CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03201419Updated Mar 2, 2022Results posted

A Trial to Investigate Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of FE 201836 for Nocturia Due to Nocturnal Polyuria in Adults

A Phase 2 interventional study of FE 201836 and Desmopressin in Nocturia, sponsored by Ferring Pharmaceuticals. Completed at 72 sites in 7 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-03-02.

Sponsored by Ferring Pharmaceuticals · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
302
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this trial was to investigate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of different oral doses of FE 201836, with desmopressin as a benchmark, during 12 weeks of treatment for nocturia due to nocturnal polyuria in adults

02

Conditions studied

  • Nocturia

Browse trials for

03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults ≥18 years of age (at the time of written consent)
  • Medical history of, or subject reported nocturia symptoms during the 6 months prior to Visit 1
  • ≥2 nocturnal voids (an average over 3 days) as documented in the 3-day e-Diary prior to Visit 2
  • The largest single voided volume must be ≥200 mL (at least 1 void ≥200 mL) as documented in the 3-day e-Diary prior to Visit 2
  • Nocturnal polyuria, defined as Nocturnal Polyuria index >33%, a ratio of Nocturnal Urine Volume in excess of 33% of total daily (24-hour) urine volume as documented in the 3-day e-Diary prior to Visit 2
  • ≥20% decrease in the nocturnal diuresis rate (mL/min) (that was recorded at Visit 2) as documented in the 3-day e-Diary prior to Visit 3

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Current diagnosis of Obstructive Sleep Apnoea (OSA)
  • Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS)
  • Bladder Outlet Obstruction (BOO) or urine flow \<5 mL/s, as confirmed by uroflowmetry upon suspicion during screening prior to Visit 2
  • Urinary incontinence defined as an average of >1 episode/day in the 3-day e-Diary prior to Visit 2 (occasional urge incontinence during daytime or at night on the way to void is not necessarily exclusionary)
  • Any pelvic or lower urinary tract surgery and/or radio therapy or previous pelvic irradiation within the past 6 months prior to Visit 1. Including e.g., transurethral resection for Bladder Outlet Obstruction or Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia, hysterectomy or female incontinence procedures
  • Genito-urinary tract pathology that can in the investigator's opinion be responsible for urgency or urinary incontinence e.g., symptomatic or recurrent urinary tract infections, interstitial cystitis, bladder-related pain, chronic pelvic pain syndrome, or stone in the bladder or urethra causing symptoms
  • A history of cancer with the last date of disease activity/presence of malignancy within the last 12 months prior to Visit 1, except for adequately treated basal cell carcinoma of the skin
  • History of any neurological disease affecting bladder function or muscle strength (e.g., Multiple Sclerosis, Parkinson's, spinal cord injury, spina bifida)
  • Habitual (fluid intake >3L per day) or psychogenic polydipsia
  • Uncontrolled hypertension, as judged by the investigator
  • Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, as judged by the investigator
  • Central or nephrogenic diabetes insipidus
  • Known history of Syndrome of Inappropriate Antidiuretic Hormone (SIADH) secretion
  • History of gastric retention
  • Suspicion or evidence of congestive heart failure, (New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II, III, IV)
  • Hyponatraemia:

    • Serum sodium level \<135 mmol/L at Visit 1(re-tested, with results available within 7 days)
    • Serum sodium level \<130 mmol/L at Visit 3 (re-tested, with results available within 7 days)
  • Use of any prohibited therapy listed below:

    • Current or former (within 3 months prior to screening) treatment with any other investigational medicinal product (IMP)
    • Unstable electrostimulation or behavioural bladder training program less than 3 months prior to screening (stable electrostimulation or behavioural bladder training program started at least 3 months before screening are acceptable)
    • Thiazide diuretics
    • Antiarrhythmic agents
    • V2-receptor antagonists/agonists (e.g., vaptans/desmopressin, vasopressin)
    • Loperamide
    • Botulinum toxin (cosmetic non-urological use is acceptable)
    • Valproate
04

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
302 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    FE 201836 500 μg (Randomized Treatment Period)

    FE 201836 500 μg oral solution and placebo orally disintegrating tablet (ODT), administered once daily

    Drug: FE 201836 · Drug: Placebo ODT

  • Experimental
    FE 201836 350 μg (Randomized Treatment Period)

    FE 201836 350 μg oral solution and placebo ODT, administered once daily

    Drug: FE 201836 · Drug: Placebo ODT

  • Experimental
    FE 201836 250 μg (Randomized Treatment Period)

    FE 201836 250 μg oral solution and placebo ODT, administered once daily

    Drug: FE 201836 · Drug: Placebo ODT

  • Experimental
    FE 201836 150 μg (Randomized Treatment Period)

    FE 201836 150 μg oral solution and placebo ODT, administered once daily

    Drug: FE 201836 · Drug: Placebo ODT

  • Experimental
    FE 201836 100 μg (Randomized Treatment Period)

    FE 201836 100 μg oral solution and placebo ODT, administered once daily

    Drug: FE 201836 · Drug: Placebo ODT

  • Experimental
    FE 201836 50 μg (Randomized Treatment Period)

    FE 201836 50 μg oral solution and placebo ODT, administered once daily

    Drug: FE 201836 · Drug: Placebo ODT

  • Experimental
    Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period)

    Placebo oral solution and placebo ODT, administered once daily

    Drug: Placebo oral solution · Drug: Placebo ODT

  • Experimental
    Desmopressin 25 μg (Randomized Treatment Period)

    Desmopressin 25 μg ODT and placebo oral solution, administered once daily (female subjects)

    Drug: Desmopressin · Drug: Placebo oral solution

  • Experimental
    Desmopressin 50 μg (Randomized Treatment Period)

    Desmopressin 50 μg ODT and placebo oral solution, administered once daily (male subjects)

    Drug: Desmopressin · Drug: Placebo oral solution

Interventions

  • DrugFE 201836

    Oral solution for daily intake

    Also known as: Velmupressin

  • DrugDesmopressin

    Desmopressin Orally Disintegrating Tablet (ODT)

    Also known as: NOCDURNA

  • DrugPlacebo oral solution

    Manufactured to mimic experimental drug

  • DrugPlacebo ODT

    Manufactured to mimic experimental drug

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Aggregated Mean Number of Nocturnal Voids During 12 Weeks of Treatment

    Nocturnal voids were defined as voids occuring from 5 minutes after bedtime until rising in the morning. The number of nocturnal voids at each visit was calculated as the average over the 3 consecutive 24 hour periods just prior to the respective visit. The visit-specific means were aggregated into a mean of current and preceding visits. Level estimated for baseline value of mean number of nocturnal voids equal to 2, and 95% credibility interval (2.5 and 97.5 percentiles of the posterior distribution) instead of confidence interval are presented in this endpoint.

    Time frame: Baseline, during 12 weeks of treatment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Nocturnal Voids at Week 1

    Nocturnal voids were defined as voids occuring from 5 minutes after bedtime until rising in the morning. The number of nocturnal voids at each visit was calculated as the average over the 3 consecutive 24 hour periods just prior to the respective visit. Adjusted visit-specific mean changes from baseline in nocturnal voids are estimated using a baseline value of 2. MMRM=Mixed Model for Repeated Measurements. For all visit-specific results, the tables present the number of subjects with an observation of the endpoints in question at the specific visit. All secondary analyses are performed using the observed-case approach based on repeated measurements for all subjects in the ITT-RT population. That is, these secondary analyses are based on all subjects with at least one non-missing post-baseline observation (with a baseline value if relevant).

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 1

  2. Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Nocturnal Voids at Week 4

    Nocturnal voids were defined as voids occuring from 5 minutes after bedtime until rising in the morning. The number of nocturnal voids at each visit was calculated as the average over the 3 consecutive 24 hour periods just prior to the respective visit. Adjusted visit-specific mean changes from baseline in nocturnal voids are estimated using a baseline value of 2.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4

  3. Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Nocturnal Voids at Week 8

    Nocturnal voids were defined as voids occuring from 5 minutes after bedtime until rising in the morning. The number of nocturnal voids at each visit was calculated as the average over the 3 consecutive 24 hour periods just prior to the respective visit. Adjusted visit-specific mean changes from baseline in nocturnal voids are estimated using a baseline value of 2.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 8

  4. Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Nocturnal Voids at Week 12

    Nocturnal voids were defined as voids occuring from 5 minutes after bedtime until rising in the morning. The number of nocturnal voids at each visit was calculated as the average over the 3 consecutive 24 hour periods just prior to the respective visit. Adjusted visit-specific mean changes from baseline in nocturnal voids are estimated using a baseline value of 2.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

  5. Responder Rate in Nocturnal Voids at Week 1

    Defined as 50% reduction in nocturnal voids from baseline. Adjusted visit-specific estimated odds of at least 50% in the reduction mean number of nocturnal voids are estimated using a baseline value of 2. The estimated odd equals the probability of response divided by the probability of non-response; these odds may vary between 0 and infinity. For example, if the probability of responding is 80%, the odd of responding is 4, as it is 4 times more likely to respond (80%) then it is not to respond (20%).

    Time frame: Week 1

  6. Responder Rate in Nocturnal Voids at Week 4

    Defined as 50% reduction in nocturnal voids from baseline. Adjusted visit-specific estimated odds of at least 50% reduction in the mean number of nocturnal voids are estimated using a baseline value of 2. The estimated odd equals the probability of response divided by the probability of non-response; these odds may vary between 0 and infinity. For example, if the probability of responding is 80%, the odd of responding is 4, as it is 4 times more likely to respond (80%) then it is not to respond (20%).

    Time frame: Week 4

  7. Responder Rate in Nocturnal Voids at Week 8

    Defined as 50% reduction in nocturnal voids from baseline. Adjusted visit-specific estimated odds of at least 50% reduction in the mean number of nocturnal voids are estimated using a baseline value of 2. The estimated odd equals the probability of response divided by the probability of non-response; these odds may vary between 0 and infinity. For example, if the probability of responding is 80%, the odd of responding is 4, as it is 4 times more likely to respond (80%) then it is not to respond (20%).

    Time frame: Week 8

  8. Responder Rate in Nocturnal Voids at Week 12

    Defined as 50% reduction in nocturnal voids from baseline. Adjusted visit-specific estimated odds of at least 50% reduction in the mean number of nocturnal voids are estimated using a baseline value of 2. The estimated odd equals the probability of response divided by the probability of non-response; these odds may vary between 0 and infinity. For example, if the probability of responding is 80%, the odd of responding is 4, as it is 4 times more likely to respond (80%) then it is not to respond (20%).

    Time frame: Week 12

  9. Responder Rate in Nocturnal Voids During 12 Weeks of Treatment

    Defined as 50% reduction in nocturnal voids from baseline. Estimated odds of at least 50% reduction in the aggregated mean number of nocturnal voids for a subject with 2 nocturnal voids at baseline are presented in this endpoint. The 95% credibility interval (2.5 and 97.5 percentiles of the posterior distribution) instead of confidence interval is presented for this endpoint. The estimated odd equals the probability of response divided by the probability of non-response; these odds may vary between 0 and infinity. For example, if the probability of responding is 80%, the odd of responding is 4, as it is 4 times more likely to respond (80%) then it is not to respond (20%).

    Time frame: During 12 weeks of treatment

  10. Change From Baseline in Mean NI Diary Total Score at Week 1

    The NI Diary is a 12-item questionnaire with 11 core items (Q1-Q11) and an overall quality of life (QoL) impact question (Q12). The NI Diary Total Scores are calculated by summing the 11 core items.Responses are scored from 0 to 4 (lowest t o highest impact). The NI Diary Total is standardized from 0 to 100 (lowest to highest impact). The score at each visit was calculated as the average over the three consecutive 24 hour periods just prior to the respective visit. Adjusted visit-specific mean changes from baseline in NI Diary Total Score are estimated using a baseline value of 40.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 1

  11. Change From Baseline in Mean NI Diary Total Score at Week 4

    The NI Diary is a 12-item questionnaire with 11 core items (Q1-Q11) and an overall QoL impact question (Q12). The NI Diary Total Scores are calculated by summing the 11 core items. Responses are scored from 0 to 4 (lowest to highest impact). The NI Diary Total is standardized from 0 to 100 (lowest to highest impact). The score at each visit was calculated as the average over the three consecutive 24 hour periods just prior to the respective visit. Adjusted visit-specific mean changes from baseline in NI Diary Total Score are estimated using a baseline value of 40.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4

  12. Change From Baseline in Mean NI Diary Total Score at Week 8

    The NI Diary is a 12-item questionnaire with 11 core items (Q1-Q11) and an overall QoL impact question (Q12). The NI Diary Total Scores are calculated by summing the 11 core items. Responses are scored from 0 to 4 (lowest to highest impact). The NI Diary Total is standardized from 0 to 100 (lowest to highest impact). The score at each visit was calculated as the average over the three consecutive 24 hour periods just prior to the respective visit. Adjusted visit-specific mean changes from baseline in NI Diary Total Score are estimated using a baseline value of 40.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 8

  13. Change From Baseline in Mean NI Diary Total Score at Week 12

    The NI Diary is a 12-item questionnaire with 11 core items (Q1-Q11) and an overall QoL impact question (Q12). The NI Diary Total Scores are calculated by summing the 11 core items. Responses are scored from 0 to 4 (lowest to highest impact). The NI Diary Total is standardized from 0 to 100 (lowest to highest impact). The score at each visit was calculated as the average over the three consecutive 24 hour periods just prior to the respective visit. Adjusted visit-specific mean changes from baseline in NI Diary Total Score are estimated using a baseline value of 40.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

  14. Change From Baseline in Aggregated Mean NI Diary Total Score During 12 Weeks of Treatment

    The NI Diary is a 12-item questionnaire with 11 core items (Q1-Q11) and an overall QoL impact question (Q12). The NI Diary Total Scores are calculated by summing the 11 core items. Responses are scored from 0 to 4 (lowest to highest impact). The NI Diary Total is standardized from 0 to 100 (lowest to highest impact). The score at each visit was calculated as the mean over the three consecutive 24 hour periods just prior to the respective visit. The visit-specific means were aggregated into a mean of current and preceding visits. Level estimated for baseline value of mean NI Diary Total Score equal to 40 is presented in this endpoint. The 95% credibility interval (2.5 and 97.5 percentiles of the posterior distribution) instead of confidence interval is presented for this endpoint.

    Time frame: Baseline, during 12 weeks of treatment

  15. Percentage of Nights With at Most One Nocturnal Void During 12 Weeks of Treatment

    The percentages of nights during the treatment period with at most one nocturnal void are presented in this endpoint. Level estimated for baseline value of mean number of nocturnal voids equal to 2 is presented in this endpoint.

    Time frame: During 12 weeks of treatment

  16. Percentage of Nights With No Nocturnal Voids During 12 Weeks of Treatment

    The percentages of nights during the treatment period with complete response, i.e. no nocturnal voids are presented in this endpoint. Level estimated for baseline value of mean number of nocturnal voids equal to 2 is presented in this endpoint.

    Time frame: During 12 weeks of treatment

  17. Change From Baseline in Mean NI Diary Overall Impact Score at Week 1

    The NI Diary is a 12-item questionnaire with 11 core items (Q1-Q11) and an overall QoL impact question (Q12). For the overall impact question (Q12), response options range from 0 (not at all) to 4 (a great deal). The NI Diary Overall Impact Scores are standardized from 0 to 100 (lowest to highest impact). The score at each visit was calculated as the average over the three consecutive 24 hour periods just prior to the respective visit. Adjusted visit-specific mean changes from baseline in NI Diary Overall Impact Score are estimated using a baseline value of 40.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 1

  18. Change From Baseline in Mean NI Diary Overall Impact Score at Week 4

    The NI Diary is a 12-item questionnaire with 11 core items (Q1-Q11) and an overall QoL impact question (Q12). For the overall impact question (Q12), response options range from 0 (not at all) to 4 (a great deal). The NI Diary Overall Impact Scores are standardized from 0 to 100 (lowest to highest impact). The score at each visit was calculated as the average over the three consecutive 24 hour periods just prior to the respective visit. Adjusted visit-specific mean changes from baseline in NI Diary Overall Impact Score are estimated using a baseline value of 40.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4

  19. Change From Baseline in Mean NI Diary Overall Impact Score at Week 8

    The NI Diary is a 12-item questionnaire with 11 core items (Q1-Q11) and an overall QoL impact question (Q12). For the overall impact question (Q12), response options range from 0 (not at all) to 4 (a great deal). The NI Diary Overall Impact Scores are standardized from 0 to 100 (lowest to highest impact). The score at each visit was calculated as the average over the three consecutive 24 hour periods just prior to the respective visit. Adjusted visit-specific mean changes from baseline in NI Diary Overall Impact Score are estimated using a baseline value of 40.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 8

  20. Change From Baseline in Mean NI Diary Overall Impact Score at Week 12

    The NI Diary is a 12-item questionnaire with 11 core items (Q1-Q11) and an overall QoL impact question (Q12). For the overall impact question (Q12), response options range from 0 (not at all) to 4 (a great deal). The NI Diary Overall Impact Scores are standardized from 0 to 100 (lowest to highest impact). The score at each visit was calculated as the average over the three consecutive 24 hour periods just prior to the respective visit. Adjusted visit-specific mean changes from baseline in NI Diary Overall Impact Score are estimated using a baseline value of 40.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

  21. Change From Baseline in Aggregated Mean NI Diary Overall Impact Score During 12 Weeks of Treatment

    The NI Diary is a 12-item questionnaire with 11 core items (Q1-Q11) and an overall QoL impact question (Q12). For the overall impact question (Q12), response options range from 0 (not at all) to 4 (a great deal). The NI Diary Overall Impact Scores are standardized from 0 to 100 (lowest to highest impact). The score at each visit was calculated as the average over the three consecutive 24 hour periods just prior to the respective visit. The visit-specific means were aggregated into a mean of current and preceding visits. Level estimated for baseline value of mean NI Diary Overall Impact Score equal to 40 is presented in this endpoint. The 95% credibility interval (2.5 and 97.5 percentiles of the posterior distribution) instead of confidence interval is presented for this endpoint.

    Time frame: Baseline, during 12 weeks of treatment

  22. Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) Urinary Symptoms Scores at Week 1

    The PGI-I is a 1-item questionnaire designed to assess the patient's impression of changes in urinary symptoms. The PGI-I was scored from 1 (very much better) to 7 (very much worse). Visit-specific PGI-I in urinary symptoms is presented in this endpoint.

    Time frame: Week 1

  23. Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) Urinary Symptoms Scores at Week 4

    The PGI-I is a 1-item questionnaire designed to assess the patient's impression of changes in urinary symptoms. The PGI-I was scored from 1 (very much better) to 7 (very much worse). Visit-specific PGI-I in urinary symptoms is presented in this endpoint.

    Time frame: Week 4

  24. Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) Urinary Symptoms Scores at Week 8

    The PGI-I is a 1-item questionnaire designed to assess the patient's impression of changes in urinary symptoms. The PGI-I was scored from 1 (very much better) to 7 (very much worse). Visit-specific PGI-I in urinary symptoms is presented in this endpoint.

    Time frame: Week 8

  25. Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) Urinary Symptoms Scores at Week 12

    The PGI-I is a 1-item questionnaire designed to assess the patient's impression of changes in urinary symptoms. The PGI-I was scored from 1 (very much better) to 7 (very much worse). Visit-specific PGI-I in urinary symptoms is presented in this endpoint.

    Time frame: Week 12

  26. Change From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) Scores at Week 1

    The PGI-S is a 1-item questionnaire designed to assess patient's impression of disease severity. The PGI-S was scored from 1 (none) to 4 (severe). Change from baseline in visit-specific PGI-S is presented in this endpoint. Level estimated for baseline value of PGI-S equal to 3 is presented in this endpoint.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 1

  27. Change From Baseline in PGI-S Scores at Week 4

    The PGI-S is a 1-item questionnaire designed to assess patient's impression of disease severity. The PGI-S was scored from 1 (none) to 4 (severe). Change from baseline in visit-specific PGI-S is presented in this endpoint. Level estimated for baseline value of PGI-S equal to 3 is presented in this endpoint.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4

  28. Change From Baseline in PGI-S Scores at Week 8

    The PGI-S is a 1-item questionnaire designed to assess patient's impression of disease severity. The PGI-S was scored from 1 (none) to 4 (severe). Change from baseline in visit-specific PGI-S is presented in this endpoint. Level estimated for baseline value of PGI-S equal to 3 is presented in this endpoint.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 8

  29. Change From Baseline in PGI-S Scores at Week 12

    The PGI-S is a 1-item questionnaire designed to assess patient's impression of disease severity. The PGI-S was scored from 1 (none) to 4 (severe). Change from baseline in visit-specific PGI-S is presented in this endpoint. Level estimated for baseline value of PGI-S equal to 3 is presented in this endpoint.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

  30. Change From Baseline in Hsu 5-point Likert Bother Scale at Week 1

    The Hsu 5-point Likert Bother scale is a questionnaire designed to assess the subjective bothersomeness and functional disruptiveness of nocturia. The Hsu 5 point Likert Bother Scale was scored from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely). Change from baseline in visit-specific Hsu Bother is presented in this endpoint. Level estimated for baseline value of Hsu Bother equal to 3 is presented in this endpoint.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 1

  31. Change From Baseline in Hsu 5-point Likert Bother Scale at Week 4

    The Hsu 5-point Likert Bother scale is a questionnaire designed to assess the subjective bothersomeness and functional disruptiveness of nocturia. The Hsu 5 point Likert Bother Scale was scored from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely). Change from baseline in visit-specific Hsu Bother is presented in this endpoint. Level estimated for baseline value of Hsu Bother equal to 3 is presented in this endpoint.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4

  32. Change From Baseline in Hsu 5-point Likert Bother Scale at Week 8

    The Hsu 5-point Likert Bother scale is a questionnaire designed to assess the subjective bothersomeness and functional disruptiveness of nocturia. The Hsu 5 point Likert Bother Scale was scored from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely). Change from baseline in visit-specific Hsu Bother is presented in this endpoint. Level estimated for baseline value of Hsu Bother equal to 3 is presented in this endpoint.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 8

  33. Change From Baseline in Hsu 5-point Likert Bother Scale at Week 12

    The Hsu 5-point Likert Bother scale is a questionnaire designed to assess the subjective bothersomeness and functional disruptiveness of nocturia. The Hsu 5 point Likert Bother Scale was scored from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely). Change from baseline in visit-specific Hsu Bother is presented in this endpoint. Level estimated for baseline value of Hsu Bother equal to 3 is presented in this endpoint.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

  34. Change From Baseline in ISI at Week 4

    The ISI is a 7-item questionnaire which comprises of four 'sleep-related' items and three 'wake-related' items. Each item is rated on a 0-4 scale and the total score ranges from 0 to 28 (higher score suggests more severe insomnia). Change from baseline in visit-specific ISI is presented in this endpoint. Level estimated for baseline value of ISI equal to 15 is presented in this endpoint.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4

  35. Change From Baseline in ISI at Week 8

    The ISI is a 7-item questionnaire which comprises of four 'sleep-related' items and three 'wake-related' items. Each item is rated on a 0-4 scale and the total score ranges from 0 to 28 (higher score suggests more severe insomnia). Change from baseline in visit-specific ISI is presented in this endpoint. Level estimated for baseline value of ISI equal to 15 is presented in this endpoint.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 8

  36. Change From Baseline in ISI at Week 12

    The ISI is a 7-item questionnaire which comprises of four 'sleep-related' items and three 'wake-related' items. Each item is rated on a 0-4 scale and the total score ranges from 0 to 28 (higher score suggests more severe insomnia). Change from baseline in visit-specific ISI is presented in this endpoint. Level estimated for baseline value of ISI equal to 15 is presented in this endpoint.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

  37. Change From Baseline in Mean Duration of First Undisturbed Sleep Period (FUSP) at Week 1

    The FUSP is defined as the time in minutes from the time of going to bed to the time of first nocturnal void, or time of awakening if no void occured. The duration of FUSP at each visit was calculated as the average over the 3 consecutive 24-hour periods just prior to the respective visit. Adjusted visit-specific mean changes from baseline in FUSP are estimated using a baseline value of 180 (min).

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 1

  38. Change From Baseline in Mean Duration of FUSP at Week 4

    The FUSP is defined as the time in minutes from the time of going to bed to the time of first nocturnal void, or time of awakening if no void occurred. The duration of FUSP at each visit was calculated as the average over the 3 consecutive 24-hour periods just prior to the respective visit. Adjusted visit-specific mean changes from baseline in FUSP are estimated using a baseline value of 180 (min).

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4

  39. Change From Baseline in Mean Duration of FUSP at Week 8

    The FUSP is defined as the time in minutes from the time of going to bed to the time of first nocturnal void, or time of awakening if no void occurred. The duration of FUSP at each visit was calculated as the average over the 3 consecutive 24-hour periods just prior to the respective visit. Adjusted visit-specific mean changes from baseline in FUSP are estimated using a baseline value of 180 (min).

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 8

  40. Change From Baseline in Mean Duration of FUSP at Week 12

    The FUSP is defined as the time in minutes from the time of going to bed to the time of first nocturnal void, or time of awakening if no void occurred. The duration of FUSP at each visit was calculated as the average over the 3 consecutive 24-hour periods just prior to the respective visit. Adjusted visit-specific mean changes from baseline in FUSP are estimated using a baseline value of 180 (min).

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

  41. Change From Baseline in Aggregated Mean Duration of FUSP During 12 Weeks of Treatment

    The FUSP is defined as the time in minutes from the time of going to bed to the time of first nocturnal void, or time of awakening if no void occurred. The visit-specific means were aggregated into a mean of current and preceding visits. Level estimated for baseline value of mean duration of FUSP (minutes) equal to 180 is presented in this endpoint. The 95% credibility interval (2.5 and 97.5 percentiles of the posterior distribution) instead of confidence interval is presented for this endpoint.

    Time frame: Baseline, During 12 Weeks of Treatment

  42. Change From Baseline in Nocturnal Diuresis Rate Profiles at Week 1

    The nocturnal diuresis rate (mL/min) is calculated as the mean of the nocturnal diuresis for each of the three nights, with the single-night nocturnal diuresis calculated as the ratio of NUV to total time in bed. Change from baseline in visit-specific mean nocturnal diuresis (mL/min) is presented. Level estimated for baseline value of mean nocturnal diuresis (mL/min) equal to 1.3 is presented in this endpoint.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 1

  43. Change From Baseline in Nocturnal Diuresis Rate Profiles at Week 12

    The nocturnal diuresis rate (mL/min) is calculated as the mean of the nocturnal diuresis for each of the three nights, with the single-night nocturnal diuresis calculated as the ratio of NUV to total time in bed. Change from baseline in visit-specific mean nocturnal diuresis (mL/min) is presented. Level estimated for baseline value of mean nocturnal diuresis (mL/min) equal to 1.3 is presented in this endpoint.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

  44. Change From Baseline in Mean NUV in Week 1

    The NUV is defined as the total urine volume from 5 minutes after bedtime with the intention to sleep including the first void within 30 minutes of rising in the morning. The NUV at each visit was calculated as the average over the 3 consecutive 24-hour periods just prior to the respective visit. Adjusted visit-specific mean changes from baseline in NUV are estimated using a baseline value of 750 (mL).

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 1

  45. Change From Baseline in Mean NUV at Week 12

    The NUV is defined as the total urine volume from 5 minutes after bedtime with the intention to sleep including the first void within 30 minutes of rising in the morning. The NUV at each visit was calculated as the average over the 3 consecutive 24-hour periods just prior to the respective visit. Adjusted visit-specific mean changes from baseline in NUV are estimated using a baseline value of 750 (mL).

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

06

Results

Posted Dec 23, 2020

Participant flow

A total of 71 sites were authorized to recruit subjects for the trial between July 2017 and July 2019. The trial sites that screened subjects to the trial were: 5 in Belgium, 10 in Canada, 5 in Czech Republic, 2 in Germany, 5 in Hungary, 1 in Poland and 43 in the Unites States of America (USA).

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneFE 201836 500 µg (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 350 µg (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 250 µg (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 150 µg (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 100 µg (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 50 µg (Randomized Treatment Period)Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period)Desmopressin 25 µg (Randomized Treatment Period)Desmopressin 50 µg (Randomized Treatment Period)
Started602724141334872617
Completed522422141233812515
Not completed832011612
Withdrew: Adverse event310011500
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up100000000
Withdrew: Protocol deviation000000100
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject421000012
Withdrew: Other001000000

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange From Baseline in Aggregated Mean Number of Nocturnal Voids During 12 Weeks of Treatment

Nocturnal voids were defined as voids occuring from 5 minutes after bedtime until rising in the morning. The number of nocturnal voids at each visit was calculated as the average over the 3 consecutive 24 hour periods just prior to the respective visit. The visit-specific means were aggregated into a mean of current and preceding visits. Level estimated for baseline value of mean number of nocturnal voids equal to 2, and 95% credibility interval (2.5 and 97.5 percentiles of the posterior distribution) instead of confidence interval are presented in this endpoint.

Time frame:
Baseline, during 12 weeks of treatment
Reported as:
Mean · nocturnal voids
Change From Baseline in Aggregated Mean Number of Nocturnal Voids During 12 Weeks of Treatment
nocturnal voidsFE 201836 500 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 350 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 250 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 150 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 100 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 50 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period)
Change From Baseline in Aggregated Mean Number of Nocturnal Voids During 12 Weeks of Treatment-1.06 (-1.28 to -0.86)-0.99 (-1.20 to -0.78)-0.89 (-1.12 to -0.69)-0.80 (-1.00 to -0.62)-0.77 (-0.97 to -0.59)-0.76 (-0.95 to -0.58)-0.76 (-0.95 to -0.58)
Statistical analysis
  • FE 201836 500 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · Mean difference: -0.30 · 95% CI -0.54 to -0.07
  • FE 201836 350 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · Mean difference: -0.23 · 95% CI -0.46 to -0.02
  • FE 201836 250 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · Mean difference: -0.14 · 95% CI -0.36 to -0.00
  • FE 201836 150 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · Mean difference: -0.040 · 95% CI -0.23 to -0.00
  • FE 201836 100 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · Mean difference: -0.02 · 95% CI -0.14 to -0.00
  • FE 201836 50 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · Mean difference: -0.01 · 95% CI -0.07 to -0.00
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Mean Number of Nocturnal Voids at Week 1

Nocturnal voids were defined as voids occuring from 5 minutes after bedtime until rising in the morning. The number of nocturnal voids at each visit was calculated as the average over the 3 consecutive 24 hour periods just prior to the respective visit. Adjusted visit-specific mean changes from baseline in nocturnal voids are estimated using a baseline value of 2. MMRM=Mixed Model for Repeated Measurements. For all visit-specific results, the tables present the number of subjects with an observation of the endpoints in question at the specific visit. All secondary analyses are performed using the observed-case approach based on repeated measurements for all subjects in the ITT-RT population. That is, these secondary analyses are based on all subjects with at least one non-missing post-baseline observation (with a baseline value if relevant).

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 1
Reported as:
Mean · nocturnal voids
Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Nocturnal Voids at Week 1
nocturnal voidsFE 201836 500 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 350 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 250 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 150 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 100 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 50 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period)
Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Nocturnal Voids at Week 1-0.714 (-1.005 to -0.424)-1.162 (-1.577 to -0.747)-0.722 (-1.149 to -0.296)-0.520 (-1.058 to 0.017)-0.722 (-1.318 to -0.126)-0.325 (-0.709 to 0.059)-0.575 (-0.842 to -0.308)
Statistical analysis
  • FE 201836 500 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.4214 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: -0.139 · 95% CI -0.480 to 0.201
  • FE 201836 350 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.0101 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: -0.587 · 95% CI -1.034 to -0.141
  • FE 201836 250 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.5203 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: -0.148 · 95% CI -0.599 to 0.304
  • FE 201836 150 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.8483 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: 0.055 · 95% CI -0.508 to 0.617
  • FE 201836 100 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.6357 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: -0.147 · 95% CI -0.759 to 0.464
  • FE 201836 50 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.2222 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: 0.250 · 95% CI -0.152 to 0.652
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Mean Number of Nocturnal Voids at Week 4

Nocturnal voids were defined as voids occuring from 5 minutes after bedtime until rising in the morning. The number of nocturnal voids at each visit was calculated as the average over the 3 consecutive 24 hour periods just prior to the respective visit. Adjusted visit-specific mean changes from baseline in nocturnal voids are estimated using a baseline value of 2.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 4
Reported as:
Mean · nocturnal voids
Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Nocturnal Voids at Week 4
nocturnal voidsFE 201836 500 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 350 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 250 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 150 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 100 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 50 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period)
Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Nocturnal Voids at Week 4-1.078 (-1.345 to -0.811)-1.330 (-1.708 to -0.952)-0.784 (-1.181 to -0.386)-0.471 (-0.969 to 0.028)-0.952 (-1.469 to -0.435)-0.518 (-0.866 to -0.171)-0.912 (-1.152 to -0.673)
Statistical analysis
  • FE 201836 500 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.2909 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: -0.166 · 95% CI -0.474 to 0.143
  • FE 201836 350 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.0440 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: -0.418 · 95% CI -0.824 to -0.011
  • FE 201836 250 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.5438 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: 0.128 · 95% CI -0.288 to 0.545
  • FE 201836 150 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.0960 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: 0.441 · 95% CI -0.079 to 0.962
  • FE 201836 100 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.8826 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: -0.040 · 95% CI -0.568 to 0.488
  • FE 201836 50 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.0344 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: 0.394 · 95% CI 0.029 to 0.759
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Mean Number of Nocturnal Voids at Week 8

Nocturnal voids were defined as voids occuring from 5 minutes after bedtime until rising in the morning. The number of nocturnal voids at each visit was calculated as the average over the 3 consecutive 24 hour periods just prior to the respective visit. Adjusted visit-specific mean changes from baseline in nocturnal voids are estimated using a baseline value of 2.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 8
Reported as:
Mean · nocturnal voids
Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Nocturnal Voids at Week 8
nocturnal voidsFE 201836 500 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 350 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 250 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 150 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 100 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 50 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period)
Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Nocturnal Voids at Week 8-1.085 (-1.394 to -0.776)-1.177 (-1.603 to -0.751)-0.965 (-1.414 to -0.516)-0.490 (-1.037 to 0.058)-1.077 (-1.671 to -0.484)-0.786 (-1.187 to -0.386)-0.953 (-1.233 to -0.672)
Statistical analysis
  • FE 201836 500 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.4732 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: -0.132 · 95% CI -0.496 to 0.231
  • FE 201836 350 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.3394 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: -0.224 · 95% CI -0.685 to 0.237
  • FE 201836 250 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.9600 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: -0.012 · 95% CI -0.488 to 0.463
  • FE 201836 150 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.1131 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: 0.463 · 95% CI -0.111 to 1.037
  • FE 201836 100 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.6853 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: -0.124 · 95% CI -0.729 to 0.480
  • FE 201836 50 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.4364 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: 0.166 · 95% CI -0.254 to 0.587
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Mean Number of Nocturnal Voids at Week 12

Nocturnal voids were defined as voids occuring from 5 minutes after bedtime until rising in the morning. The number of nocturnal voids at each visit was calculated as the average over the 3 consecutive 24 hour periods just prior to the respective visit. Adjusted visit-specific mean changes from baseline in nocturnal voids are estimated using a baseline value of 2.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 12
Reported as:
Mean · nocturnal voids
Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Nocturnal Voids at Week 12
nocturnal voidsFE 201836 500 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 350 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 250 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 150 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 100 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 50 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period)
Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Nocturnal Voids at Week 12-1.256 (-1.568 to -0.944)-1.120 (-1.558 to -0.683)-0.850 (-1.301 to -0.400)-0.674 (-1.206 to -0.142)-1.053 (-1.650 to -0.456)-0.921 (-1.317 to -0.524)-0.957 (-1.237 to -0.677)
Statistical analysis
  • FE 201836 500 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.1106 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: -0.299 · 95% CI -0.667 to 0.069
  • FE 201836 350 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.5005 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: -0.163 · 95% CI -0.639 to 0.313
  • FE 201836 250 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.6604 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: 0.107 · 95% CI -0.372 to 0.586
  • FE 201836 150 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.3178 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: 0.283 · 95% CI -0.275 to 0.842
  • FE 201836 100 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.7561 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: -0.096 · 95% CI -0.701 to 0.510
  • FE 201836 50 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.8614 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: 0.037 · 95% CI -0.378 to 0.452
SecondaryResponder Rate in Nocturnal Voids at Week 1

Defined as 50% reduction in nocturnal voids from baseline. Adjusted visit-specific estimated odds of at least 50% in the reduction mean number of nocturnal voids are estimated using a baseline value of 2. The estimated odd equals the probability of response divided by the probability of non-response; these odds may vary between 0 and infinity. For example, if the probability of responding is 80%, the odd of responding is 4, as it is 4 times more likely to respond (80%) then it is not to respond (20%).

Time frame:
Week 1
Reported as:
Mean · odd of response
Responder Rate in Nocturnal Voids at Week 1
odd of responseFE 201836 500 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 350 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 250 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 150 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 100 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 50 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period)
Responder Rate in Nocturnal Voids at Week 10.844 (0.457 to 1.558)1.202 (0.510 to 2.833)0.682 (0.280 to 1.662)0.818 (0.269 to 2.490)0.810 (0.240 to 2.738)0.513 (0.227 to 1.157)0.480 (0.272 to 0.848)
Statistical analysis
  • FE 201836 500 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.117 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Odds ratio (or): 1.759 · 95% CI 0.869 to 3.560
  • FE 201836 350 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.048 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Odds ratio (or): 2.505 · 95% CI 1.010 to 6.214
  • FE 201836 250 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.460 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Odds ratio (or): 1.420 · 95% CI 0.560 to 3.602
  • FE 201836 150 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.367 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Odds ratio (or): 1.704 · 95% CI 0.535 to 5.427
  • FE 201836 100 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.407 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Odds ratio (or): 1.689 · 95% CI 0.489 to 5.825
  • FE 201836 50 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.876 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Odds ratio (or): 1.069 · 95% CI 0.462 to 2.473
SecondaryResponder Rate in Nocturnal Voids at Week 4

Defined as 50% reduction in nocturnal voids from baseline. Adjusted visit-specific estimated odds of at least 50% reduction in the mean number of nocturnal voids are estimated using a baseline value of 2. The estimated odd equals the probability of response divided by the probability of non-response; these odds may vary between 0 and infinity. For example, if the probability of responding is 80%, the odd of responding is 4, as it is 4 times more likely to respond (80%) then it is not to respond (20%).

Time frame:
Week 4
Reported as:
Mean · odd of response
Responder Rate in Nocturnal Voids at Week 4
odd of responseFE 201836 500 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 350 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 250 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 150 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 100 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 50 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period)
Responder Rate in Nocturnal Voids at Week 41.199 (0.633 to 2.270)5.851 (1.511 to 22.650)0.634 (0.255 to 1.575)0.534 (0.165 to 1.731)1.760 (0.470 to 6.596)0.683 (0.301 to 1.550)1.235 (0.686 to 2.224)
Statistical analysis
  • FE 201836 500 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.937 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Odds ratio (or): 0.971 · 95% CI 0.470 to 2.005
  • FE 201836 350 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.028 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Odds ratio (or): 4.738 · 95% CI 1.183 to 18.968
  • FE 201836 250 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.166 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Odds ratio (or): 0.513 · 95% CI 0.200 to 1.318
  • FE 201836 150 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.174 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Odds ratio (or): 0.433 · 95% CI 0.129 to 1.447
  • FE 201836 100 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.608 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Odds ratio (or): 1.425 · 95% CI 0.369 to 5.512
  • FE 201836 50 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.171 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Odds ratio (or): 0.553 · 95% CI 0.237 to 1.292
SecondaryResponder Rate in Nocturnal Voids at Week 8

Defined as 50% reduction in nocturnal voids from baseline. Adjusted visit-specific estimated odds of at least 50% reduction in the mean number of nocturnal voids are estimated using a baseline value of 2. The estimated odd equals the probability of response divided by the probability of non-response; these odds may vary between 0 and infinity. For example, if the probability of responding is 80%, the odd of responding is 4, as it is 4 times more likely to respond (80%) then it is not to respond (20%).

Time frame:
Week 8
Reported as:
Mean · odd of response
Responder Rate in Nocturnal Voids at Week 8
odd of responseFE 201836 500 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 350 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 250 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 150 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 100 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 50 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period)
Responder Rate in Nocturnal Voids at Week 81.395 (0.717 to 2.715)3.398 (1.150 to 10.043)1.928 (0.721 to 5.155)0.877 (0.286 to 2.688)1.039 (0.302 to 3.569)1.489 (0.638 to 3.474)1.503 (0.806 to 2.803)
Statistical analysis
  • FE 201836 500 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.850 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Odds ratio (or): 0.928 · 95% CI 0.430 to 2.003
  • FE 201836 350 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.150 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Odds ratio (or): 2.261 · 95% CI 0.745 to 6.862
  • FE 201836 250 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.632 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Odds ratio (or): 1.283 · 95% CI 0.462 to 3.566
  • FE 201836 150 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.363 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Odds ratio (or): 0.583 · 95% CI 0.183 to 1.863
  • FE 201836 100 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.555 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Odds ratio (or): 0.691 · 95% CI 0.203 to 2.359
  • FE 201836 50 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.984 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Odds ratio (or): 0.991 · 95% CI 0.408 to 2.405
SecondaryResponder Rate in Nocturnal Voids at Week 12

Defined as 50% reduction in nocturnal voids from baseline. Adjusted visit-specific estimated odds of at least 50% reduction in the mean number of nocturnal voids are estimated using a baseline value of 2. The estimated odd equals the probability of response divided by the probability of non-response; these odds may vary between 0 and infinity. For example, if the probability of responding is 80%, the odd of responding is 4, as it is 4 times more likely to respond (80%) then it is not to respond (20%).

Time frame:
Week 12
Reported as:
Mean · odd of response
Responder Rate in Nocturnal Voids at Week 12
odd of responseFE 201836 500 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 350 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 250 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 150 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 100 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 50 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period)
Responder Rate in Nocturnal Voids at Week 123.914 (1.830 to 8.370)1.891 (0.693 to 5.163)1.824 (0.694 to 4.795)0.854 (0.279 to 2.611)1.400 (0.401 to 4.893)1.395 (0.611 to 3.181)1.590 (0.844 to 2.993)
Statistical analysis
  • FE 201836 500 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.046 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Odds ratio (or): 2.462 · 95% CI 1.017 to 5.961
  • FE 201836 350 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.745 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Odds ratio (or): 1.190 · 95% CI 0.418 to 3.386
  • FE 201836 250 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.790 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Odds ratio (or): 1.147 · 95% CI 0.417 to 3.155
  • FE 201836 150 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.293 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Odds ratio (or): 0.537 · 95% CI 0.169 to 1.710
  • FE 201836 100 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.843 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Odds ratio (or): 0.881 · 95% CI 0.252 to 3.076
  • FE 201836 50 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.763 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Odds ratio (or): 0.877 · 95% CI 0.375 to 2.053
SecondaryResponder Rate in Nocturnal Voids During 12 Weeks of Treatment

Defined as 50% reduction in nocturnal voids from baseline. Estimated odds of at least 50% reduction in the aggregated mean number of nocturnal voids for a subject with 2 nocturnal voids at baseline are presented in this endpoint. The 95% credibility interval (2.5 and 97.5 percentiles of the posterior distribution) instead of confidence interval is presented for this endpoint. The estimated odd equals the probability of response divided by the probability of non-response; these odds may vary between 0 and infinity. For example, if the probability of responding is 80%, the odd of responding is 4, as it is 4 times more likely to respond (80%) then it is not to respond (20%).

Time frame:
During 12 weeks of treatment
Reported as:
Mean · odd of response
Responder Rate in Nocturnal Voids During 12 Weeks of Treatment
odd of responseFE 201836 500 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 350 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 250 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 150 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 100 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 50 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period)
Responder Rate in Nocturnal Voids During 12 Weeks of Treatment1.129 (0.808 to 1.753)1.095 (0.772 to 1.661)1.032 (0.711 to 1.543)0.934 (0.597 to 1.378)0.887 (0.555 to 1.253)0.849 (0.534 to 1.187)0.834 (0.514 to 1.180)
Statistical analysis
  • FE 201836 500 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · Odds ratio (or): 1.422 · 95% CI 0.868 to 2.597
  • FE 201836 350 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · Odds ratio (or): 1.373 · 95% CI 0.905 to 2.450
  • FE 201836 250 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · Odds ratio (or): 1.284 · 95% CI 0.927 to 2.264
  • FE 201836 150 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · Odds ratio (or): 1.145 · 95% CI 0.957 to 1.896
  • FE 201836 100 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · Odds ratio (or): 1.079 · 95% CI 0.972 to 1.638
  • FE 201836 50 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · Odds ratio (or): 1.023 · 95% CI 0.991 to 1.313
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Mean NI Diary Total Score at Week 1

The NI Diary is a 12-item questionnaire with 11 core items (Q1-Q11) and an overall quality of life (QoL) impact question (Q12). The NI Diary Total Scores are calculated by summing the 11 core items.Responses are scored from 0 to 4 (lowest t o highest impact). The NI Diary Total is standardized from 0 to 100 (lowest to highest impact). The score at each visit was calculated as the average over the three consecutive 24 hour periods just prior to the respective visit. Adjusted visit-specific mean changes from baseline in NI Diary Total Score are estimated using a baseline value of 40.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 1
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Mean NI Diary Total Score at Week 1
score on a scaleFE 201836 500 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 350 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 250 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 150 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 100 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 50 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period)
Change From Baseline in Mean NI Diary Total Score at Week 1-7.55 (-11.67 to -3.43)-21.91 (-28.15 to -15.68)-10.90 (-17.17 to -4.63)-8.93 (-17.15 to -0.72)-9.68 (-18.41 to -0.94)-8.75 (-14.27 to -3.23)-8.07 (-11.48 to -4.65)
Statistical analysis
  • FE 201836 500 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.8463 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: 0.52 · 95% CI -4.75 to 5.78
  • FE 201836 350 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.0001 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: -13.85 · 95% CI -20.89 to -6.81
  • FE 201836 250 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.4355 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: -2.84 · 95% CI -9.99 to 4.32
  • FE 201836 150 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.8483 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: -0.87 · 95% CI -9.79 to 8.06
  • FE 201836 100 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.7336 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: -1.61 · 95% CI -10.91 to 7.69
  • FE 201836 50 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.8347 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: -0.69 · 95% CI -7.15 to 5.78
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Mean NI Diary Total Score at Week 4

The NI Diary is a 12-item questionnaire with 11 core items (Q1-Q11) and an overall QoL impact question (Q12). The NI Diary Total Scores are calculated by summing the 11 core items. Responses are scored from 0 to 4 (lowest to highest impact). The NI Diary Total is standardized from 0 to 100 (lowest to highest impact). The score at each visit was calculated as the average over the three consecutive 24 hour periods just prior to the respective visit. Adjusted visit-specific mean changes from baseline in NI Diary Total Score are estimated using a baseline value of 40.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 4
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Mean NI Diary Total Score at Week 4
score on a scaleFE 201836 500 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 350 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 250 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 150 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 100 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 50 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period)
Change From Baseline in Mean NI Diary Total Score at Week 4-12.62 (-16.89 to -8.35)-17.44 (-23.80 to -11.08)-14.37 (-20.96 to -7.78)-11.23 (-19.82 to -2.65)-22.23 (-31.11 to -13.35)-13.29 (-19.00 to -7.58)-14.20 (-17.77 to -10.64)
Statistical analysis
  • FE 201836 500 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.5695 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: 1.59 · 95% CI -3.90 to 7.07
  • FE 201836 350 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.3784 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: -3.23 · 95% CI -10.46 to 3.99
  • FE 201836 250 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.9653 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: -0.17 · 95% CI -7.67 to 7.34
  • FE 201836 150 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.5304 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: 2.97 · 95% CI -6.35 to 12.29
  • FE 201836 100 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.0968 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: -8.02 · 95% CI -17.51 to 1.46
  • FE 201836 50 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.7885 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: 0.91 · 95% CI -5.79 to 7.62
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Mean NI Diary Total Score at Week 8

The NI Diary is a 12-item questionnaire with 11 core items (Q1-Q11) and an overall QoL impact question (Q12). The NI Diary Total Scores are calculated by summing the 11 core items. Responses are scored from 0 to 4 (lowest to highest impact). The NI Diary Total is standardized from 0 to 100 (lowest to highest impact). The score at each visit was calculated as the average over the three consecutive 24 hour periods just prior to the respective visit. Adjusted visit-specific mean changes from baseline in NI Diary Total Score are estimated using a baseline value of 40.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 8
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Mean NI Diary Total Score at Week 8
score on a scaleFE 201836 500 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 350 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 250 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 150 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 100 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 50 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period)
Change From Baseline in Mean NI Diary Total Score at Week 8-16.03 (-20.49 to -11.57)-23.22 (-29.79 to -16.64)-15.10 (-21.85 to -8.35)-12.04 (-20.77 to -3.32)-19.23 (-28.62 to -9.83)-14.11 (-20.00 to -8.22)-14.83 (-18.50 to -11.16)
Statistical analysis
  • FE 201836 500 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.6792 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: -1.20 · 95% CI -6.89 to 4.50
  • FE 201836 350 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.0276 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: -8.39 · 95% CI -15.84 to -0.93
  • FE 201836 250 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.9445 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: -0.27 · 95% CI -7.97 to 7.42
  • FE 201836 150 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.5637 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: 2.79 · 95% CI -6.71 to 12.28
  • FE 201836 100 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.3870 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: -4.40 · 95% CI -14.39 to 5.60
  • FE 201836 50 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.8373 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: 0.72 · 95% CI -6.19 to 7.63
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Mean NI Diary Total Score at Week 12

The NI Diary is a 12-item questionnaire with 11 core items (Q1-Q11) and an overall QoL impact question (Q12). The NI Diary Total Scores are calculated by summing the 11 core items. Responses are scored from 0 to 4 (lowest to highest impact). The NI Diary Total is standardized from 0 to 100 (lowest to highest impact). The score at each visit was calculated as the average over the three consecutive 24 hour periods just prior to the respective visit. Adjusted visit-specific mean changes from baseline in NI Diary Total Score are estimated using a baseline value of 40.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 12
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Mean NI Diary Total Score at Week 12
score on a scaleFE 201836 500 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 350 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 250 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 150 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 100 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 50 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period)
Change From Baseline in Mean NI Diary Total Score at Week 12-16.92 (-21.66 to -12.18)-24.44 (-31.52 to -17.35)-14.68 (-21.94 to -7.42)-10.13 (-19.37 to -0.88)-22.59 (-32.46 to -12.71)-17.18 (-23.39 to -10.96)-17.45 (-21.36 to -13.53)
Statistical analysis
  • FE 201836 500 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.8646 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: 0.53 · 95% CI -5.54 to 6.59
  • FE 201836 350 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.0870 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: -6.99 · 95% CI -15.00 to 1.02
  • FE 201836 250 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.5100 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: 2.77 · 95% CI -5.50 to 11.04
  • FE 201836 150 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.1535 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: 7.32 · 95% CI -2.75 to 17.39
  • FE 201836 100 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.3369 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: -5.14 · 95% CI -15.66 to 5.38
  • FE 201836 50 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.9417 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: 0.27 · 95% CI -7.05 to 7.59
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Aggregated Mean NI Diary Total Score During 12 Weeks of Treatment

The NI Diary is a 12-item questionnaire with 11 core items (Q1-Q11) and an overall QoL impact question (Q12). The NI Diary Total Scores are calculated by summing the 11 core items. Responses are scored from 0 to 4 (lowest to highest impact). The NI Diary Total is standardized from 0 to 100 (lowest to highest impact). The score at each visit was calculated as the mean over the three consecutive 24 hour periods just prior to the respective visit. The visit-specific means were aggregated into a mean of current and preceding visits. Level estimated for baseline value of mean NI Diary Total Score equal to 40 is presented in this endpoint. The 95% credibility interval (2.5 and 97.5 percentiles of the posterior distribution) instead of confidence interval is presented for this endpoint.

Time frame:
Baseline, during 12 weeks of treatment
Reported as:
Median · score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Aggregated Mean NI Diary Total Score During 12 Weeks of Treatment
score on a scaleFE 201836 500 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 350 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 250 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 150 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 100 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 50 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period)
Change From Baseline in Aggregated Mean NI Diary Total Score During 12 Weeks of Treatment-12.40 (-14.71 to -8.59)-12.69 (-15.07 to -10.53)-12.75 (-15.16 to -10.57)-12.77 (-15.21 to -10.59)-12.77 (-15.23 to -10.54)-12.78 (-15.18 to -10.50)-12.77 (-15.18 to -10.47)
Statistical analysis
  • FE 201836 500 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · Median difference: 0.00 · 95% CI -1.41 to 5.47
  • FE 201836 350 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · Median difference: 0.00 · 95% CI -0.43 to 1.19
  • FE 201836 250 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · Median difference: 0.00 · 95% CI -0.16 to 0.50
  • FE 201836 150 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · Median difference: 0.00 · 95% CI -0.03 to 0.15
  • FE 201836 100 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · Median difference: 0.00 · 95% CI -0.01 to 0.05
  • FE 201836 50 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · Median difference: 0.00 · 95% CI -0.00 to 0.01
SecondaryPercentage of Nights With at Most One Nocturnal Void During 12 Weeks of Treatment

The percentages of nights during the treatment period with at most one nocturnal void are presented in this endpoint. Level estimated for baseline value of mean number of nocturnal voids equal to 2 is presented in this endpoint.

Time frame:
During 12 weeks of treatment
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of nights
Percentage of Nights With at Most One Nocturnal Void During 12 Weeks of Treatment
percentage of nightsFE 201836 500 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 350 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 250 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 150 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 100 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 50 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period)
Percentage of Nights With at Most One Nocturnal Void During 12 Weeks of Treatment67.2 (58.2 to 76.2)77.5 (64.9 to 90.2)64.5 (51.0 to 78.0)55.3 (38.3 to 72.3)73.2 (55.1 to 91.2)61.4 (49.3 to 73.5)62.0 (53.8 to 70.2)
Statistical analysis
  • FE 201836 500 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · ANCOVA · p = 0.3328 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: 5.2 · 95% CI -5.3 to 15.7
  • FE 201836 350 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · ANCOVA · p = 0.0255 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: 15.5 · 95% CI 1.9 to 29.2
  • FE 201836 250 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · ANCOVA · p = 0.7296 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: 2.5 · 95% CI -11.7 to 16.7
  • FE 201836 150 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · ANCOVA · p = 0.4586 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: -6.7 · 95% CI -24.5 to 11.1
  • FE 201836 100 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · ANCOVA · p = 0.2327 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: 11.2 · 95% CI -7.2 to 29.5
  • FE 201836 50 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · ANCOVA · p = 0.9240 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: -0.6 · 95% CI -13.3 to 12.1
SecondaryPercentage of Nights With No Nocturnal Voids During 12 Weeks of Treatment

The percentages of nights during the treatment period with complete response, i.e. no nocturnal voids are presented in this endpoint. Level estimated for baseline value of mean number of nocturnal voids equal to 2 is presented in this endpoint.

Time frame:
During 12 weeks of treatment
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of nights
Percentage of Nights With No Nocturnal Voids During 12 Weeks of Treatment
percentage of nightsFE 201836 500 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 350 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 250 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 150 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 100 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 50 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period)
Percentage of Nights With No Nocturnal Voids During 12 Weeks of Treatment23.3 (16.3 to 30.3)28.8 (19.0 to 38.6)17.3 (6.8 to 27.8)12.9 (-0.3 to 26.1)14.8 (0.8 to 28.8)21.5 (12.1 to 30.9)23.0 (16.6 to 29.4)
Statistical analysis
  • FE 201836 500 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · ANCOVA · p = 0.9499 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: 0.3 · 95% CI -7.9 to 8.5
  • FE 201836 350 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · ANCOVA · p = 0.2842 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: 5.8 · 95% CI -4.8 to 16.4
  • FE 201836 250 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · ANCOVA · p = 0.3100 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: -5.7 · 95% CI -16.8 to 5.4
  • FE 201836 150 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · ANCOVA · p = 0.1499 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: -10.1 · 95% CI -23.9 to 3.7
  • FE 201836 100 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · ANCOVA · p = 0.2571 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: -8.2 · 95% CI -22.5 to 6.0
  • FE 201836 50 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · ANCOVA · p = 0.7629 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: -1.5 · 95% CI -11.4 to 8.3
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Mean NI Diary Overall Impact Score at Week 1

The NI Diary is a 12-item questionnaire with 11 core items (Q1-Q11) and an overall QoL impact question (Q12). For the overall impact question (Q12), response options range from 0 (not at all) to 4 (a great deal). The NI Diary Overall Impact Scores are standardized from 0 to 100 (lowest to highest impact). The score at each visit was calculated as the average over the three consecutive 24 hour periods just prior to the respective visit. Adjusted visit-specific mean changes from baseline in NI Diary Overall Impact Score are estimated using a baseline value of 40.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 1
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Mean NI Diary Overall Impact Score at Week 1
score on a scaleFE 201836 500 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 350 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 250 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 150 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 100 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 50 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period)
Change From Baseline in Mean NI Diary Overall Impact Score at Week 1-10.98 (-16.40 to -5.56)-30.39 (-38.62 to -22.17)-15.51 (-23.85 to -7.17)-11.77 (-22.69 to -0.85)-2.79 (-14.29 to 8.70)-12.26 (-19.57 to -4.95)-13.46 (-17.89 to -9.03)
Statistical analysis
  • FE 201836 500 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.4846 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: 2.48 · 95% CI -4.50 to 9.46
  • FE 201836 350 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.0004 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: -16.93 · 95% CI -26.26 to -7.60
  • FE 201836 250 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.6685 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: -2.05 · 95% CI -11.47 to 7.37
  • FE 201836 150 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.7772 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: 1.69 · 95% CI -10.07 to 13.46
  • FE 201836 100 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.0895 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: 10.67 · 95% CI -1.66 to 23.00
  • FE 201836 50 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.7820 · Mean difference: 1.20 · 95% CI -7.34 to 9.74
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Mean NI Diary Overall Impact Score at Week 4

The NI Diary is a 12-item questionnaire with 11 core items (Q1-Q11) and an overall QoL impact question (Q12). For the overall impact question (Q12), response options range from 0 (not at all) to 4 (a great deal). The NI Diary Overall Impact Scores are standardized from 0 to 100 (lowest to highest impact). The score at each visit was calculated as the average over the three consecutive 24 hour periods just prior to the respective visit. Adjusted visit-specific mean changes from baseline in NI Diary Overall Impact Score are estimated using a baseline value of 40.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 4
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Mean NI Diary Overall Impact Score at Week 4
score on a scaleFE 201836 500 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 350 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 250 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 150 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 100 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 50 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period)
Change From Baseline in Mean NI Diary Overall Impact Score at Week 4-22.17 (-28.25 to -16.09)-26.07 (-35.09 to -17.05)-19.35 (-28.80 to -9.90)-18.36 (-30.66 to -6.07)-17.95 (-30.50 to -5.41)-21.40 (-29.54 to -13.26)-21.75 (-26.74 to -16.77)
Statistical analysis
  • FE 201836 500 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.9175 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: -0.41 · 95% CI -8.25 to 7.42
  • FE 201836 350 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.4098 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: -4.32 · 95% CI -14.62 to 5.98
  • FE 201836 250 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.6566 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: 2.41 · 95% CI -8.25 to 13.06
  • FE 201836 150 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.6144 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: 3.39 · 95% CI -9.85 to 16.63
  • FE 201836 100 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.5798 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: 3.80 · 95% CI -9.71 to 17.31
  • FE 201836 50 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.9417 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: 0.35 · 95% CI -9.17 to 9.88
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Mean NI Diary Overall Impact Score at Week 8

The NI Diary is a 12-item questionnaire with 11 core items (Q1-Q11) and an overall QoL impact question (Q12). For the overall impact question (Q12), response options range from 0 (not at all) to 4 (a great deal). The NI Diary Overall Impact Scores are standardized from 0 to 100 (lowest to highest impact). The score at each visit was calculated as the average over the three consecutive 24 hour periods just prior to the respective visit. Adjusted visit-specific mean changes from baseline in NI Diary Overall Impact Score are estimated using a baseline value of 40.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 8
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Mean NI Diary Overall Impact Score at Week 8
score on a scaleFE 201836 500 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 350 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 250 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 150 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 100 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 50 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period)
Change From Baseline in Mean NI Diary Overall Impact Score at Week 8-28.13 (-34.76 to -21.50)-34.97 (-44.69 to -25.25)-21.71 (-31.80 to -11.62)-19.03 (-32.06 to -6.00)-23.84 (-37.71 to -9.96)-20.70 (-29.45 to -11.94)-25.32 (-30.69 to -19.95)
Statistical analysis
  • FE 201836 500 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.5148 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: -2.81 · 95% CI -11.31 to 5.68
  • FE 201836 350 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.0879 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: -9.65 · 95% CI -20.75 to 1.44
  • FE 201836 250 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.5335 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: 3.61 · 95% CI -7.79 to 15.00
  • FE 201836 150 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.3787 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: 6.29 · 95% CI -7.76 to 20.34
  • FE 201836 100 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.8448 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: 1.48 · 95% CI -13.41 to 16.38
  • FE 201836 50 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.3751 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: 4.62 · 95% CI -5.63 to 14.87
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Mean NI Diary Overall Impact Score at Week 12

The NI Diary is a 12-item questionnaire with 11 core items (Q1-Q11) and an overall QoL impact question (Q12). For the overall impact question (Q12), response options range from 0 (not at all) to 4 (a great deal). The NI Diary Overall Impact Scores are standardized from 0 to 100 (lowest to highest impact). The score at each visit was calculated as the average over the three consecutive 24 hour periods just prior to the respective visit. Adjusted visit-specific mean changes from baseline in NI Diary Overall Impact Score are estimated using a baseline value of 40.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 12
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Mean NI Diary Overall Impact Score at Week 12
score on a scaleFE 201836 500 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 350 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 250 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 150 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 100 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 50 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period)
Change From Baseline in Mean NI Diary Overall Impact Score at Week 12-30.47 (-37.49 to -23.45)-36.76 (-47.18 to -26.34)-20.84 (-31.65 to -10.02)-15.32 (-29.10 to -1.54)-28.89 (-43.40 to -14.39)-27.13 (-36.35 to -17.91)-30.03 (-35.74 to -24.33)
Statistical analysis
  • FE 201836 500 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.9245 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: -0.43 · 95% CI -9.43 to 8.57
  • FE 201836 350 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.2657 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: -6.72 · 95% CI -18.59 to 5.15
  • FE 201836 250 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.1383 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: 9.20 · 95% CI -2.99 to 21.38
  • FE 201836 150 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.0523 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: 14.72 · 95% CI -0.15 to 29.59
  • FE 201836 100 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.8855 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: 1.14 · 95% CI -14.47 to 16.75
  • FE 201836 50 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.5972 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: 2.91 · 95% CI -7.91 to 13.72
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Aggregated Mean NI Diary Overall Impact Score During 12 Weeks of Treatment

The NI Diary is a 12-item questionnaire with 11 core items (Q1-Q11) and an overall QoL impact question (Q12). For the overall impact question (Q12), response options range from 0 (not at all) to 4 (a great deal). The NI Diary Overall Impact Scores are standardized from 0 to 100 (lowest to highest impact). The score at each visit was calculated as the average over the three consecutive 24 hour periods just prior to the respective visit. The visit-specific means were aggregated into a mean of current and preceding visits. Level estimated for baseline value of mean NI Diary Overall Impact Score equal to 40 is presented in this endpoint. The 95% credibility interval (2.5 and 97.5 percentiles of the posterior distribution) instead of confidence interval is presented for this endpoint.

Time frame:
Baseline, during 12 weeks of treatment
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Aggregated Mean NI Diary Overall Impact Score During 12 Weeks of Treatment
score on a scaleFE 201836 500 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 350 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 250 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 150 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 100 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 50 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period)
Change From Baseline in Aggregated Mean NI Diary Overall Impact Score During 12 Weeks of Treatment-6.50 (-10.57 to -2.85)-6.25 (-9.78 to -3.03)-6.11 (-9.49 to -2.90)-6.00 (-9.28 to -2.70)-5.98 (-9.29 to -2.58)-5.97 (-9.32 to -2.57)-5.96 (-9.42 to -2.49)
Statistical analysis
  • FE 201836 500 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · Mean difference: -0.54 · 95% CI -6.09 to 2.28
  • FE 201836 350 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · Mean difference: -0.28 · 95% CI -4.30 to 0.75
  • FE 201836 250 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · Mean difference: -0.15 · 95% CI -2.44 to 0.33
  • FE 201836 150 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · Mean difference: -0.04 · 95% CI -0.92 to 0.07
  • FE 201836 100 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · Mean difference: -0.02 · 95% CI -0.48 to 0.02
  • FE 201836 50 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · Mean difference: -0.00 · 95% CI -0.15 to 0.00
SecondaryPatient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) Urinary Symptoms Scores at Week 1

The PGI-I is a 1-item questionnaire designed to assess the patient's impression of changes in urinary symptoms. The PGI-I was scored from 1 (very much better) to 7 (very much worse). Visit-specific PGI-I in urinary symptoms is presented in this endpoint.

Time frame:
Week 1
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) Urinary Symptoms Scores at Week 1
score on a scaleFE 201836 500 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 350 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 250 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 150 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 100 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 50 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period)
Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) Urinary Symptoms Scores at Week 12.475 (2.261 to 2.689)2.045 (1.723 to 2.367)2.708 (2.385 to 3.031)2.786 (2.363 to 3.209)2.781 (2.316 to 3.245)2.758 (2.482 to 3.033)2.745 (2.571 to 2.919)
Statistical analysis
  • FE 201836 500 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.0550 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: -0.270 · 95% CI -0.545 to 0.006
  • FE 201836 350 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.0002 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: -0.700 · 95% CI -1.066 to -0.335
  • FE 201836 250 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.8440 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: -0.037 · 95% CI -0.404 to 0.330
  • FE 201836 150 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.8610 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: 0.041 · 95% CI -0.417 to 0.498
  • FE 201836 100 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.8871 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: 0.036 · 95% CI -0.460 to 0.532
  • FE 201836 50 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.9396 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: 0.013 · 95% CI -0.313 to 0.338
SecondaryPatient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) Urinary Symptoms Scores at Week 4

The PGI-I is a 1-item questionnaire designed to assess the patient's impression of changes in urinary symptoms. The PGI-I was scored from 1 (very much better) to 7 (very much worse). Visit-specific PGI-I in urinary symptoms is presented in this endpoint.

Time frame:
Week 4
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) Urinary Symptoms Scores at Week 4
score on a scaleFE 201836 500 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 350 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 250 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 150 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 100 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 50 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period)
Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) Urinary Symptoms Scores at Week 42.121 (1.866 to 2.376)2.191 (1.813 to 2.569)2.447 (2.039 to 2.855)2.521 (1.995 to 3.047)2.385 (1.859 to 2.910)2.582 (2.244 to 2.921)2.596 (2.386 to 2.806)
Statistical analysis
  • FE 201836 500 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.0050 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: -0.475 · 95% CI -0.806 to -0.145
  • FE 201836 350 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.0665 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: -0.405 · 95% CI -0.837 to 0.028
  • FE 201836 250 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.5245 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: -0.149 · 95% CI -0.608 to 0.310
  • FE 201836 150 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.7947 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: -0.075 · 95% CI -0.642 to 0.492
  • FE 201836 100 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.4625 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: -0.211 · 95% CI -0.777 to 0.355
  • FE 201836 50 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.9465 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: -0.014 · 95% CI -0.412 to 0.385
SecondaryPatient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) Urinary Symptoms Scores at Week 8

The PGI-I is a 1-item questionnaire designed to assess the patient's impression of changes in urinary symptoms. The PGI-I was scored from 1 (very much better) to 7 (very much worse). Visit-specific PGI-I in urinary symptoms is presented in this endpoint.

Time frame:
Week 8
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) Urinary Symptoms Scores at Week 8
score on a scaleFE 201836 500 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 350 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 250 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 150 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 100 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 50 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period)
Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) Urinary Symptoms Scores at Week 81.843 (1.572 to 2.113)1.887 (1.493 to 2.281)2.528 (2.109 to 2.947)2.286 (1.761 to 2.811)2.155 (1.587 to 2.723)2.273 (1.917 to 2.629)2.573 (2.355 to 2.791)
Statistical analysis
  • FE 201836 500 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = <0.0001 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: -0.730 · 95% CI -1.078 to -0.383
  • FE 201836 350 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.0030 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: -0.686 · 95% CI -1.137 to -0.236
  • FE 201836 250 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.8520 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: -0.045 · 95% CI -0.517 to 0.427
  • FE 201836 150 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.3205 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: -0.287 · 95% CI -0.856 to 0.281
  • FE 201836 100 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.1769 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: -0.418 · 95% CI -1.026 to 0.190
  • FE 201836 50 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.1584 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: -0.300 · 95% CI -0.717 to 0.118
SecondaryPatient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) Urinary Symptoms Scores at Week 12

The PGI-I is a 1-item questionnaire designed to assess the patient's impression of changes in urinary symptoms. The PGI-I was scored from 1 (very much better) to 7 (very much worse). Visit-specific PGI-I in urinary symptoms is presented in this endpoint.

Time frame:
Week 12
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) Urinary Symptoms Scores at Week 12
score on a scaleFE 201836 500 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 350 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 250 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 150 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 100 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 50 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period)
Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) Urinary Symptoms Scores at Week 121.667 (1.357 to 1.977)1.671 (1.224 to 2.119)2.656 (2.167 to 3.146)2.452 (1.855 to 3.049)1.678 (1.052 to 2.304)2.384 (1.994 to 2.774)2.490 (2.240 to 2.740)
Statistical analysis
  • FE 201836 500 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = <0.0001 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: -0.822 · 95% CI -1.220 to -0.424
  • FE 201836 350 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.0019 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: -0.818 · 95% CI -1.331 to -0.306
  • FE 201836 250 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.5510 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: 0.167 · 95% CI -0.383 to 0.716
  • FE 201836 150 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.9086 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: -0.038 · 95% CI -0.685 to 0.610
  • FE 201836 100 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.0185 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: -0.812 · 95% CI -1.486 to -0.138
  • FE 201836 50 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.6537 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: -0.106 · 95% CI -0.569 to 0.357
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) Scores at Week 1

The PGI-S is a 1-item questionnaire designed to assess patient's impression of disease severity. The PGI-S was scored from 1 (none) to 4 (severe). Change from baseline in visit-specific PGI-S is presented in this endpoint. Level estimated for baseline value of PGI-S equal to 3 is presented in this endpoint.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 1
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) Scores at Week 1
score on a scaleFE 201836 500 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 350 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 250 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 150 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 100 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 50 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period)
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) Scores at Week 1-0.739 (-0.927 to -0.552)-0.970 (-1.253 to -0.688)-0.811 (-1.094 to -0.529)-0.643 (-1.012 to -0.273)-0.417 (-0.840 to 0.007)-0.719 (-0.984 to -0.454)-0.593 (-0.746 to -0.440)
Statistical analysis
  • FE 201836 500 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.2350 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Least square mean difference: -0.146 · 95% CI -0.388 to 0.096
  • FE 201836 350 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.0215 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Least square mean difference: -0.377 · 95% CI -0.699 to -0.056
  • FE 201836 250 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.1818 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Least square mean difference: -0.218 · 95% CI -0.540 to 0.103
  • FE 201836 150 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.8063 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Least square mean difference: -0.050 · 95% CI -0.450 to 0.350
  • FE 201836 100 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.4414 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Least square mean difference: 0.176 · 95% CI -0.274 to 0.627
  • FE 201836 50 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.4179 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Least square mean difference: -0.126 · 95% CI -0.432 to 0.180
SecondaryChange From Baseline in PGI-S Scores at Week 4

The PGI-S is a 1-item questionnaire designed to assess patient's impression of disease severity. The PGI-S was scored from 1 (none) to 4 (severe). Change from baseline in visit-specific PGI-S is presented in this endpoint. Level estimated for baseline value of PGI-S equal to 3 is presented in this endpoint.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 4
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline in PGI-S Scores at Week 4
score on a scaleFE 201836 500 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 350 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 250 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 150 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 100 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 50 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period)
Change From Baseline in PGI-S Scores at Week 4-0.837 (-1.015 to -0.659)-1.025 (-1.292 to -0.758)-0.798 (-1.081 to -0.516)-0.749 (-1.115 to -0.383)-0.656 (-1.033 to -0.278)-0.936 (-1.189 to -0.684)-0.898 (-1.045 to -0.750)
Statistical analysis
  • FE 201836 500 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.6042 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Least square mean difference: 0.061 · 95% CI -0.170 to 0.292
  • FE 201836 350 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.4114 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Least square mean difference: -0.127 · 95% CI -0.432 to 0.177
  • FE 201836 250 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.5394 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Least square mean difference: 0.099 · 95% CI -0.219 to 0.418
  • FE 201836 150 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.4590 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Least square mean difference: 0.149 · 95% CI -0.246 to 0.544
  • FE 201836 100 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.2397 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Least square mean difference: 0.242 · 95% CI -0.163 to 0.647
  • FE 201836 50 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.7954 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Least square mean difference: -0.039 · 95% CI -0.332 to 0.254
SecondaryChange From Baseline in PGI-S Scores at Week 8

The PGI-S is a 1-item questionnaire designed to assess patient's impression of disease severity. The PGI-S was scored from 1 (none) to 4 (severe). Change from baseline in visit-specific PGI-S is presented in this endpoint. Level estimated for baseline value of PGI-S equal to 3 is presented in this endpoint.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 8
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline in PGI-S Scores at Week 8
score on a scaleFE 201836 500 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 350 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 250 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 150 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 100 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 50 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period)
Change From Baseline in PGI-S Scores at Week 8-1.132 (-1.322 to -0.942)-1.410 (-1.688 to -1.132)-0.825 (-1.114 to -0.536)-0.643 (-1.004 to -0.281)-0.816 (-1.215 to -0.418)-1.013 (-1.279 to -0.747)-0.800 (-0.953 to -0.647)
Statistical analysis
  • FE 201836 500 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.0077 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Least square mean difference: -0.332 · 95% CI -0.576 to -0.089
  • FE 201836 350 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.0002 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Least square mean difference: -0.610 · 95% CI -0.927 to -0.293
  • FE 201836 250 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.8778 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Least square mean difference: -0.026 · 95% CI -0.352 to 0.301
  • FE 201836 150 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.4309 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Least square mean difference: 0.157 · 95% CI -0.235 to 0.549
  • FE 201836 100 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.9392 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Least square mean difference: -0.017 · 95% CI -0.444 to 0.411
  • FE 201836 50 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.1734 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Least square mean difference: -0.213 · 95% CI -0.521 to 0.094
SecondaryChange From Baseline in PGI-S Scores at Week 12

The PGI-S is a 1-item questionnaire designed to assess patient's impression of disease severity. The PGI-S was scored from 1 (none) to 4 (severe). Change from baseline in visit-specific PGI-S is presented in this endpoint. Level estimated for baseline value of PGI-S equal to 3 is presented in this endpoint.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline in PGI-S Scores at Week 12
score on a scaleFE 201836 500 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 350 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 250 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 150 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 100 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 50 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period)
Change From Baseline in PGI-S Scores at Week 12-1.181 (-1.383 to -0.979)-1.338 (-1.630 to -1.045)-0.894 (-1.208 to -0.579)-0.638 (-1.020 to -0.257)-1.168 (-1.571 to -0.764)-1.041 (-1.312 to -0.770)-0.853 (-1.016 to -0.690)
Statistical analysis
  • FE 201836 500 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.0133 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Least square mean difference: -0.328 · 95% CI -0.587 to -0.069
  • FE 201836 350 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.0048 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Least square mean difference: -0.484 · 95% CI -0.819 to -0.150
  • FE 201836 250 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.8223 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Least square mean difference: -0.040 · 95% CI -0.395 to 0.314
  • FE 201836 150 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.3083 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Least square mean difference: 0.215 · 95% CI -0.200 to 0.630
  • FE 201836 100 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.1556 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Least square mean difference: -0.315 · 95% CI -0.750 to 0.121
  • FE 201836 50 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.2423 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Least square mean difference: -0.188 · 95% CI -0.504 to 0.128
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Hsu 5-point Likert Bother Scale at Week 1

The Hsu 5-point Likert Bother scale is a questionnaire designed to assess the subjective bothersomeness and functional disruptiveness of nocturia. The Hsu 5 point Likert Bother Scale was scored from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely). Change from baseline in visit-specific Hsu Bother is presented in this endpoint. Level estimated for baseline value of Hsu Bother equal to 3 is presented in this endpoint.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 1
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Hsu 5-point Likert Bother Scale at Week 1
score on a scaleFE 201836 500 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 350 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 250 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 150 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 100 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 50 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period)
Change From Baseline in Hsu 5-point Likert Bother Scale at Week 1-0.649 (-0.922 to -0.376)-1.072 (-1.441 to -0.703)-0.748 (-1.125 to -0.370)-0.458 (-0.942 to 0.026)-0.346 (-0.955 to 0.262)-0.376 (-0.714 to -0.039)-0.570 (-0.799 to -0.341)
Statistical analysis
  • FE 201836 500 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.6381 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Least square mean difference: -0.079 · 95% CI -0.409 to 0.251
  • FE 201836 350 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.0221 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Least square mean difference: -0.502 · 95% CI -0.931 to -0.073
  • FE 201836 250 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.4112 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Least square mean difference: -0.177 · 95% CI -0.602 to 0.247
  • FE 201836 150 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.6761 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Least square mean difference: 0.112 · 95% CI -0.416 to 0.640
  • FE 201836 100 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.4898 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Least square mean difference: 0.224 · 95% CI -0.414 to 0.861
  • FE 201836 50 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.3311 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Least square mean difference: 0.194 · 95% CI -0.198 to 0.585
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Hsu 5-point Likert Bother Scale at Week 4

The Hsu 5-point Likert Bother scale is a questionnaire designed to assess the subjective bothersomeness and functional disruptiveness of nocturia. The Hsu 5 point Likert Bother Scale was scored from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely). Change from baseline in visit-specific Hsu Bother is presented in this endpoint. Level estimated for baseline value of Hsu Bother equal to 3 is presented in this endpoint.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 4
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Hsu 5-point Likert Bother Scale at Week 4
score on a scaleFE 201836 500 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 350 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 250 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 150 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 100 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 50 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period)
Change From Baseline in Hsu 5-point Likert Bother Scale at Week 4-0.896 (-1.161 to -0.630)-0.940 (-1.294 to -0.586)-0.712 (-1.083 to -0.340)-0.606 (-1.079 to -0.132)-1.096 (-1.698 to -0.493)-0.861 (-1.193 to -0.530)-0.665 (-0.885 to -0.445)
Statistical analysis
  • FE 201836 500 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.1583 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Least square mean difference: -0.230 · 95% CI -0.551 to 0.090
  • FE 201836 350 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.1884 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Least square mean difference: -0.275 · 95% CI -0.685 to 0.136
  • FE 201836 250 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.8256 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Least square mean difference: -0.047 · 95% CI -0.463 to 0.369
  • FE 201836 150 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.8198 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Least square mean difference: 0.059 · 95% CI -0.455 to 0.574
  • FE 201836 100 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.1793 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Least square mean difference: -0.431 · 95% CI -1.061 to 0.199
  • FE 201836 50 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.3155 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Least square mean difference: -0.196 · 95% CI -0.581 to 0.189
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Hsu 5-point Likert Bother Scale at Week 8

The Hsu 5-point Likert Bother scale is a questionnaire designed to assess the subjective bothersomeness and functional disruptiveness of nocturia. The Hsu 5 point Likert Bother Scale was scored from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely). Change from baseline in visit-specific Hsu Bother is presented in this endpoint. Level estimated for baseline value of Hsu Bother equal to 3 is presented in this endpoint.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 8
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Hsu 5-point Likert Bother Scale at Week 8
score on a scaleFE 201836 500 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 350 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 250 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 150 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 100 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 50 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period)
Change From Baseline in Hsu 5-point Likert Bother Scale at Week 8-0.972 (-1.273 to -0.672)-1.044 (-1.423 to -0.664)-0.991 (-1.389 to -0.594)-0.499 (-1.001 to 0.004)-1.012 (-1.691 to -0.333)-0.881 (-1.240 to -0.522)-0.731 (-0.968 to -0.495)
Statistical analysis
  • FE 201836 500 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.1830 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Least square mean difference: -0.241 · 95% CI -0.596 to 0.114
  • FE 201836 350 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.1618 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Least square mean difference: -0.313 · 95% CI -0.751 to 0.126
  • FE 201836 250 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.2519 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Least square mean difference: -0.260 · 95% CI -0.706 to 0.186
  • FE 201836 150 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.4044 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Least square mean difference: 0.232 · 95% CI -0.316 to 0.781
  • FE 201836 100 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.4348 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Least square mean difference: -0.280 · 95% CI -0.986 to 0.426
  • FE 201836 50 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.4786 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Least square mean difference: -0.150 · 95% CI -0.565 to 0.266
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Hsu 5-point Likert Bother Scale at Week 12

The Hsu 5-point Likert Bother scale is a questionnaire designed to assess the subjective bothersomeness and functional disruptiveness of nocturia. The Hsu 5 point Likert Bother Scale was scored from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely). Change from baseline in visit-specific Hsu Bother is presented in this endpoint. Level estimated for baseline value of Hsu Bother equal to 3 is presented in this endpoint.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Hsu 5-point Likert Bother Scale at Week 12
score on a scaleFE 201836 500 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 350 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 250 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 150 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 100 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 50 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period)
Change From Baseline in Hsu 5-point Likert Bother Scale at Week 12-0.992 (-1.306 to -0.679)-1.249 (-1.663 to -0.834)-0.700 (-1.132 to -0.267)-0.880 (-1.416 to -0.343)-0.974 (-1.676 to -0.272)-0.921 (-1.303 to -0.540)-0.769 (-1.027 to -0.511)
Statistical analysis
  • FE 201836 500 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.2412 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Least square mean difference: -0.223 · 95% CI -0.598 to 0.151
  • FE 201836 350 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.0501 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Least square mean difference: -0.480 · 95% CI -0.959 to 0.000
  • FE 201836 250 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.7788 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Least square mean difference: 0.069 · 95% CI -0.417 to 0.556
  • FE 201836 150 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.7111 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Least square mean difference: -0.111 · 95% CI -0.698 to 0.477
  • FE 201836 100 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.5816 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Least square mean difference: -0.205 · 95% CI -0.937 to 0.527
  • FE 201836 50 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.4981 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Least square mean difference: -0.152 · 95% CI -0.595 to 0.290
SecondaryChange From Baseline in ISI at Week 4

The ISI is a 7-item questionnaire which comprises of four 'sleep-related' items and three 'wake-related' items. Each item is rated on a 0-4 scale and the total score ranges from 0 to 28 (higher score suggests more severe insomnia). Change from baseline in visit-specific ISI is presented in this endpoint. Level estimated for baseline value of ISI equal to 15 is presented in this endpoint.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 4
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline in ISI at Week 4
score on a scaleFE 201836 500 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 350 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 250 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 150 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 100 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 50 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period)
Change From Baseline in ISI at Week 4-6.589 (-8.046 to -5.133)-6.652 (-8.689 to -4.616)-5.630 (-7.772 to -3.487)-5.428 (-8.200 to -2.656)-4.510 (-7.996 to -1.023)-6.372 (-8.291 to -4.452)-5.277 (-6.493 to -4.061)
Statistical analysis
  • FE 201836 500 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.1733 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Least square mean difference: -1.313 · 95% CI -3.207 to 0.582
  • FE 201836 350 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.2538 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Least square mean difference: -1.375 · 95% CI -3.745 to 0.994
  • FE 201836 250 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.7782 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Least square mean difference: -0.353 · 95% CI -2.818 to 2.113
  • FE 201836 150 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.9218 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Least square mean difference: -0.151 · 95% CI -3.182 to 2.880
  • FE 201836 100 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.6823 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Least square mean difference: 0.767 · 95% CI -2.923 to 4.457
  • FE 201836 50 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.3436 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Least square mean difference: -1.095 · 95% CI -3.369 to 1.179
SecondaryChange From Baseline in ISI at Week 8

The ISI is a 7-item questionnaire which comprises of four 'sleep-related' items and three 'wake-related' items. Each item is rated on a 0-4 scale and the total score ranges from 0 to 28 (higher score suggests more severe insomnia). Change from baseline in visit-specific ISI is presented in this endpoint. Level estimated for baseline value of ISI equal to 15 is presented in this endpoint.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 8
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline in ISI at Week 8
score on a scaleFE 201836 500 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 350 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 250 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 150 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 100 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 50 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period)
Change From Baseline in ISI at Week 8-7.643 (-9.140 to -6.147)-8.091 (-10.116 to -6.067)-6.693 (-8.799 to -4.588)-6.959 (-9.668 to -4.250)-5.707 (-9.283 to -2.131)-7.167 (-9.055 to -5.280)-6.408 (-7.603 to -5.213)
Statistical analysis
  • FE 201836 500 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.2042 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Least square mean difference: -1.235 · 95% CI -3.146 to 0.676
  • FE 201836 350 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.1591 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Least square mean difference: -1.683 · 95% CI -4.031 to 0.665
  • FE 201836 250 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.8168 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Least square mean difference: -0.285 · 95% CI -2.708 to 2.138
  • FE 201836 150 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.7148 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Least square mean difference: -0.551 · 95% CI -3.517 to 2.416
  • FE 201836 100 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.7141 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Least square mean difference: 0.701 · 95% CI -3.066 to 4.468
  • FE 201836 50 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.5041 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Least square mean difference: -0.759 · 95% CI -2.995 to 1.477
SecondaryChange From Baseline in ISI at Week 12

The ISI is a 7-item questionnaire which comprises of four 'sleep-related' items and three 'wake-related' items. Each item is rated on a 0-4 scale and the total score ranges from 0 to 28 (higher score suggests more severe insomnia). Change from baseline in visit-specific ISI is presented in this endpoint. Level estimated for baseline value of ISI equal to 15 is presented in this endpoint.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline in ISI at Week 12
score on a scaleFE 201836 500 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 350 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 250 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 150 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 100 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 50 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period)
Change From Baseline in ISI at Week 12-7.807 (-9.427 to -6.188)-9.329 (-11.619 to -7.040)-6.355 (-8.733 to -3.977)-6.193 (-9.195 to -3.191)-5.002 (-8.865 to -1.138)-7.908 (-10.016 to -5.800)-6.678 (-8.018 to -5.338)
Statistical analysis
  • FE 201836 500 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.2896 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Least square mean difference: -1.129 · 95% CI -3.226 to 0.967
  • FE 201836 350 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.0498 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Least square mean difference: -2.652 · 95% CI -5.301 to -0.003
  • FE 201836 250 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.8159 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Least square mean difference: 0.323 · 95% CI -2.409 to 3.055
  • FE 201836 150 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.7719 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Least square mean difference: 0.485 · 95% CI -2.809 to 3.779
  • FE 201836 100 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.4193 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Least square mean difference: 1.676 · 95% CI -2.407 to 5.760
  • FE 201836 50 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.3333 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Least square mean difference: -1.230 · 95% CI -3.730 to 1.270
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Mean Duration of First Undisturbed Sleep Period (FUSP) at Week 1

The FUSP is defined as the time in minutes from the time of going to bed to the time of first nocturnal void, or time of awakening if no void occured. The duration of FUSP at each visit was calculated as the average over the 3 consecutive 24-hour periods just prior to the respective visit. Adjusted visit-specific mean changes from baseline in FUSP are estimated using a baseline value of 180 (min).

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 1
Reported as:
Mean · minutes
Change From Baseline in Mean Duration of First Undisturbed Sleep Period (FUSP) at Week 1
minutesFE 201836 500 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 350 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 250 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 150 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 100 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 50 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period)
Change From Baseline in Mean Duration of First Undisturbed Sleep Period (FUSP) at Week 1122.9 (86.2 to 159.7)187.0 (132.3 to 241.7)106.0 (49.6 to 162.4)91.7 (18.7 to 164.8)82.9 (2.5 to 163.4)51.3 (3.9 to 98.7)81.1 (50.8 to 111.4)
Statistical analysis
  • FE 201836 500 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.0853 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: 41.8 · 95% CI -5.9 to 89.6
  • FE 201836 350 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.0010 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: 105.9 · 95% CI 43.4 to 168.4
  • FE 201836 250 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.4418 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: 24.9 · 95% CI -38.8 to 88.6
  • FE 201836 150 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.7902 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: 10.7 · 95% CI -68.2 to 89.6
  • FE 201836 100 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.9664 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: 1.8 · 95% CI -84.2 to 87.9
  • FE 201836 50 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.2977 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: -29.8 · 95% CI -85.9 to 26.4
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Mean Duration of FUSP at Week 4

The FUSP is defined as the time in minutes from the time of going to bed to the time of first nocturnal void, or time of awakening if no void occurred. The duration of FUSP at each visit was calculated as the average over the 3 consecutive 24-hour periods just prior to the respective visit. Adjusted visit-specific mean changes from baseline in FUSP are estimated using a baseline value of 180 (min).

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 4
Reported as:
Mean · minutes
Change From Baseline in Mean Duration of FUSP at Week 4
minutesFE 201836 500 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 350 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 250 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 150 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 100 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 50 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period)
Change From Baseline in Mean Duration of FUSP at Week 4164.5 (127.9 to 201.0)211.0 (156.3 to 265.7)132.3 (75.2 to 189.4)89.5 (15.1 to 163.9)122.0 (46.8 to 197.3)95.5 (48.6 to 142.5)150.2 (120.4 to 180.0)
Statistical analysis
  • FE 201836 500 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.5523 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: 14.3 · 95% CI -33.0 to 61.5
  • FE 201836 350 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.0556 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: 60.8 · 95% CI -1.5 to 123.0
  • FE 201836 250 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.5837 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: -17.9 · 95% CI -82.0 to 46.3
  • FE 201836 150 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.1363 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: -60.7 · 95% CI -140.7 to 19.3
  • FE 201836 100 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.4938 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: -28.2 · 95% CI -109.1 to 52.8
  • FE 201836 50 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.0535 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: -54.7 · 95% CI -110.2 to 0.8
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Mean Duration of FUSP at Week 8

The FUSP is defined as the time in minutes from the time of going to bed to the time of first nocturnal void, or time of awakening if no void occurred. The duration of FUSP at each visit was calculated as the average over the 3 consecutive 24-hour periods just prior to the respective visit. Adjusted visit-specific mean changes from baseline in FUSP are estimated using a baseline value of 180 (min).

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 8
Reported as:
Mean · minutes
Change From Baseline in Mean Duration of FUSP at Week 8
minutesFE 201836 500 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 350 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 250 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 150 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 100 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 50 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period)
Change From Baseline in Mean Duration of FUSP at Week 8160.4 (112.4 to 208.3)225.4 (157.9 to 293.0)190.2 (118.9 to 261.6)136.8 (48.3 to 225.4)163.2 (68.7 to 257.8)164.3 (104.9 to 223.7)161.0 (122.6 to 199.5)
Statistical analysis
  • FE 201836 500 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.9829 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: -0.7 · 95% CI -62.2 to 60.9
  • FE 201836 350 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.1038 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: 64.4 · 95% CI -13.3 to 142.1
  • FE 201836 250 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.4764 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: 29.2 · 95% CI -51.4 to 109.8
  • FE 201836 150 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.6204 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: -24.2 · 95% CI -120.5 to 72.0
  • FE 201836 100 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.9660 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: 2.2 · 95% CI -100.1 to 104.6
  • FE 201836 50 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.9275 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: 3.3 · 95% CI -67.4 to 73.9
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Mean Duration of FUSP at Week 12

The FUSP is defined as the time in minutes from the time of going to bed to the time of first nocturnal void, or time of awakening if no void occurred. The duration of FUSP at each visit was calculated as the average over the 3 consecutive 24-hour periods just prior to the respective visit. Adjusted visit-specific mean changes from baseline in FUSP are estimated using a baseline value of 180 (min).

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 12
Reported as:
Mean · minutes
Change From Baseline in Mean Duration of FUSP at Week 12
minutesFE 201836 500 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 350 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 250 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 150 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 100 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 50 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period)
Change From Baseline in Mean Duration of FUSP at Week 12178.5 (132.5 to 224.5)160.0 (93.3 to 226.6)180.7 (112.2 to 249.2)111.5 (29.7 to 193.2)141.1 (51.3 to 230.9)166.2 (110.5 to 221.8)162.8 (126.9 to 198.7)
Statistical analysis
  • FE 201836 500 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.5964 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: 15.7 · 95% CI -42.7 to 74.2
  • FE 201836 350 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.9418 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: -2.8 · 95% CI -78.5 to 72.9
  • FE 201836 250 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.6452 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: 18.0 · 95% CI -58.8 to 94.7
  • FE 201836 150 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.2565 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: -51.3 · 95% CI -140.2 to 37.6
  • FE 201836 100 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.6605 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: -21.6 · 95% CI -118.6 to 75.4
  • FE 201836 50 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.9191 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: 3.4 · 95% CI -62.6 to 69.4
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Aggregated Mean Duration of FUSP During 12 Weeks of Treatment

The FUSP is defined as the time in minutes from the time of going to bed to the time of first nocturnal void, or time of awakening if no void occurred. The visit-specific means were aggregated into a mean of current and preceding visits. Level estimated for baseline value of mean duration of FUSP (minutes) equal to 180 is presented in this endpoint. The 95% credibility interval (2.5 and 97.5 percentiles of the posterior distribution) instead of confidence interval is presented for this endpoint.

Time frame:
Baseline, During 12 Weeks of Treatment
Reported as:
Mean · minutes
Change From Baseline in Aggregated Mean Duration of FUSP During 12 Weeks of Treatment
minutesFE 201836 500 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 350 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 250 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 150 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 100 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 50 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period)
Change From Baseline in Aggregated Mean Duration of FUSP During 12 Weeks of Treatment154.98 (130.41 to 189.10)150.23 (130.20 to 181.15)145.95 (128.21 to 170.90)140.74 (120.51 to 160.16)139.19 (117.86 to 157.42)138.13 (115.62 to 157.24)137.45 (114.12 to 157.30)
Statistical analysis
  • FE 201836 500 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · Mean difference: 17.52 · 95% CI -6.19 to 62.09
  • FE 201836 350 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · Mean difference: 12.78 · 95% CI -0.73 to 55.89
  • FE 201836 250 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · Mean difference: 8.50 · 95% CI -0.14 to 47.28
  • FE 201836 150 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · Mean difference: 3.29 · 95% CI -0.01 to 28.07
  • FE 201836 100 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · Mean difference: 1.74 · 95% CI -0.00 to 17.90
  • FE 201836 50 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · Mean difference: 0.68 · 95% CI -0.00 to 7.55
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Nocturnal Diuresis Rate Profiles at Week 1

The nocturnal diuresis rate (mL/min) is calculated as the mean of the nocturnal diuresis for each of the three nights, with the single-night nocturnal diuresis calculated as the ratio of NUV to total time in bed. Change from baseline in visit-specific mean nocturnal diuresis (mL/min) is presented. Level estimated for baseline value of mean nocturnal diuresis (mL/min) equal to 1.3 is presented in this endpoint.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 1
Reported as:
Mean · mL/min
Change From Baseline in Nocturnal Diuresis Rate Profiles at Week 1
mL/minFE 201836 500 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 350 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 250 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 150 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 100 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 50 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period)
Change From Baseline in Nocturnal Diuresis Rate Profiles at Week 1-0.575 (-0.687 to -0.463)-0.635 (-0.801 to -0.468)-0.610 (-0.779 to -0.440)-0.459 (-0.678 to -0.239)-0.523 (-0.766 to -0.280)-0.328 (-0.474 to -0.182)-0.402 (-0.494 to -0.310)
Statistical analysis
  • FE 201836 500 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.0196 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: -0.173 · 95% CI -0.318 to -0.028
  • FE 201836 350 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.0167 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: -0.233 · 95% CI -0.423 to -0.043
  • FE 201836 250 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.0352 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: -0.208 · 95% CI -0.401 to -0.015
  • FE 201836 150 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.6402 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: -0.057 · 95% CI -0.295 to 0.182
  • FE 201836 100 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.3602 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: -0.121 · 95% CI -0.381 to 0.139
  • FE 201836 50 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.4018 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: 0.074 · 95% CI -0.099 to 0.247
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Nocturnal Diuresis Rate Profiles at Week 12

The nocturnal diuresis rate (mL/min) is calculated as the mean of the nocturnal diuresis for each of the three nights, with the single-night nocturnal diuresis calculated as the ratio of NUV to total time in bed. Change from baseline in visit-specific mean nocturnal diuresis (mL/min) is presented. Level estimated for baseline value of mean nocturnal diuresis (mL/min) equal to 1.3 is presented in this endpoint.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 12
Reported as:
Mean · mL/min
Change From Baseline in Nocturnal Diuresis Rate Profiles at Week 12
mL/minFE 201836 500 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 350 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 250 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 150 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 100 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 50 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period)
Change From Baseline in Nocturnal Diuresis Rate Profiles at Week 12-0.648 (-0.789 to -0.508)-0.606 (-0.805 to -0.408)-0.735 (-0.937 to -0.533)-0.458 (-0.693 to -0.223)-0.685 (-0.945 to -0.425)-0.651 (-0.812 to -0.490)-0.515 (-0.619 to -0.412)
Statistical analysis
  • FE 201836 500 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.1354 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: -0.133 · 95% CI -0.308 to 0.042
  • FE 201836 350 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.4238 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: -0.091 · 95% CI -0.315 to 0.133
  • FE 201836 250 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.0574 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: -0.220 · 95% CI -0.446 to 0.007
  • FE 201836 150 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.6579 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: 0.058 · 95% CI -0.199 to 0.315
  • FE 201836 100 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.2337 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: -0.170 · 95% CI -0.450 to 0.110
  • FE 201836 50 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.1639 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: -0.136 · 95% CI -0.328 to 0.056
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Mean NUV in Week 1

The NUV is defined as the total urine volume from 5 minutes after bedtime with the intention to sleep including the first void within 30 minutes of rising in the morning. The NUV at each visit was calculated as the average over the 3 consecutive 24-hour periods just prior to the respective visit. Adjusted visit-specific mean changes from baseline in NUV are estimated using a baseline value of 750 (mL).

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 1
Reported as:
Mean · mL
Change From Baseline in Mean NUV in Week 1
mLFE 201836 500 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 350 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 250 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 150 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 100 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 50 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period)
Change From Baseline in Mean NUV in Week 1-328.8 (-395.3 to -262.3)-371.8 (-470.4 to -273.3)-352.4 (-452.8 to -252.1)-265.5 (-395.5 to -135.6)-312.6 (-455.9 to -169.3)-218.2 (-304.9 to -131.6)-241.6 (-296.3 to -186.9)
Statistical analysis
  • FE 201836 500 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.0470 · Mean difference: -87.2 · 95% CI -173.2 to -1.2
  • FE 201836 350 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.0237 · Mean difference: -130.2 · 95% CI -242.9 to -17.6
  • FE 201836 250 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.0569 · Mean difference: -110.8 · 95% CI -224.9 to 3.3
  • FE 201836 150 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.7383 · Mean difference: -23.9 · 95% CI -164.8 to 117.0
  • FE 201836 100 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.3626 · Mean difference: -71.0 · 95% CI -224.3 to 82.3
  • FE 201836 50 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.6524 · Mean difference: 23.4 · 95% CI -78.9 to 125.7
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Mean NUV at Week 12

The NUV is defined as the total urine volume from 5 minutes after bedtime with the intention to sleep including the first void within 30 minutes of rising in the morning. The NUV at each visit was calculated as the average over the 3 consecutive 24-hour periods just prior to the respective visit. Adjusted visit-specific mean changes from baseline in NUV are estimated using a baseline value of 750 (mL).

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 12
Reported as:
Mean · mL
Change From Baseline in Mean NUV at Week 12
mLFE 201836 500 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 350 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 250 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 150 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 100 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 50 ug (Randomized Treatment Period)Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period)
Change From Baseline in Mean NUV at Week 12-367.3 (-447.1 to -287.5)-392.4 (-505.2 to -279.5)-411.3 (-526.0 to -296.7)-284.2 (-418.4 to -149.9)-393.5 (-541.9 to -245.1)-403.2 (-495.5 to -310.9)-317.8 (-377.1 to -258.5)
Statistical analysis
  • FE 201836 500 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.3273 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: -49.5 · 95% CI -148.9 to 49.9
  • FE 201836 350 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.2500 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: -74.6 · 95% CI -202.0 to 52.9
  • FE 201836 250 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.1537 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: -93.5 · 95% CI -222.3 to 35.2
  • FE 201836 150 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.6515 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: 33.6 · 95% CI -113.1 to 180.3
  • FE 201836 100 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.3506 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: -75.7 · 95% CI -235.3 to 83.9
  • FE 201836 50 ug (Randomized Treatment Period) vs Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) · MMRM · p = 0.1255 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mean difference: -85.4 · 95% CI -194.8 to 24.1

Adverse events

Collected over Enrichment period: Treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) occurring in the time interval from V2 (active run-in) to V4 (randomization), including AEs with missing start date. Randomized treatment period: Treatment-emergent AEs occurring in the time interval from V4 to end-of-trial.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
FE 201836 500 µg (Enrichment Period)0/531 (0%)2/531 (0.4%)0/531 (0%)
FE 201836 500 µg (Randomized Treatment Period)0/60 (0%)1/60 (1.7%)16/60 (26.7%)
FE 201836 350 µg (Randomized Treatment Period)0/27 (0%)2/27 (7.4%)3/27 (11.1%)
FE 201836 250 µg (Randomized Treatment Period)0/24 (0%)1/24 (4.2%)3/24 (12.5%)
FE 201836 150 µg (Randomized Treatment Period)0/14 (0%)0/14 (0%)8/14 (57.1%)
FE 201836 100 µg (Randomized Treatment Period)0/13 (0%)1/13 (7.7%)5/13 (38.5%)
FE 201836 50 µg (Randomized Treatment Period)0/34 (0%)0/34 (0%)7/34 (20.6%)
Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period)0/87 (0%)2/87 (2.3%)16/87 (18.4%)
Desmopressin 25 µg (Randomized Treatment Period)0/26 (0%)0/26 (0%)8/26 (30.8%)
Desmopressin 50 µg (Randomized Treatment Period)0/17 (0%)0/17 (0%)9/17 (52.9%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 15
Most frequent serious events
EventFE 201836 500 µg (Enrichment Period)FE 201836 500 µg (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 350 µg (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 250 µg (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 150 µg (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 100 µg (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 50 µg (Randomized Treatment Period)Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period)Desmopressin 25 µg (Randomized Treatment Period)Desmopressin 50 µg (Randomized Treatment Period)
Abdominal pain upperGastrointestinal disorders0/5310/600/270/240/141/130/340/870/260/17
SyncopeNervous system disorders0/5310/600/271/240/140/130/340/870/260/17
Facial bones fractureInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/5310/600/271/240/140/130/340/870/260/17
Subdural haematomaInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/5310/600/271/240/140/130/340/870/260/17
Staphylococcal infectionInfections and infestations0/5310/601/270/240/140/130/340/870/260/17
Urinary tract infectionInfections and infestations0/5310/601/270/240/140/130/340/870/260/17
Prostate cancerNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)0/5310/601/270/240/140/130/340/870/260/17
Transitional cell carcinomaNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)0/5310/601/270/240/140/130/340/870/260/17
Serum sickness-like reactionImmune system disorders0/5311/600/270/240/140/130/340/870/260/17
ColitisGastrointestinal disorders0/5310/600/270/240/140/130/341/870/260/17
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 33
Most frequent other events
EventFE 201836 500 µg (Enrichment Period)FE 201836 500 µg (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 350 µg (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 250 µg (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 150 µg (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 100 µg (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 50 µg (Randomized Treatment Period)Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period)Desmopressin 25 µg (Randomized Treatment Period)Desmopressin 50 µg (Randomized Treatment Period)
Accidental overdoseInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/5310/600/271/240/140/131/343/870/264/17
Gamma-glutamyltransferase increasedInvestigations0/5312/600/270/242/140/130/340/870/260/17
Alanine aminotransferase increasedInvestigations0/5310/600/270/242/140/130/340/870/260/17
Aspartate aminotransferase increasedInvestigations0/5310/600/270/242/140/130/340/870/260/17
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders0/5310/600/270/242/140/131/341/870/261/17
Hepatic enzyme increasedInvestigations0/5310/600/270/240/140/130/340/873/260/17
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders0/5313/601/272/240/140/131/343/870/261/17
AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders0/5311/600/270/240/141/131/341/870/260/17
Hand fractureInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/5310/600/270/240/141/130/340/870/260/17
HyponatraemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders0/5313/602/270/240/141/130/340/870/261/17

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)FE 201836 500 µg (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 350 µg (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 250 µg (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 150 µg (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 100 µg (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 50 µg (Randomized Treatment Period)Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period)Desmopressin 25µg (Randomized Treatment Period)Desmopressin 50 µg (Randomized Treatment Period)Total
Mean59.0 ± 14.158.0 ± 14.360.8 ± 13.063.9 ± 7.561.5 ± 9.259.1 ± 10.458.9 ± 13.951.1 ± 11.160.9 ± 9.558.8 ± 12.8
Age, Customized
Age, Customized(years)FE 201836 500 µg (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 350 µg (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 250 µg (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 150 µg (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 100 µg (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 50 µg (Randomized Treatment Period)Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period)Desmopressin 25µg (Randomized Treatment Period)Desmopressin 50 µg (Randomized Treatment Period)Total
<65 years old3519146621522411188
>=65 years old2581087133526114
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)FE 201836 500 µg (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 350 µg (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 250 µg (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 150 µg (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 100 µg (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 50 µg (Randomized Treatment Period)Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period)Desmopressin 25µg (Randomized Treatment Period)Desmopressin 50 µg (Randomized Treatment Period)Total
Female401816581651260180
Male2098951836017122
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)FE 201836 500 µg (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 350 µg (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 250 µg (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 150 µg (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 100 µg (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 50 µg (Randomized Treatment Period)Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period)Desmopressin 25µg (Randomized Treatment Period)Desmopressin 50 µg (Randomized Treatment Period)Total
Hispanic or Latino1796371235124105
Not Hispanic or Latino42181811622511413195
Unknown or Not Reported0000000000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)FE 201836 500 µg (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 350 µg (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 250 µg (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 150 µg (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 100 µg (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 50 µg (Randomized Treatment Period)Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period)Desmopressin 25µg (Randomized Treatment Period)Desmopressin 50 µg (Randomized Treatment Period)Total
American Indian or Alaska Native0000111003
Asian2000002105
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0000000000
Black or African American63201156428
White522422141131781913264
More than one race0000000000
Unknown or Not Reported0000000000
Baseline body mass index (BMI)
Baseline body mass index (BMI)(kg/m^2)FE 201836 500 µg (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 350 µg (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 250 µg (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 150 µg (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 100 µg (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 50 µg (Randomized Treatment Period)Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period)Desmopressin 25µg (Randomized Treatment Period)Desmopressin 50 µg (Randomized Treatment Period)Total
Mean30.66 ± 6.0529.91 ± 4.6429.56 ± 6.5032.03 ± 8.2631.52 ± 4.6030.93 ± 6.1629.54 ± 5.1431.89 ± 7.9931.05 ± 6.4930.44 ± 6.00
Mean Number of Nocturnal Voids
Mean Number of Nocturnal Voids(nocturnal voids)FE 201836 500 µg (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 350 µg (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 250 µg (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 150 µg (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 100 µg (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 50 µg (Randomized Treatment Period)Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period)Desmopressin 25µg (Randomized Treatment Period)Desmopressin 50 µg (Randomized Treatment Period)Total
Mean2.88 ± 0.843.01 ± 0.723.10 ± 1.112.98 ± 0.843.33 ± 0.823.24 ± 1.183.09 ± 0.833.38 ± 1.453.16 ± 1.223.09 ± 0.98
Mean Nocturnal Urine Volume (NUV)
Mean Nocturnal Urine Volume (NUV)(mL)FE 201836 500 µg (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 350 µg (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 250 µg (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 150 µg (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 100 µg (Randomized Treatment Period)FE 201836 50 µg (Randomized Treatment Period)Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period)Desmopressin 25µg (Randomized Treatment Period)Desmopressin 50 µg (Randomized Treatment Period)Total
Mean804.6 ± 313.8766.0 ± 242.1897.3 ± 373.6803.1 ± 304.7892.4 ± 206.7879.9 ± 354.1752.3 ± 269.5839.3 ± 286.4803.5 ± 425.8808.8 ± 307.5

4 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

07

Study locations

72 sites
  • Achieve Clinical Research, LLC
    Birmingham, Alabama 35216, United States
  • Coastal Clinical Research, an AMR company
    Mobile, Alabama 36608, United States
  • Clinical Trials Research
    Lincoln, California 95648, United States
  • Tri Valley Urology Medical Group
    Murrieta, California 92562, United States
  • San Diego Clinical Trials
    San Diego, California 92120, United States
  • Advanced Rx Clinical Research Group, Inc.
    Westminster, California 92683, United States
  • Downtown Women's Health Care
    Denver, Colorado 80209, United States
  • Genitourinary Surgical Consultants, P.C.
    Denver, Colorado 80220, United States
  • South Florida Medical Research
    Aventura, Florida 33180, United States
  • Women's Medical Research Group, LLC
    Clearwater, Florida 33759, United States
  • Tampa Bay Medical Research, Inc.
    Clearwater, Florida 33761, United States
  • Clinical Research of South Florida
    Coral Gables, Florida 33134, United States
  • Avail Clinical Research, LLC
    DeLand, Florida 32720, United States
  • Finlay Medical Research Corp
    Greenacres City, Florida 33467, United States
  • Pharmax Research Clinic
    Miami, Florida 33126, United States
  • Doctors Research Institute Corporation
    Miami, Florida 33145, United States
  • Sanitas Research
    Miami, Florida 33155, United States
  • Bayside Clinical Research LLC
    New Port Richey, Florida 34655, United States
  • Pines Care Research Center, Inc
    Pembroke Pines, Florida 33026, United States
  • Clinical Research Center of Florida
    Pompano Beach, Florida 33060, United States
  • Meridien Research, Inc.
    Saint Petersburg, Florida 33709, United States
  • American Health Network of Indiana, LLC
    Avon, Indiana 46123, United States
  • American Health Network of Indiana, LLC
    Greenfield, Indiana 46140, United States
  • Bay State Clinical Trials, Inc.
    Watertown, Massachusetts 02472, United States
  • Beyer Research
    Kalamazoo, Michigan 49009, United States
  • Remedica LLC
    Rochester, Michigan 48307, United States
  • Quality Clinical Research Center, Inc.
    Omaha, Nebraska 68114, United States
  • Clinical Research Consortium, an AMR company
    Las Vegas, Nevada 89119-5190, United States
  • Mid Hudson Medical Research, PLLC
    New Windsor, New York 12553, United States
  • Premier Medical Group of the Hudson Valley, PC
    Poughkeepsie, New York 12601, United States
  • American Health Research, Inc.
    Charlotte, North Carolina 28207, United States
  • Medication Management, LLC
    Greensboro, North Carolina 27408, United States
  • Peters Medical Research
    High Point, North Carolina 27262, United States
  • PMG Research of Raleigh, LLC
    Raleigh, North Carolina 27609, United States
  • PMG Research of Wilmington, LLC
    Wilmington, North Carolina 28401, United States
  • HWC Women's Research Center
    Englewood, Ohio 45322, United States
  • NECCR Primacare Research, LLC
    Providence, Rhode Island 02908, United States
  • Coastal Carolina Research Center, Inc
    Mount Pleasant, South Carolina 29464, United States
  • PMG Research of Charleston, LLC
    Mount Pleasant, South Carolina 29464, United States
  • MCA Research - Partner
    Houston, Texas 77079, United States
  • Ericksen Research & Development, LLC
    Clinton, Utah 84015, United States
  • Advanced Research Institute
    Ogden, Utah 84405, United States
  • Clinical Research Associates of Tidewater, an AMR company
    Norfolk, Virginia 23507, United States
  • ULB Hopital Erasme
    Bruxelles, Belgium
  • UZ Antwerpen
    Edegem, Belgium
  • Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
    Gent, Belgium
  • AZ Groeninge - Campus Vercruysselaan
    Kortrijk, Belgium
  • UZ Leuven
    Leuven, Belgium
  • Ultra-Med Inc.
    Pointe-Claire, Quebec, Canada
  • Milestone Research
    London, Canada
  • SKDS Research Inc.
    Newmarket, Canada
  • DIEX Recherche Quebec Inc.
    Quebec, Canada
  • Clinique Médicale St-Louis (Recherche) inc d/b/a/ Centre de Recherche Saint-Louis
    Québec, Canada
  • Bluewater Health-Norman Site
    Sarnia, Canada
  • CHUS - Hôpital Fleurimont
    Sherbrooke, Canada
  • DIEX Recherche Sherbrooke Inc.
    Sherbrooke, Canada
  • Ferring Investigational Site
    Toronto, Canada
  • DIEX Recherche Victoriaville Inc.
    Victoriaville, Canada
  • Urologie Benešov - Afimed s.r.o.
    Benešov, Czechia
  • Fakultni nemocnice Brno, Dept of Klinika nemoci plicnich a tuberkulozy
    Brno, Czechia
  • Krajska nemocnice Liberec, a.s.
    Liberec, Czechia
  • Urocentrum Plzen
    Plzen, Czechia
  • Thomayerova nemocnice, PARENT
    Praha, Czechia
  • Gemeinschaftspraxis fuer Urologie und Andrologie
    Duisburg, Germany
  • Urologische Gemeinschaftspraxis
    Emmendingen, Germany
  • Klinikum Weiden, Klinik f. Urologie, Andrologie und Kinderurologie
    Weiden, Germany
  • Jahn Ferenc Del-pesti Korhaz es Rendelointezet
    Budapest, Hungary
  • Synexus Magyarorszag Kft.
    Budapest, Hungary
  • Bagoly Egeszseghaz
    Kecskemet, Hungary
  • SzSzB Megyei Korhazak es Egyetemi Oktatokorhaz, Josa Andras Oktatokorhaz Urologia
    Nyiregyhaza, Hungary
  • Jasz-Nagykun-Szolnok Megyei Hetenyi Geza Korhaz-Rendelointezet
    Szolnok, Hungary
  • Nasz Lekarz Osrodek Badan Klinicznych
    Bydgoszcz, Poland
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Hudgens S, Howerter A, Polek E, Andersson FL. Psychometric validation and interpretation of the Nocturia Impact Diary in a clinical trial setting. Qual Life Res. 2022 Jun;31(6):1837-1848. doi: 10.1007/s11136-021-03060-4. Epub 2021 Dec 21. PubMed 34932192 ↗

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Jul 5, 2018
  • Statistical analysis plan · Dec 12, 2019

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03201419
Lead sponsor
Ferring Pharmaceuticals
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 28, 2017
Start date
Jul 27, 2017
Primary completion
Oct 31, 2019
Completion
Oct 31, 2019
Results posted
Dec 23, 2020
Last update
Mar 2, 2022

Study contacts

Global Clinical Compliance
study director · Ferring Pharmaceuticals

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion