CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03181542Updated Dec 21, 2021Results posted

Infra Red Vein Visualization: Efficacy vs. Standard Technique

An interventional study of Infrared illumination in Difficult Intravenous Access, sponsored by Milton S. Hershey Medical Center. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged Up to 2 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-12-21.

Sponsored by Milton S. Hershey Medical Center · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
160
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
Up to 2 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The objective of the study is to assess the efficacy of the vein visualization device AccuVein (AccuVein, Inc., Huntington, NY) in comparison to a standard technique for establishing intravenous (iv) access in the infant and toddler population (\<2years)

Read the detailed description

The objective of this project is to compare the iv success rate using the FDA approved Accuvein device for vein illumination versus not using the device, for infants/toddlers undergoing surgery at Penn State Children's Hospital with an ASA physical status 1, 2, or 3. After obtaining informed consent, the infant will be randomized to the vein illuminatin or standard group based on a computer generated number.

02

Conditions studied

  • Difficult Intravenous Access
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Milton S. Hershey Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 480 studies on the registry; 61 are open to participants now.

Of its 56 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 42 (75%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Up to 2 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Children(\<2year) undergoing anesthesia procedures at Penn State Health, Hershey Medical Center and Penn State Children's Hospital
  2. ASA physical status 1,2 or 3

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Emergency procedures requiring anesthesia
  2. ASA physical status 4
  3. Patients with pre existing iv access
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
160 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Infrared vein illumination

    Infrared illumination of veins, using the FDA approved AccuVein device, will be used to assist in vein location when inserting an intravenous access line

    Device: Infrared illumination

  • No intervention
    Standard Technique

    Standard vein location techniques will be used when inserting an intravenous access line

Interventions

  • DeviceInfrared illumination

    Infrared illumination of veins using the FDA approved AccuVein (AccuVein, Inc., Huntington, NY) device.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Success Rate

    Success for insertion of intravenous access line will be determined by flushability with 5 ml of sterile normal saline

    Time frame: When patient is in operating room and insertion of intravenous access line has been confirmed to be successful, an average of 30 minutes

Secondary outcomes

  1. The Number of Attempts

    The number of attempts it takes for successful insertion of the intravenous access line

    Time frame: When patient is in operating room and insertion of intravenous access line is performed

  2. Time to Successful Insertion

    The time to successful insertion of the intravenous access line will be measured from the first time that the canula touches the skin to until successful iv access is established

    Time frame: When patient is in operating room and insertion of intravenous access line is performed

07

Results

Posted Dec 21, 2021

Participant flow

Potential subjects will be identified from the electronic operating room scheduling system (surginet) by reviewing the operative list schedule the day before or on the day of their scheduled surgical or diagnostic procedure.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneInfrared Vein IlluminationStandard Technique
Started8080
Completed7980
Not completed10
Withdrew: Subject withdrawn because research physician could not make it in time to place iv10

Outcome measures

PrimarySuccess Rate

Success for insertion of intravenous access line will be determined by flushability with 5 ml of sterile normal saline

Time frame:
When patient is in operating room and insertion of intravenous access line has been confirmed to be successful, an average of 30 minutes
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Success Rate
percentage of participantsInfrared Vein IlluminationStandard Technique
Success Rate84.8190
Statistical analysis
  • Infrared Vein Illumination vs Standard Technique · Fisher Exact · p = 0.34
SecondaryThe Number of Attempts

The number of attempts it takes for successful insertion of the intravenous access line

Time frame:
When patient is in operating room and insertion of intravenous access line is performed
Reported as:
Mean · number of attempts
The Number of Attempts
number of attemptsInfrared Vein IlluminationStandard Technique
The Number of Attempts1.93 ± 1.462.15 ± 3.11
Statistical analysis
  • Infrared Vein Illumination vs Standard Technique · Jonckheere-Terpstra Test · p = 0.40
SecondaryTime to Successful Insertion

The time to successful insertion of the intravenous access line will be measured from the first time that the canula touches the skin to until successful iv access is established

Time frame:
When patient is in operating room and insertion of intravenous access line is performed
Reported as:
Mean · seconds
Time to Successful Insertion
secondsInfrared Vein IlluminationStandard Technique
Time to Successful Insertion149.39 ± 354.04136.92 ± 179.79
Statistical analysis
  • Infrared Vein Illumination vs Standard Technique · Jonckheere-Terpstra Test · p = 0.90

Adverse events

Collected over During the procedure up to their discharge from Post-anesthesia care unit or recovery unit up to 1 hour after the procedure, an average of 3 hours total. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Infrared Vein Illumination0/79 (0%)0/79 (0%)0/79 (0%)
Standard Technique0/80 (0%)0/80 (0%)0/80 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(months)Infrared Vein IlluminationStandard TechniqueTotal
Mean13.11 ± 6.1912.42 ± 6.4412.76 ± 6.31
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Infrared Vein IlluminationStandard TechniqueTotal
Female363874
Male434285
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(participants)Infrared Vein IlluminationStandard TechniqueTotal
Caucasian6056116
African American5813
Hispanic/Latino81018
Asian224
Mixed Race325
Other112
Unknown011
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)Infrared Vein IlluminationStandard TechniqueTotal
United States7980159
Skin Color
Skin Color(Participants)Infrared Vein IlluminationStandard TechniqueTotal
Light6057117
Medium151833
Dark448
Anticipated IV access difficulty
Anticipated IV access difficulty(participants)Infrared Vein IlluminationStandard TechniqueTotal
0055
114923
2221941
3232649
4111122
59918
Prematurity
Prematurity(Participants)Infrared Vein IlluminationStandard TechniqueTotal
yes131225
no6568133
ASA physical Status
ASA physical Status(Participants)Infrared Vein IlluminationStandard TechniqueTotal
1192140
2474390
3131629
4000
5000

2 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

1 site
  • Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
    Hershey, Pennsylvania 17033, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Kaddoum RN, Anghelescu DL, Parish ME, Wright BB, Trujillo L, Wu J, Wu Y, Burgoyne LL. A randomized controlled trial comparing the AccuVein AV300 device to standard insertion technique for intravenous cannulation of anesthetized children. Paediatr Anaesth. 2012 Sep;22(9):884-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2012.03896.x. Epub 2012 Jun 14. PubMed 22694242 ↗
  • Rothbart A, Yu P, Muller-Lobeck L, Spies CD, Wernecke KD, Nachtigall I. Peripheral intravenous cannulation with support of infrared laser vein viewing system in a pre-operation setting in pediatric patients. BMC Res Notes. 2015 Sep 21;8:463. doi: 10.1186/s13104-015-1431-2. PubMed 26391665 ↗
  • de Graaff JC, Cuper NJ, Mungra RA, Vlaardingerbroek K, Numan SC, Kalkman CJ. Near-infrared light to aid peripheral intravenous cannulation in children: a cluster randomised clinical trial of three devices. Anaesthesia. 2013 Aug;68(8):835-45. doi: 10.1111/anae.12294. Epub 2013 Jun 14. PubMed 23763614 ↗
  • Nafiu OO, Burke C, Cowan A, Tutuo N, Maclean S, Tremper KK. Comparing peripheral venous access between obese and normal weight children. Paediatr Anaesth. 2010 Feb;20(2):172-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2009.03198.x. Epub 2009 Nov 17. PubMed 19922428 ↗
  • Jacobson AF, Winslow EH. Variables influencing intravenous catheter insertion difficulty and failure: an analysis of 339 intravenous catheter insertions. Heart Lung. 2005 Sep-Oct;34(5):345-59. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2005.04.002. PubMed 16157191 ↗
  • Yen K, Riegert A, Gorelick MH. Derivation of the DIVA score: a clinical prediction rule for the identification of children with difficult intravenous access. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2008 Mar;24(3):143-7. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e3181666f32. PubMed 18347490 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Feb 18, 2021

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 21, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03181542
Lead sponsor
Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
Responsible party
Priti G. Dalal (Professor of Anesthesiology & Perioperative Medicine, Milton S. Hershey Medical Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 8, 2017
Start date
Jul 10, 2017
Primary completion
Oct 29, 2020
Completion
Oct 29, 2020
Results posted
Dec 21, 2021
Last update
Dec 21, 2021

Study contacts

Priti G Dalal, MD
principal investigator · Milton S. Hershey Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion