.001 · Least squares mean difference: -17.3 · 95% CI -24.8 to -9.8
SecondaryParticipants With Baseline NAPSI ˃0: Change From Baseline to Week 24

The NAPSI score is calculated by summing the scores of all the nails which for each nail are the sum of the nail matrix score and nail bed score. Each of these is scored as 0=none, 1=present in 1/4 nail, 2=present in 2/4 nail, 3=present in 3/4 nail, 4=present in 4/4 nail. Each nail has a matrix score (0-4) and a nail bed score (0-4). The total nail score is the sum of those 2 (nail matrix and nail bed) individual scores (0-8). The sum of the total score of all involved fingernails is then the total NAPSI score. The NAPSI score is calculated only if all questions in the case report form are completed. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. LOCF imputation was used for missing data.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 24
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Participants With Baseline NAPSI ˃0: Change From Baseline to Week 24
units on a scaleFumadermRisankizumab
Participants With Baseline NAPSI ˃0: Change From Baseline to Week 24-6.0 ± 3.03-27.5 ± 2.79
Statistical analysis
  • Fumaderm vs Risankizumab · ANCOVA · p = < 0.001 · Least squares mean difference: -21.5 · 95% CI -28.8 to -14.2

Adverse events

Collected over Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious adverse events (TESAEs) were collected from first dose of study drug until 15 weeks after the last dose of risankizumab (up to 31 weeks) or until 1 week after the last dose of Fumaderm(R) (up to 25 weeks).. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Fumaderm0/57 (0%)2/57 (3.5%)54/57 (94.7%)
Risankizumab0/60 (0%)1/60 (1.7%)45/60 (75%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventFumadermRisankizumab
ObesityMetabolism and nutrition disorders1/570/60
ArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1/570/60
InfluenzaInfections and infestations0/571/60
Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/571/60
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 21
Most frequent other events
EventFumadermRisankizumab
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations26/5735/60
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders32/574/60
Abdominal pain upperGastrointestinal disorders26/571/60
FlushingVascular disorders23/570/60
Abdominal painGastrointestinal disorders11/570/60
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders9/570/60
LymphopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders8/570/60
HeadacheNervous system disorders7/575/60
PruritusSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders5/572/60
Oropharyngeal painRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders2/575/60

Baseline characteristics

Intent to Treat (ITT) analysis set: all participants who were randomized.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)FumadermRisankizumabTotal
Mean42.5 ± 12.7142.0 ± 13.7542.3 ± 13.18
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)FumadermRisankizumabTotal
Female222749
Male383371
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)FumadermRisankizumabTotal
Hispanic or Latino101
Not Hispanic or Latino5960119
Unknown or Not Reported000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)FumadermRisankizumabTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian011
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American000
White6059119
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported000
07

Study locations

23 sites
  • Universitaetsklinik Heidelberg /ID# 161014
    Heidelberg, Baden-Wuerttemberg 69120, Germany
  • Universitaetsklinikum Erlangen /ID# 161035
    Erlangen, Bayern 91054, Germany
  • Universitatsklinikum Frankfurt /ID# 161036
    Frankfurt, Hessen 60590, Germany
  • Universitatsklinikum Munster /ID# 165739
    Munster, Niedersachsen 48149, Germany
  • Johannes Wesling Klin Minden /ID# 161015
    Minden, Nordrhein-Westfalen 32429, Germany
  • CMS3 Company for Medical Study /ID# 161103
    Selters (Westerwald), Rheinland-Pfalz 56242, Germany
  • Univ Hosp Schleswig-Holstein /ID# 160995
    Kiel, Schleswig-Holstein 24105, Germany
  • Medizinisches Versorgungszentrum DermaKiel GmbH /ID# 161102
    Kiel, Schleswig-Holstein 24148, Germany
  • Charité Universitätsmedizin Campus Mitte /ID# 165621
    Berlin, 10117, Germany
  • ISA GmbH /ID# 165619
    Berlin, 10789, Germany
  • Gemeinschaftspraxis /ID# 161037
    Blankenfeld-mahlow, 15831, Germany
  • Hautzentrum Niesmann Othlingha /ID# 161034
    Bochum, 44803, Germany
  • Universitaetsklinikum Bonn /ID# 165618
    Bonn, 53113, Germany
  • Hautklinik Klinikum Darmstadt /ID# 164940
    Darmstadt, 64297, Germany
  • Universitaetklinikum Dresden /ID# 160983
    Dresden, 01307, Germany
  • Univ Klinik Eppendorf Hamburg /ID# 161038
    Hamburg, 20246, Germany
  • Tfs /Id# 160994
    Hamburg, 20354, Germany
  • Klinik fur Dermatologie /ID# 161101
    Leipzig, 4103, Germany
  • Univ Johannes Gutenberg /ID# 161104
    Mainz, 55131, Germany
  • TU Uniklinik Munchen /ID# 160996
    Munich, 80802, Germany
  • Universitatsklinikum Tubingen /ID# 165620
    Tuebingen, 72076, Germany
  • Hoffmann, Witten, DE /ID# 165622
    Witten, 58453, Germany
  • Centroderm Wuppertal /ID# 165615
    Wuppertal, 42287, Germany
08

References and documents

Related links

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Nov 28, 2017
  • Statistical analysis plan · Jan 11, 2018

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — AbbVie is committed to responsible data sharing regarding the clinical trials we sponsor. This includes access to anonymized, individual and trial-level data (analysis data sets), as well as other information (e.g., protocols and clinical study reports), as long as the trials are not part of an ongoing or planned regulatory submission. This includes requests for clinical trial data for unlicensed products and indications.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Csr, Analytic code

09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03255382
Lead sponsor
AbbVie
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 21, 2017
Start date
Aug 22, 2017
Primary completion
Jul 6, 2018
Completion
Jul 6, 2018
Results posted
Sep 13, 2019
Last update
Sep 13, 2019

Study contacts

AbbVie Inc.
study director · AbbVie

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion