CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03243942Updated Jul 10, 2019

Noninvasive, Subharmonic Intra-Cardiac Pressure Measurement

A Phase 2 interventional study of Definity in Cardiac Catheterization, Blood Pressure and Heart Ventricles, sponsored by Thomas Jefferson University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 21 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-07-10.

Sponsored by Thomas Jefferson University · Phase 2, Interventional, and Diagnostic

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was Jun 2019, 7 years 3 months ago, and no results have been posted to the registry.
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
56
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
21 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The fundamental hypothesis of this project is that real-time intracardiac pressures can be monitored and quantified noninvasively in humans using a novel contrast-enhanced ultrasound technique called subharmonic-aided pressure estimation (SHAPE).This study will use contrast echocardiography to assess the accuracy of SHAPE compared to simultaneously acquired intracardiac pressures measured invasively during cardiac catheterization. This study is designed to verify that contrast echocardiography using the SHAPE method, already proven in a canine model and tested in a human pilot study can be used as a surrogate for cardiac catheterization with sufficient accuracy to allow clinical applicability in humans.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cardiac Catheterization
  • Blood Pressure
  • Heart Ventricles
  • Echocardiography
  • Heart Failure

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • pressure measurements
  • blood pressure
  • contrast echocardiography
  • ventricular pressures
  • catheterization
03

In context

Heart Failure

5,697 studies on the registry are indexed under Heart Failure; 1,219 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 56 is below the median of 72 across 3,733 interventional studies indexed under Heart Failure.

Browse Heart Failure studies →

Lead sponsor

Thomas Jefferson University is the lead sponsor of 384 studies on the registry; 71 are open to participants now.

Of its 44 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 20 (45%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Be scheduled for a cardiac catheterization procedure
  • Adult patients over the age of 21
  • Acceptable baseline echocardiographic images in the supine position
  • If a female of child-bearing potential, must have a negative pregnancy test
  • Provide written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Clinically unstable patients, e.g., those who are clinically in decompensated heart failure or having active chest pain or presenting for admission with an unstable anginal syndrome
  • Patients in whom introduction of a catheter into the left ventricle is contraindicated or would potentially be dangerous, e.g., patients with active ventricular arrhythmias or with significant aortic valve stenosis where crossing the aortic valve may be difficult and not clinically necessary
  • Patients with anatomic right-to-left, bi-directional, or transient right-to-left cardiac shunts where Definity could traverse as a bolus
  • Patients with known hypersensitivity to Definity
  • Females who are pregnant or nursing
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
56 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Definity for pressure measurements

    2 vials of activated Definity mixed with 50 ml saline. As per manufacturer's recommendation the infusion rate may vary between 4-10 ml/min (to provide diagnostic intracardiac contrast visibility).

    Drug: Definity

Interventions

  • DrugDefinity

    Whenever a patient undergoes cardiac catheterization, which routinely includes intracardiac pressure monitoring using a pressure catheter, as part of their standard clinical care and agrees to participate in the study, we will acquire research data. With Definity infusion, SHAPE algorithm will be initiated to determine optimum acoustic pressure. Then, at the optimum acoustic pressure SHAPE specific data will be acquired from the cardiac chambers and aorta synchronously with the pressures recorded by the catheter (as a part of the patient's standard of care). After acquiring the ultrasound imaging data, the remainder of the heart catheterization will be completed by the attending cardiologist according to the patients' standard of care.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Agreement between SHAPE and pressure catheter measurements

    Correlation

    Time frame: up to 1 day

  2. Error between SHAPE and pressure catheter measurements

    ANOVA/Post-hoc comparisons

    Time frame: up to 1 day

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Thomas Jefferson University and Thomas Jefferson University Hospital
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Dave JK, Halldorsdottir VG, Eisenbrey JR, Liu JB, McDonald ME, Dickie K, Leung C, Forsberg F. Noninvasive estimation of dynamic pressures in vitro and in vivo using the subharmonic response from microbubbles. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2011 Oct;58(10):2056-66. doi: 10.1109/TUFFC.2011.2056. PubMed 21989870 ↗
  • Dave JK, Halldorsdottir VG, Eisenbrey JR, Forsberg F. Processing of subharmonic signals from ultrasound contrast agents to determine ambient pressures. Ultrason Imaging. 2012 Apr;34(2):81-92. doi: 10.1177/016173461203400202. PubMed 22724314 ↗
  • Dave JK, Halldorsdottir VG, Eisenbrey JR, Merton DA, Liu JB, Machado P, Zhao H, Park S, Dianis S, Chalek CL, Thomenius KE, Brown DB, Forsberg F. On the implementation of an automated acoustic output optimization algorithm for subharmonic aided pressure estimation. Ultrasonics. 2013 Apr;53(4):880-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ultras.2012.12.010. Epub 2013 Jan 2. PubMed 23347593 ↗
  • Dave JK, Halldorsdottir VG, Eisenbrey JR, Raichlen JS, Liu JB, McDonald ME, Dickie K, Wang S, Leung C, Forsberg F. Subharmonic microbubble emissions for noninvasively tracking right ventricular pressures. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2012 Jul;303(1):H126-32. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00560.2011. Epub 2012 May 4. PubMed 22561300 ↗
  • Dave JK, Halldorsdottir VG, Eisenbrey JR, Raichlen JS, Liu JB, McDonald ME, Dickie K, Wang S, Leung C, Forsberg F. Noninvasive LV pressure estimation using subharmonic emissions from microbubbles. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 Jan;5(1):87-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2011.08.017. PubMed 22239898 ↗
  • Eisenbrey JR, Dave JK, Halldorsdottir VG, Merton DA, Miller C, Gonzalez JM, Machado P, Park S, Dianis S, Chalek CL, Kim CE, Baliff JP, Thomenius KE, Brown DB, Navarro V, Forsberg F. Chronic liver disease: noninvasive subharmonic aided pressure estimation of hepatic venous pressure gradient. Radiology. 2013 Aug;268(2):581-8. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13121769. Epub 2013 Mar 22. PubMed 23525208 ↗
  • Forsberg F, Liu JB, Shi WT, Furuse J, Shimizu M, Goldberg BB. In vivo pressure estimation using subharmonic contrast microbubble signals: proof of concept. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2005 Apr;52(4):581-3. doi: 10.1109/tuffc.2005.1428040. PubMed 16060506 ↗
  • Halldorsdottir VG, Dave JK, Leodore LM, Eisenbrey JR, Park S, Hall AL, Thomenius K, Forsberg F. Subharmonic contrast microbubble signals for noninvasive pressure estimation under static and dynamic flow conditions. Ultrason Imaging. 2011 Jul;33(3):153-64. doi: 10.1177/016173461103300301. PubMed 21842580 ↗
  • Shi WT, Forsberg F, Raichlen JS, Needleman L, Goldberg BB. Pressure dependence of subharmonic signals from contrast microbubbles. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1999 Feb;25(2):275-83. doi: 10.1016/s0301-5629(98)00163-x. PubMed 10320317 ↗
  • Halldorsdottir VG, Dave JK, Eisenbrey JR, Machado P, Zhao H, Liu JB, Merton DA, Forsberg F. Subharmonic aided pressure estimation for monitoring interstitial fluid pressure in tumours--in vitro and in vivo proof of concept. Ultrasonics. 2014 Sep;54(7):1938-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ultras.2014.04.022. Epub 2014 May 6. PubMed 24856899 ↗
  • Esposito C, Machado P, Cohen IS, Mehrotra P, Savage M, Fischman D, Davis M, Ruggiero N, Walinsky P, McDonald ME, Dickie K, Forsberg F, Dave JK. Comparing Central Aortic Pressures Obtained Using a SphygmoCor Device to Pressures Obtained Using a Pressure Catheter. Am J Hypertens. 2022 May 10;35(5):397-406. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpac010. PubMed 35079778 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — This project will generate pressure values in the aorta, and left and right ventricles using the proposed research method (i.e., SHAPE) and using the standard of care (i.e., catheter based pressure values). Additionally peripheral and central pressures will be generated. All of the pressure values will be made available. Further, all ultrasound data obtained for SHAPE measurements will be made available after anonymizing the data-set to remove any patient information.

Supporting information: Icf

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 10, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03243942
Lead sponsor
Thomas Jefferson University
Collaborators
American Heart Association, Lantheus Medical Imaging
Responsible party
Jaydev Dave (Assistant Professor, Thomas Jefferson University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 9, 2017
Start date
Jun 1, 2017
Primary completion
Jun 26, 2019
Completion
Jun 26, 2019
Last update
Jul 10, 2019

Study contacts

Jaydev Dave
principal investigator · Thomas Jefferson University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion