An interventional study of GC Saliva-Check BUFFER in Tooth Wear, sponsored by Hacettepe University. Completed. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-06-23.
Sponsored by Hacettepe University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic
This study compares the associated risk factors between adults with tooth wear and age- and sex-matched controls without tooth wear.
Some people are at greater risk due to their eating and brushing habits. Poor oral health behaviors and malnutrition are the leading causes of tooth surface loss in adults. Fluid consumption trends have changed, and the increased consumption of carbonated drinks coincides with a decline in the consumption of dairy products and increases in the use of packaged products. Frequent and faulty brushing with abrasive oral hygiene products can also increase TW. Individuals unhappy with the color of their teeth may also frequently use whitening toothpaste.
Saliva is considered the biological factor with the greatest potential to modify the progression of TW. There are several potential mechanisms by which saliva may protect enamel from dietary acid erosion. Saliva protection mechanisms include the dilution of erosive agents in the mouth, neutralization, effects of calcium and phosphate ions, and slowing of the rate of enamel dissolution.
The loss of dental tissue can lead to the character's loss of precision and form, and in advanced stages the dentin surface can be exposed. TW is initially painless and unrecognizable. In the next stage, complaints often include tenderness and non-aesthetic factors. It is difficult to recognize the signs of TW and very important to avoid premature diagnosis, as TW can often be diagnosed by a dentist. Correct diagnosis is an important part of the treatment and will help the dentist determine recommendations for the patient.
62 studies on the registry are indexed under Tooth Wear; 12 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 100 is above the median of 49 across 41 interventional studies indexed under Tooth Wear.
Browse Tooth Wear studies →Hacettepe University is the lead sponsor of 1,009 studies on the registry; 214 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Subject is in good health. Subject is able to understand and read the questionnaire.
Exclusion Criteria:
Wearing orthodontic appliances, Having crowns or partial dentures Using any medications.
Saliva test pH Buffering capacity Flow rate
Diagnostic Test: GC Saliva-Check BUFFER
Evaluating the saliva flow rate, saliva pH and saliva buffering capacity
Saliva test
Highly acidic saliva will be in the red section, pH 5.0 - 5.8. Moderately acidic saliva will be found in the yellow section, pH 6.0 - 6.6. Healthy saliva will be in the green section pH 6.8 - 7.8.
Time frame: 1 day
Tooth wear
Scoring the tooth wear, Smith and Knight's index (0=No loss of enamel surface characteristics, 1=Loss of enamel surface characteristics, 2=Loss of enamel exposing dentine for less than one third of surface, 3=Loss of enamel exposing dentine for more than one third of the surface, 4=Complete enamel loss, pulp exposure, secondary dentine exposure
Time frame: 1 day
No study locations are listed for this record.
Plan to share: No
Ran from Nov 2014 to primary completion in Jun 2015, 7 months.
Of 21 interventional studies with no phase under Tooth Wear, half reached primary completion within 19 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 3 and three quarters within 30. This study's 7 months is below that.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.