ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03192579Updated Jan 9, 2018

Effect of Rosuvastatin and Eicosapentaenoic Acid on Neoatherosclerosis: The LINK-IT Trial

A Phase 4 interventional study of EPA and high dose rosuvastatin and Standard dose rosuvastatin in Coronary Artery Disease Progression, sponsored by Kobe University. Completed. Open to participants aged 20 Years to 85 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-01-09.

Sponsored by Kobe University · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 3 years 10 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jul 2013, registered Jun 2017).
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
20 Years to 85 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study aim to evaluate whether intensive lipid lowering therapy may improve the clinical outcomes in coronary artery disease patients with in-stent neoatherosclerosis, in comparison with standard therapy.

Read the detailed description

Eicosapentaenoic acid and statin therapy prevents cardiovascular events. However, the impact of these treatment in patients with in-stent neoatherosclerosis (NA) has not been clarified.

Drug-eluting stent (DES) use has successfully offered a significant reduction of mid-term restenosis and repeat revascularization by controlling acute-phase excessive intimal growth after stent implantation. However, several issues still exists mainly with respect to the late-phase clinical events, including late stent thrombosis and delayed restenosis after first- and second-generation DES implantation. A growing number of evidence have suggested the potential contribution of atheromatous changes within neointimal tissue, namely neoatherosclerosis (NA) on these phenomena occurring long-term after stent implantation.

Rosuvastatin is one of the most widely used statin that has an extensive evidence for reducing adverse cardiovascular event in patients with coronary artery disease. The JUPITER (Justification for the Use of Statins in Prevention: an Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin ) trial demonstrated that 20mg/del of Rosuvastatin significantly reduced combined primary end point of myocardial infarction, stroke, arterial revascularization, hospitalization for unstable angina, or death from cardiovascular causes in patients with elevated CRP level. Also, the ASTEROID Trial showed that high-intensity statin therapy with rosuvastatin of 40 mg/d reduced low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level to 60.8 (20.0) mg/dL (53.2% reduction) and induced significant plaque volume reduction measured by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) (JAMA. 2006;295:1556-1565). Although the dose of lipid-lowering therapy is one of the major contributing factors to the effect of lipid-lowering therapy, it is also well known that the effect of statin therapy has ethnic variation, being less statin dose required for Asians. Indeed in Japan, relatively less intensive statin therapy has been reported to reduce serum LDL-C level on average by 70mg/dl (change from baseline: -42%) and reduced atheroma volume measured by IVUS. Using Virtual histology IVUS, Hong et al. demonstrated that 10 mg/day Rosuvastatin therapy reduced serum low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) on average by 83 mg/dl (change from baseline: -32%) and decreased atheroma burden in 67% of enrolled patients.

Eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) is another lipid-lowering therapyAccording to a recent study, the addition of highly purified EPA to statin therapy provides further benefits in preventing cardiovascular events (Yokoyama M, Origasa H, Matsuzaki M et al. Effects of eicosapentaenoic acid on major coronary events in hypercholesterolaemic patients (JELIS): a randomised open-label, blinded endpoint analysis. Lancet 2007;369:1090-8.). Also, we had reported that the concomitant use of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and rosuvastatin reduced serum hs-CRP level significantly and increased fibrous cap thickness in patients who were detected thin-cap fibroatheroma by OCT.

Recently, we conducted a retrospective, nonrandomized OCT study to demonstrate that higher LDL cholesterol and CRP levels were independent determinants of NA progression. Also, Therefore, we designed a prospective, randomized OCT study in Japan to assess the effect of 10 mg/day plus eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) versus 2.5-5.0 mg/day of rosuvastatin on the extent of NA after stent implantation.

The OCT operators randomly assigned 50 patients who were detected NA on follow-up optical coherence tomography (OCT) examination to either 2.5-5mg/day of rosuvastatin therapy (standard dose group) or 10mg/day(up to 20mg/day) of rosuvastatin and 1800mg/day of eicosapentaenoic acid therapy (intensive dose group). Serial coronary angiography and OCT were performed at 12 months after baseline OCT procedure. Sample size was calculated based on the assumption that the average difference in multiplication of lipid arc and lipid length growth between the groups receiving only rosuvastatin and EPA (1800mg/day) adding on rosuvastatin is 81.5, and the SD of multiplication of lipid arc and lipid length growth distribution for either group is 102.1. With a 2-sided alpha level of 0.05 and a power of 80%, 25 patients were required in each group.

02

Conditions studied

  • Coronary Artery Disease Progression

Keywords

  • neoatherosclerosis
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Kobe University is the lead sponsor of 17 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years to 85 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Consecutive patients with stent implantation who were performed coronary angiography and OCT follow-up of the coronary arteries were candidate. During this period, OCT was performed for the following reasons: 1) planned follow-up coronary angiography and OCT for routine stent follow-up or due to other study protocols, regardless of symptoms; 2) evidence of myocardial ischemia such as silent myocardial ischemia, stable angina, or acute coronary syndrome; or 3) planned follow-up angiography for other stent segments. These patients were implanted bare metal stent, sirolimus-eluting stents (Cypher, Cordis, Miami Lakes, FL, USA), paclitaxel-eluting stents (Taxus, Boston Scientific, Natick, MA, USA), or everolimus-eluting stents (XIENCE V, Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The investigators assessed their OCT examination at the follow-up OCT time and patients who were detected NA on OCT findings were eligible for the presence study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Exclusion criteria for OCT were 1) anatomically unsuitable target artery for OCT according to previously described criteria, 10 2) apparent congestive heart failure, 3) renal insufficiency with baseline creatinine level ≥2.0 mg/dL expect for under hemodialysis, or 4) lack of written informed consent from the patient.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
50 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Standard lipid lowering therapy

    Start with only rosuvastatin 2.5mg and up to 20mg/day

    Drug: Standard dose rosuvastatin

  • Active comparator
    Intensive lipid lowering therapy

    Start EPA and rosuvastatin 10mg/day and up to 20mg/day

    Drug: EPA and high dose rosuvastatin

Interventions

  • DrugEPA and high dose rosuvastatin

    Drug pages: Eicosapentaenoic Acid · Rosuvastatin

    After randomization, patients with intensive lipid lowering therapy start EPA (1800mg/day) and high dose rosuvastatin (10mg/day) for 12 months.

    Also known as: Rosuvastatin, Eicosapentaenoic acid

  • After randomization, patients with standard lipid lowering therapy start only rosuvastatin (2.5mg/day) for 12 months.

    Also known as: rosuvastatin

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Lipid index change between baseline and 12 month follow-up

    Lipid core arc was measured by every 0.2-mm interval throughout segments with NA on OCT findings. The mean lipid core arc was calculated for each lesion. Then, the lipid index was calculated by multiplying the mean lipid core arc by the lipid core longitudinal length.

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 month follow-up

Secondary outcomes

  1. Macrophage grade change between baseline and 12 month follow-up

    Macrophage arc were measured on OCT images with NA every 0.2-mm intervals and divided 4 groups as follows: grade 0, no mac¬rophage; grade 1, localized macrophage accumulation (\<30°); grade 2, clus¬tered accumulation ≥30° and \<90°; grade 3, clus¬tered accumulation ≥90° and \<270°; and grade 4, clustered accumulation ≥270° and \<360° . Macrophage grade was evaluated as summation of 0 to 4 grades across all cross section in NA.

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 month follow-up

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Jul 2013 to primary completion in Jun 2017, 46 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 15, 2017
First posted
Jun 20, 2017
StartActual
Jul 26, 2013
Primary completionActual
Jun 2, 2017
CompletionActual
Jun 2, 2017
Last update
Jan 9, 2018
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 9, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03192579
Lead sponsor
Kobe University
Responsible party
Hiromasa Otake (Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 20, 2017
Start date
Jul 26, 2013
Primary completion
Jun 2, 2017
Completion
Jun 2, 2017
Last update
Jan 9, 2018

Study contacts

Hiromasa Otake, ph.D
study chair · Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Rosuvastatin

Start the discussion