An interventional study of Risk Assessment App and Audio Recording - Sleep in Healthy Volunteers, sponsored by Washington University School of Medicine. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 30 Years to 64 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-01-18.
Sponsored by Washington University School of Medicine · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention
Epidemiology seeks to improve public health by identifying risk factors for cancer and other diseases and conveying that information to relevant audiences (e.g., physicians, the public). The audience is presumed to understand and use that information to make appropriate decisions about lifestyle behaviors and medical treatments. Yet, even though a single risk factor can affect the risk of multiple health outcomes, this information is seldom communicated to people in a way that optimizes their understanding of the importance of engaging in a single healthy behavior. Providing individuals with the ability to understand how a single behavior (obtaining sufficient physical activity) could affect their risk of developing multiple diseases could foster a more coherent and meaningful picture of the behavior's importance in reducing health risks, increase motivation and intentions to engage in the behavior, and over time improve public health.
The proposed study translates epidemiological data about five diseases that cause significant morbidity and mortality (i.e., colon cancer, breast cancer (women), heart disease, diabetes, and stroke) into a visual display that conveys individualized risk estimates in a comprehensible, meaningful, and useful way to diverse lay audiences.
Exclusion Criteria:
* With help from a research assistant, participants complete the Risk Assessment App. The App asks demographic \& health questions. It then provides personalized risk estimates for participants' current activity level \& how it would change with regular exercise. * Participants take Baseline Survey 1. * Participants listen to an audio recording that guides them through a mental imagery activity. They write down an exercise goal \& are asked to practice the mental imagery twice a day for 3 weeks. * Participants take Baseline Survey 2. * Participants receive text messages reminding them to practice the mental imagery twice daily for 5 minutes each time (3 texts a week for 3 weeks). * Participants take surveys via text at the end of each week for 4 weeks. * 90 days post-baseline, participants complete a survey sent through the mail. * Participants may be contacted for another survey 1 year later.
Behavioral: Risk Assessment App · Other: Surveys · Behavioral: Audio Recording - Exercise · Other: Text message reminders · Other: Text Message Survey
* With help from a research assistant, participants complete the Risk Assessment App. The App asks demographic \& health questions. It then provides personalized risk estimates for participants' current activity level \& how it would change with regular exercise. * Participants take Baseline Survey 1. * Participants listen to an audio recording that guides them through a mental imagery activity. They write down a sleep goal \& are asked to practice the mental imagery twice a day for 3 weeks. * Participants take Baseline Survey 2. * Participants receive text messages reminding them to practice the mental imagery twice daily for 5 minutes each time (3 texts a week for 3 weeks). * Participants take surveys via text at the end of each week for 4 weeks. * 90 days post-baseline, participants complete a survey sent through the mail. * Participants may be contacted for another survey 1 year later.
Behavioral: Risk Assessment App · Behavioral: Audio Recording - Sleep · Other: Surveys · Other: Text message reminders · Other: Text Message Survey
* With help from a research assistant, participants complete the Risk Assessment App. The App asks demographic \& health questions. It then provides personalized risk estimates for participants' current activity level \& how it would change with regular exercise. * Participants take Baseline Survey 1. * Participants listen to an audio recording that guides them through a mental imagery activity. They write down an exercise goal \& are asked to practice the mental imagery twice a day for 3 weeks. * Participants take Baseline Survey 2. * Participants receive text messages reminding them to practice the mental imagery twice daily for 5 minutes each time (3 texts a week for 3 weeks). * Participants take surveys via text at the end of each week for 4 weeks. * 90 days post-baseline, participants complete a survey sent through the mail. * Participants may be contacted for another survey 1 year later.
Behavioral: Risk Assessment App · Other: Surveys · Behavioral: Audio Recording - Exercise · Other: Text message reminders · Other: Text Message Survey
* With help from a research assistant, participants complete the Risk Assessment App. The App asks demographic \& health questions. It then provides personalized risk estimates for participants' current activity level \& how it would change with regular exercise. * Participants take Baseline Survey 1. * Participants listen to an audio recording that guides them through a mental imagery activity. They write down a sleep goal \& are asked to practice the mental imagery twice a day for 3 weeks. * Participants take Baseline Survey 2. * Participants receive text messages reminding them to practice the mental imagery twice daily for 5 minutes each time (3 texts a week for 3 weeks). * Participants take surveys via text at the end of each week for 4 weeks. * 90 days post-baseline, participants complete a survey sent through the mail. * Participants may be contacted for another survey 1 year later.
Behavioral: Risk Assessment App · Behavioral: Audio Recording - Sleep · Other: Surveys · Other: Text message reminders · Other: Text Message Survey
* With help from a research assistant, participants complete the Risk Assessment App. The App asks demographic \& health questions. It then provides personalized risk estimates for participants' current activity level \& how it would change with regular exercise. * Participants take Baseline Survey 1. * Participants listen to an audio recording that guides them through a mental imagery activity. They write down an exercise goal \& are asked to practice the mental imagery twice a day for 3 weeks. * Participants take Baseline Survey 2. * Participants receive text messages reminding them to practice the mental imagery twice daily for 5 minutes each time (3 texts a week for 3 weeks). * Participants take surveys via text at the end of each week for 4 weeks. * 90 days post-baseline, participants complete a survey sent through the mail. * Participants may be contacted for another survey 1 year later.
Behavioral: Risk Assessment App · Other: Surveys · Behavioral: Audio Recording - Exercise · Other: Text message reminders · Other: Text Message Survey
* With help from a research assistant, participants complete the Risk Assessment App. The App asks demographic \& health questions. It then provides personalized risk estimates for participants' current activity level \& how it would change with regular exercise. * Participants take Baseline Survey 1. * Participants listen to an audio recording that guides them through a mental imagery activity. They write down a sleep goal \& are asked to practice the mental imagery twice a day for 3 weeks. * Participants take Baseline Survey 2. * Participants receive text messages reminding them to practice the mental imagery twice daily for 5 minutes each time (3 texts a week for 3 weeks). * Participants take surveys via text at the end of each week for 4 weeks. * 90 days post-baseline, participants complete a survey sent through the mail. * Participants may be contacted for another survey 1 year later.
Behavioral: Risk Assessment App · Behavioral: Audio Recording - Sleep · Other: Surveys · Other: Text message reminders · Other: Text Message Survey
The App provides participants with personalized risk results for colon cancer, breast cancer (women), heart disease, diabetes, and stroke.
-Participants imagine themselves improving sleep hygiene
Assesses information comprehension, intentions, perceived risk and severity worry, self- efficacy, response efficacy, affect, race, education, age, numeracy, graph literacy, and exercise and sleep behaviors.
Participants imagine themselves improving exercise
-Reminders to practice mental imagery
-Assesses exercise behavior, intentions, actions plans, self-efficacy, affect, imagery vividness, and practice.
Change From Baseline to 90-day Follow-up in Self Reported Weekly Minutes of Exercise
Time frame: Baseline and up to 90 days
Difference in Gist Comprehension of Risk Information by Risk Display Format
* Risk display format = risk ladder, table, or text * Gist comprehension of risk information: being able to extract the bottom-line meaning of information provided by the website (e.g., if exercising decreased heath risk) * Measured by the sum of (4) questions coded as correctly comprehending risk information (1 point) or incorrectly comprehending risk information (0 points), with a total score range of 0=low comprehension to 4=high comprehension. Higher comprehension is considered a better outcome. * All comprehension questions have an additional "don't know" option, which is counted as incorrect. * To limit participant burden, the investigators assessed comprehension for diabetes only, instead of all diseases as planned. * Comprehension will not be assessed for people who report a history of diabetes because they are not given risk information.
Time frame: Baseline
Difference in Verbatim Comprehension of Risk Information by Risk Communication Strategy
* Risk communication strategy = risk ladder, table, or text * Verbatim comprehension of risk information: being able to recall the exact information specific to diabetes risk and hours of recommended weekly physical activity * Measured by the sum of (3) questions coded as correctly comprehending information (1 point) or incorrectly comprehending information (0 points), with a total score range of 0=low comprehension to 3=high comprehension. Higher comprehension is considered a better outcome. * All comprehension questions have an additional "don't know" option, which is counted as incorrect. * To limit participant burden, the investigators assessed comprehension for diabetes only, instead of all diseases as planned. * Comprehension will not be assessed for people who report a history of diabetes because they are not given risk information.
Time frame: Baseline
Difference in Self-reported Intentions to Engage in Physical Activity by Risk Display Format
* Risk display format = risk ladder, table, or text * Self-reported physical activity intentions is defined as intentions to engage in physical activity in the next 3 months * Measured as an average of three variables, each measured on a 5 point Likert Scale (range: 1=lower intentions to 5=higher intentions) * Higher intentions are considered a better outcome
Time frame: Baseline
Effect of the Intervention on Physical Activity Levels as Measured by Maintenance Self-efficacy
* Maintenance Self-efficacy is defined as being sure one can engage in physical activity even when it is hard * Measured on a 4 point Likert Scale (range: 1=lower Maintenance Self-efficacy to 4=higher Maintenance Self-efficacy) * Higher maintenance self-efficacy is considered a better outcome * Note: to limit participant burden, the investigators used a single item instead of averaging across multiple items
Time frame: 90 days
Effect of the Intervention on Physical Activity Levels as Measured by Recovery Self-efficacy
* Recovery Self-efficacy is defined as being sure one can re-engage in physical activity after putting it off * Measured on a 4 point Likert Scale (range: 1=lower recovery Self-efficacy to 4=higher recovery Self-efficacy) * Higher recovery self-efficacy is considered a better outcome * Note: to limit participant burden, the investigators used a single item instead of averaging across multiple items
Time frame: 90 days
Effect of the Intervention on Physical Activity Levels as Measured by Affective Attitudes to Exercise - Enjoying Behavior
* Affective Attitudes to Exercise - Enjoying Behavior is defined as thinking getting regular exercise is enjoyable * Measured on a 4 point Likert Scale (range: 1=lower Affective Attitudes to Exercise to 4=higher Affective Attitudes to Exercise) * Higher Affective Attitudes to Exercise - Enjoying Behavior is considered a better outcome * Note: to limit participant burden, the investigators used a single item instead of averaging across multiple items
Time frame: 90 days
Effect of the Intervention on Physical Activity Levels as Measured by Affective Attitudes to Exercise - Thinking Behavior is Unpleasant
* Affective Attitudes to Exercise - Thinking Behavior is Unpleasant is defined as not thinking getting regular exercise is unpleasant * Measured on a 4 point Likert Scale (range: 1=lower Affective Attitudes to Exercise to 4=higher Affective Attitudes to Exercise) * Higher Affective Attitudes to Exercise - Thinking Behavior is Unpleasant is considered a better outcome * Note: to limit participant burden, the investigators used a single item instead of averaging across multiple items
Time frame: 90 days
Effect of the Intervention on Physical Activity Levels as Measured by Perceived Vividness of Self-regulatory Imagery
* Perceived Vividness of Self-regulatory Imagery is defined as having clear and vivid images of steps towards getting physical activity * Measured as an average of two variables measured on a 4 point Likert Scale (range: 1=lower Perceived Vividness of Self-regulatory Imagery to 4=higher Perceived Vividness of Self-regulatory Imagery) * Higher Perceived Vividness of Self-regulatory Imagery is considered a better outcome * Note: to limit participant burden, the investigators used a single item instead of averaging across multiple items
Time frame: 90 days
Effect of the Intervention on Physical Activity Levels as Measured by Action Planning
* Action planning is defined as having a detailed plan about getting adequate physical activity * Measured as an average of three variables measured on a 4 point Likert Scale (range: 1=lower action planning to 4=higher action planning) * Higher action planning is considered a better outcome * Note: to limit participant burden, the investigators used a single item instead of averaging across multiple items
Time frame: 90 days
Effect of the Intervention on Physical Activity Levels as Measured by Coping Planning
* Coping planning is defined as having a detailed plan of solving problems that may prevent getting adequate physical activity * Measured on a 4 point Likert Scale (range: 1=lower Coping Planning to 4=higher Coping Planning) * Higher coping planning is considered a better outcome * Note: to limit participant burden, the investigators used a single item instead of averaging across multiple items
Time frame: 90 days
Effect of the Intervention on Physical Activity Levels as Measured by Action Self-efficacy
* Action self-efficacy is defined as having the confidence to engage in physical activity * Measured on a 4 point Likert Scale (range: 1=lower Action Self-efficacy to 4=higher Action Self-efficacy) * Higher Action Self-efficacy is considered a better outcome * Note: to limit participant burden, the investigators used a single item instead of averaging across multiple items
Time frame: 90 days
| Milestone | Risk Display Format:Risk Ladder:Imagery Behavior:Exercise | Risk Display Format:Risk Ladder:Imagery Behavior:Sleep | Risk Display Format:Table:Imagery Behavior:Exercise | Risk Display Format:Table: Imagery Behavior:Sleep | Risk Display Format:Text:Imagery Behavior:Exercise | Risk Display Format:Text:Imagery Behavior:Sleep |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Started | 93 | 90 | 91 | 90 | 95 | 95 |
| Completed | 80 | 78 | 85 | 84 | 88 | 85 |
| Not completed | 13 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 10 |
| Withdrew: Determined to be ineligible | 10 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 10 |
| Withdrew: Baseline data collection issues | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| minutes | Risk Display Format:Risk Ladder:Imagery Behavior:Exercise | Risk Display Format:Risk Ladder:Imagery Behavior:Sleep | Risk Display Format:Table:Imagery Behavior:Exercise | Risk Display Format:Table: Imagery Behavior:Sleep | Risk Display Format:Text:Imagery Behavior:Exercise | Risk Display Format:Text:Imagery Behavior:Sleep |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline to 90-day Follow-up in Self Reported Weekly Minutes of Exercise | 92.2 ± 12.7 | 37.5 ± 13.4 | 63.1 ± 12.4 | 60.0 ± 12.9 | 50.1 ± 12.5 | 49.3 ± 13.0 |
* Risk display format = risk ladder, table, or text * Gist comprehension of risk information: being able to extract the bottom-line meaning of information provided by the website (e.g., if exercising decreased heath risk) * Measured by the sum of (4) questions coded as correctly comprehending risk information (1 point) or incorrectly comprehending risk information (0 points), with a total score range of 0=low comprehension to 4=high comprehension. Higher comprehension is considered a better outcome. * All comprehension questions have an additional "don't know" option, which is counted as incorrect. * To limit participant burden, the investigators assessed comprehension for diabetes only, instead of all diseases as planned. * Comprehension will not be assessed for people who report a history of diabetes because they are not given risk information.
| score on a scale | Risk Display Format: Risk Ladder | Risk Display Format: Table | Risk Display Format: Text |
|---|---|---|---|
| Difference in Gist Comprehension of Risk Information by Risk Display Format | 3.6 ± 0.1 | 3.4 ± 0.1 | 3.2 ± 0.1 |
* Risk communication strategy = risk ladder, table, or text * Verbatim comprehension of risk information: being able to recall the exact information specific to diabetes risk and hours of recommended weekly physical activity * Measured by the sum of (3) questions coded as correctly comprehending information (1 point) or incorrectly comprehending information (0 points), with a total score range of 0=low comprehension to 3=high comprehension. Higher comprehension is considered a better outcome. * All comprehension questions have an additional "don't know" option, which is counted as incorrect. * To limit participant burden, the investigators assessed comprehension for diabetes only, instead of all diseases as planned. * Comprehension will not be assessed for people who report a history of diabetes because they are not given risk information.
| score on a scale | Risk Display Format: Risk Ladder | Risk Display Format: Table | Risk Display Format: Text |
|---|---|---|---|
| Difference in Verbatim Comprehension of Risk Information by Risk Communication Strategy | 1.6 ± 0.1 | 1.6 ± 0.1 | 1.5 ± 0.1 |
* Risk display format = risk ladder, table, or text * Self-reported physical activity intentions is defined as intentions to engage in physical activity in the next 3 months * Measured as an average of three variables, each measured on a 5 point Likert Scale (range: 1=lower intentions to 5=higher intentions) * Higher intentions are considered a better outcome
| score on a scale | Risk Display Format: Risk Ladder | Risk Display Format: Table | Risk Display Format: Text |
|---|---|---|---|
| Difference in Self-reported Intentions to Engage in Physical Activity by Risk Display Format | 3.9 ± 0.1 | 4.0 ± 0.1 | 3.8 ± 0.1 |
* Maintenance Self-efficacy is defined as being sure one can engage in physical activity even when it is hard * Measured on a 4 point Likert Scale (range: 1=lower Maintenance Self-efficacy to 4=higher Maintenance Self-efficacy) * Higher maintenance self-efficacy is considered a better outcome * Note: to limit participant burden, the investigators used a single item instead of averaging across multiple items
| score on a scale | Mental Imagery Behavior: Exercise |
|---|---|
| Effect of the Intervention on Physical Activity Levels as Measured by Maintenance Self-efficacy | 2.95 ± 0.05 |
* Recovery Self-efficacy is defined as being sure one can re-engage in physical activity after putting it off * Measured on a 4 point Likert Scale (range: 1=lower recovery Self-efficacy to 4=higher recovery Self-efficacy) * Higher recovery self-efficacy is considered a better outcome * Note: to limit participant burden, the investigators used a single item instead of averaging across multiple items
| score on a scale | Mental Imagery Behavior: Exercise |
|---|---|
| Effect of the Intervention on Physical Activity Levels as Measured by Recovery Self-efficacy | 3.26 ± 0.05 |
* Affective Attitudes to Exercise - Enjoying Behavior is defined as thinking getting regular exercise is enjoyable * Measured on a 4 point Likert Scale (range: 1=lower Affective Attitudes to Exercise to 4=higher Affective Attitudes to Exercise) * Higher Affective Attitudes to Exercise - Enjoying Behavior is considered a better outcome * Note: to limit participant burden, the investigators used a single item instead of averaging across multiple items
| score on a scale | Mental Imagery Behavior: Exercise |
|---|---|
| Effect of the Intervention on Physical Activity Levels as Measured by Affective Attitudes to Exercise - Enjoying Behavior | 3.05 ± 0.05 |
* Affective Attitudes to Exercise - Thinking Behavior is Unpleasant is defined as not thinking getting regular exercise is unpleasant * Measured on a 4 point Likert Scale (range: 1=lower Affective Attitudes to Exercise to 4=higher Affective Attitudes to Exercise) * Higher Affective Attitudes to Exercise - Thinking Behavior is Unpleasant is considered a better outcome * Note: to limit participant burden, the investigators used a single item instead of averaging across multiple items
| score on a scale | Mental Imagery Behavior: Exercise |
|---|---|
| Effect of the Intervention on Physical Activity Levels as Measured by Affective Attitudes to Exercise - Thinking Behavior is Unpleasant | 3.19 ± 0.05 |
* Perceived Vividness of Self-regulatory Imagery is defined as having clear and vivid images of steps towards getting physical activity * Measured as an average of two variables measured on a 4 point Likert Scale (range: 1=lower Perceived Vividness of Self-regulatory Imagery to 4=higher Perceived Vividness of Self-regulatory Imagery) * Higher Perceived Vividness of Self-regulatory Imagery is considered a better outcome * Note: to limit participant burden, the investigators used a single item instead of averaging across multiple items
| score on a scale | Mental Imagery Behavior: Exercise |
|---|---|
| Effect of the Intervention on Physical Activity Levels as Measured by Perceived Vividness of Self-regulatory Imagery | 3.36 ± 0.04 |
* Action planning is defined as having a detailed plan about getting adequate physical activity * Measured as an average of three variables measured on a 4 point Likert Scale (range: 1=lower action planning to 4=higher action planning) * Higher action planning is considered a better outcome * Note: to limit participant burden, the investigators used a single item instead of averaging across multiple items
| score on a scale | Mental Imagery Behavior: Exercise |
|---|---|
| Effect of the Intervention on Physical Activity Levels as Measured by Action Planning | 3.52 ± 0.03 |
* Coping planning is defined as having a detailed plan of solving problems that may prevent getting adequate physical activity * Measured on a 4 point Likert Scale (range: 1=lower Coping Planning to 4=higher Coping Planning) * Higher coping planning is considered a better outcome * Note: to limit participant burden, the investigators used a single item instead of averaging across multiple items
| score on a scale | Mental Imagery Behavior: Exercise |
|---|---|
| Effect of the Intervention on Physical Activity Levels as Measured by Coping Planning | 2.98 ± 0.04 |
* Action self-efficacy is defined as having the confidence to engage in physical activity * Measured on a 4 point Likert Scale (range: 1=lower Action Self-efficacy to 4=higher Action Self-efficacy) * Higher Action Self-efficacy is considered a better outcome * Note: to limit participant burden, the investigators used a single item instead of averaging across multiple items
| score on a scale | Mental Imagery Behavior: Exercise |
|---|---|
| Effect of the Intervention on Physical Activity Levels as Measured by Action Self-efficacy | 3.36 ± 0.04 |
Collected over Adverse events were not collected for this study.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| Risk Display Format:Risk Ladder:Imagery Behavior:Exercise | 0/80 (0%) | — | — |
| Risk Display Format:Risk Ladder:Imagery Behavior:Sleep | 0/78 (0%) | — | — |
| Risk Display Format:Table:Imagery Behavior:Exercise | 0/85 (0%) | — | — |
| Risk Display Format:Table:Imagery Behavior:Sleep | 0/84 (0%) | — | — |
| Risk Display Format:Text:Imagery Behavior:Exercise | 0/88 (0%) | — | — |
| Risk Display Format:Text:Imagery Behavior:Sleep | 0/85 (0%) | — | — |
| Age, Continuous(years) | Risk Display Format:Risk Ladder:Imagery Behavior:Exercise | Risk Display Format:Risk Ladder:Imagery Behavior:Sleep | Risk Display Format:Table:Imagery Behavior:Exercise | Risk Display Format:Table:Imagery Behavior:Sleep | Risk Display Format:Text:Imagery Behavior:Exercise | Risk Display Format:Text:Imagery Behavior:Sleep | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 47.2 ± 9.8 | 47.3 ± 8.7 | 50.3 ± 9.9 | 49.8 ± 9.9 | 46.8 ± 10.7 | 47.2 ± 10.5 | 48.1 ± 10.0 |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | Risk Display Format:Risk Ladder:Imagery Behavior:Exercise | Risk Display Format:Risk Ladder:Imagery Behavior:Sleep | Risk Display Format:Table:Imagery Behavior:Exercise | Risk Display Format:Table:Imagery Behavior:Sleep | Risk Display Format:Text:Imagery Behavior:Exercise | Risk Display Format:Text:Imagery Behavior:Sleep | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 63 | 67 | 68 | 67 | 69 | 73 | 407 |
| Male | 17 | 11 | 17 | 17 | 19 | 12 | 93 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants) | Risk Display Format:Risk Ladder:Imagery Behavior:Exercise | Risk Display Format:Risk Ladder:Imagery Behavior:Sleep | Risk Display Format:Table:Imagery Behavior:Exercise | Risk Display Format:Table:Imagery Behavior:Sleep | Risk Display Format:Text:Imagery Behavior:Exercise | Risk Display Format:Text:Imagery Behavior:Sleep | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hispanic or Latino | 4 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 17 |
| Not Hispanic or Latino | 76 | 77 | 84 | 79 | 84 | 83 | 483 |
| Unknown or Not Reported | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants) | Risk Display Format:Risk Ladder:Imagery Behavior:Exercise | Risk Display Format:Risk Ladder:Imagery Behavior:Sleep | Risk Display Format:Table:Imagery Behavior:Exercise | Risk Display Format:Table:Imagery Behavior:Sleep | Risk Display Format:Text:Imagery Behavior:Exercise | Risk Display Format:Text:Imagery Behavior:Sleep | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| American Indian/Alaskan Native | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Asian/Pacific Islander | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 6 |
| Black/African American | 27 | 35 | 26 | 37 | 37 | 23 | 185 |
| White/Caucasian | 49 | 43 | 50 | 40 | 46 | 56 | 284 |
| Multiracial/Other | 2 | 0 | 6 | 7 | 4 | 4 | 23 |
| Region of Enrollment(participants) | Risk Display Format:Risk Ladder:Imagery Behavior:Exercise | Risk Display Format:Risk Ladder:Imagery Behavior:Sleep | Risk Display Format:Table:Imagery Behavior:Exercise | Risk Display Format:Table:Imagery Behavior:Sleep | Risk Display Format:Text:Imagery Behavior:Exercise | Risk Display Format:Text:Imagery Behavior:Sleep | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 80 | 78 | 85 | 84 | 88 | 85 | 500 |
| Vocational-technical training or less(Participants) | Risk Display Format:Risk Ladder:Imagery Behavior:Exercise | Risk Display Format:Risk Ladder:Imagery Behavior:Sleep | Risk Display Format:Table:Imagery Behavior:Exercise | Risk Display Format:Table:Imagery Behavior:Sleep | Risk Display Format:Text:Imagery Behavior:Exercise | Risk Display Format:Text:Imagery Behavior:Sleep | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Count of participants | 20 | 20 | 14 | 14 | 15 | 14 | 97 |
| Body mass index (BMI) - Obese(Participants) | Risk Display Format:Risk Ladder:Imagery Behavior:Exercise | Risk Display Format:Risk Ladder:Imagery Behavior:Sleep | Risk Display Format:Table:Imagery Behavior:Exercise | Risk Display Format:Table:Imagery Behavior:Sleep | Risk Display Format:Text:Imagery Behavior:Exercise | Risk Display Format:Text:Imagery Behavior:Sleep | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Count of participants | 38 | 32 | 46 | 52 | 48 | 42 | 258 |
| Body mass index (BMI) - Overweight(Participants) | Risk Display Format:Risk Ladder:Imagery Behavior:Exercise | Risk Display Format:Risk Ladder:Imagery Behavior:Sleep | Risk Display Format:Table:Imagery Behavior:Exercise | Risk Display Format:Table:Imagery Behavior:Sleep | Risk Display Format:Text:Imagery Behavior:Exercise | Risk Display Format:Text:Imagery Behavior:Sleep | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Count of participants | 21 | 23 | 19 | 15 | 24 | 25 | 127 |
5 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.
Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.
Plan to share: No
This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Washington University School of Medicine