CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03245255Updated May 29, 2024Results posted

Noninvasive Real-time Intracardiac Pressure Measurements Using Subharmonic Ultrasound

A Phase 2 interventional study of Sonazoid in Cardiac Catheterization, Blood Pressure and Heart Ventricles, sponsored by Thomas Jefferson University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 21 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-05-29.

Sponsored by Thomas Jefferson University · Phase 2, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
80
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
21 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study will use contrast echocardiography to assess the accuracy of a new non-invasive imaging method for subharmonic aided pressure estimation (SHAPE) compared to simultaneously acquired intra-cardiac pressures measured invasively during cardiac catheterization. This study is designed to verify that contrast echocardiography using the SHAPE method, already proven in a canine model and tested in a human pilot study can be used as a surrogate for cardiac catheterization with sufficient accuracy to allow clinical applicability in humans.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cardiac Catheterization
  • Blood Pressure
  • Heart Ventricles
  • Echocardiography
  • Heart Failure

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • pressure measurements
  • blood pressure
  • contrast echocardiography
  • ventricular pressures
  • catheterization
03

In context

Heart Failure

5,701 studies on the registry are indexed under Heart Failure; 1,220 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 80 is above the median of 72 across 3,736 interventional studies indexed under Heart Failure.

Browse Heart Failure studies →

Lead sponsor

Thomas Jefferson University is the lead sponsor of 384 studies on the registry; 71 are open to participants now.

Of its 44 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 20 (45%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Be scheduled for cardiac catheterization procedure.
  • Be at least 18 years of age.
  • Be medically stable.
  • If a female of child-bearing potential, must have a negative pregnancy test.
  • Be conscious and able to comply with study procedures.
  • Have signed Informed Consent to participate in the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Clinically unstable patients, e.g., those who are clinically in decompensated heart failure or having active chest pain or presenting for admission with an unstable anginal syndrome
  • Patients in whom introduction of a catheter into the left ventricle is contraindicated or would potentially be dangerous, e.g., patients with active ventricular arrhythmias or with significant aortic valve stenosis where crossing the aortic valve may be difficult and not clinically necessary
  • Females who are pregnant or nursing.
  • Patients not scheduled for cardiac catheterization procedure.
  • Patients who have received an investigational drug in the 30 days before, or will receive one within 72 h after, study drug administration.
  • Patients currently on chemotherapy or with other primary cancers requiring treatment.
  • Patients who are medically unstable, patients who are seriously or terminally ill, and patients whose clinical course is unpredictable.
  • Patients with a history of anaphylactic allergy to eggs or egg products, manifested by one or more of the following symptoms: generalised urticaria, difficulty in breathing, swelling of the mouth and throat, hypotension, or shock. (Subjects with nonanaphylactic allergies to eggs or egg products may be enrolled in the study, but must be watched carefully for 1 h following the administration of SONAZOID).
  • Patients with congenital heart defects.
  • Patients with severe emphysema, pulmonary vasculitis, or a history of pulmonary emboli.
  • Patients with respiratory distress syndrome or a contraindication to pharmacological vasodilator stress agents.
  • Patients with thrombosis within the hepatic, portal, or mesenteric veins.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
80 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Sonazoid for pressure measurements

    48 µl of Sonazoid microbubbles (GE Healthcare, Oslo, Norway) will be co-infused at a rate of 0.024 µl/kg body weight/minute together with a 0.9% sodium chloride solution infused at a rate of at least 2 ml/min.

    Drug: Sonazoid

Interventions

  • DrugSonazoid

    Whenever a patient undergoes cardiac catheterization, which routinely includes intracardiac pressure monitoring using a pressure catheter, as part of their standard clinical care and agrees to participate in the study, we will acquire research data. With Sonazoid infusion, SHAPE algorithm will be initiated to determine optimum acoustic pressure. Then, at the optimum acoustic pressure, SHAPE specific data will be acquired from the cardiac chambers and aorta synchronously with the pressures recorded by the catheter (as a part of the patient's standard of care). After acquiring the ultrasound imaging data, the remainder of the heart catheterization will be completed by the attending cardiologist according to the patients' standard of care.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Agreement Between SHAPE and Pressure Catheter Measurements

    The Pearson correlation coefficient was computed between the simultaneously acquired subharmonic signal and pressure catheter data (i.e., waveforms) for each participant. The Pearson correlation coefficient was used for comparing waveforms given the underlying data and pressure values used for comparisons followed a normal distribution. Values reported will be the mean Pearson correlation coefficient values between the subharmonic waveforms and pressure catheter waveforms obtained.

    Time frame: up to 1 day

  2. Error Between SHAPE and Pressure Catheter Measurements

    Based on the distribution of the differences in cardiac pressure values obtained using the SHAPE technique and the clinical pressure catheter, either a two-tailed paired t test (normal distribution) or Wilcoxon signed rank test (nonnormal distribution) was used to compare the SHAPE technique to the reference standard. Bonferroni corrections were used for multiple comparisons

    Time frame: up to 1 day

07

Results

Posted May 29, 2024

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneSonazoid for Pressure Measurements
Started80
Completed71
Not completed9

Outcome measures

PrimaryAgreement Between SHAPE and Pressure Catheter Measurements

The Pearson correlation coefficient was computed between the simultaneously acquired subharmonic signal and pressure catheter data (i.e., waveforms) for each participant. The Pearson correlation coefficient was used for comparing waveforms given the underlying data and pressure values used for comparisons followed a normal distribution. Values reported will be the mean Pearson correlation coefficient values between the subharmonic waveforms and pressure catheter waveforms obtained.

Time frame:
up to 1 day
Reported as:
Mean · Correlation coefficient value
Agreement Between SHAPE and Pressure Catheter Measurements
Correlation coefficient valueFor Data From Right VentricleFor Data From Left Ventricle
Agreement Between SHAPE and Pressure Catheter Measurements-0.8 ± 0.1-0.8 ± 0.1
Statistical analysis
  • For Data From Right Ventricle vs For Data From Left Ventricle · Pearson correlation coefficient: -0.8
PrimaryError Between SHAPE and Pressure Catheter Measurements

Based on the distribution of the differences in cardiac pressure values obtained using the SHAPE technique and the clinical pressure catheter, either a two-tailed paired t test (normal distribution) or Wilcoxon signed rank test (nonnormal distribution) was used to compare the SHAPE technique to the reference standard. Bonferroni corrections were used for multiple comparisons

Time frame:
up to 1 day
Reported as:
Median · mmHg
Error Between SHAPE and Pressure Catheter Measurements
mmHgFor Data From Left Ventricle - Errors in Mean Diastolic PressureFor Data From Left Ventricle - Errors in Minimum Diastolic PressureFor Data From Left Ventricle - Errors in End Diastolic PressureFor Data From Right Ventricle
Error Between SHAPE and Pressure Catheter Measurements5.4 ± 7.46.6 ± 8.35.8 ± 7.51.2 ± 1.5

Adverse events

Collected over During data acquisition after Sonazoid infusion (5-10 minutes) and when the patients were observed in the recovery area after the procedure for up to 60 minutes after the procedure.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Sonazoid for Pressure Measurements0/71 (0%)0/71 (0%)0/71 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Sonazoid for Pressure Measurements
Mean63 (32 to 82)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Sonazoid for Pressure Measurements
Female31
Male49
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Sonazoid for Pressure Measurements
White Non Hispanic61
Black or African American15
Asian2
Hispanic or Latino1
Other1
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Sonazoid for Pressure Measurements
United States80
Body Mass Index
Body Mass Index(kg/m^2)Sonazoid for Pressure Measurements
Mean30 (15 to 49)
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Thomas Jefferson University and Thomas Jefferson University Hospital
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Dave JK, Halldorsdottir VG, Eisenbrey JR, Liu JB, McDonald ME, Dickie K, Leung C, Forsberg F. Noninvasive estimation of dynamic pressures in vitro and in vivo using the subharmonic response from microbubbles. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2011 Oct;58(10):2056-66. doi: 10.1109/TUFFC.2011.2056. PubMed 21989870 ↗
  • Dave JK, Halldorsdottir VG, Eisenbrey JR, Forsberg F. Processing of subharmonic signals from ultrasound contrast agents to determine ambient pressures. Ultrason Imaging. 2012 Apr;34(2):81-92. doi: 10.1177/016173461203400202. PubMed 22724314 ↗
  • Dave JK, Halldorsdottir VG, Eisenbrey JR, Merton DA, Liu JB, Machado P, Zhao H, Park S, Dianis S, Chalek CL, Thomenius KE, Brown DB, Forsberg F. On the implementation of an automated acoustic output optimization algorithm for subharmonic aided pressure estimation. Ultrasonics. 2013 Apr;53(4):880-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ultras.2012.12.010. Epub 2013 Jan 2. PubMed 23347593 ↗
  • Dave JK, Halldorsdottir VG, Eisenbrey JR, Raichlen JS, Liu JB, McDonald ME, Dickie K, Wang S, Leung C, Forsberg F. Subharmonic microbubble emissions for noninvasively tracking right ventricular pressures. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2012 Jul;303(1):H126-32. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00560.2011. Epub 2012 May 4. PubMed 22561300 ↗
  • Dave JK, Halldorsdottir VG, Eisenbrey JR, Raichlen JS, Liu JB, McDonald ME, Dickie K, Wang S, Leung C, Forsberg F. Noninvasive LV pressure estimation using subharmonic emissions from microbubbles. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 Jan;5(1):87-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2011.08.017. PubMed 22239898 ↗
  • Eisenbrey JR, Dave JK, Halldorsdottir VG, Merton DA, Miller C, Gonzalez JM, Machado P, Park S, Dianis S, Chalek CL, Kim CE, Baliff JP, Thomenius KE, Brown DB, Navarro V, Forsberg F. Chronic liver disease: noninvasive subharmonic aided pressure estimation of hepatic venous pressure gradient. Radiology. 2013 Aug;268(2):581-8. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13121769. Epub 2013 Mar 22. PubMed 23525208 ↗
  • Forsberg F, Liu JB, Shi WT, Furuse J, Shimizu M, Goldberg BB. In vivo pressure estimation using subharmonic contrast microbubble signals: proof of concept. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2005 Apr;52(4):581-3. doi: 10.1109/tuffc.2005.1428040. PubMed 16060506 ↗
  • Halldorsdottir VG, Dave JK, Leodore LM, Eisenbrey JR, Park S, Hall AL, Thomenius K, Forsberg F. Subharmonic contrast microbubble signals for noninvasive pressure estimation under static and dynamic flow conditions. Ultrason Imaging. 2011 Jul;33(3):153-64. doi: 10.1177/016173461103300301. PubMed 21842580 ↗
  • Shi WT, Forsberg F, Raichlen JS, Needleman L, Goldberg BB. Pressure dependence of subharmonic signals from contrast microbubbles. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1999 Feb;25(2):275-83. doi: 10.1016/s0301-5629(98)00163-x. PubMed 10320317 ↗
  • Halldorsdottir VG, Dave JK, Eisenbrey JR, Machado P, Zhao H, Liu JB, Merton DA, Forsberg F. Subharmonic aided pressure estimation for monitoring interstitial fluid pressure in tumours--in vitro and in vivo proof of concept. Ultrasonics. 2014 Sep;54(7):1938-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ultras.2014.04.022. Epub 2014 May 6. PubMed 24856899 ↗
  • Esposito C, Machado P, Cohen IS, Mehrotra P, Savage M, Fischman D, Davis M, Ruggiero N, Walinsky P, McDonald ME, Dickie K, Forsberg F, Dave JK. Comparing Central Aortic Pressures Obtained Using a SphygmoCor Device to Pressures Obtained Using a Pressure Catheter. Am J Hypertens. 2022 May 10;35(5):397-406. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpac010. PubMed 35079778 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Mar 9, 2016

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — This project will generate pressure values in the aorta, and left and right ventricles using the proposed research method (i.e., SHAPE) and using the standard of care (i.e., catheter based pressure values). Additionally peripheral and central pressures will be generated. All of the pressure values will be made available. Further, all ultrasound data obtained for SHAPE measurements will be made available after anonymizing the data-set to remove any patient information

Supporting information: Csr

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 29, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03245255
Lead sponsor
Thomas Jefferson University
Collaborators
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), GE Healthcare
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 10, 2017
Start date
Dec 4, 2017
Primary completion
Sep 18, 2020
Completion
Jun 7, 2023
Results posted
May 29, 2024
Last update
May 29, 2024

Study contacts

Jaydev K Dave
principal investigator · Thomas Jefferson University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion