CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03200717IO-PAZUpdated Aug 21, 2023Results posted

Study of Efficacy, Safety, and Quality of Life of Pazopanib in Patients With Advanced and/or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma After Prior Checkpoint Inhibitor Treatment

A Phase 2 interventional study of Pazopanib in Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma and Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma, sponsored by Novartis Pharmaceuticals. Completed at 22 sites in 11 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-08-21.

Sponsored by Novartis Pharmaceuticals · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
62
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The main purpose of this study was to assess the progression-free survival (PFS) based on local investigator assessment of pazopanib in participants with advanced and/or metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) following prior treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI).

Read the detailed description

This was a multi-center, open-label, single-arm Phase II study to determine the efficacy, tolerability, safety and quality of life of treatment with pazopanib in subjects with advanced and/or metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) following prior treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI).

Subjects could have received prior systemic therapy with an ICI (monotherapy or combination) as 1st or 2nd line RCC treatment. However, they must not have received pazopanib previously. In this study, pazopanib could be administered in the 2nd or 3rd line setting. The therapeutic line for individual subjects was assigned at the time of screening.

Subjects received 800 mg of pazopanib daily until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, death, pregnancy, start of a new anti-neoplastic therapy, discontinuation at the discretion of the investigator or patient, lost to follow-up or end of study, whichever came first.

02

Conditions studied

  • Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma
  • Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

Keywords

  • renal cell carcinoma
  • metastatic renal cell
  • pazopanib
  • checkpoint inhibitor therapy
  • RCC
  • hypernephroma
  • renal adenocarcinoma
  • kidney cancer
  • renal cancer
  • adult
03

In context

Carcinoma

6,741 studies on the registry are indexed under Carcinoma; 1,161 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 62 is above the median of 45 across 5,170 interventional studies indexed under Carcinoma.

Browse Carcinoma studies →

Lead sponsor

Novartis Pharmaceuticals is the lead sponsor of 2,673 studies on the registry; 228 are open to participants now.

Of its 576 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 431 (75%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria:

  • Histologically confirmed locally recurrent or metastatic predominantly clear cell renal cell carcinoma.
  • Measurable disease based on RECIST 1.1 criteria
  • Prior systemic therapy with an immune checkpoint inhibitor (monotherapy or combination) as 1st or 2nd line RCC treatment. Note: patients with prior mTOR inhibitor or TKI treatment as monotherapy or in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitor were allowed; however, treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitor (monotherapy or in combination) must have been the last treatment prior to study entry.
  • Last dose of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy received 4 or more weeks before start of study treatment
  • Karnofsky performance status ≥70%.
  • Potassium, sodium, calcium and magnesium within normal limits of the central laboratory

Key Exclusion Criteria:

  • Renal cell carcinoma without any clear (conventional) cell component
  • History or evidence of central nervous system (CNS) metastases (patients with pretreated metastases were eligible under certain conditions)
  • Prior treatment with pazopanib
  • Prior treatment with bevacizumab that was not given in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy.
  • Prior treatment with more than 2 lines of therapy (combination treatments were considered 1 line of therapy)
  • Not recovered from toxicity from prior immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Recovery was defined as ≤ NCI-CTCAE Grade 1, except for liver function test levels which must be \<Grade 1.
  • Disease recurrence less than 6 months from the last dose of prior neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy (including VEGF-R TKI)
  • Patients receiving prohibited concomitant medications that could not be discontinued or replaced by safe alternative medication at least 5 half-lives of the concomitant medication or 7 days, whichever was longer, prior to the start of pazopanib treatment.
  • Administration of any investigational drug within 4 weeks prior to the first dose of study treatment
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
62 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Pazopanib- 2nd line treatment

    Participants received pazopanib as 2nd line treatment

    Drug: Pazopanib

  • Experimental
    Pazopanib- 3rd line treatment

    Participants received pazopanib as 3rd line treatment

    Drug: Pazopanib

Interventions

  • DrugPazopanib

    Participants received 800mg of pazopanib once daily orally. Pazopanib was supplied as aqueous film-coated tablets containing 200 mg or 400 mg.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Progression Free Survival (PFS)

    PFS is defined as the time from the start date of pazopanib treatment to the date of the first documented progression or death due to any cause. PFS was assessed via local review according to RECIST 1.1. PFS was censored at the date of the last adequate tumor assessment if no PFS event (disease progression or death due to any cause) was observed prior to the analysis cut-off date. The PFS distribution was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

    Time frame: Date of first treatment to date of progression or death up to approximately 38 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Overall Response Rate (ORR) Based on Local Investigator Assessment According to RECIST v1.1

    ORR is defined as the percentage of participants with best overall response of confirmed complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) based on local investigator's assessment according to RECIST v1.1. The 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed using Clopper and Pearson method. CR: Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.

    Time frame: Up to approximately 38 months

  2. Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR) Based on Local Investigator Assessment According to RECIST v1.1.

    CBR is defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response of CR or PR or an overall lesion response of stable disease (SD) or Non-CR/Non-PD lasting ≥ 24 weeks based on local investigator's assessment according to RECIST v1.1. The 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed using Clopper and Pearson method. CR: Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. SD: Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR or CR nor an increase in lesions which would qualify for progressive disease.

    Time frame: Up to approximately 38 months

  3. Overall Survival (OS)

    OS is defined as the time from the first administration of study treatment until death due to any cause. If a participant was not known to have died, survival was censored at the date of last known date patient alive. The OS distribution was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

    Time frame: From date of first treatment to date of death, up to approximately 44 months

  4. Duration of Response (DOR) Based on Local Investigators Assessment According to RECIST v1.1

    DOR is defined as the time from the date of first documented response (confirmed CR or PR according to RECIST v1.1 based on local Investigators review of tumor assessment data) to the date of tumor progression, or death due to underlying cancer, whichever comes first. If a patient not had an event, duration was censored at the date of last adequate tumor assessment. The DOR distribution was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

    Time frame: From the date of first documented response (confirmed CR or PR) to the date of tumor progression, up to approximately 36 months

  5. Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy- Kidney Symptom (FKSI-DRS) Score

    FKSI-DRS is a 9-item questionnaire specifically designed to evaluate symptoms that are directly attributable to kidney cancer and includes patient's symptoms in the past seven days such as lack of energy, pain, bone-pain, shortness of breath, fatigue, blood in urine, etc. Each item is scored on a 5-point scale (0=not at all to 4=very much). FKSI-DRS total score ranged from 0 (no symptoms) to 36 (most severe symptoms) with a higher score indicating greater presence of kidney cancer symptoms. The baseline is defined as the last FKSI-DRS assessment on or prior to first day of treatment. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement in kidney cancer symptom status.

    Time frame: Baseline, Day 1 of Cycle 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 11, 13, 16 and every 3rd cycle thereafter until end of treatment, and end of treatment, assessed up to approximately 38 months. Cycle=28 days

  6. Change From Baseline in EuroQoL 5-level Instrument Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-5L-5D VAS) Score

    EQ-5D-5L is a standardized participant completed questionnaire that measures health-related quality of life and translates that score into an index value or utility score. EQ-5D-5L consists of two components: a health state profile and an optional visual analogue scale (VAS). The EQ-5L-5D VAS records the respondent's self-rated health on a vertical VAS, ranging from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state), with higher scores indicating higher health-related quality of life. The baseline is defined as the last EQ-5L-5D assessment on or prior to first day of treatment. A positive change from baseline indicates improvement in the heath state.

    Time frame: Baseline, Day 1 of Cycle 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 11, 13, 16 and every 3rd cycle thereafter until end of treatment, and end of treatment, assessed up to approximately 38 months. Cycle=28 days

07

Results

Posted Mar 21, 2023

Participant flow

The study was conducted across 22 centers in 11 countries

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePazopanib- 2nd LinePazopanib- 3rd Line
Started4715
Completed60
Not completed4115
Withdrew: Progressive disease245
Withdrew: Adverse event118
Withdrew: Physician decision32
Withdrew: Death20
Withdrew: Subject/guardian decision10

Outcome measures

PrimaryProgression Free Survival (PFS)

PFS is defined as the time from the start date of pazopanib treatment to the date of the first documented progression or death due to any cause. PFS was assessed via local review according to RECIST 1.1. PFS was censored at the date of the last adequate tumor assessment if no PFS event (disease progression or death due to any cause) was observed prior to the analysis cut-off date. The PFS distribution was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Time frame:
Date of first treatment to date of progression or death up to approximately 38 months
Reported as:
Median · Months
Progression Free Survival (PFS)
MonthsPazopanib- 2nd LinePazopanib- 3rd LineAll Participants
Progression Free Survival (PFS)7.5 (3.7 to 12.6)4.6 (3.3 to 9.2)6.8 (3.7 to 11.1)
SecondaryOverall Response Rate (ORR) Based on Local Investigator Assessment According to RECIST v1.1

ORR is defined as the percentage of participants with best overall response of confirmed complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) based on local investigator's assessment according to RECIST v1.1. The 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed using Clopper and Pearson method. CR: Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.

Time frame:
Up to approximately 38 months
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Overall Response Rate (ORR) Based on Local Investigator Assessment According to RECIST v1.1
Percentage of participantsPazopanib- 2nd LinePazopanib- 3rd LineAll Participants
Overall Response Rate (ORR) Based on Local Investigator Assessment According to RECIST v1.123.4 (12.3 to 38.0)0 (0.0 to 21.8)17.7 (9.2 to 29.5)
SecondaryClinical Benefit Rate (CBR) Based on Local Investigator Assessment According to RECIST v1.1.

CBR is defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response of CR or PR or an overall lesion response of stable disease (SD) or Non-CR/Non-PD lasting ≥ 24 weeks based on local investigator's assessment according to RECIST v1.1. The 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed using Clopper and Pearson method. CR: Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. SD: Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR or CR nor an increase in lesions which would qualify for progressive disease.

Time frame:
Up to approximately 38 months
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR) Based on Local Investigator Assessment According to RECIST v1.1.
Percentage of participantsPazopanib- 2nd LinePazopanib- 3rd LineAll Participants
Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR) Based on Local Investigator Assessment According to RECIST v1.1.53.2 (38.1 to 67.9)40.0 (16.3 to 67.7)50.0 (37.0 to 63.0)
SecondaryOverall Survival (OS)

OS is defined as the time from the first administration of study treatment until death due to any cause. If a participant was not known to have died, survival was censored at the date of last known date patient alive. The OS distribution was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Time frame:
From date of first treatment to date of death, up to approximately 44 months
Reported as:
Median · Months
Overall Survival (OS)
MonthsPazopanib- 2nd LinePazopanib- 3rd LineAll Participants
Overall Survival (OS)27.8 (14.9 to NA)20.0 (9.2 to 25.6)23.4 (14.9 to 31.8)
SecondaryDuration of Response (DOR) Based on Local Investigators Assessment According to RECIST v1.1

DOR is defined as the time from the date of first documented response (confirmed CR or PR according to RECIST v1.1 based on local Investigators review of tumor assessment data) to the date of tumor progression, or death due to underlying cancer, whichever comes first. If a patient not had an event, duration was censored at the date of last adequate tumor assessment. The DOR distribution was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Time frame:
From the date of first documented response (confirmed CR or PR) to the date of tumor progression, up to approximately 36 months
Reported as:
Median · Months
Duration of Response (DOR) Based on Local Investigators Assessment According to RECIST v1.1
MonthsPazopanib- 2nd LinePazopanib- 3rd Line
Duration of Response (DOR) Based on Local Investigators Assessment According to RECIST v1.1NA (9.5 to NA)—
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy- Kidney Symptom (FKSI-DRS) Score

FKSI-DRS is a 9-item questionnaire specifically designed to evaluate symptoms that are directly attributable to kidney cancer and includes patient's symptoms in the past seven days such as lack of energy, pain, bone-pain, shortness of breath, fatigue, blood in urine, etc. Each item is scored on a 5-point scale (0=not at all to 4=very much). FKSI-DRS total score ranged from 0 (no symptoms) to 36 (most severe symptoms) with a higher score indicating greater presence of kidney cancer symptoms. The baseline is defined as the last FKSI-DRS assessment on or prior to first day of treatment. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement in kidney cancer symptom status.

Time frame:
Baseline, Day 1 of Cycle 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 11, 13, 16 and every 3rd cycle thereafter until end of treatment, and end of treatment, assessed up to approximately 38 months. Cycle=28 days
Reported as:
Mean · Score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy- Kidney Symptom (FKSI-DRS) Score
Score on a scalePazopanib- 2nd LinePazopanib- 3rd LineAll Participants
Cycle 2 Day 1-1.3 ± 4.95-0.3 ± 4.31-1.0 ± 4.78
Cycle 3 Day 1-0.5 ± 4.551.7 ± 4.18-0.0 ± 4.51
Cycle 4 Day 1-0.1 ± 2.971.8 ± 4.220.2 ± 3.24
Cycle 5 Day 10.1 ± 3.132.0 ± 2.350.4 ± 3.06
Cycle 6 Day 1-0.3 ± 5.682.7 ± 3.270.3 ± 5.36
Cycle 7 Day 1-0.1 ± 3.472.5 ± 3.730.4 ± 3.63
Cycle 9 Day 1-0.1 ± 4.22—-0.1 ± 4.22
Cycle 11 Day 10.7 ± 3.300.0 ± NA0.6 ± 3.20
Cycle 13 Day 11.4 ± 2.12—1.4 ± 2.12
Cycle 16 Day 10.6 ± 1.59—0.6 ± 1.59
Cycle 19 Day 10.0 ± 2.76—0.0 ± 2.76
Cycle 22 Day 1-0.5 ± 3.27—-0.5 ± 3.27
Cycle 25 Day 12.0 ± 2.31—2.0 ± 2.31
Cycle 31 Day 10.5 ± 0.71—0.5 ± 0.71
Cycle 34 Day 11.0 ± NA—1.0 ± NA
Cycle 37 Day 11.0 ± NA—1 ± NA
End of Treatment-0.6 ± 3.86-0.8 ± 6.00-0.6 ± 4.37
SecondaryChange From Baseline in EuroQoL 5-level Instrument Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-5L-5D VAS) Score

EQ-5D-5L is a standardized participant completed questionnaire that measures health-related quality of life and translates that score into an index value or utility score. EQ-5D-5L consists of two components: a health state profile and an optional visual analogue scale (VAS). The EQ-5L-5D VAS records the respondent's self-rated health on a vertical VAS, ranging from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state), with higher scores indicating higher health-related quality of life. The baseline is defined as the last EQ-5L-5D assessment on or prior to first day of treatment. A positive change from baseline indicates improvement in the heath state.

Time frame:
Baseline, Day 1 of Cycle 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 11, 13, 16 and every 3rd cycle thereafter until end of treatment, and end of treatment, assessed up to approximately 38 months. Cycle=28 days
Reported as:
Mean · Score on a scale
Change From Baseline in EuroQoL 5-level Instrument Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-5L-5D VAS) Score
Score on a scalePazopanib- 2nd LinePazopanib- 3rd LineAll Participants
Cycle 2 Day 10.1 ± 16.44-1.9 ± 19.46-0.4 ± 17.02
Cycle 3 Day 1-2.8 ± 14.353.6 ± 19.28-1.3 ± 15.58
Cycle 4 Day 1-0.7 ± 10.88-1.5 ± 22.86-0.8 ± 13.27
Cycle 5 Day 1-1.5 ± 13.613.2 ± 19.51-0.7 ± 14.45
Cycle 6 Day 1-1.3 ± 18.35-3.5 ± 24.09-1.7 ± 19.21
Cycle 7 Day 10.2 ± 11.890.7 ± 20.370.3 ± 13.73
Cycle 9 Day 13.8 ± 11.64—3.8 ± 11.64
Cycle 11 Day 13.9 ± 12.62-2.0 ± NA3.5 ± 12.30
Cycle 13 Day 15.7 ± 12.26—5.7 ± 12.26
Cycle 16 Day 1-1.3 ± 11.70—-1.3 ± 11.70
Cycle 19 Day 15.5 ± 10.09—5.5 ± 10.09
Cycle 22 Day 10.5 ± 9.93—0.5 ± 9.93
Cycle 25 Day 10.0 ± 9.70—0.0 ± 9.70
Cycle 31 Day 199.5 ± 0.71—99.5 ± 0.71
Cycle 34 Day 110.0 ± NA—10.0 ± NA
Cycle 37 Day 190.0 ± NA—90.0 ± NA
End of Treatment-1.9 ± 20.84-8.9 ± 19.99-3.6 ± 20.59
Post-hocAll Collected Deaths

On-treatment deaths were collected from first dose of study medication to 30 days after the last dose of study medication, for a maximum duration of approximately 38 months. Post-treatment survival follow-up deaths were collected from day 31 after last dose of study medication to end of study, up to approximately 44 months. All deaths refer to the sum of on-treatment deaths and post-treatment survival follow-up deaths.

Time frame:
On-treatment deaths: Up to approximately 38 months. Post-treatment survival follow-up deaths: Up to approximately 44 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
All Collected Deaths
ParticipantsPazopanib- 2nd LinePazopanib- 3rd LineAll Participants
On-treatment deaths516
Post-treatment survival follow-up deaths221032
All deaths271138

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 30 days, up to a maximum duration of approximately 38 months. Deaths were collected in the post treatment survival follow up period from 31 days after last dose of study medication until the end of the study, up to approximately 44 months. These are not considered Adverse Events. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Pazopanib- 2nd Line (On-Treatment)5/47 (10.6%)21/47 (44.7%)46/47 (97.9%)
Pazopanib- 3rd Line (On-Treatment)1/15 (6.7%)9/15 (60%)14/15 (93.3%)
Pazopanib- 2nd Line (Post-treatment Survival Follow-up)22/35 (62.9%)——
Pazopanib- 3rd Line (Post-treatment Survival Follow-up)10/13 (76.9%)——
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 35
Most frequent serious events
EventPazopanib- 2nd Line (On-Treatment)Pazopanib- 3rd Line (On-Treatment)Pazopanib- 2nd Line (Post-treatment Survival Follow-up)Pazopanib- 3rd Line (Post-treatment Survival Follow-up)
Alanine aminotransferase increasedInvestigations2/473/15——
AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders0/471/15——
Abdominal pain upperGastrointestinal disorders0/471/15——
AscitesGastrointestinal disorders0/471/15——
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders0/471/15——
Drug-induced liver injuryHepatobiliary disorders0/471/15——
Immune system disorderImmune system disorders0/471/15——
Bronchitis viralInfections and infestations0/471/15——
Urinary tract infectionInfections and infestations1/471/15——
Transaminases increasedInvestigations1/471/15——
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 80
Most frequent other events
EventPazopanib- 2nd Line (On-Treatment)Pazopanib- 3rd Line (On-Treatment)Pazopanib- 2nd Line (Post-treatment Survival Follow-up)Pazopanib- 3rd Line (Post-treatment Survival Follow-up)
FatigueGeneral disorders15/478/15——
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders24/476/15——
Alanine aminotransferase increasedInvestigations7/475/15——
DysgeusiaNervous system disorders5/475/15——
Decreased appetiteMetabolism and nutrition disorders14/473/15——
HypertensionVascular disorders13/473/15——
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders12/474/15——
Aspartate aminotransferase increasedInvestigations5/474/15——
Blood alkaline phosphatase increasedInvestigations2/474/15——
Blood bilirubin increasedInvestigations3/474/15——

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)Pazopanib- 2nd LinePazopanib- 3rd LineTotal
Mean62.4 ± 11.5565.4 ± 9.7763.2 ± 11.15
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Pazopanib- 2nd LinePazopanib- 3rd LineTotal
Female11415
Male361147
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Pazopanib- 2nd LinePazopanib- 3rd LineTotal
White441357
Asian101
Other011
Unknown213
08

Study locations

22 sites
  • Roswell Park Cancer Institute
    Buffalo, New York 14263, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Caba, Buenos Aires C1280AEB, Argentina
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Graz, 8036, Austria
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Salzburg, 5020, Austria
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Wien, A-1090, Austria
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Calgary, Alberta T2N 4N2, Canada
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Temuco, Araucania 4810469, Chile
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Santiago, 8420383, Chile
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Brno, Czech Republic 656 53, Czechia
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Olomouc, CZE 775 20, Czechia
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Paris, 75015, France
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Strasbourg Cedex, F 67098, France
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Valenciennes, 59300, France
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Hannover, 30625, Germany
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Jena, 07740, Germany
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Tübingen, 72076, Germany
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Budapest, H 1122, Hungary
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Sevilla, Andalucia 41013, Spain
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Madrid, 28041, Spain
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    London, NW3 2QG, United Kingdom
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Manchester, M20 2BX, United Kingdom
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Preston, PR2 9HT, United Kingdom
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Sep 14, 2020
  • Statistical analysis plan · Feb 11, 2020

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Novartis is committed to sharing with qualified external researchers, access to patient-level data and supporting clinical documents from eligible studies. These requests are reviewed and approved by an independent review panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations. This trial data availability is according to the criteria and process described on https://www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com/.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 21, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03200717
Lead sponsor
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 27, 2017
Start date
Nov 14, 2017
Primary completion
Aug 10, 2021
Completion
Aug 10, 2021
Results posted
Mar 21, 2023
Last update
Aug 21, 2023

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion