ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03200405NANEPUpdated Jan 17, 2019

Visible vs. Non-Visible Mesh in Underlay Positon After Repair of Umbilical Hernias

An interventional study of DynaMeshVisible and DynaMeshCICAT in Umbilical Hernia, sponsored by Wuerzburg University Hospital. Completed at 1 site in Germany. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 76 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-01-17.

Sponsored by Wuerzburg University Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 7 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Oct 2016, registered May 2017).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
31
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 76 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the exact position of a mesh which is placed in underlay position in umbilical hernia in vitro. The investigators want to gain information if the mesh lays directly next to the abdominal wall fascia or if there´s fat tissue between mesh and fascia. Furthermore they hope to get some information about the tissue incorporation.

Read the detailed description

The literature tells to supply umbilical hernia with a mesh, that overlaps 5-6 cm in each direction. To achieve this overlap an extensive taxidermy is necessary, which causes a big operation trauma. An umbilical hernia is an extended physiological stoma and compared to an incisional hernia has no risk to rip further. Therefore the researchers act on the assumption that this generous overlap is not necessary. For a short time there is a new mesh available, which combines all the necessary requirements as elasticity, effective porousness and a structure of monofilaments with MRI visibility. In a randomised clinical trial two sorts of meshes, a conventional PVDF(polyvinylidene fluoride) mesh (DynaMesh-CICAT) and a MRI visible PVDF(polyvinylidene fluoride) mesh (DynaMeshVisible) shall be compared.The investigators postulate that there is no difference between the two groups concerning complications, relapse and life quality after 4 weeks and 12 months. Altogether the goal of the study is to determine the exact position of the mesh in vitro.

The study design is a double-blinded, multicentric randomised controlled study. The radiologist and the examiner are blinded. It will be reported according to the CONSORT Statements.

The eligibility criteria is written anywhere else. The operation results after an single shot antibiotics in open method. The access happens via a semicircular infraumbilical cut. There will be prepared until the linea alba and the umbilical hernia orifice to display the hernia gap and the hernia sac. If there´s only a fat prolapse, it will be removed by ligation. If there´s an peritoneal hernia sac, the content will be repositioned and the hernia sac will be removed. The preperitoneal space will be prepared bluntly and the peritoneum will be released from the rectus sheath. A 4-6 cm trimmed mesh with a central thread will be inserted in underlay position. The central thread is used for orientation. The hernial gap will be closed in transversal direction with absorbable threads. After the reinsertion of the navel the region of the operation will be closed with subcutaneous und intracutaneous seams.

The randomisation succeeded via block randomisation at a ratio of 1 to 1. A randomisation list with SAS®-Makros "Randomisation Tables" by M. Stout is already created. There is one list for Wuerzburg and one for Kitzingen. In total there are 72 assignments created, instead of 50. But upon consultation the recruitment will be stopped after the 50th patient. According to the calculations of the epidemiological departement of the University of Wuerzburg there are 22 patients needed in each arm, that means 44 patients in total to reach the confidence interval. The patient data will be imported to EuraHS. This data entry is based on the ethics committee vote of the medical departement of Wuerzburg dated the 31th of july 2012 (application number 256/11) and the renewal of the 21st of july 2015.

If there´s an increased complication rate in one of the groups or the morphology of the MRI-visible meshes is found unsatisfactory the study will be cancelled.

The patient data will be recorded via pseudonyms.

02

Conditions studied

  • Umbilical Hernia

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • umbilical hernia
  • mesh repair
  • MRI-visibility
  • underlay
  • NANEP
  • DynaMeshCICAT
  • DynaMeshVisible
  • preperitoneal
03

In context

Hernia, Umbilical

70 studies on the registry are indexed under Hernia, Umbilical; 14 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 31 is below the median of 66 across 42 interventional studies indexed under Hernia, Umbilical.

Browse Hernia, Umbilical studies →

Lead sponsor

Wuerzburg University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 98 studies on the registry; 19 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 76 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • umbilical hernia > 0,4 cm; \<= 3 cm
  • BMI > 20; \< 51

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • emergency operation
  • previous abdominal operation
  • epigastric hernia in more than 3 cm distance of the umbilical hernia
  • ascites
  • hepatic insufficiency
  • periumbilical skin disease
  • incisional umbilical hernia
  • claustrophobia
  • contraindications concerning the MRI examination
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
31 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    DynaMeshVisible

    the umbilical hernia will be fixed with a mesh, which is incorporated with Fe3O4 particles to become visible in MRI

    Device: DynaMeshVisible

  • Active comparator
    DynaMeshCICAT

    the umbilical hernia will be fixed with a Non-MRI-visible PVDF Mesh

    Device: DynaMeshCICAT

Interventions

  • DeviceDynaMeshVisible

    The umbilical hernias will be fixed with a mesh. In this group a MRI-visible mesh will be used.

  • DeviceDynaMeshCICAT

    The umbilical hernias will be fixed with a mesh. In this group a non-visible mesh will be used.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. MRI visibility and visible size of the mesh 4 weeks after operation

    A MRI will be done 4 weeks after the operation and it will be registered if the mesh is visible; furthermore there will be done some measurements to specify the exact position and the visible size of the mesh

    Time frame: 4 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. MRI visibility and visible size of the mesh 12 months after operation

    A MRI will be done 12 months after the operation and it will be registered if the mesh is visible; furthermore there will be done some measurements to specify the exact position and the visible size of the mesh

    Time frame: 12 months

  2. intraoperative and postoperative complications (30-day morbidity)

    There will be registered if there are any intraoperative or postoperative complications

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  3. relapse 12 months after operation

    There will be registered if there is an relapse 12 months after operation.

    Time frame: 12 months

  4. life quality 4 weeks and 12 months after operation

    There will be done a questionnaire 4 weeks and 12 months after operation.

    Time frame: 12 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Universitätsklinikum Wuerzburg
    Würzburg, 97080, Germany
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Oct 2016 to primary completion in Jul 2017, 9 months.

Of 18 interventional studies with no phase under Hernia, Umbilical, half reached primary completion within 24 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 47. This study's 9 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 23, 2017
First posted
Jun 27, 2017
StartActual
Oct 2016
Primary completionActual
Jul 2017
CompletionActual
Jul 2018
Last update
Jan 17, 2019
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 17, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03200405
Lead sponsor
Wuerzburg University Hospital
Responsible party
Prof. Dr. Dr. Ulrich Dietz (Prof., Wuerzburg University Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 27, 2017
Start date
Oct 2016
Primary completion
Jul 2017
Completion
Jul 2018
Last update
Jan 17, 2019

Study contacts

Ulrich Dietz, Prof Dr Dr
principal investigator · Wuerzburg UH

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion