ClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT03247413Updated Jan 5, 2024Results posted

Post-lesion Administration of Dexamethasone to Prevent the Development of Neuritis After Radiofrequency Ablation

A Phase 4 interventional study of Dexamethasone 4 mg/ml and Normal saline in Neuritis and Radiofrequency Ablation, sponsored by Johns Hopkins University. Terminated at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 90 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-01-05.

Sponsored by Johns Hopkins University · Phase 4, Interventional, and Prevention

Why this study was terminated
Study has been halted prematurely
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
63
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 90 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Chronic neck and back pain has become one of the leading causes of disability and loss of productivity. For many patients with facet or sacroiliac joint mediated pain who have responded to diagnostic nerve blocks, radiofrequency ablation of the nerves innervating the joints can provide long term relief. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a relatively safe procedure with minimal risk of adverse events. However, with any procedure involving damage to the peripheral nervous system, there is risk of post-procedure neuropathic pain. The investigators will test the hypothesis that dexamethasone injection delivered at the time of lesion effectively prevents the development of post-ablation neuritis through a placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized trial in patients undergoing cervical, thoracic, lumbar, and sacroiliac joint radiofrequency denervations

02

Conditions studied

  • Neuritis
  • Radiofrequency Ablation

Browse trials for

03

In context

Neuritis

73 studies on the registry are indexed under Neuritis; 20 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 63 is above the median of 48 across 51 interventional studies indexed under Neuritis.

Browse Neuritis studies →

Lead sponsor

Johns Hopkins University is the lead sponsor of 1,815 studies on the registry; 315 are open to participants now.

Of its 208 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 144 (69%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 90 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • patients with a diagnosis of either cervical, thoracic, or lumbar facet or sacroiliac joint pain who have responded to medial branch blocks and are already scheduled for bilateral radiofrequency ablations
  • age greater than 18 years old
  • English speaking

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patient not previously scheduled for radiofrequency ablation of the cervical, thoracic, or lumbar facets, or sacroiliac joints
  • on anticoagulation
  • have a pacemaker
  • age less than 18 years old
  • non-English speaking
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator)
Enrollment
63 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Dexamethasone

    Lesions where dexamethasone 4 milligram is administered post-radiofrequency ablation

    Drug: Dexamethasone 4 mg/ml

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Lesions where 1 milliliter of normal saline is administered post-radiofrequency ablation

    Drug: Normal saline

Interventions

  • DrugDexamethasone 4 mg/ml

    Drug page: Dexamethasone

    dexamethasone 4 milligram given post-ablation at each lesion site

  • DrugNormal saline

    Placebo, normal saline administered post-ablation at each lesion site

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Lesions With Post-Ablation Neuritis

    Each patient had 2 lesions. One Lesion was treated with dexamethasone. The other lesion was treated with placebo. We then looked at the number of lesions that developed post-ablation neuritis.

    Time frame: 4 weeks

07

Results

Posted Jan 5, 2024

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneAll Study Participants
Started63
Received dexamethasone (4 mg/ml) intervention63
Received placebo (1 mg saline) intervention63
Completed35
Not completed28
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up28

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Lesions With Post-Ablation Neuritis

Each patient had 2 lesions. One Lesion was treated with dexamethasone. The other lesion was treated with placebo. We then looked at the number of lesions that developed post-ablation neuritis.

Time frame:
4 weeks
Reported as:
Number · lesions
Number of Lesions With Post-Ablation Neuritis
lesionsDexamethasonePlacebo
Number of Lesions With Post-Ablation Neuritis320

Adverse events

Collected over 1 year. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Dexamethasone/Placebo0/35 (0%)0/35 (0%)0/35 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Dexamethasone/Placebo
<=18 years0
Between 18 and 65 years18
>=65 years17
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Dexamethasone/Placebo
Mean58.8 ± 15.83
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Dexamethasone/Placebo
Female15
Male20
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)Dexamethasone/Placebo
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)Dexamethasone/Placebo
United States35
Post-neurotomy pain incidence
Post-neurotomy pain incidence(Participants)Dexamethasone/Placebo
Count of participants3
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Johns Hopkins Hospital
    Baltimore, Maryland 21287, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Shustorovich A, AlFarra T, Arel AT, Singh JR, Roemmich RT, Chhatre A. Dexamethasone Effectively Reduces the Incidence of Post-neurotomy Neuropathic Pain: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study. Pain Physician. 2021 Dec;24(8):517-524. PubMed 34793638 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Sep 2019 to primary completion in Oct 2022, 37 months.

Results were first posted in Jan 2024, 1 year 2 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 8, 2017
First posted
Aug 11, 2017
StartActual
Sep 1, 2019
Primary completionActual
Oct 14, 2022
CompletionActual
Oct 14, 2022
Results first posted
Jan 5, 2024
Last update
Jan 5, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 5, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03247413
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 11, 2017
Start date
Sep 1, 2019
Primary completion
Oct 14, 2022
Completion
Oct 14, 2022
Results posted
Jan 5, 2024
Last update
Jan 5, 2024

Study contacts

Akhil Chhatre, MD
principal investigator · Johns Hopkins University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Jan 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Dexamethasone

Start the discussion