ClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT03214601RelayBranchUpdated May 31, 2025

Early Feasibility Study of the RelayBranch Thoracic Stent-Graft System

An interventional study of penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer, aorta branch cardiovascular implant in Thoracic Aorta Aneurysm, Aneurysm, Ruptured and Aortic Aneurysm, sponsored by Bolton Medical. Active, not recruiting at 12 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-05-31.

Sponsored by Bolton Medical (part of Terumo Corporation) · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to conduct an early clinical evaluation of the Relay Branch System, which will provide initial insight into the clinical safety and function of the device.

This Early Feasibility Study (EFS) will assess the safety and effectiveness of the device at the index procedure and at 30-day follow-up. The study will evaluate the delivery and deployment of the device, patency of branches and branch vessels, and exclusion of the aortic pathology. The data will help determine if modifications need to be made to the device, the procedural steps, operator technique, or the indications for use.

Read the detailed description

This Early Feasibility Study (EFS) protocol describes the clinical study requirements for the Relay Branch System; a device designed to provide an option for patients with arch and proximal descending chronic thoracic aortic pathologies. As an EFS, this investigation is intended to provide proof of principle and initial clinical safety data on the Relay Branch System. The study is planned as an initial investigation of the device for aortic arch and proximal descending thoracic aortic aneurysmal disease, PAU (including IMH) and uncomplicated chronic Type B aortic dissection (including IMH). The study will yield information on procedural techniques; assessing the safety and effectiveness of the device at the index procedure and at 30 days, focusing on device delivery and deployment, and circulatory exclusion of the pathologic process. As a branched device, patency of the endograft branches will also be assessed.

The study will evaluate three-dimensional (3D) imaging data, both at baseline and through follow-up. Baseline 3D anatomy will augment information on the precise anatomic configuration of patients presenting aortic arch pathology treatable with the device. Follow-up imaging will provide information on the effectiveness of the device with respect to endoleaks in patients with aneurysms, sealing of dissections, PAU and IMH, and stability of the device at the deployed position, response, endograft patency, and short-term device integrity.

The data from this EFS will yield insights into the following aspects of the device, preceding a traditional feasibility or pivotal study:

  • The clinical safety of the device-specific aspects of the procedure,
  • Determination of delivery and deployment of the device,
  • Operator-dependent aspects of device use,
  • Human factors associated with the design and use of the device,
  • Safety of the device as assessed by device-related adverse events,
  • Effectiveness of the device in performing its intended purpose over short-term follow-up.

Observations from the study will guide the instructions for use (IFU) for the device. Finally, the study will collect imaging data to augment the current use conditions data set. It is anticipated that information collected will be used to make applicable design changes, or be combined with a prospective, investigational device exemption (IDE) study for submission of an original premarket approval application (PMA) to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for approval to commercially distribute the system.

02

Conditions studied

  • Thoracic Aorta Aneurysm
  • Aneurysm, Ruptured
  • Aortic Aneurysm
03

In context

Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic

131 studies on the registry are indexed under Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic; 33 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 30 is below the median of 50 across 62 interventional studies indexed under Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic.

Browse Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic studies →

Lead sponsor

Bolton Medical is the lead sponsor of 14 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

First submitted after Bolton Medical became part of Terumo Corporation.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥18 years
  • Anatomy that would require coverage of the brachiocephalic trunk (BCT) and/or left carotid arteries if a non-branch endograft were implanted
  • At least one of the following:

    a. Aneurysm of the ascending aorta, aortic arch, or proximal descending aorta that meets at least one of the following: i. ≥ 5.5 cm in diameter ii. ≥ 4.0 cm in diameter that has increased in size by 0.5 cm in the last 6 months iii. Measures twice the size of the normal aorta diameter iv. Is saccular in configuration

    b. PAU within the ascending aorta, aortic arch, or proximal descending thoracic aorta (DTA) with or without intramural hematoma (IMH)

    c. Chronic, uncomplicated aortic dissection distal to the BCT (type B), with either aortic diameter ≥5.5 cm or ≥4.0 cm with an increase in size by 0.5 cm in the last 6 months d. IMH distal to the BCT with recurrent symptoms, i.e. hypertension or intractable pain, despite best medical therapy.

  • A non-aneurysmal proximal aortic neck diameter ranging between 28 mm and 43 mm and a non-aneurysmal distal aortic neck diameter ranging between 19 mm and 43 mm.
  • A proximal attachment zone of the arch graft, meeting the oversizing requirement, must be a minimum of 25mm in length when measured on the inner curve of the ascending aorta, proximal to the BCT.
  • Total length from the coronaries to the proximal edge of the BCT must be a minimum of 70mm.
  • The length of the distal landing zone should be 20mm minimum.
  • Coverage of the left subclavian artery is permitted. Revascularization of the left subclavian artery may be considered in all cases by the treating physician and, especially, in anatomies where revascularization is determined to be clinically necessary
  • The distal landing zone must contain a straight segment (non-tapered, non-reverse tapered; defined by \< 10% diameter change) with length equal to or greater than the required attachment length of the intended device
  • Non-aneurysmal BCT and left common carotid arteries with diameters ranging > 6.0mm across the entire length of the treatment zone.
  • Distal branch landing zone must be \<20.0 mm in diameter and a minimum of 25.0 mm in length.
  • Adequate arterial access for introduction and delivery of the Relay Branch System. Note: Alternative methods to gain proper access can be utilized (e.g., iliac conduit)
  • Considered high risk or prohibitive risk for conventional surgery by treating physician or aortic team
  • Must be willing to comply with the follow-up evaluation schedule
  • Subject or legally authorized representative must sign the form prior to implant.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Significant stenosis, calcification, thrombus, or tortuosity of intended fixation sites that would compromise fixation or seal of the device
  • Aortic angulations (radius) less than 15mm at intended proximal landing zone.
  • Ascending aortas that would require the arch graft to be deployed less than 15mm distal to the coronaries
  • Pre-procedure occlusion or planned coverage of both subclavian arteries
  • Anatomic variants which would compromise circulation to both vertebral arteries after placement of the stent-graft
  • Prior endovascular repair in the ascending/descending thoracic aorta or aortic arch. The device may not be placed within any prior endovascular graft
  • Concomitant aneurysm/disease of the abdominal aorta requiring repair
  • Prior abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (endovascular or surgical) that was performed less than 6 months prior to the planned stent implant procedure
  • Prior mechanical aortic valve replacement except for hybrid valves with biological leaflets.
  • Major surgical or medical procedure within 45 days prior to the planned procedure or is scheduled for a major surgical or medical procedure within 60 days post implantation. Except for any planned procedures for the prospective stent-graft placement, e.g., left subclavian artery bypass or transposition
  • Untreatable allergy or sensitivity to contrast media or device components
  • Blood coagulation disorder or bleeding diathesis in which the treatment cannot be suspended for one week pre and post repair
  • Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) including unstable angina
  • Severe Congestive Heart Failure ( functional class IV)
  • Stroke within 12 months of the planned treatment date
  • Myocardial infarction within 3 months of the planned treatment date.
  • Chronic atrial fibrillation or other hypercoagulable condition that requires treatment with anticoagulants or presence of left atrial appendage thrombus
  • Severe pulmonary disease (documented FEVI \<30% or as assessed by the study physician) at screening
  • Acute renal failure (defined as serum creatinine > 2.5mg/dL Note: Patients that have chronic renal failure and are managed medically or through hemodialysis, and can tolerate the follow-up imaging schedule can be included.
  • Significant carotid bifurcation disease (>70% diameter reduction by duplex ultrasound or angiography)
  • Hemodynamic instability
  • Active systemic infection at the time of treatment
  • Morbid obesity or other condition that may compromise or prevent the necessary imaging requirements
  • Connective tissue disorders, mycotic aneurysms, or infected aorta
  • Less than two-year
  • Current or planned participation in an drug or device study that has not completed primary endpoint evaluation
  • Currently pregnant or planning to become pregnant during the course of the study
  • Medical, social, or psychological issues that the Investigator believes may interfere with treatment or follow-up
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
30 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Relay Branch System

    Subjects who receive the Relay Branch System for repair which includes those with aneurysmal disease, penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer (PAU), and chronic uncomplicated Type B aortic dissection.

    Device: penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer, aorta branch cardiovascular implant

Interventions

  • Devicepenetrating atherosclerotic ulcer, aorta branch cardiovascular implant

    The Relay Branch System is intended to provide an option for patients with arch and proximal descending chronic thoracic aortic pathologies.

    Also known as: Relay Branch System, system, endovascular graft, aortic aneurysm treatment

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Composite of Major Adverse Events (MAEs)

    The primary safety outcome determined by the rate of MAEs, including * All-cause mortality * Disabling stroke: a Modified Rankin Score (mRS) of 2 or more at 90 days and an increase in at least one mRS category from an individual's pre-stroke baseline * Permanent Paralysis/Paraparesis * Spontaneous Myocardial Infarction according to the SCAI definition * Renal Failure * Procedural Blood Loss \>1,000mL

    Time frame: 30 days after the index procedure

Secondary outcomes

  1. Composite of the following Criteria

    * Acute technical success evaluation, beginning with the insertion of the introducer sheath and as a composite of the following: 1. Success is defined as a successful delivery of the device through (i.e. ability to deliver the implant to the intended implantation site, without the need for unanticipated corrective intervention related to delivery): 2. Successful deployment of the device as defined as i. Deployment of the endovascular stent-graft at the intended implantation site; ii. Patency (\<50%) of all components of the implant with absence of device deformations requiring unplanned placement of an additional device within the endovascular stent-graft; and iii. absence of inadvertent covering of aortic branch vessels; and c. Successful withdrawal of the delivery system * Patency of all endograft components at 30 days

    Time frame: Technical success will be evaluated in 2 stages; the first evaluation occurs during the implant procedure. Technical success is then re-evaluated again 30 days post operation to ensure the graft placement was successful as outlined above

07

Study locations

12 sites
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 31, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03214601
Lead sponsor
Bolton Medical
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 11, 2017
Start date
Dec 4, 2017
Primary completion
Sep 18, 2023
Completion
Aug 31, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
May 31, 2025

Study contacts

Luis Sanchez, MD
principal investigator · Barnes Jewish Hospital, Washington Univ
Wilson Szeto, MD
principal investigator · Penn Presbyterian Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Apr 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion