CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03130322Updated Sep 15, 2025

SLeep and IMagery Correlates (SOMMEIL-IMAGERIE)

An interventional study of Imagery and Sleep questionnaires and MEG recordings (pre-test) in Healthy, sponsored by Hospices Civils de Lyon. Completed at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 40 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-09-15.

Sponsored by Hospices Civils de Lyon · Not applicable, Interventional, and Basic science

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 3 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Dec 2015, registered Mar 2017).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
51
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years to 40 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study is designed to determine the neural networks underlying the sleep-related motor consolidation process following motor imagery practice. While beneficial effects of sleep are expected for sequential movement but not for adaptation motor tasks, the corresponding neuroanatomical correlates have not yet been investigated when participants acquired the motor tasks through mental practice. Data should substantially promote how designing motor imagery interventions targeting (re)learning and/or motor recovery in patients suffering from motor disorders.

02

Conditions studied

  • Healthy
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Hospices Civils de Lyon is the lead sponsor of 1,826 studies on the registry; 439 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 40 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Healthy right-handed persons without neurologic disease
  • Persons having signed informed consent for a neuroimagery study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Persons under curatorship or any administrative/judicial measure
  • Participants refusing to be informed of the results of the experiment
  • Pregnant women
  • Participants with contraindications to the MEG examination: head size, presence of a neurostimulator, steel pivot for the root canal, metallic fragments, ear implants, metal screws in the body or mouth.
  • Persons using a pacemaker, insulin pump, or working regularly with iron filings
  • Claustrophobic persons
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
51 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    NightPP

    Participants of the NightPP will be subjected to one MRI session and two MEG recording sessions: the first one before a physical practice session of the two motor tasks investigated in the study, and second MEG session right after practice.

    Other: Imagery and Sleep questionnaires · Other: MEG recordings (pre-test) · Other: Practice session · Other: MEG recordings (Post-test) · Other: MRI

  • Experimental
    NightMI

    Participants of the NightMI will be subjected to one MRI session and two MEG recording sessions: the first one before a motor imagery practice session of the two motor tasks investigated in the study, and second MEG session right after practice.

    Other: Imagery and Sleep questionnaires · Other: MEG recordings (pre-test) · Other: Practice session · Other: MEG recordings (Post-test) · Other: MRI

  • Experimental
    NightCtrl

    Participants of the NightCtrl will be subjected to one MRI session and two MEG recording sessions: the first one before a mental rotation practice session, a second MEG session right after practice,and second MEG session right after practice.

    Other: Imagery and Sleep questionnaires · Other: MEG recordings (pre-test) · Other: Practice session · Other: MEG recordings (Post-test) · Other: MRI

  • Experimental
    Day

    Participants of the NightMI will be subjected to one MRI session and two MEG recording sessions: the first one before a motor imagery practice session of the two motor tasks investigated in the study, and second MEG session right after practice.

    Other: Imagery and Sleep questionnaires · Other: MEG recordings (pre-test) · Other: Practice session · Other: MEG recordings (Post-test) · Other: MRI

Interventions

  • OtherImagery and Sleep questionnaires

    Participants complete a motor imagery questionnaire to assess their ability to form vivid mental images, as well as sleep questionnaires to control the quality of their sleep

  • OtherMEG recordings (pre-test)

    Participants of the Day group perform two motor tasks (a finger sequential motor task and an adaptation motor task using a trackball) in the MEG, during a pre-test (Day 1 - 9h). Task 1: Participants perform an 8-digit motor sequential task where each finger (except the thumb) is used twice. Performance is assessed by using a 4-keys keyboard. Participants are required to keep their fingers on the keys to minimize amplitude are instructed to tap the sequence as few errors as possible Task 2: Participants perform a motor adaptation task requiring scrolling a trackball to superimpose a geometric shape on another one, strictly similar but presented from another angle, as fast as possible.

  • OtherPractice session

    Participants of the Day group perform a block of motor imagery practice of the two motor tasks.

  • OtherMEG recordings (Post-test)

    Participants perform the two motor tasks in the MEG (post-test, strictly similar to the pre-test)

  • OtherMRI

    The registration of the brain anatomy of each participant will be done by MRI 3D / T the week before the first experimental session.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Evidence of MEG correlates of sleep motor consolidation (day 1)

    The investigator will use Single Aperture Magnetometry, i.e. a minimum variance beamformer mapping the spatial distribution of event-related desynchronizations and synchronizations within a predetermined frequency domain (Beta oscillations 15-35 Hz). The time course of MEG Beta power will be considered, and Granger causal connectivity analyses will be performed to investigate relationships between cortical motor regions.

    Time frame: Day 1 at 19h00 [post-training] (Groups 1, 2 and 3) OR Day 1 at 9h00 [post-training] (Group 4)

  2. Evidence of MEG correlates of sleep motor consolidation (day 2)

    The investigator will use Single Aperture Magnetometry, i.e. a minimum variance beamformer mapping the spatial distribution of event-related desynchronizations and synchronizations within a predetermined frequency domain (Beta oscillations 15-35 Hz). The time course of MEG Beta power will be considered, and Granger causal connectivity analyses will be performed to investigate relationships between cortical motor regions.

    Time frame: Day 2 at 9h00 [Retention test] (Groups 1, 2 and 3) OR Day 1 at 19h00 [Retention test] (Group 4)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time needed to complete the motor tasks (day 1)

    The investigators will measure the time needed to complete the motor tasks needed to complete each motor task (finger sequential tasks OR motor adaptation task).

    Time frame: Day 1 at 19h00 [post-training] (Groups 1, 2 and 3) OR Day 1 at 9h00 [post-training] (Group 4)

  2. Evidence of MEG correlates of sleep motor consolidation

    The investigators will use Single Aperture Magnetometry, i.e. a minimum variance beamformer mapping the spatial distribution of event-related desynchronizations and synchronizations within a predetermined frequency domain (Beta oscillations 15-35 Hz). The time course of MEG Beta power will be considered, and Granger causal connectivity analyses will be performed to investigate relationships between cortical motor regions.

    Time frame: Day 2 at 9h00 [Retention test] (Groups 1, 2 and 3) OR Day 1 at 19h00 [Retention test] (Group 4)

  3. Accuracy of the motor tasks

    The investigators will measure the number of errors and correct trials for each motor task (finger sequential tasks OR motor adaptation task).

    Time frame: Day 1 at 19h00 [post-training] (Groups 1, 2 and 3) OR Day 1 at 9h00 [post-training] (Group 4)

  4. Time needed to complete the motor tasks

    The investigators will measure the time needed to complete each motor task (finger sequential tasks OR motor adaptation task).

    Time frame: Day 2 at 9h00 [Retention test] (Groups 1, 2 and 3) OR Day 1 at 19h00 [Retention test] (Group 4)

  5. Accuracy of the motor tasks 2

    The investigators will measure the number of errors and correct trials for each motor task (finger sequential tasks OR motor adaptation task).

    Time frame: Day 2 at 9h00 [Retention test] (Groups 1, 2 and 3) OR Day 1 at 19h00 [Retention test] (Group 4)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • CH le Vinatier
    Bron, 69500, France
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Di Rienzo F, Debarnot U, Daligault S, Delpuech C, Doyon J, Guillot A. Brain plasticity underlying sleep-dependent motor consolidation after motor imagery. Cereb Cortex. 2023 Nov 27;33(23):11431-11445. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhad379. PubMed 37814365 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 15, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03130322
Lead sponsor
Hospices Civils de Lyon
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 26, 2017
Start date
Dec 9, 2015
Primary completion
Dec 9, 2017
Completion
Jul 4, 2018
Last update
Sep 15, 2025

Study contacts

Alain Nicolas, MD
principal investigator · CH le Vinatier

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion