CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03174314VIS4IONUpdated May 30, 2025

Feasibility and Efficacy of Assisstive Tactile and Auditory Communicating Devices

An interventional study of Standard object battery and training sequence and VIS4ION System in Visual Impairment, sponsored by NYU Langone Health. Completed at 4 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-05-30.

Sponsored by NYU Langone Health · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
120
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This pilot study will integrate multi-sensor fusion techniques (software) to effectively combine information obtained from the newly embedded infrared, ultrasound, and stereo-camera-based sensor systems (hardware) that are implemented into the VIS4ION platform.

The core of this technology is based on 4 components: (1) a wearable vest with several distinct range and image sensors embedded. These sensors extract pertinent information about obstacles and the environment, which are conveyed to (2) a haptic interface (belt) that communicates this spatial information to the end-user in real-time via an intuitive, ergonomic and personalized vibrotactile re-display along the torso. (3) A smartphone serves as a connectivity gateway and coordinates the core components through WiFi, bluetooth, and/or 4G LTE, (4) a headset that contains both binaural, open-ear, bone conduction speakers (leaving the ear canal patent for ambient sounds) and a microphone for oral communication-based voice recognition during use of a virtual personal assistant (VPA).

Blindfolded-sighted, and blind subjects in a real-world, combined obstacle avoidance / navigation task will serve as an independent measure of overall improvements in the system as well as a roadmap for future avenues to enhance performance.

Further, a prospective, randomized crossover, controlled, non-blinded phase will be conducted in Thailand as part of this study to compare and evaluate effectiveness of the wearable vest for increasing navigation and quality of life.

Read the detailed description

Investigators will try to develop algorithms that will recognize multiple objects and persons in real-time (enhanced scene interpretation for multi-object identification). And based on that, human-centered simulation trials and experiments for feasibility and efficacy of the platform's tactile and auditory 'communication' outputs will be conducted. Finally auditory and tactile 'prompts' (system output) based on the end user's immediate needs based on initial testing results, will be integrated into the platform.

Additional activities will occur at the Thailand site. In the second phase, an improved system will be tested in an extended-use experiment, detecting for health-related changes in our participants (increased mobility and QoL). The study team will further test the generalizability of the new mapping technology in a more challenging environment, testing system performance using metrics, comparing results between current and previous systems.

02

Conditions studied

  • Visual Impairment

Keywords

  • Visual Impairment
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • People with visual impairments of all different levels and etiologies.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Significant cognitive dysfunction (score \<24 on Folsteins' Mini Mental Status Examination)
  • Previous neurological illness, complicated medical condition;
  • Significant mobility restrictions; people using walkers and wheelchairs
  • Pregnancy
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
120 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Visually impaired

    Visually impaired subjects will provide continuity across iterations of the testing, allowing for direct comparisons of responses within an individual for a single behavioral measure across different iterations of the device architecture and output configuration.

    Behavioral: Standard object battery and training sequence

  • Active comparator
    Healthy controls

    Healthy (naive) subjects invaluable insights as well as a range of body types, cognitive abilities, and other idiosyncrasies that will keep our design and testing process from tailoring the device to a small set of individuals rather than the broader population.

    Behavioral: Standard object battery and training sequence

  • Experimental
    Thailand Site - Group A: Assistive Mode then Passive Mode

    During the first 15 days, group A will go through an assistive mode and then a passive mode for the next 15 days

    Device: VIS4ION System

  • Active comparator
    Thailand Site - Group B: Passive Mode then Assistive Mode

    Group B will go through a passive mode for the first 15 days and then an assistive mode for the second half of the month

    Device: VIS4ION System

Interventions

  • BehavioralStandard object battery and training sequence

    Used to examine human localization and identification performance. Object battery will include: trip hazards ('pucks' with various height/width combinations to represent children's toys, street debris, rocks, pets, etc.), furniture (chairs, desks, couches, benches), people, walls, and corridors. Objects will be recorded by placing them to the right or left on the path-of-travel. Raw sensor outputs for single obstacles and walls in isolation (trip-hazard pucks with 8 heights, chair, desk, person, wall) and the same set of single obstacles against a wall. This set of 23 raw sensor traces can be used in various combinations (e.g., encountering a curb and then a person, or a chair) to create a training sequence that will help experimentally naïve subjects to understand the correspondence between tactile stimulation and the real-world scenario it is intended to depict.

  • DeviceVIS4ION System

    When in "Assistive Mode," participants will navigate campus while receiving navigation assistance (acquiring data and simultaneously providing assistance/audio feedback). When in "Passive Mode," participants will navigate campus wearing the backpack without receiving navigation assistant.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Correct Responses by Feedback Devices

    Assessment of ability of the feedback devices (vibrating belt- wrist band/haptic interface and audio output/open-ear headset) to provide correct responses on alternative force choice tasks during simulation experiments.

    Time frame: Month 6

  2. Total Time to Complete Activities of Daily Living

    Such activities can include navigation, shopping and cooking.

    Time frame: Month 6

  3. Path Length

    Total length of the path taken when participants perform navigation task.

    Time frame: Month 6

  4. Success Rate

    Percentage of participants who achieve the destination and/or target in the navigation task.

    Time frame: Month 6

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) Score

    7-item questionnaire assessing the types and intensity of physical activity and sitting time that people do as part of their daily lives; the total score is total physical activity, which is quantified in metabolic equivalent (MET) minutes per week.

    Time frame: Baseline, Month 6

  2. Change in World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL)-BREF Score

    WHOQOL-BREF is a 26-item questionnaire assessing how patients have felt about their quality of life and health over the past 4 weeks. Each item is rated on a scale from 1-5. The raw score is the sum of responses and is rescaled to a total score of 0-100; higher scores indicate greater health states.

    Time frame: Baseline, Month 6

  3. Change in Visual Functioning Questionnaire - 25 (VFQ-25) Score

    25-item assessment of how participants feel about their vision or vision condition. Each item is rated on a scale from 1-6. The raw score is the sum of responses and is converted to a 0-100 scale for the total score; higher scores indicate greater visual functioning.

    Time frame: Baseline, Month 6

06

Study locations

4 sites
  • New York University School of Medicine
    New York, New York 10016, United States
  • Mahidol University College of Music, Engineering, Science, Religious Studies, Social Sciences and Humanities
    Salaya, Thailand
  • Mahidol University International College
    Salaya, Thailand
  • Ratchasuda College, Mahidol University
    Salaya, Thailand
07

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03174314
Lead sponsor
NYU Langone Health
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 2, 2017
Start date
Jul 26, 2017
Primary completion
Jun 2, 2023
Completion
Jul 23, 2024
Last update
May 30, 2025

Study contacts

John R Rizzo, MD
principal investigator · NYU Langone Health

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion