CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03232125Updated Aug 25, 2020

Effect of Ramosetron on Heart Rate-corrected QT Interval During Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy With Steep Trendelenburg Position

An interventional study of Ramosetron and Normal saline in Prostate Cancer, sponsored by Yonsei University. Completed at 1 site in Korea, Republic of. Open to participants aged 20 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-08-25.

Sponsored by Yonsei University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
54
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
20 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Intraperitoneal insufflation of carbon dioxide may affect the sympathetic activity that leads to changes in ventricular re-polarization. This in turn can result in changes of heart rate-corrected QT (QTc) interval. Ramosetron is a 5-hydroxytryptamine three receptor antagonist and widely used anti-emetics. However, QTc interval prolongation has been observed in a number of patients after administration of 5-HT3 receptor antagonists. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of ramosetron on QTc interval and possible cardiovascular adverse effects during robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy with steep Trendelenburg position.

Read the detailed description

Intraperitoneal insufflation of carbon dioxide may affect the sympathetic activity that leads to changes in ventricular re-polarization. This in turn can result in changes of heart rate-corrected QT (QTc) interval. Ramosetron is a 5-hydroxytryptamine three receptor antagonist and widely used anti-emetics. However, QTc interval prolongation has been observed in a number of patients after administration of 5-HT3 receptor antagonists. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of ramosetron on QTc interval and possible cardiovascular adverse effects during robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy with steep Trendelenburg position. Fifty-six patients, aged more than 19 years, undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy will be divided into ramosetron group (n=28) and control group (n=28). Randomly selected patients of the ramoseton group are given a 0.3 mg of ramosetron after induction. In contrast, patients in the control group are given the same volume of normal saline after induction and given a 0.3 mg of ramosetron after measurement of QTc interval. The primary endpoint is the difference in maximal change of QTc interval between groups.

02

Conditions studied

  • Prostate Cancer

Browse trials for

03

In context

Prostatic Neoplasms

6,370 studies on the registry are indexed under Prostatic Neoplasms; 1,400 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 54 is close to the median of 58 across 4,822 interventional studies indexed under Prostatic Neoplasms.

Browse Prostatic Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Yonsei University is the lead sponsor of 1,387 studies on the registry; 232 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy
  • Age more than 19 years

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Preoperative electrocardiography (ECG) abnormalities, including a QTc interval of >500 ms, ventricular conduction abnormalities, or arrhythmias
  • History of cardiac disease such as pacemaker insertion, unstable angina
  • Use of antiarrhythmic agents or medications that are known to prolong the QTc interval
  • Abnormal levels of preoperative serum electrolyte
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator)
Enrollment
54 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Ramosetron group

    Randomly selected patients of the ramoseton group are given a 0.3 mg of ramosetron after induction.

    Drug: Ramosetron

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo group

    In contrast, patients in the control group are given the same volume of normal saline after induction and given a 0.3 mg of ramosetron after measurement of QTc interval.

    Drug: Normal saline

Interventions

  • DrugRamosetron

    Randomly selected patients of the ramoseton group are given a 0.3 mg of ramosetron after induction.

  • DrugNormal saline

    In contrast, patients in the control group are given the same volume of normal saline after induction and given a 0.3 mg of ramosetron after measurement of QTc interval.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Maximum change of QTc interval

    Maximum change of QTc interval from continuous ECG monitoring in lead V5 were collected by using the LabChart software.

    Time frame: Before induction of anesthesia in the supine position (Baseline)

  2. Maximum change of QTc interval

    Maximum change of QTc interval from continuous ECG monitoring in lead V5 were collected by using the LabChart software.

    Time frame: 10 minutes after tracheal intubation (Intu-10 min.)

  3. Maximum change of QTc interval

    Maximum change of QTc interval from continuous ECG monitoring in lead V5 were collected by using the LabChart software.

    Time frame: immediately after steep Trendelenburg position with CO2 pneumoperitoneum (T-on)

  4. Maximum change of QTc interval

    Maximum change of QTc interval from continuous ECG monitoring in lead V5 were collected by using the LabChart software.

    Time frame: 30 minutes after steep Trendelenburg position with CO2 pneumoperitoneum (T-30 min)

  5. Maximum change of QTc interval

    Maximum change of QTc interval from continuous ECG monitoring in lead V5 were collected by using the LabChart software.

    Time frame: 60 minutes after steep Trendelenburg position with CO2 pneumoperitoneum (T-60 min)

  6. Maximum change of QTc interval

    Maximum change of QTc interval from continuous ECG monitoring in lead V5 were collected by using the LabChart software.

    Time frame: 90 minutes after steep Trendelenburg position with CO2 pneumoperitoneum (T-90 min)

  7. Maximum change of QTc interval

    Maximum change of QTc interval from continuous ECG monitoring in lead V5 were collected by using the LabChart software.

    Time frame: immediately after a supine position with CO2 desufflation (T-off)

  8. Maximum change of QTc interval

    Maximum change of QTc interval from continuous ECG monitoring in lead V5 were collected by using the LabChart software.

    Time frame: at the end of surgery (Surgery end)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Professor, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine
    Seoul, 03722, Korea, Republic of
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Kim TK, Cho YJ, Lim CW, Min JJ, Choi EK, Hong DM, Jeon Y. Effect of ramosetron on QTc interval: a randomised controlled trial in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. BMC Anesthesiol. 2016 Aug 3;16(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s12871-016-0222-1. PubMed 27488394 ↗
  • Lee JH, Yoo EK, Song IK, Kim JT, Kim HS. Effect of ramosetron on the QT interval during sevoflurane anaesthesia in children: a prospective observational study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2015 May;32(5):330-5. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000200. PubMed 25485883 ↗
  • Kim SH, Lee SM, Kim YK, Park SY, Lee JH, Cho SH, Chai WS, Jin HC. Effects of prophylactic ramosetron and ondansetron on corrected QT interval during general anesthesia. J Clin Anesth. 2014 Nov;26(7):511-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2014.02.011. Epub 2014 Oct 18. PubMed 25439413 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 25, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03232125
Lead sponsor
Yonsei University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 27, 2017
Start date
Aug 1, 2017
Primary completion
Jun 9, 2020
Completion
Jun 12, 2020
Last update
Aug 25, 2020

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion