ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03213938Updated Aug 9, 2022Results posted

Acupuncture for Chronic Prostatitis/Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome

An interventional study of Acupuncture and Sham acupuncture in Chronic Prostatitis With Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome, sponsored by Guang'anmen Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences. Completed at 1 site in China. Open to male participants aged 18 Years to 50 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-08-09.

Sponsored by Guang'anmen Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
440
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 50 Years
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

Chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS) refers to the presence of bothersome pelvic pain symptoms without an identifiable cause. Common symptoms of CP/CPPS include discomfort in the perineum, suprapubic region, and lower urinary tract symptoms. It affects men of all ages without apparent racial predisposition, among which, 36-50 years old are the most commonly influenced. Yet, few effective therapies are available for treating CP/CPPS.

Acupuncture may be an effective treatment option for CP/CPPS. However, effects of acupuncture on CP/CPPS remain uncertain because of the small sample sizes or other methodological limitations.

The objective of this multi-centre, randomized, sham acupuncture-controlled trial is to assess the effectiveness of acupuncture for relieving symptoms of CP/CPPS. The results will provide a robust conclusion with a high level of evidence.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Prostatitis With Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Chronic prostatitis
  • chronic pelvic pain syndrome
  • acupuncture
  • randomized controlled trial
03

In context

Prostatitis

88 studies on the registry are indexed under Prostatitis; 11 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 440 is above the median of 60 across 73 interventional studies indexed under Prostatitis.

Browse Prostatitis studies →

Lead sponsor

Guang'anmen Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences is the lead sponsor of 137 studies on the registry; 37 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 50 Years
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • 1.History of pain perceived in the prostate region and absence of other lower urinary tract pathology for a minimum of three of the past 6 months. In addition, any associated lower urinary tract symptoms, sexual function, and psychological factors should be addressed. Physical examinations, urinary analyses, and urine cultures will be performed for all subjects;
    1. Age 18 to 50 years.
    1. NIH Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH- CPSI) total score ≥ 15.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

    1. Prostate, bladder, or urethral cancer, seizure disorder in any medical history.
    1. Inflammatory bowel disease, active urethral stricture, neurologic disease or disorder affecting the bladder, liver disease, neurologic impairment or psychiatric disorder preventing understanding of consent and self-report scale.
    1. Urinary tract infection with a urine culture value of more than 100,000 CFU/mL, clinical evidence of urethritis, including urethral discharge or positive culture, diagnostic of sexually transmitted diseases (including gonorrhoea, chlamydia, mycoplasma or trichomonas, but not including /AIDS), symptoms of acute or chronic epididymitis).
    1. Residual urine volume≥100ML.
    1. Qmax≤15ML/S.
    1. Prior 4 weeks used androgen hormone inhibitors (finasteride), alpha-blockers (terazosin HCI, doxazosin mesylate, tamsulosin hydrochloride), antibiotics (ciprofloxacin hydrochloride), or any other prostatitis-specific medication (including herb and Chinese medicine).
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
440 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Acupuncture

    The participants in the acupuncture group will receive treatment that consists of 20 acupuncture sessions over an 8-week (3 sessions in each of the first 4 weeks, and 2 sessions in each of the remaining 4 weeks) period after baseline, each for 30 minutes. Hwato brand disposable acupuncture needles (size 0.30 × 75mm; size 0.30 × 40mm) will be used. Sanyinjiao (SP6), Zhongliao (BL33), Shenshu (BL23), and Huiyang (BL35), were selected as acupoints protocol. SP6 is on the tibial aspect of the leg, posterior to the medial border of the tibia, 3 cun superior to the prominence of the medial malleolus; BL32 is in the sacral region, in the second posterior sacral foramen; BL33 is in the third posterior sacral foramen; BL35 is in the buttock region, 0.5 cun lateral to the extremity of the coccyx.

    Device: Acupuncture

  • Sham comparator
    Sham acupuncture

    The participants in the sham acupuncture group will receive shallow needling at bilateral sham BL23, BL33, BL35 and SP6. The protocol includes the same duration and frequency of sessions as for the acupuncture treatment, but the treatment was delivered superficially at non-acupuncture points 10-15 mm to the lateral of corresponding acupuncture and not above a meridian line (15mm to BL23, BL33 and BL35; 10mm to SP6). The Hwato brand disposable acupuncture needles (size 0.30 × 25mm) will be inserted with a depth of 2-3 mm without any manipulation.

    Device: Sham acupuncture

Interventions

  • DeviceAcupuncture

    For acupuncture group, Hwato brand disposable acupuncture needles (size 0.30 × 75mm; size 0.30 × 40mm) will be used. Bilateral SP6, BL33, BL23, and BL35, were selected as acupoints protocol. Acupuncture group consists of 20 sessions over an 8-week period after baseline, each for 30 minutes, and will be administered over 8 weeks (3 sessions in each of the first 4 weeks, and 2 sessions in each of the remaining 4 weeks).

  • DeviceSham acupuncture

    For sham acupuncture group, Hwato brand disposable acupuncture needles (size 0.30 × 25mm) will be used to insert vertically about 2-3 mm without manipulation into non-acupoints bilateral sham SP6, sham BL33, sham BL23, and sham BL35, which were located at different physical locations than SP6, BL23, BL 33, and BL35. Sham acupuncture group consists of 20 sessions over an 8-week period after baseline, each for 30 minutes, and will be administered over 8 weeks (3 sessions in each of the first 4 weeks, and 2 sessions in each of the remaining 4 weeks).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Proportion of Responders at the End of 8-week

    The responder is defined as who has a decline of 6 or more than 6-point from baseline measured by using the National Institutes of Health Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI).

    Time frame: week 8

  2. Proportion of Responders at the End of 32-week

    The responder is defined as who has a decline of 6 or more than 6-point from baseline measured by using the NIH-CPSI.

    Time frame: week 32

Secondary outcomes

  1. Proportion of Responders at Other Time Points

    The responder is defined as who has a decline of 6 or more than 6-point from baseline measured by using the NIH-CPSI.

    Time frame: weeks 1-7; week 20

  2. the Change From Baseline in NIH-CPSI Total Score

    The National Institutes of Health Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI) is a universally accepted, reliable and valid instrument recommended for clinical evaluation and research of CP/CPPS by consensus guidelines. It measures the domains of pain (score range, 0-21), urinary function (0-10) and quality of life impact (0-12) in CP/CPPS, with a total score ranging from 0 to 43 and higher scores indicating worse conditions.

    Time frame: weeks 1-8; week 20; week 32

  3. the Change From Baseline in NIH-CPSI Subscales

    The NIH-CPSI is a universally accepted, reliable and valid instrument recommended for clinical evaluation and research of CP/CPPS by consensus guidelines. It measures the domains of pain, urinary function and quality of life impact in CP/CPPS. The score range of pain subscale is 0-21, with higher scores indicating worse conditions. The score range of urinary function subscale is 0-10, with higher scores indicating worse conditions. The score range of quality-of-life subscale is 0-12, with higher scores indicating worse quality of life.

    Time frame: weeks 1-8; week 20; week 32

  4. the Change From Baseline in the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS)

    IPSS is a valid, reliable and sensitive measure for patients with lower urinary tract symptoms; it is widely used in clinical practice and research to determine the severity of lower urinary tract symptoms, including incomplete bladder emptying, frequency of urination, intermittency, urgency, weak urine stream, straining and nocturia. Each of the questions is rated from 0 (not at all) to 5 (almost always). IPSS score ranges from 0 to 35, with higher score indicating more severe urinary symptoms.

    Time frame: week 4; week 8; week 20; week 32

  5. the Change From Baseline in the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)

    HADS is made up of 7 items for the assessment of depression and anxiety; the completion of this scale usually requires 2-5 minutes. HADS score ranges from 0 to 42, with higher scores indicating greater anxiety and depression.

    Time frame: week 8; week 20; week 32

  6. the Change From Baseline in the International Index of Erectile Function 5 (IIEF-5)

    The IIEF-5 is a psychometrically valid and reliable instrument with high sensitivity and specificity for detecting treatment effects in patients with erection dysfunction of a broad spectrum of aetiology. Chinese version IIEF-5 score ranges from 0 to 25, with lower scores indicating greater severity of dysfunction and minimal clinical important difference over 5.

    Time frame: week 8; week 20; week 32

  7. the Change From Baseline in the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Questionnaire

    The EQ-5D-5L is a well-established and suitable for evaluation of quality of life in participants with CP/CPPS. EQ-5D-5L overall index ranges from -0.39 to 1.00, with higher overall index indicating better generic health-status.

    Time frame: week 8; week 20; week 32

  8. the Proportions of Participants in Each Response Category of the Global Response Assessment (GRA)

    GRA consists of 7 response categories: markedly worsened, moderately worsened, slightly worsened, no change, slightly improved, moderately improved, and markedly improved.

    Time frame: week 4; week 8; week 20; week 32

  9. the Change for Peak and Average Urinary Flow Rate From Baseline

    Time frame: weeks 8 and 32

Other outcomes

  1. Expectation Assessment

    Expectation assessment will be assessed at baseline, which includes 2 brief questions to investigate whether patients are confident that acupuncture treatment will help their CP/CPPS: "In general, is acupuncture effective for controlling the illness?", "Do you think acupuncture will helpful to improve your CP/CPPS symptoms?" For each question, participants could choose "Yes", "No" or "unclear" as the answer.

    Time frame: baseline

07

Results

Posted Sep 27, 2021

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneAcupunctureSham Acupuncture
Started220220
Completed206208
Not completed1412
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up43
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy10
Withdrew: Decline to participate54
Withdrew: Without reason45

Outcome measures

PrimaryProportion of Responders at the End of 8-week

The responder is defined as who has a decline of 6 or more than 6-point from baseline measured by using the National Institutes of Health Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI).

Time frame:
week 8
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Proportion of Responders at the End of 8-week
percentage of participantsAcupunctureSham Acupuncture
Proportion of Responders at the End of 8-week60.636.8
PrimaryProportion of Responders at the End of 32-week

The responder is defined as who has a decline of 6 or more than 6-point from baseline measured by using the NIH-CPSI.

Time frame:
week 32
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Proportion of Responders at the End of 32-week
percentage of participantsAcupunctureSham Acupuncture
Proportion of Responders at the End of 32-week61.538.3
SecondaryProportion of Responders at Other Time Points

The responder is defined as who has a decline of 6 or more than 6-point from baseline measured by using the NIH-CPSI.

Time frame:
weeks 1-7; week 20
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Proportion of Responders at Other Time Points
percentage of participantsAcupunctureSham Acupuncture
Week 19.18.3
Week 215.213.9
Week 327.219.8
Week 439.526.4
Week 542.624.1
Week 653.033.3
Week 761.035.3
Week 2064.134.8
Secondarythe Change From Baseline in NIH-CPSI Total Score

The National Institutes of Health Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI) is a universally accepted, reliable and valid instrument recommended for clinical evaluation and research of CP/CPPS by consensus guidelines. It measures the domains of pain (score range, 0-21), urinary function (0-10) and quality of life impact (0-12) in CP/CPPS, with a total score ranging from 0 to 43 and higher scores indicating worse conditions.

Time frame:
weeks 1-8; week 20; week 32
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
the Change From Baseline in NIH-CPSI Total Score
score on a scaleAcupunctureSham Acupuncture
Week 1-1.9 (-2.4 to -1.5)-1.3 (-1.8 to -0.9)
Week 2-2.9 (-3.4 to -2.4)-2.4 (-2.9 to -1.9)
Week 3-3.9 (-4.4 to -3.4)-3.0 (-3.5 to -2.5)
Week 4-4.8 (-5.4 to -4.3)-3.7 (-4.2 to -3.1)
Week 5-5.2 (-5.8 to -4.6)-3.7 (-4.3 to -3.2)
Week 6-5.9 (-6.5 to -5.3)-4.0 (-4.6 to -3.5)
Week 7-6.7 (-7.3 to -6.1)-4.6 (-5.2 to -4.0)
Week 8-7.4 (-8.0 to -6.8)-4.9 (-5.5 to -4.3)
Week 20-7.2 (-8.0 to -6.6)-4.5 (-5.2 to -3.9)
Week 32-7.4 (-8.1 to -6.7)-4.9 (-5.5 to -4.2)
Secondarythe Change From Baseline in NIH-CPSI Subscales

The NIH-CPSI is a universally accepted, reliable and valid instrument recommended for clinical evaluation and research of CP/CPPS by consensus guidelines. It measures the domains of pain, urinary function and quality of life impact in CP/CPPS. The score range of pain subscale is 0-21, with higher scores indicating worse conditions. The score range of urinary function subscale is 0-10, with higher scores indicating worse conditions. The score range of quality-of-life subscale is 0-12, with higher scores indicating worse quality of life.

Time frame:
weeks 1-8; week 20; week 32
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
the Change From Baseline in NIH-CPSI Subscales
score on a scaleAcupunctureSham Acupuncture
Change in NIH-CPSI pain subscale at week 1-0.6 (-0.9 to -0.4)-0.5 (-0.7 to -0.2)
Change in NIH-CPSI pain subscale at week 2-0.8 (-1.1 to -0.6)-0.8 (-1.0 to -0.5)
Change in NIH-CPSI pain subscale at week 3-1.1 (-1.4 to -0.9)-0.8 (-1.1 to -0.6)
Change in NIH-CPSI pain subscale at week 4-1.6 (-1.8 to -1.3)-1.1 (-1.3 to -0.9)
Change in NIH-CPSI pain subscale at week 5-1.5 (-1.7 to -1.2)-1.1 (-1.3 to -0.9)
Change in NIH-CPSI pain subscale at week 6-1.8 (-2.0 to -1.5)-1.1 (-1.4 to -0.9)
Change in NIH-CPSI pain subscale at week 7-2.0 (-2.3 to -1.8)-1.3 (-1.5 to -1.1)
Change in NIH-CPSI pain subscale at week 8-2.1 (-2.4 to -1.9)-1.3 (-1.5 to -1.1)
Change in NIH-CPSI pain subscale at week 20-2.0 (-2.3 to -1.8)-1.0 (-1.2 to -0.7)
Change in NIH-CPSI pain subscale at week 32-2.0 (-2.3 to -1.8)-1.3 (-1.5 to -1.0)
Change in NIH-CPSI urinary subscale at week 1-0.5 (-0.7 to -0.3)-0.4 (-0.6 to -0.2)
Change in NIH-CPSI urinary subscale at week 2-0.8 (-1.0 to -0.6)-0.6 (-0.8 to -0.4)
Change in NIH-CPSI urinary subscale at week 3-1.0 (-1.3 to -0.8)-0.9 (-1.1 to -0.7)
Change in NIH-CPSI urinary subscale at week 4-1.3 (-1.6 to -1.1)-1.0 (-1.2 to -0.8)
Change in NIH-CPSI urinary subscale at week 5-1.6 (-1.8 to -1.3)-1.1 (-1.3 to -0.9)
Change in NIH-CPSI urinary subscale at week 6-1.7 (-1.9 to -1.5)-1.2 (-1.4 to -0.9)
Change in NIH-CPSI urinary subscale at week 7-1.9 (-2.2 to -1.7)-1.3 (-1.6 to -1.1)
Change in NIH-CPSI urinary subscale at week 8-2.1 (-2.4 to -1.9)-1.4 (-1.6 to -1.2)
Change in NIH-CPSI urinary subscale at week 20-2.1 (-2.3 to -1.8)-1.5 (-1.7 to -1.2)
Change in NIH-CPSI urinary subscale at week 32-2.1 (-2.4 to -1.9)-1.5 (-1.8 to -1.2)
Change in NIH-CPSI quality of life subscale at week 1-0.8 (-0.9 to -0.6)-0.5 (-0.7 to -0.3)
Change in NIH-CPSI quality of life subscale at week 2-1.2 (-1.4 to -1.0)-0.9 (-1.2 to -0.7)
Change in NIH-CPSI quality of life subscale at week 3-1.7 (-1.9 to -1.5)-1.2 (-1.4 to -1.0)
Change in NIH-CPSI quality of life subscale at week 4-1.9 (-2.2 to -1.7)-1.5 (-1.8 to -1.3)
Change in NIH-CPSI quality of life subscale at week 5-2.2 (-2.4 to -1.9)-1.5 (-1.8 to -1.3)
Change in NIH-CPSI quality of life subscale at week 6-2.4 (-2.7 to -2.2)-1.7 (-2.0 to -1.5)
Change in NIH-CPSI quality of life subscale at week 7-2.8 (-3.0 to -2.5)-1.9 (-2.2 to -1.7)
Change in NIH-CPSI quality of life subscale at week 8-3.1 (-3.4 to -2.8)-2.2 (-2.4 to -1.9)
Change in NIH-CPSI quality of life subscale at week 20-3.2 (-3.5 to -2.8)-2.0 (-2.4 to -1.7)
Change in NIH-CPSI quality of life subscale at week 32-3.1 (-3.5 to -2.8)-2.1 (-2.4 to -1.8)
Secondarythe Change From Baseline in the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS)

IPSS is a valid, reliable and sensitive measure for patients with lower urinary tract symptoms; it is widely used in clinical practice and research to determine the severity of lower urinary tract symptoms, including incomplete bladder emptying, frequency of urination, intermittency, urgency, weak urine stream, straining and nocturia. Each of the questions is rated from 0 (not at all) to 5 (almost always). IPSS score ranges from 0 to 35, with higher score indicating more severe urinary symptoms.

Time frame:
week 4; week 8; week 20; week 32
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
the Change From Baseline in the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS)
score on a scaleAcupunctureSham Acupuncture
Week 4-2.7 (-3.2 to -2.3)-1.7 (-2.1 to -1.2)
Week 8-4.4 (-4.9 to -3.9)-2.7 (-3.2 to -2.2)
Week 20-4.7 (-5.3 to -4.2)-3.0 (-3.6 to -2.4)
Week 32-4.7 (-5.4 to -4.1)-3.1 (-3.8 to -2.5)
Secondarythe Change From Baseline in the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)

HADS is made up of 7 items for the assessment of depression and anxiety; the completion of this scale usually requires 2-5 minutes. HADS score ranges from 0 to 42, with higher scores indicating greater anxiety and depression.

Time frame:
week 8; week 20; week 32
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
the Change From Baseline in the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
score on a scaleAcupunctureSham Acupuncture
Week 8-1.9 (-2.5 to -1.4)-0.8 (-1.3 to -0.3)
Week 20-2.4 (-3.0 to -1.8)-0.6 (-1.3 to 0.0)
Week 32-2.8 (-3.5 to -2.2)-0.5 (-1.2 to 0.1)
Secondarythe Change From Baseline in the International Index of Erectile Function 5 (IIEF-5)

The IIEF-5 is a psychometrically valid and reliable instrument with high sensitivity and specificity for detecting treatment effects in patients with erection dysfunction of a broad spectrum of aetiology. Chinese version IIEF-5 score ranges from 0 to 25, with lower scores indicating greater severity of dysfunction and minimal clinical important difference over 5.

Time frame:
week 8; week 20; week 32
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
the Change From Baseline in the International Index of Erectile Function 5 (IIEF-5)
score on a scaleAcupunctureSham Acupuncture
Week 80.8 (0.2 to 1.3)0.3 (-0.3 to 0.8)
Week 200.7 (0.2 to 1.3)0.2 (-0.3 to 0.7)
Week 321.0 (0.4 to 1.6)0.4 (-0.1 to 1.0)
Secondarythe Change From Baseline in the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Questionnaire

The EQ-5D-5L is a well-established and suitable for evaluation of quality of life in participants with CP/CPPS. EQ-5D-5L overall index ranges from -0.39 to 1.00, with higher overall index indicating better generic health-status.

Time frame:
week 8; week 20; week 32
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
the Change From Baseline in the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Questionnaire
units on a scaleAcupunctureSham Acupuncture
Week 80.06 (0.05 to 0.07)0.03 (0.02 to 0.04)
Week 200.06 (0.05 to 0.07)0.03 (0.02 to 0.04)
Week 320.06 (0.05 to 0.08)0.03 (0.02 to 0.04)
Secondarythe Proportions of Participants in Each Response Category of the Global Response Assessment (GRA)

GRA consists of 7 response categories: markedly worsened, moderately worsened, slightly worsened, no change, slightly improved, moderately improved, and markedly improved.

Time frame:
week 4; week 8; week 20; week 32
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
the Proportions of Participants in Each Response Category of the Global Response Assessment (GRA)
percentage of participantsAcupunctureSham Acupuncture
Week 4 : Markedly improved15.97.5
Week 4 : Moderately improved24.014.6
Week 4 : Slightly improved46.650.7
Week 4 : No change13.025.4
Week 4 : Slightly worsened0.51.9
Week 4 : Moderately worsened00
Week 4 : Markedly worsened00
Week 8 : Markedly improved30.68.7
Week 8 : Moderately improved36.427.9
Week 8 : Slightly improved27.240.9
Week 8 : No change5.319.2
Week 8 : Slightly worsened0.53.4
Week 8 : Moderately worsened00
Week 8 : Markedly worsened00
Week 20 : Markedly improved24.36.7
Week 20 : Moderately improved24.317.8
Week 20 : Slightly improved27.731.7
Week 20 : No change19.430.3
Week 20 : Slightly worsened4.412.0
Week 20 : Moderately worsened01.4
Week 20 : Markedly worsened00
Week 32 : Markedly improved22.38.2
Week 32 : Moderately improved24.816.8
Week 32 : Slightly improved27.229.3
Week 32 : No change20.932.7
Week 32 : Slightly worsened4.48.7
Week 32 : Moderately worsened0.53.9
Week 32 : Markedly worsened00.5
Secondarythe Change for Peak and Average Urinary Flow Rate From Baseline
Time frame:
weeks 8 and 32
Reported as:
Mean · ml/s
the Change for Peak and Average Urinary Flow Rate From Baseline
ml/sAcupunctureSham Acupuncture
Changes in peak urinary flow rate at week 80.6 (-0.3 to 1.6)0.7 (-0.2 to 1.6)
Changes in peak urinary flow rate at week 320.5 (-0.4 to 1.3)-0.6 (-1.4 to 0.2)
Changes in average urinary flow rate at week 80.6 (0.1 to 1.1)0.4 (-0.1 to 0.9)
Changes in average urinary flow rate at week 320.5 (0.1 to 1.0)-0.2 (-0.6 to 0.3)
Other pre-specifiedExpectation Assessment

Expectation assessment will be assessed at baseline, which includes 2 brief questions to investigate whether patients are confident that acupuncture treatment will help their CP/CPPS: "In general, is acupuncture effective for controlling the illness?", "Do you think acupuncture will helpful to improve your CP/CPPS symptoms?" For each question, participants could choose "Yes", "No" or "unclear" as the answer.

Time frame:
baseline
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Expectation Assessment
ParticipantsAcupunctureSham Acupuncture
Do you believe acupuncture is effective for treating diseases in general? — Yes167165
Do you believe acupuncture is effective for treating diseases in general? — No01
Do you believe acupuncture is effective for treating diseases in general? — Unclear4649
Do you think acupuncture will be helpful to improve your CP/CPPS symptoms? — Yes156150
Do you think acupuncture will be helpful to improve your CP/CPPS symptoms? — No01
Do you think acupuncture will be helpful to improve your CP/CPPS symptoms? — Unclear5764

Adverse events

Collected over 34 weeks. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Acupuncture0/220 (0%)0/220 (0%)20/220 (9.1%)
Sham Acupuncture0/220 (0%)0/220 (0%)14/220 (6.4%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventAcupunctureSham Acupuncture
Subcutaneous hematomaSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders9/2205/220
ColdGeneral disorders7/2206/220
Localized infectionInfections and infestations1/2200/220
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders1/2200/220
FeverGeneral disorders1/2201/220
TonsillitisRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/2201/220
FallInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/2201/220
PneumoniaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/2200/220
Acute gastritisGastrointestinal disorders0/2201/220

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)AcupunctureSham AcupunctureTotal
Mean35.5 ± 8.036.1 ± 7.935.8 ± 8.0
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)AcupunctureSham AcupunctureTotal
Female000
Male220220440
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)AcupunctureSham AcupunctureTotal
Han213214427
Others224
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)AcupunctureSham AcupunctureTotal
China220220440
National Institutes of Health Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI) total score
National Institutes of Health Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI) total score(units on a scale)AcupunctureSham AcupunctureTotal
Mean31.0 ± 4.831.4 ± 5.231.2 ± 5.0
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Guang'anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Science
    Beijing, Beijing 100053, China
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Qin Z, Liu Y, Zhou K, Wu J, Pang R, Li N, Xu C, Kwong JSW, Liu Z. Acupuncture for chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2017 Dec 22;18(1):616. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2383-8. PubMed 29273095 ↗
  • Sun Y, Liu Y, Liu B, Zhou K, Yue Z, Zhang W, Fu W, Yang J, Li N, He L, Zang Z, Su T, Fang J, Ding Y, Qin Z, Song H, Hu H, Zhao H, Mo Q, Zhou J, Wu J, Liu X, Wang W, Pang R, Chen H, Wang X, Liu Z. Efficacy of Acupuncture for Chronic Prostatitis/Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome : A Randomized Trial. Ann Intern Med. 2021 Oct;174(10):1357-1366. doi: 10.7326/M21-1814. Epub 2021 Aug 17. PubMed 34399062 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Deidentified participant data and data dictionary will be available with publication until six months after publication. Formal request should be sent to the corresponding author (zhishunjournal@163.com) with a methodologically sound proposal. Researchers whose proposal has been approved will sign a data access agreement

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form, Clinical study report, Analytic code

Time frame: The data will be available with publication until until six months after publication.

Access criteria: Formal request should be sent to the corresponding author (zhishunjournal@163.com) with a methodologically sound proposal. Researchers whose proposal has been approved. Researchers whose proposal has been approved will sign a data access agreement

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 9, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03213938
Responsible party
Liu Zhishun (Principal Investigator, Guang'anmen Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 11, 2017
Start date
Oct 9, 2017
Primary completion
Dec 10, 2019
Completion
Dec 10, 2019
Results posted
Sep 27, 2021
Last update
Aug 9, 2022

Study contacts

Zhishun Liu
principal investigator · Guang'anmen Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion