CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03202537Updated Jan 12, 2023

Effectiveness of Physiologic Testing in PPI Non-Responders

An Early Phase 1 interventional study of dexlansoprazole in Gastro Esophageal Reflux, sponsored by Northwestern University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-01-12.

Sponsored by Northwestern University · Early Phase 1, Interventional, and Other

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was Jul 2022, 4 years 2 months ago, and no results have been posted to the registry.
Phase
Early Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
240
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The prevalence of GERD is estimated to be as high as 20% in the US, and up to 50% remain symptomatic on proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy. The clinical approach to understand the mechanism of nonresponse is not standardized, and patients will often undergo various tests: 1) pH-impedance, 2) wireless pH monitoring over 96 hours, 3) high-resolution impedance manometry (HRIM), and 4) mucosal impedance (MI). Controversy exists regarding the best technique, optimal study protocol and treatment approach for the PPI non-responder (PPINR) group, resulting in inappropriate resource utilization and a failure to provide effective personalized care. The first aim is to identify the relevant physiologic parameters of diagnostic tools in their ability to predict PPI requirement. In Aim Two, these results will be applied to guide the formal development of a clinical algorithm for the management of PPINRs with personalized clinical pathways based on mechanism of treatment failure. We will first perform a prospective comparison trial of 240 PPINR subjects at 2 sites over 4 years. Subjects will complete symptom questionnaires and undergo diagnostic testing (pH-impedance on PPI therapy, HRIM, 96-hr wireless pH monitoring off PPI therapy and MI). Those who have a positive pH study and/or resume PPI therapy will receive escalation of therapy with dexlansoprazole. We will compare the ability of 96-hr wireless pH monitoring vs pH impedance to predict PPI requirement and response to dexlansoprazole, respectively. We will explore whether MI is equivalent to 96-hr wireless pH monitoring in predicting PPI requirement. Lastly, we will determine whether HRIM metrics can be utilized to determine reflux burden, mechanism and response to treatment. Next, the investigators will develop quality measures for reflux testing in order to develop a simplified management strategy for the PPINR group. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Methodology will be utilized with an expert working group to develop formal validated quality measures for reflux testing.

Read the detailed description

The prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease is estimated to be as high as 20% in the United States, and up to 50% of these patients remain symptomatic on proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy. Unfortunately, the clinical approach to understand the mechanism of nonresponse is not standardized, and patients will often undergo various esophageal function tests: 1) pH-impedance, 2) wireless pH monitoring over 96 hours, 3) high-resolution impedance manometry (HRIM), and 4) mucosal impedance. Currently significant controversy exists regarding the best technique, optimal study protocol and treatment approach for the PPI non-responder (PPINR) group, resulting in inappropriate resource utilization and a failure to provide effective personalized care. As such, PPINRs contribute to a large healthcare burden in the United States.

The first aim of the study is to identify the relevant physiologic parameters of the aforementioned diagnostic tools in their ability to predict PPI requirement. Subsequently, in Aim Two, these results will be applied to guide the formal development of a clinical algorithm for the management of PPINRs with personalized clinical pathways based on mechanism of treatment failure.

The investigators will first perform a prospective comparison trial of 240 PPINR subjects at two centers over a 4 year period. Subjects will complete symptom questionnaires and undergo diagnostic testing (pH-impedance on PPI therapy, HRIM, 96-hthe wireless pH monitoring off of PPI therapy and mucosal impedance). Those who have a positive pH study and/or resume PPI therapy will receive escalation of acid suppression therapy with dexlansoprazole. Experiments 1a \& 1b will compare the ability of 96-hthe wireless pH monitoring vs pH impedance to predict PPI requirement and response to dexlansoprazole, respectively. Experiment 1c will explore whether mucosal impedance is equivalent to 96-hthe wireless pH monitoring in predicting PPI requirement. Lastly, Experiment 1d will determine whether HRIM metrics can be utilized to determine reflux burden, mechanism and response to treatment. Next, the investigators will develop quality measures for reflux testing in order to develop a simplified management strategy for the PPINR group. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Methodology will be utilized with an expert working group to develop formal validated quality measures for reflux testing based on results from aim 1 in addition to the available literature \& evidence. This will be conducted over twelve months (years 4 to 5).

02

Conditions studied

  • Gastro Esophageal Reflux
03

In context

Gastroesophageal Reflux

1,067 studies on the registry are indexed under Gastroesophageal Reflux; 188 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 240 is above the median of 72 across 711 interventional studies indexed under Gastroesophageal Reflux.

Browse Gastroesophageal Reflux studies →

Lead sponsor

Northwestern University is the lead sponsor of 1,396 studies on the registry; 199 are open to participants now.

Of its 102 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 73 (72%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Male or female subjects aged 18-80 years old (females of childbearing potential should be on highly effective contraceptive methods)
  • Mentally capable to provide informed consent in English
  • Present to the Northwestern Medical Group GI practice or the Washington University Division of Gastroenterology with symptoms of GERD (heartburn, regurgitation, and non-cardiac chest pain)
  • Have failed an appropriate compliant trial of PPI therapy with a GERD-Q score ≥8.
  • Able to undergo endoscopy, ambulatory reflux monitoring, manometry, PPI therapy cessation and trial of dexlansoprazole therapy. Subjects with Los Angeles Classification Grade A (mild) or B esophagitis and symptomatic, non-erosive disease will be enrolled.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participation in a concurrent clinical trial or completed another trial within past 8 weeks.
  • Active severe erosive esophagitis (Los Angeles Grade C or D), long-segment Barrett's esophagus (Zap score of 4)
  • Eosinophilic esophagitis
  • Prior gastrointestinal surgery of the esophagus and/or stomach
  • Current treatment with dexlansoprazole
  • Current signs or symptoms of heart disease. All patients with non-cardiac chest pain are required to have a cardiologist evaluation as standard of care work up in the evaluation of non-cardiac chest pain.
  • Subjects with clinically abnormal results of the screening ECG and/or chemistry panel (particularly prolonged QTc interval or hypomagnesaemia) excluded from the dexlansoprazole trial. Subjects with sensitivities or allergies to the metals contained in the Bravo capsule including chromium, nickel, copper, cobalt, and iron.
  • Unstable medical illness with ongoing diagnostic work-up and treatment. Patients with well-controlled hypertension, diabetes and a remote history of ischemic heart disease that is deemed stable, as judged by the investigator can be included.
  • History of drug addiction, drug abuse or alcoholism.
  • Current neurologic or cognitive impairment, which would preclude ability to obtain informed consent.
  • Pregnant patients.
  • Patients with Cirrhosis (Childs Classification A-C).Special vulnerable populations including children, prisoners, institutionalized individuals.
  • Bleeding disorder or requirement of NSAID/aspirin during monitoring period.
  • Drugs that affect gastrointestinal symptoms (H2 blockers, antacids, metoclopramide, domperidone, erythromycin, anticholinergics [bentyl, levsin, belladonna etc.]). Antidepressants can be continued at stable dose.
  • Drugs listed on the Dexilant label including antiretrovirals (Rilpivirine-containing products, Atazanavir, Nelfinavir, Saquinavir, etc), Warfarin, Methotrexate, Drugs Dependent on Gastric pH for Absorption (e.g., iron salts, erlotinib, dasatinib, nilotinib, mycophenolate mofetil, ketoconazole/itraconazole), Tacrolimus, CYP2C19 or CYP3A4 Inducers or inhibitors.
  • Patients found to have achalasia, a spastic disorder, hypercontractile disorder or functional obstruction at the esophagogastric junction will be excluded. Subjects with a history of structuring or narrowing upon endoscopy (Subjects with no such history will be enrolled; however, if such features are noted upon endoscopy during the study, these subjects will not undergo MI testing).
05

Study design

Phase
Early Phase 1
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
240 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    dexlansoprazole

    dexlansoprazole 90mg per day (60mg am, 30mg pm dosing) for 4 weeks

    Drug: dexlansoprazole

Interventions

  • Drugdexlansoprazole

    dexlansoprazole treatment for Gastroesophageal Reflux symptoms

    Also known as: Dexilant

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. number of patients able to successfully withdraw from PPI treatment

    ability of 96 hour pH wireless vs pH impedance to predict PPI requirement

    Time frame: 4.5 years

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Northwestern Memorial Health Care
    Chicago, Illinois 60611, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Yadlapati R, Gyawali CP, Masihi M, Carlson DA, Kahrilas PJ, Nix BD, Jain A, Triggs JR, Vaezi MF, Kia L, Kaizer A, Pandolfino JE. Optimal Wireless Reflux Monitoring Metrics to Predict Discontinuation of Proton Pump Inhibitor Therapy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2022 Oct 1;117(10):1573-1582. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001871. Epub 2022 Jun 10. PubMed 35973148 ↗
  • Yadlapati R, Masihi M, Gyawali CP, Carlson DA, Kahrilas PJ, Nix BD, Jain A, Triggs JR, Vaezi MF, Kia L, Kaizer A, Pandolfino JE. Ambulatory Reflux Monitoring Guides Proton Pump Inhibitor Discontinuation in Patients With Gastroesophageal Reflux Symptoms: A Clinical Trial. Gastroenterology. 2021 Jan;160(1):174-182.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.09.013. Epub 2020 Sep 16. PubMed 32949568 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 12, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03202537
Lead sponsor
Northwestern University
Collaborators
Washington University School of Medicine, Vanderbilt University
Responsible party
John Pandolfino (Professor of Medicine, Northwestern University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 28, 2017
Start date
Jul 1, 2017
Primary completion
Jul 31, 2022
Completion
Jul 31, 2022
Last update
Jan 12, 2023

Study contacts

John Pandolfino, MD
principal investigator · Northwestern University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion