ClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT03181828Updated Dec 15, 2021Results posted

Manipulating the Gut Microbiome Study

A Phase 1/2 interventional study of Acetohydroxamic Acid Oral Tablet and No treatment in Urea Cycle Disorder, sponsored by Nicholas Ah Mew. Terminated at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 60 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-12-15.

Sponsored by Nicholas Ah Mew · Phase 1/2, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
The incidence of AEs was higher than the IB reported.
Phase
Phase 1/2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
4
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 60 Years
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-13

Among 40 studies in Urea Cycle Disorders, Inborn with a site in United States — 9 open to participants now, 12 under way, 1 of them phase 3. Urea Cycle Disorders, Inborn · United States.

Enrollment
23rd of 24
4 · median 16
Started
2017
with 4 others
Phase 1/2
3 of 40
1 open now
Registered
26th of 40
by date
Lead sponsor
2 of 40
Nicholas Ah Mew

Among the 40 studies in Urea Cycle Disorders, Inborn with a site in United States, this one is the 23rd largest by enrollment of the 24 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 5 that started in 2017, is one of 3 in phase 1/2, and was the 26th registered.

Urea Cycle Disorders, Inborn

66 studies on the registry are indexed under Urea Cycle Disorders, Inborn; 14 are open to participants now.

Browse Urea Cycle Disorders, Inborn studies →

Open to participants now

9 of the 40 studies in Urea Cycle Disorders, Inborn with a site in United States are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

4 more — sign in →

All 9 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in United States have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in United States →

Who these studies take

Of the 12 Urea Cycle Disorders, Inborn studies recruiting now, 5 (42%) set no upper age limit and 7 (58%) stop at 75 or younger; 11 take children under 18; 4 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years to 60 Years · all sexes · healthy volunteers too.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 40 studies in Urea Cycle Disorders, Inborn with a site in United States, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

The objective is to determine if acetohydroxamic acid (AHA) can prevent hydrolysis of urea by inhibiting the bacterial urease of gut flora of both healthy control adults as well as adults with urea cycle disorders

Read the detailed description

This project will study the efficacy and safety of the pharmacologic blockade of urease in the nitrogen salvage pathway of intestinal microbes in subjects with partial urea cycle disorders. Additional trapping of ammonia as excretable urea may result in improved nitrogen excretion and reduced ammonia levels.

Urea cycle disorders (UCDs) are a group of disorders resulting from a complete or partial deficiency of one of the 6 enzymes or 2 transporters that comprise the urea cycle, the essential biochemical pathway which converts toxic ammonia into urea. These disorders have as a common feature, a reduced or complete inability to convert ammonia into urea, thereby resulting in high ammonia levels, or hyperammonemia. If untreated, hyperammonemia may result acutely in lethargy and coma, and chronically in intellectual disability. Current treatment for hyperammonemia is suboptimal, thus the search for new treatments is critical.

The urease inhibitor, acetohydroxamic acid (AHA, Lithostat®, Mission Pharmacal), is an FDA-approved product for another indication- the treatment of struvite nephrolithiasis in chronic urinary tract infections in both adults and children.

It is known that many urea-splitting bacteria also exist in the gut, and that in healthy individuals, approximately 15-30% of blood urea is degraded via gut bacteria into ammonia3, which returns to the liver via the portal vein, only to be recycled into urea. This percentage of degraded urea may even be greater in patients with urea cycle disorders, who are on a low protein-diet4 and whose gastrointestinal contents thus likely have lower nitrogen content, promoting bacterial recycling of nitrogen from available urea. Additionally, urea hydrolysis has been shown to be greatest in infants5, precisely the age at which hyperammonemic episodes are the most frequent in UCD patients.

We intend to study if AHA can inhibit gut bacteria degradation of urea, thereby reducing the quantity of ammonia returning to the liver. We intend to investigate this by studying subjects on two occasions at least 3 days apart:

On the first occasion, subjects will receive an intravenous dose of 13C-urea. Following the intravenous bolus of 13C-urea, over the subsequent 4 hours, we will collect several sequential measurements of blood and urine biomarkers from an IV catheter placed in the other arm. The intent is to obtain baseline 13CO2 kinetics in the subject.

On the second occasion, subjects will first receive an oral dose of AHA approximately 1 hour prior to the intravenous 13C-urea dose. Similar sequential measurements of blood and urine biomarkers will be performed. The intent is to observe a reduction in 13CO2 when AHA is administered.

We intend to initially study a cohort of unaffected adult subjects. If successful, we will study adults with partial urea cycle disorders.

This study will be conducted in the Clinical Research Center (CRC) of the Clinical and Translational Research Institute (CTSI) of Children's National Medical Center (CNMC).

03

Conditions studied

  • Urea Cycle Disorder

Keywords

  • CPSI deficiency
  • OTC Deficiency
  • AS Deficiency
  • AL Deficiency
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • For Group 1 (healthy adults):
  • Ages 18-60 years
  • Compliant with receiving medications orally and intravenously
  • Compliant with providing blood and urine samples

For Group 2 (adult UCD patients):

  • Ages 18-60 years
  • Compliant with receiving medications orally and intravenously
  • Compliant with providing blood and urine samples
  • Established diagnosis of CPSD, OTCD, ASSD or ASLD as follows:

    • Diagnosis of CPS I deficiency, defined as decreased (less than 20 % of control) CPS I enzyme activity in liver or an identified pathogenic mutation
    • Diagnosis of OTC deficiency, defined as the identification of a pathogenic mutation, linkage analysis in an affected family, less than 20% of control of OTC activity in the liver, or elevated urinary orotate (greater than 20 uM/mM) in a random sample or following allopurinol loading with absence of argininosuccinic acid
    • Diagnosis of AS deficiency (Citrullinemia), defined as a greater than or equal to 10-fold elevation of citrulline in plasma, decreased AS enzyme activity in cultured skin fibroblasts or other appropriate tissue, or identification of a pathogenic mutation in the AS gene
    • Diagnosis of AL deficiency (Argininosuccinic Aciduria, ASA), defined as the presence of argininosuccinic acid in the blood or urine, decreased AL enzyme activity in cultured skin fibroblasts or other appropriate tissue, or identification of a pathogenic mutation in the AL gene

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • For both Group 1 and Group 2:
  • Current or prior Helicobacter pylori infection
  • Chronic gastrointestinal illness (e.g., inflammatory bowel disease)
  • Chronic renal failure
  • Taking probiotic medications within a week of study start date
  • Currently pregnant or lactating. Documentation of a negative pregnancy test within a week prior to testing is required, unless pre-menarchal or menopausal, experiencing menses that week, or other circumstances which preclude pregnancy (e.g. hysterectomy).
  • Presence of acute infection at the time of inclusion
  • Participation in any other clinical interventional trial or received experimental medication within the last 30 days
  • Any clinical or laboratory abnormality or medical condition that, at the discretion of the investigator, may put the subject at an additional risk by participating in this study
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
4 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Acetohydroxamic Acid Oral Tablet then No Intervention

    Participants receive a single oral dose of 60 mg/kg acetohydroxamic acid (rounded to the nearest 250 mg) in the fasted state on the morning of the study. After completion of the 4-h study, participants then enter a wash-out period of 3 days. Participants then completed an identical 4-h study in the fasted state without acetohydroxamic acid.

    Drug: Acetohydroxamic Acid Oral Tablet · Other: No treatment

  • Experimental
    No Intervention then Acetohydroxamic Acid Oral Tablet

    Participants completed a 4-h study in the fasted state without acetohydroxamic acid. 3 days later, participants then completed an identical 4-h study in the fasted state, after having received a single oral dose of 60 mg/kg acetohydroxamic acid (rounded to the nearest 250 mg).

    Drug: Acetohydroxamic Acid Oral Tablet · Other: No treatment

Interventions

  • DrugAcetohydroxamic Acid Oral Tablet

    A single oral dose of 60 mg/kg acetohydroxamic acid rounded to the nearest 250 mg tablet.

    Also known as: Lithostat

  • OtherNo treatment

    No treatment

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Atom Percent Excess of 13CO2

    Difference in the % enrichment of Carbon-13 in blood CO2 as compared to baseline measurement, at sequential time points, after a single bolus of intravenous \[13C\]-Urea,

    Time frame: Time +0 minutes, +30 minutes, +60 minutes, +90 minutes, +120 minutes, +180 minutes, and +240 minutes from time of infused [13C] Urea IV

Secondary outcomes

  1. Blood [13C]-Urea

    Concentration of urea labeled with Carbon-13

    Time frame: Time +O minutes, +30 minutes, +60 minutes, +90 minutes, +120 minutes, +180 minutes, and +240 minutes from time of [13C] Urea IV

07

Results

Posted Dec 15, 2021

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneNo Intervention, Then Acetohydroxamic Acid Oral Tablet [Lithostat]Acetohydroxamic Acid Oral Tablet [Lithostat], Then No Intervention
Started22
Completed22
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryAtom Percent Excess of 13CO2

Difference in the % enrichment of Carbon-13 in blood CO2 as compared to baseline measurement, at sequential time points, after a single bolus of intravenous \[13C\]-Urea,

Time frame:
Time +0 minutes, +30 minutes, +60 minutes, +90 minutes, +120 minutes, +180 minutes, and +240 minutes from time of infused [13C] Urea IV
Reported as:
Mean · Atom % Excess
Atom Percent Excess of 13CO2
Atom % ExcessAcetohydroxamic Acid Oral TabletNo Intervention
0 min0 ± 00 ± 0
30 min-0.00216 ± 0.003760.00268 ± 0.00531
60 min0.000959 ± 0.001300.000318 ± 0.0105
90 min0.00129 ± 0.001010.00336 ± 0.00583
120 min0.00152 ± 0.001170.00277 ± 0.00528
180-0.00392 ± 0.00561-0.000982 ± 0.00122
240-0.000537 ± 0.003860.00203 ± 0.00617
SecondaryBlood [13C]-Urea

Concentration of urea labeled with Carbon-13

Time frame:
Time +O minutes, +30 minutes, +60 minutes, +90 minutes, +120 minutes, +180 minutes, and +240 minutes from time of [13C] Urea IV
Reported as:
Mean · micromol/L
Blood [13C]-Urea
micromol/LAcetohydroxamic Acid Oral TabletNo Intervention
0 Min0 ± 00 ± 0
30 Min174.9 ± 43.57199.5 ± 9.12
60 Min151.9 ± 30.05165.2 ± 6.07
90 Min140.9 ± 12.48152.4 ± 6.14
120 Min137.3 ± 9.58136.8 ± 6.65
180 Min127.8 ± 9.87126.5 ± 7.78
240119.9 ± 11.93117.2 ± 9.95

Adverse events

Collected over 1 week. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Acetohydroxamic Acid Oral Tablet0/4 (0%)0/4 (0%)4/4 (100%)
No Intervention0/4 (0%)0/4 (0%)0/4 (0%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventAcetohydroxamic Acid Oral TabletNo Intervention
HeadacheNervous system disorders4/40/4
NauseaNervous system disorders2/40/4

Baseline characteristics

All the enrolled participants have been healthy adults.

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)No Intervention Then Acetohydroxamic Acid Oral TabletAcetohydroxamic Acid Oral Tablet Then No InterventionTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years224
>=65 years000
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)No Intervention Then Acetohydroxamic Acid Oral TabletAcetohydroxamic Acid Oral Tablet Then No InterventionTotal
Mean47 (36 to 58)40 (38 to 42)43.5 (36 to 58)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)No Intervention Then Acetohydroxamic Acid Oral TabletAcetohydroxamic Acid Oral Tablet Then No InterventionTotal
Female112
Male112
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)No Intervention Then Acetohydroxamic Acid Oral TabletAcetohydroxamic Acid Oral Tablet Then No InterventionTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian101
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American123
White000
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)No Intervention Then Acetohydroxamic Acid Oral TabletAcetohydroxamic Acid Oral Tablet Then No InterventionTotal
United States224
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Children's National Medical Center
    Washington, District of Columbia 20010, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Mar 2017 to primary completion in Jun 2018, 14 months.

Results were first posted in Dec 2021, 3 years 6 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 1, 2017
First posted
Jun 9, 2017
StartActual
Mar 24, 2017
Primary completionActual
Jun 5, 2018
CompletionActual
Jun 5, 2018
Results first posted
Dec 15, 2021
Last update
Dec 15, 2021
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 15, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03181828
Lead sponsor
Nicholas Ah Mew
Responsible party
Nicholas Ah Mew (MD, Children's National Research Institute) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Jun 9, 2017
Start date
Mar 24, 2017
Primary completion
Jun 5, 2018
Completion
Jun 5, 2018
Results posted
Dec 15, 2021
Last update
Dec 15, 2021

Study contacts

Nicholas Ah Mew, MD
principal investigator · Children's National Research Institute

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Nov 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion