ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT03183115Updated Mar 3, 2023

RFA to Prevent Metachronous Squamous Neoplasia Recurrence After Complete Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection

An interventional study of Radiofrequency ablation and Endoscopy in Esophageal Squamous Cell Neoplasm, sponsored by E-DA Hospital. Recruiting at 1 site in Taiwan. Open to participants aged 20 Years to 90 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-03-03.

Sponsored by E-DA Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Oct 2025, 1 year ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Registered 1 year 1 month after the study started (first participant enrolled Apr 2016, registered May 2017).
  • Started Apr 2016; still recruiting 10 years 6 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
20 Years to 90 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Esophageal cancer is a highly lethal disease, and its incidence is still increasing in the world. Recent advances in image-enhanced techniques such as Lugol chromoendoscopy and narrow band imaging, the number of patients with early esophageal squamous cell neoplasias (ESCNs) detected has markedly increased. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) enables en bloc resection of the neoplasia, and the resected specimen allows for a pathological assessment to evaluate the curability. However, the patients who received complete ESD for early ESCNs frequently developed metachronous recurrence. The cumulative metachronous recurrence rate at 5 years was 50%, and the mean annual incidence of newly diagnosed metachronous tumors was 10%. Among them, those with "speckled" lugol staining pattern over the esophageal background mucosa have the highest risk and should be seen as a precancerous lesion of ESCCs. This issue is gaining attention in the era of endoscopic treatment, but currently there was no appropriate strategy to prevent the tumor recurrence in these high-risk subjects.

Endoscopic radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a rapidly evolving therapeutic modality, and recent studies have shown its efficacy and safety for eradicating for flat type early ESCNs. To search a best strategy for the prevention of ESCNs, the investigators thus propose a hypothesis that the preemptive RFA for esophageal "speckled" lugol background mucosa may prevent the metachronous neoplastic recurrence after complete endoscopic resection.

02

Conditions studied

  • Esophageal Squamous Cell Neoplasm

Keywords

  • Early esophageal squamous cell neoplasm
  • Radiofrequency ablation
  • Endoscopic submucosal dissection
  • Esophageal cancer
  • Recurrence
  • Field cancerization
03

In context

Esophageal Neoplasms

1,873 studies on the registry are indexed under Esophageal Neoplasms; 501 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is above the median of 58 across 1,347 interventional studies indexed under Esophageal Neoplasms.

Browse Esophageal Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

E-DA Hospital is the lead sponsor of 35 studies on the registry; 8 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years to 90 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults with early stage ESCNs (squamous high grade dysplasia, carcinoma in situ, or T1N0M0 SCC) who were treated by endoscopic submucosal dissection.
  • Lugol staining showed "speckled" (>10 small lugol-unstained lesions) pattern of background mucosa.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Having a history of incomplete endoscopic treatment, or complications during/after treatment (perforation, stricture).
  • Having history of systemic chemotherapy or radiation therapy for esophagus or post esophagectomy.
  • \<2 yr.
  • Decompensated cirrhosis (Child score B, C).
  • Having large esophageal varices.
  • Poor performance status (>2).
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

ECOG performance status

A scale of how much an illness limits everyday activity. For people being assessed to join a study, scores run from 0 (fully active) to 4; lower is more active.

0
Fully active, no restrictions.
1
Limited in strenuous activity, but walking and able to do light work, such as housework or office work.
2
Walking and able to look after yourself, but unable to work; up and about more than half of waking hours.
3
Able to look after yourself only in part; in bed or a chair more than half of waking hours.
4
Unable to look after yourself at all; in bed or a chair all day.

Studies most often ask for 0–1 or 0–2. Your doctor gives the score; the WHO scale uses the same steps. The full scale also has 5, which records death.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    RFA group

    Balloon type RFA (12J/cm2, 1 application) will be applied for the entire speckled esophageal mucosa at the 3 months after complete ESD. Oral prednisolone 30mg/day will be prescribed at day 3 after RFA procedure and continue for 28 days to prevent the post-RFA stenosis.

    Procedure: Radiofrequency ablation · Device: Endoscopy · Drug: Lugol's Solution (1.5%)

  • No intervention
    Control group

    No intervention; surveillance endoscopy alone

Interventions

  • ProcedureRadiofrequency ablation

    HALO360 System (Covidien GI Solutions, Sunnyvale, California, USA), which has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and is approved for use in Europe (CE mark) and Taiwan (Ministry of Health and Welfare). Because the HALO 360 balloon catheter has been phased out since 2019, a new Barrx™ 360 Express catheter was used thereafter.

  • DeviceEndoscopy

    The participants will receive meticulous endoscopic examination with Lugol chromoendoscopy and Narrow-band imaging

  • Before the RFA intervention, the participants will received Lugol staining over the esophagus

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Tumor recurrence

    Metachronous tumor recurrence is defined as a tumor (high-grade dysplasia or squamous cell carcinoma) recurring at a new site after more than 6 months of complete remission status.

    Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of first documented tumor recurrence, assessed up to 100 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Major adverse events

    including perforation, dysphagia, stenosis, defined as the failure of a standard endoscope (9.8 mm in diameter) to pass through the stenosis, or others resulting in the patients intolerable and discontinued intervention.

    Time frame: From date of intervention until the date of first documented adverse events, assessed up to 12months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Lee CT, Chang CY, Lee YC, Tai CM, Wang WL, Tseng PH, Hwang JC, Hwang TZ, Wang CC, Lin JT. Narrow-band imaging with magnifying endoscopy for the screening of esophageal cancer in patients with primary head and neck cancers. Endoscopy. 2010 Aug;42(8):613-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1255514. Epub 2010 Jul 28. PubMed 20669074 ↗
  • Lee CT, Chang CY, Tai CM, Wang WL, Tseng CH, Hwang JC, Lin JT. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early esophageal neoplasia: a single center experience in South Taiwan. J Formos Med Assoc. 2012 Mar;111(3):132-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2010.12.002. Epub 2012 Feb 8. PubMed 22423666 ↗
  • Shimizu Y, Tukagoshi H, Fujita M, Hosokawa M, Kato M, Asaka M. Metachronous squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus arising after endoscopic mucosal resection. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001 Aug;54(2):190-4. doi: 10.1067/mge.2001.116877. PubMed 11474389 ↗
  • Urabe Y, Hiyama T, Tanaka S, Oka S, Yoshihara M, Arihiro K, Chayama K. Metachronous multiple esophageal squamous cell carcinomas and Lugol-voiding lesions after endoscopic mucosal resection. Endoscopy. 2009 Apr;41(4):304-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1214477. Epub 2009 Apr 1. PubMed 19340732 ↗
  • Muto M, Hironaka S, Nakane M, Boku N, Ohtsu A, Yoshida S. Association of multiple Lugol-voiding lesions with synchronous and metachronous esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in patients with head and neck cancer. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002 Oct;56(4):517-21. doi: 10.1067/mge.2002.128104. PubMed 12297767 ↗
  • Shaheen NJ, Sharma P, Overholt BF, Wolfsen HC, Sampliner RE, Wang KK, Galanko JA, Bronner MP, Goldblum JR, Bennett AE, Jobe BA, Eisen GM, Fennerty MB, Hunter JG, Fleischer DE, Sharma VK, Hawes RH, Hoffman BJ, Rothstein RI, Gordon SR, Mashimo H, Chang KJ, Muthusamy VR, Edmundowicz SA, Spechler SJ, Siddiqui AA, Souza RF, Infantolino A, Falk GW, Kimmey MB, Madanick RD, Chak A, Lightdale CJ. Radiofrequency ablation in Barrett's esophagus with dysplasia. N Engl J Med. 2009 May 28;360(22):2277-88. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0808145. PubMed 19474425 ↗
  • Shaheen NJ, Overholt BF, Sampliner RE, Wolfsen HC, Wang KK, Fleischer DE, Sharma VK, Eisen GM, Fennerty MB, Hunter JG, Bronner MP, Goldblum JR, Bennett AE, Mashimo H, Rothstein RI, Gordon SR, Edmundowicz SA, Madanick RD, Peery AF, Muthusamy VR, Chang KJ, Kimmey MB, Spechler SJ, Siddiqui AA, Souza RF, Infantolino A, Dumot JA, Falk GW, Galanko JA, Jobe BA, Hawes RH, Hoffman BJ, Sharma P, Chak A, Lightdale CJ. Durability of radiofrequency ablation in Barrett's esophagus with dysplasia. Gastroenterology. 2011 Aug;141(2):460-8. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2011.04.061. Epub 2011 May 6. PubMed 21679712 ↗
  • Phoa KN, van Vilsteren FG, Weusten BL, Bisschops R, Schoon EJ, Ragunath K, Fullarton G, Di Pietro M, Ravi N, Visser M, Offerhaus GJ, Seldenrijk CA, Meijer SL, ten Kate FJ, Tijssen JG, Bergman JJ. Radiofrequency ablation vs endoscopic surveillance for patients with Barrett esophagus and low-grade dysplasia: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2014 Mar 26;311(12):1209-17. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.2511. PubMed 24668102 ↗
  • Bergman JJ, Zhang YM, He S, Weusten B, Xue L, Fleischer DE, Lu N, Dawsey SM, Wang GQ. Outcomes from a prospective trial of endoscopic radiofrequency ablation of early squamous cell neoplasia of the esophagus. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Dec;74(6):1181-90. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.05.024. Epub 2011 Aug 15. PubMed 21839994 ↗
  • van Vilsteren FG, Alvarez Herrero L, Pouw RE, ten Kate FJ, Visser M, Seldenrijk CA, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Weusten BL, Bergman JJ. Radiofrequency ablation for the endoscopic eradication of esophageal squamous high grade intraepithelial neoplasia and mucosal squamous cell carcinoma. Endoscopy. 2011 Apr;43(4):282-90. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1256309. Epub 2011 Mar 31. PubMed 21455869 ↗
  • Wang WL, Chang IW, Chang CY, Lin JT, Mo LR, Wang HP, Lee CT. Circumferential balloon-based radiofrequency ablation for ultralong and extensive flat esophageal squamous neoplasia. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Dec;80(6):1185-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.07.025. Epub 2014 Sep 23. No abstract available. PubMed 25257127 ↗
  • Wang WL, Chang IW, Chen CC, Chang CY, Mo LR, Lin JT, Wang HP, Lee CT. Radiofrequency Ablation Versus Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in Treating Large Early Esophageal Squamous Cell Neoplasia. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Dec;94(49):e2240. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000002240. PubMed 26656367 ↗
  • He S, Bergman J, Zhang Y, Weusten B, Xue L, Qin X, Dou L, Liu Y, Fleischer D, Lu N, Dawsey SM, Wang GQ. Endoscopic radiofrequency ablation for early esophageal squamous cell neoplasia: report of safety and effectiveness from a large prospective trial. Endoscopy. 2015 May;47(5):398-408. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1391285. Epub 2015 Feb 10. PubMed 25668428 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — The initial outcome and the data of adverse events will be shared with other researchers, by mail, when they are available.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Apr 2016 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Oct 2025, 114 months after the start.

Of 209 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Esophageal Neoplasms, half reached primary completion within 46 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 23 and three quarters within 96. This study's planned 114 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 218 studies reached it within 46 months; a quarter within 23 and three quarters within 96.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 28, 2017
First posted
Jun 9, 2017
StartActual
Apr 18, 2016
Primary completionEst.
Oct 30, 2025
CompletionEst.
Dec 30, 2026
Last update
Mar 3, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 3, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03183115
Lead sponsor
E-DA Hospital
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 9, 2017
Start date
Apr 18, 2016
Primary completion
Oct 30, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 30, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 3, 2023

Study contacts

Wen-Lun Wang, Ph.D
Contact
warrengodr@gmail.com
886-7-6150011 ext. 251346
Ching-Tai Lee, M.D.
Contact
fattoo@gmail.com
886-7-6150011 ext. 251205

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Lugol's solution

Start the discussion