CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03197285Updated Jun 23, 2017

Effectiveness of an Eye-Cervical Re-education Program in Chronic Neck Pain

An interventional study of EYE-CERVICAL RE-EDUCATION PROGRAM and Combined Physiotherapy Protocol in Neck Pain and Eye Strain, sponsored by University of Cadiz. Completed at 1 site in Spain. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 50 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-06-23.

Sponsored by University of Cadiz · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 5 years after the study started (first participant enrolled Jun 2012, registered Jun 2017).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
44
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 50 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of the present study is to value the effectiveness of an Eye-Cervical Re-education Program (ECRP) to decrease pain and increase mobility in the cervical area compared to a Combined Physiotherapy Protocol (CPP) in patients with chronic neck pain symptoms.

Read the detailed description

Background:

In Physiotherapy there is a growing interest of authors to clarify the relationship between the visual system and the neck. Aspects such as deficiencies in eye movement during cervical rotation are common disorders in patients who have suffered whiplash trauma or have dizzy syndromes. On the other hand, deep muscle disorders of the neck are related to the decrease in cervical-ocular reflex. Furthermore, some disorders in eye movements in patients with idiopathic neck pain have been identified.

Consequently, a pragmatic approach to multimodal intervention has been recommended to address changes in sensorimotor control at the cervical level. For this purpose, head-neck sensitization exercises (joint position sense training with head relocation), oculo-motor exercises (ie, eye stability, eye-neck coordination) or balance training have been proposed. These programs lead to a sensorimotor control, reducing pain and disability in the neck. However, it is not known if this approach to treatment is a significant improvement when compared to the implementation of other physiotherapy procedures, so it is unknown if the application of training oculocervical proprioception is more advisable than other modalities of physiotherapy treatment for the improvement of CNP symptoms.

Material and method:

This research is an analytical, longitudinal, prospective, experimental, evaluator blinded study. It is controlled with two parallel groups, randomized clinical trial.

The sample consisted of patients recruited in a Physiotherapy consultation in Cadiz (Spain). These assessments were made before and after the start of program and to the end of intervention (8 months).

Patients were randomized to control or experimental group. All patients are given a Combined Physiotherapy Protocol, no apply an Eye-Cervical Re-education Program in subjects in the first group and performing an Eye-Cervical Re-education Program in the second. This program was carried out by the physiotherapist. Subjects received a total of ten sessions on alternate days.

02

Conditions studied

  • Neck Pain
  • Eye Strain

Keywords

  • neck pain
  • eye
  • propioception
  • range of motion
  • pain
03

In context

Asthenopia

61 studies on the registry are indexed under Asthenopia; 10 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 44 is below the median of 60 across 49 interventional studies indexed under Asthenopia.

Browse Asthenopia studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Cadiz is the lead sponsor of 55 studies on the registry; 9 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 50 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Inclusion criteria were: to show symptoms and clinical signs of neck pain, have a medical diagnosis, meet the following lines according to the classification proposed by the Working Group "Bone and Joint Decade 2000-2010" (Axis 1:Health problem receiving health care, Axis II: tertiary care; healthcare in a private Physiotherapy center, Axis III: Grades I and II, Axis IV: Long term, more than three months, Line V: isolated, periodic or permanent Crises) and cervical pain of a mechanical origin, due to repetitive motion or maintenance of positions for long periods.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Dizziness syndrome, microwave contraindications and analgesic currents (therapeutic procedures used), post-traumatic, rheumatologic, neurological, infectious or tumor cervical pain.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
44 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Control Group

    All patients are given a Combined Physiotherapy Protocol (CPP) consisting of: Thermotherapy (70 w continuous microwave for 10 minutes), therapeutic massage (surface rubbing for 5 minutes, 10 minutes of compression and kneading massage and 2 minutes of final surface friction), application of analgesic currents (TENS, by self-adhesive silicone electrodes 4x4 cm, symmetrical biphasic rectangular current, 200 µs width pulse, a frequency of 1 Hz for 10 minutes. The patient should notice a slight vibration, without it being painful).

    Other: Combined Physiotherapy Protocol

  • Experimental
    Experimental Group

    All patients are given a Combined Physiotherapy Protocol (CPP) consisting of: Thermotherapy (70 w continuous microwave for 10 minutes), therapeutic massage (surface rubbing for 5 minutes, 10 minutes of compression and kneading massage and 2 minutes of final surface friction), application of analgesic currents (TENS, by self-adhesive silicone electrodes 4x4 cm, symmetrical biphasic rectangular current, 200 µs width pulse, a frequency of 1 Hz for 10 minutes. The patient should notice a slight vibration, without it being painful). The ECRP developed by Revel et al.(Revel et al., 1994) was also applied to patients in the experimental group. EYE-CERVICAL RE-EDUCATION PROGRAM (ECRP) This includes a total of 10 exercises that has proprioceptive reprogramming in the cervical area

    Other: EYE-CERVICAL RE-EDUCATION PROGRAM

Interventions

  • OtherEYE-CERVICAL RE-EDUCATION PROGRAM

    Subjects received a total of ten sessions on alternate days. This includes a total of 10 exercises that has proprioceptive reprogramming in the cervical area with the following phases: 1. To stimulate ocular mobility without including the cervical movement. The patient was placed in the supine position and the physiotherapist seated, at the height of the head. 2. To exercise cervical mobility with restricted eye movement. The patient is placed on a rotating stool. The ocular mobility is excluded with opaque glasses that allowed exclusively the foveal vision 3. Finally we stimulate eye and neck movement coordination. The patient continued to sit on the stool, this time without the glasses.

  • OtherCombined Physiotherapy Protocol

    Thermotherapy (70 w continuous microwave for 10 minutes), therapeutic massage (surface rubbing for 5 minutes, 10 minutes of compression and kneading massage and 2 minutes of final surface friction), application of analgesic currents (TENS, by self-adhesive silicone electrodes 4x4 cm, symmetrical biphasic rectangular current, 200 µs width pulse, a frequency of 1 Hz for 10 minutes. The patient should notice a slight vibration, without it being painful).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change of pain

    Algometer in 6 points (two trapezius, two in angular of the scapula and two sub-occipital)

    Time frame: Baseline and end of treatment(4 weeks)

  2. Change of range of motion

    Measured with inclinometer

    Time frame: Baseline and end of treatment (4 weeks)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pain Rating Index

    McGill questionnaire in Spanish version

    Time frame: Baseline and end of treatment(4 weeks)

  2. Numerical rating scale for pain

    VAS visual analogue scale

    Time frame: Baseline and end of treatment(4 weeks)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Faculty of Nursing and Physiotherapy. University of Cadiz
    Cadiz, 11009, Spain
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Andersen LL, Hansen K, Mortensen OS, Zebis MK. Prevalence and anatomical location of muscle tenderness in adults with nonspecific neck/shoulder pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011 Jul 22;12:169. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-12-169. PubMed 21777478 ↗
  • Treleaven J, Jull G, LowChoy N. Smooth pursuit neck torsion test in whiplash-associated disorders: relationship to self-reports of neck pain and disability, dizziness and anxiety. J Rehabil Med. 2005 Jul;37(4):219-23. doi: 10.1080/16501970410024299. PubMed 16024477 ↗
  • Revel M, Minguet M, Gregoy P, Vaillant J, Manuel JL. Changes in cervicocephalic kinesthesia after a proprioceptive rehabilitation program in patients with neck pain: a randomized controlled study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994 Aug;75(8):895-9. doi: 10.1016/0003-9993(94)90115-5. PubMed 8053797 ↗
  • Treleaven J, Takasaki H. Characteristics of visual disturbances reported by subjects with neck pain. Man Ther. 2014 Jun;19(3):203-7. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2014.01.005. Epub 2014 Jan 27. PubMed 24521926 ↗
  • Perez-Cabezas V, Ruiz-Molinero C, Jimenez-Rejano JJ, Chamorro-Moriana G, Gonzalez-Medina G, Chillon-Martinez R. Effectiveness of an Eye-Cervical Re-Education Program in Chronic Neck Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2020 Feb 26;2020:2760413. doi: 10.1155/2020/2760413. eCollection 2020. PubMed 32184889 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 23, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03197285
Lead sponsor
University of Cadiz
Responsible party
Veronica Perez Cabezas (Principal Investigator, University of Cadiz) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 23, 2017
Start date
Jun 2012
Primary completion
Nov 2013
Completion
May 2016
Last update
Jun 23, 2017

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion