ClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT03250247C-TRACTUpdated Jan 28, 2026

Chronic Venous Thrombosis: Relief With Adjunctive Catheter-Directed Therapy (The C-TRACT Trial)

An interventional study of Stents in Deep Vein Thrombosis, Venous Stasis and Venous Insufficiency, sponsored by Washington University School of Medicine. Active, not recruiting at 29 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-01-28.

Sponsored by Washington University School of Medicine · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
225
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if the use of image-guided, endovascular therapy (EVT) is an effective strategy with which to reduce Post Thrombotic Syndrome (PTS) disease severity and improve quality of life in patients with established disabling iliac-obstructive post thrombotic syndrome (DIO-PTS).

Read the detailed description

The rationale for performing the C-TRACT Trial is based upon:

  1. the debilitating life impact of DIO-PTS upon patients, as cited in the U.S. Surgeon General's 2008 Call to Action on DVT (95);
  2. the inability of existing therapies to prevent or alleviate most cases of DIO-PTS;
  3. the role of iliac vein obstruction and saphenous reflux in causing the severe manifestations of DIO-PTS;
  4. the ability of stent placement and endovenous ablation to eliminate obstruction and reflux, respectively, to reduce PTS severity, and to improve QOL in preliminary studies;
  5. the risks, costs, and uncertainties of this novel but invasive strategy;
  6. the lack of consensus on whether EVT should be used for DIO-PTS;
  7. the motivation of our established investigator team to answer this critical clinical question.

We will determine if EVT should be routinely used to treat DIO-PTS. If so, this finding will fundamentally change DIO-PTS practice towards more frequent use of EVT. If EVT proves ineffective or unsafe, this finding will reduce or eliminate the use of potentially risky and expensive procedures.

250 subjects with established DIO-PTS will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either EVT or No-EVT treatment groups. All participants will receive standard PTS therapy. Subjects will be enrolled over approximately 36 months in 20-40 U.S. Participants enrolled in C-TRACT protocol versions prior to 5.0 will be followed for 24 months. Subjects enrolled on protocol version 5.0 or after will be followed for 6 months. The study will take approximately 6 years to complete.

02

Conditions studied

  • Deep Vein Thrombosis
  • Venous Stasis
  • Venous Insufficiency
  • Venous Leg Ulcer
  • Venous Reflux
  • Post Thrombotic Syndrome

Keywords

  • deep vein thrombosis
  • superficial venous reflux
  • blood clot
  • post thrombotic syndrome
  • iliac vein obstruction
03

In context

Venous Thrombosis

785 studies on the registry are indexed under Venous Thrombosis; 110 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 225 is above the median of 152 across 477 interventional studies indexed under Venous Thrombosis.

Browse Venous Thrombosis studies →

Lead sponsor

Washington University School of Medicine is the lead sponsor of 1,803 studies on the registry; 271 are open to participants now.

Of its 329 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 216 (66%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria: Subjects must meet BOTH of these Criteria

  1. Disabling (moderate-to-severe) PTS, defined by a) presence of chronic venous disease > or = 3 months duration in a leg with history of DVT, as determined by the site principal investigator or a physician co-investigator; and b) substantial limitation of daily activities or work capacity due to venous symptoms or an open venous ulcer, per the same investigator.
  2. Ipsilateral iliac vein obstruction documented within 12 months prior to consent by either:

    1. Occlusion or >50% or = 50% stenosis of the iliac vein on venogram, CT venogram, MR venogram, or intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) or
    2. Air plethysmography showing deep venous obstruction of the ipsilateral leg (reduced venous outflow fraction), and ultrasound showing echogenic material in the ipsilateral iliac vein and non-phasic continuous Doppler flow in the ipsilateral common femoral vein (CFV) in the presence of normal phasic Doppler flow in the contralateral CFV.

Exclusion Criteria: Subjects meeting any of these criteria will be excluded.

  1. Age less than 18 years
  2. Acute ipsilateral proximal DVT episode within the last 3 months, or acute contralateral DVT for which thrombolytic therapy is planned
  3. Lack of suitable inflow into the ipsilateral common femoral vein per the treating physician
  4. Previous stent placement in the infrarenal IVC or ipsilateral iliac or common femoral vein
  5. Absence of PTS of at least moderate severity
  6. Chronic arterial limb ischemia (ankle-brachial index \< 0.5 within the previous 1 month) in the ipsilateral leg (if peripheral arterial disease is present or suspected, an ankle-brachial index should be obtained and documented)
  7. Presence of open venous ulcer > 50 cm2 area, suspicion for active ulcer infection, or visualization of bone or tendon within the ulcer in the ipsilateral leg
  8. Inability to tolerate endovascular procedure due to acute illness, or general health
  9. Severe allergy to iodinated contrast to premedication
  10. Known allergy to stent or catheter components
  11. \< 8.0 g/dl, uncorrectable > 3.0, or count \< 75,000/ml
  12. Severe renal impairment (on chronic dialysis or estimated \< 30 ml/min)
  13. Disseminated intravascular coagulation or other major bleeding diathesis
  14. Pregnancy (positive pregnancy test)
  15. Life-expectancy \< 6 months or chronically non-ambulatory for reasons other than PTS
  16. Inability to provide or to comply with study assessments

Note - patients who initially meet an exclusion criterion can have eligibility re-evaluated on a subsequent occasion.

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(7)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Relapsed and refractory

Relapsed: the illness came back after treatment had worked. Refractory: it did not respond to treatment, or stopped responding while still on it.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Hemoglobin (Hb)

The protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen. A low level is anaemia, which can cause tiredness and breathlessness. Measured in g/dL or g/L (9 g/dL is 90 g/L).

INR, PT and aPTT (clotting tests)

Blood tests of how long blood takes to clot. The INR is the prothrombin time (PT) put on a common scale; about 1 is usual for someone not taking a blood thinner.

Criteria often make an exception for people on a blood thinner such as warfarin, whose INR is raised on purpose.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
225 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Endovascular Therapy

    Subjects randomized to EVT will receive the following: 1. imaging-guided iliac vein stent placement; 2. anticoagulant therapy for at least 6 months; 3. oral aspirin 81 mg for at least 6 months; and 4. optimal PTS therapy: medical, compression, lifestyle measures, and venous ulcer care

    Device: Stents

  • No intervention
    No-Endovascular Therapy - Control

    Optimal PTS therapy: medical, compression, lifestyle measures, and venous ulcer care

Interventions

  • DeviceStents

    US-guided puncture of vein, fluoroscopic monitoring of catheter/guidewire manipulations, baseline venogram and intravascular ultrasound of CFV through infrarenal IVC. Iliac vein should be pre-dilated to at least 12 mm. Bare, self-expanding stents made of elgiloy or nitinol legally marketed in the US for any indication and that are at least 12 mm in diameter should be used to recanalize the entire diseased segment of vein. The use of devices \> 14 mm is highly recommended for the iliac vein and should be dilated to at least 14 mm, unless compelling patient factors dictate dilatation to a smaller diameter. Balloon angioplasty of inflow veins if needed to optimize inflow, per standard practice.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. PTS Severity

    "Venous Clinical Severity Scale (VCSS) score, adjusted for baseline"

    Time frame: over 6 months follow-up

Secondary outcomes

  1. Venous quality of life

    VEINES-QOL questionnaire

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. Gereric quality of life

    Short-Form-36 survey, physical component score

    Time frame: 6 months

  3. Estimated calf volume

    Measure calf length/diameter, formula for truncated cone

    Time frame: 6 months

  4. Presence of open ulcer

    Blinded clinic assessment

    Time frame: 6 months

  5. PTS severity (secondary)

    Villalta PTS Scale score

    Time frame: 6 months

  6. Major bleeding

    Overt, requiring \> 2 units pRBC or critical location

    Time frame: 6 months

  7. Recurrent venous thrombeombolism

    Objectively confirmed proximal DVT or PE

    Time frame: 6 months

  8. Death

    All-cause mortality

    Time frame: 6 months

  9. Valvular reflux

    Venous Segmental Disease Scale, reflux score

    Time frame: 6 months

  10. Venous obstruction

    Venous Segmental Disease Scale, obstruction score

    Time frame: 6 months

  11. Venous quality of life

    VEINES-QOL questionnaire

    Time frame: 12 months

  12. Gereric quality of life

    Short-Form-36 survey, physical component score

    Time frame: 12 months

  13. PTS severity (remote)

    Patient-Reported Villalta

    Time frame: 12 months

  14. Venous quality of life

    VEINES-QOL questionnaire

    Time frame: 18 months

  15. Gereric quality of life

    Short-Form-36 survey, physical component score

    Time frame: 18 months

  16. PTS severity (remote)

    Patient-Reported Villalta

    Time frame: 18 months

  17. Venous quality of life

    VEINES-QOL questionnaire

    Time frame: 24 months

  18. Gereric quality of life

    Short-Form-36 survey, physical component score

    Time frame: 24 months

  19. PTS severity (remote)

    Patient-Reported Villalta

    Time frame: 24 months

  20. Major bleeding

    Overt, requiring \> 2 units pRBC or critical location

    Time frame: 24 months

  21. Recurrent venous thrombeombolism

    Objectively confirmed proximal DVT or PE

    Time frame: 24 months

  22. Death Death

    All-cause mortality

    Time frame: 24 months

07

Study locations

29 sites
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Vedantham S, Kahn SR, Marston WA, Weinberg I, Sista AK, Magnuson EA, Cohen DJ, Wasan SM, Razavi MK, Goldhaber SZ, Sanfilippo KM, Comerota AJ, Azene EM, Chaar CIO, Leung DA, Kolli KP, Kalva SP, Rostambeigi N, Desai A, Desai KR, Tafur AJ, Khalsa B, Majerus E, Wang B, Wang Y, Nieters P, Derfler MC, Oliver A, Hardy C, Bashir R, Winokur R, Weger N, Khaja MS, Sharma A, Mani N, Kavali P, Thukral S, Lake LL, Mikkelsen K, Parpia S; C-TRACT Trial Investigators. Endovascular Therapy for Post-Thrombotic Syndrome - A Randomized Trial. N Engl J Med. 2026 Jun 18;394(23):2293-2304. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2519001. Epub 2026 Apr 13. PubMed 41972998 ↗
  • Flumignan RL, Nakano LC, Flumignan CD, Baptista-Silva JC. Angioplasty or stenting for deep venous thrombosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Feb 19;2(2):CD011468. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011468.pub2. PubMed 39968829 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes

Supporting information: Study protocol, Informed consent form

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 28, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03250247
Collaborators
Ontario Clinical Oncology Group (OCOG), Massachusetts General Hospital, Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 15, 2017
Start date
Jul 2, 2018
Primary completion
Nov 11, 2025
Completion
Apr 27, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Jan 28, 2026

Study contacts

Suresh Vedantham, M.D.
principal investigator · Clinical Coordinating Center at Washington University School of Medicine

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Jan 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion