CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03129178Updated Feb 10, 2020Results posted

Beet the Cold: The Effect of Inorganic Nitrate Supplementation in Individuals With Raynaud's Phenomenon

An interventional study of Concentrated beetroot juice in Raynaud Phenomenon, sponsored by University of Portsmouth. Completed at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-02-10.

Sponsored by University of Portsmouth · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
27
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Individuals with Raynaud's phenomenon often experience episodes of reduced blood flow to their fingers and toes during times of stress or cold exposure, causing significant discomfort and pain. Typically, treatment for these individuals involves using drugs like Glyceryl Trinitrate (GTN), which increases blood flow to the fingers and toes by increasing a substance called nitric oxide in the blood. Unfortunately, repeated use of these drugs increases tolerance to them, meaning higher doses are required to produce the same effect. However, increasing the dose can cause more side effects like headaches, and is therefore not considered an ideal long-term therapy.

Leafy green vegetables, especially beetroot, contain high amounts of nitrate and are beneficial to blood vessel health, since nitrate from the diet can also be turned into the important blood vessel relaxer, nitric oxide. Unlike GTN, people don't appear to develop a tolerance to dietary nitrate or experience negative side effects.

Therefore, this study aims to see if short and longer term beetroot juice supplementation can improve blood flow to the hands and feet in individuals with Raynaud's phenomenon, as well as reduce their pain. This study will tell us how many people are needed for a definitive trial investigating whether beetroot juice can help treat Raynaud's phenomenon.

Raynaud's phenomenon can cause significant discomfort and pain to individuals. Dietary nitrate appears to offer a simple, low cost means of improving blood flow to the hands and feet which should reduce both the discomfort and pain experienced characterising this condition. This study will advance our understanding of the causes of Raynaud's phenomenon, specifically the role that the nitrate-nitrite-nitric oxide pathway might play in changing Raynaud's phenomenon symptoms and identifying targets for intervention.

Read the detailed description

Raynaud's phenomenon (RP) is characterised by a recurrent transient vasospasm of the fingers or toes in response to a cold or stressful stimulus. Nitric oxide (NO•) is a known vasodilator and NO• donors, such as Glyceryl Trinitrate (GTN), improve blood flow in patients with RP and in cold sensitive individuals (Figure 1, see accompanying document). However, individuals develop a tolerance to GTN and show diminishing vasodilatory effects with chronic treatment. In addition, the deleterious side effects such as headaches means that organic nitrates (i.e. GTN and isosorbide mononitrate) are not optimal longterm therapies for RP. Alternative treatments therefore, warrant further investigation.

Diets rich in fruit and vegetables has been shown to be effective in reducing blood pressure. In addition, it lowers the risk of morbidity and mortality from cardiovascular disease and are thought to be beneficial to cardiovascular health due to their vasodilatory effects. As diet exhibits such tremendous intra- and inter-individual variation, elucidating which components of such a diet are responsible for this effect is difficult. There is a growing weight of evidence from both human and animal studies that nitrate and nitrite derived from the diet can serve as a source for nitric oxide (NO; please see below), particularly where it is deficient. Indeed, the greatest protective effect on cardiovascular disease is to be found in those diets with the greatest consumption of green leafy and or cruciferous vegetables which typically have high nitrate content.

NO is produced in the body in two ways. The first requires the availability the amino acid L-arginine, molecular oxygen, and families of enzymes, the nitric oxide synthases (NOS); that is the NOS pathway. The second pathway is independent of NOS pathway and involves the stepwise enzymatic and chemical reduction of inorganic nitrate to nitrite. A major source of nitrite in humans is the reduction of dietary nitrate by facultative anaerobic bacteria in the mouth. The remaining nitrite is then absorbed into the circulation where it acts as a storage pool for subsequent NO• production, which is expedited in hypoxaemia.

Localised hypoxemia such as that observed in the digital vasculature of individuals with RP is a potential therapeutic target for dietary nitrate supplementation. In contrast to organic nitrates (GTN), inorganic nitrate (in the form of beetroot juice) does not cause the same negative side effects or demonstrate tachyphylaxis whilst it does notable improve skin blood flow, microvascular function and lower blood pressure (BP) in healthy individuals and chronic conditions such as hypertension, peripheral arterial disease, heart failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Thus concentrated beetroot juice (CBJ) may offer an inexpensive, safe and potentially effective intervention to improve the pain and reduced peripheral blood flow characterising individuals with RP.

RP can cause significant discomfort and pain to individuals during a vasospasm. Dietary nitrate appears to offer a simple, low cost means of modifying blood flow to the peripheries and, ultimately, reducing both the discomfort and pain experienced by individuals with RP. This study will also advance our understanding of the aetiology and pathophysiology of RP, specifically the role that the nitrate-nitrite-nitric oxide pathway might play in modulating RP symptoms. An understanding of the effects of concentrated beetroot juice on microvascular blood flow and pain may lead to a range of simple, low cost and effective therapeutic interventions to prevent and treat episodes of RP.

02

Conditions studied

  • Raynaud Phenomenon

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Nitrate
  • Nitric oxide
  • Microvascular
03

In context

Raynaud Disease

83 studies on the registry are indexed under Raynaud Disease; 8 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 27 is close to the median of 30 across 71 interventional studies indexed under Raynaud Disease.

Browse Raynaud Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Portsmouth is the lead sponsor of 32 studies on the registry; 6 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Male or Female, aged 18 years or above.
  • Diagnosed with Raynaud's Phenomenon.
  • Participant is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

The participant may not enter the study if ANY of the following apply:

  • Patients with significant renal impairment (eGFR\<30)
  • Uncontrolled hypertension,
  • Taking regular organic nitrates, nicorandil, or thiazolidinidiones,
  • or any medication which may interfere with data interpretation or safety,
  • who have had a myocardial infarction or cerebro-vascular event,
  • who smoke,
  • or any other serious medical condition which would interfere with data interpretation or safety will be excluded from participation.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
27 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Beetroot juice then nitrate depleted beetroot juice

    Participants will be asked to consume 140ml of beetroot juice prior to their first experimental visit. Participants will then be asked to consume 70ml a day for 2 weeks and final visit the investigators once more following another 140ml drink.

    Dietary Supplement: Concentrated beetroot juice

  • Experimental
    Nitrate depleted beetroot juice then beetroot juice

    Participants will be asked to consume 140ml of placebo prior to their first experimental visit. Participants will then be asked to consume 70ml a day for 2 weeks and final visit the investigators once more following another 140ml drink.

    Dietary Supplement: Concentrated beetroot juice

Interventions

  • Dietary supplementConcentrated beetroot juice

    Acute and chronic supplementation of beetroot juice.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Peripheral Blood Flow

    Peripheral blood flow (CVC = skin flux/MAP; flux.mmHg-1).

    Time frame: Baseline (day 1), Acute (2 or 23), Chronic (day 16 or 36).

  2. Skin Temperature.

    Skin temperature (via thermal imaging).

    Time frame: Baseline (day 1), Acute (2 or 23), Chronic (day 16 or 36).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Perceived Discomfort

    Perceived discomfort. Thermal discomfort were measured using a 20 cm scale (0 = very cold/uncomfortable; 10 = neutral; 20 = very hot/comfortable; modified from Zhang et al. (2004)) and recorded prior to immersion, during immersion and every 2 minutes of the rewarming period.

    Time frame: Baseline (day 1), Acute (2 or 23), Chronic (day 16 or 36).

  2. Acceptability to Participants

    Interview. Specifically, semi-structured interviews explored participants' experiences of the study procedures and consumption of beetroot juice. Interviews were conducted by a researcher with experience in qualitative research methods. Interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed through thematic analysis as outlined by Braun and Clarke (2006). Participants were asked about the testing procedures and their thoughts on the juice.

    Time frame: During qualitative interviews after the intervention has ended (post day 36).

  3. Overall Number of Participants Recruited

    Number of participants who remained in the study

    Time frame: From start of study recruitment until the last participant is randomised. Estimated assesment period 6 - 52 weeks

  4. Perceived Pain

    Perceived pain. Pain sensation was assessed using a numerical rating scale for pain (0 no pain, 10 unimaginable, unspeakable pain; (Ferreira-Valente et al., 2011)) at the same time points.

    Time frame: Baseline (day 1), Acute (2 or 23), Chronic (day 16 or 36).

  5. Feasible to Participants

    Feasible to participants via interview. Specifically, semi-structured interviews explored participants' experiences of the study procedures and consumption of beetroot juice. Interviews were conducted by a researcher with experience in qualitative research methods. Interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed through thematic analysis as outlined by Braun and Clarke (2006).

    Time frame: During qualitative interviews after the intervention has ended (post day 36).

  6. Establish Retention Rates

    Establish retention rates (Descriptive statistics)

    Time frame: From date of randomization until the end of the last study visit. Estimated assesment period 6 - 52 weeks

07

Results

Posted Feb 10, 2020

Participant flow

96 people were assessed for eligibility from clinic letters, word of mouth, local groups and via the clinical trials website. Recruitment occurred from 06-07-2017 - 29-05-2018.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneBeetroot Juice, Then Nitrate Depleted Beetroot JuiceNitrate Depleted Beetroot Juice, Then Beetroot Juice
Started1313
Completed1211
Not completed12

Outcome measures

PrimaryPeripheral Blood Flow

Peripheral blood flow (CVC = skin flux/MAP; flux.mmHg-1).

Time frame:
Baseline (day 1), Acute (2 or 23), Chronic (day 16 or 36).
Reported as:
Mean · flux.mmHg-1
Peripheral Blood Flow
flux.mmHg-1Concentrated Beetroot JuiceNitrate Depleted Beetroot Juice
Baseline (day 1)3.7 ± 0.43.7 ± 0.4
Acute (2 or 23)4.1 ± 0.33.7 ± 0.3
Chronic (day 16 or 36)4.7 ± 0.45.2 ± 0.4
PrimarySkin Temperature.

Skin temperature (via thermal imaging).

Time frame:
Baseline (day 1), Acute (2 or 23), Chronic (day 16 or 36).
Reported as:
Mean · Degree Celsius
Skin Temperature.
Degree CelsiusConcentrated Beetroot JuiceNitrate Depleted Beetroot Juice
Baseline (day 1)32.4 ± 3.032.4 ± 3.0
Acute (day 2 or 23)32.1 ± 2.932.0 ± 3.0
Chronic (day 16 or 36)32.2 ± 3.432.4 ± 2.9
SecondaryPerceived Discomfort

Perceived discomfort. Thermal discomfort were measured using a 20 cm scale (0 = very cold/uncomfortable; 10 = neutral; 20 = very hot/comfortable; modified from Zhang et al. (2004)) and recorded prior to immersion, during immersion and every 2 minutes of the rewarming period.

Time frame:
Baseline (day 1), Acute (2 or 23), Chronic (day 16 or 36).
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Perceived Discomfort
score on a scaleConcentrated Beetroot JuiceNitrate Depleted Beetroot Juice
Baseline (day 1)13.4 ± 3.813.4 ± 3.8
Acute (day 2 or 23)13.1 ± 3.212.6 ± 3.7
Chronic (day 16 or 36)13.5 ± 3.512.9 ± 3.0
SecondaryAcceptability to Participants

Interview. Specifically, semi-structured interviews explored participants' experiences of the study procedures and consumption of beetroot juice. Interviews were conducted by a researcher with experience in qualitative research methods. Interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed through thematic analysis as outlined by Braun and Clarke (2006). Participants were asked about the testing procedures and their thoughts on the juice.

Time frame:
During qualitative interviews after the intervention has ended (post day 36).
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Acceptability to Participants
ParticipantsConcentrated Beetroot JuiceNitrate Depleted Beetroot Juice
Acceptability to Participants1010
SecondaryOverall Number of Participants Recruited

Number of participants who remained in the study

Time frame:
From start of study recruitment until the last participant is randomised. Estimated assesment period 6 - 52 weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Overall Number of Participants Recruited
ParticipantsConcentrated Beetroot Juice
Overall Number of Participants Recruited23
SecondaryPerceived Pain

Perceived pain. Pain sensation was assessed using a numerical rating scale for pain (0 no pain, 10 unimaginable, unspeakable pain; (Ferreira-Valente et al., 2011)) at the same time points.

Time frame:
Baseline (day 1), Acute (2 or 23), Chronic (day 16 or 36).
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Perceived Pain
score on a scaleConcentrated Beetroot JuiceNitrate Depleted Beetroot Juice
Baseline (day 1)0.2 ± 0.60.2 ± 0.6
Acute (day 2 or 23)0.3 ± 0.80.2 ± 0.6
Chronic (day 16 or 36)0.2 ± 0.60.9 ± 2.7
SecondaryFeasible to Participants

Feasible to participants via interview. Specifically, semi-structured interviews explored participants' experiences of the study procedures and consumption of beetroot juice. Interviews were conducted by a researcher with experience in qualitative research methods. Interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed through thematic analysis as outlined by Braun and Clarke (2006).

Time frame:
During qualitative interviews after the intervention has ended (post day 36).
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Feasible to Participants
ParticipantsConcentrated Beetroot JuiceNitrate Depleted Beetroot Juice
Feasible to Participants1010
SecondaryEstablish Retention Rates

Establish retention rates (Descriptive statistics)

Time frame:
From date of randomization until the end of the last study visit. Estimated assesment period 6 - 52 weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Establish Retention Rates
ParticipantsOverall Number of Participants Analyzed
Establish Retention Rates23

Adverse events

Collected over Two weeks for each intervention.. Non-serious events are listed at a 1% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Concentrated Beetroot Juice0/26 (0%)0/26 (0%)3/26 (11.5%)
Nitrate Depleted Beetroot Juice0/26 (0%)0/26 (0%)2/26 (7.7%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventConcentrated Beetroot JuiceNitrate Depleted Beetroot Juice
GI distressGastrointestinal disorders1/261/26
Nausea / sicknessGeneral disorders1/261/26
Hot flushBlood and lymphatic system disorders1/260/26

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Beetroot Juice, Then, Nitrate Depleted Beetroot JuiceNitrate Depleted Beetroot Juice, Then, Beetroot JuiceTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years448
>=65 years7815
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Beetroot Juice, Then, Nitrate Depleted Beetroot JuiceNitrate Depleted Beetroot Juice, Then, Beetroot JuiceTotal
Mean65.7 ± 16.063.0 ± 15.264.3 ± 15.3
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Beetroot Juice, Then, Nitrate Depleted Beetroot JuiceNitrate Depleted Beetroot Juice, Then, Beetroot JuiceTotal
Female81119
Male314
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Beetroot Juice, Then, Nitrate Depleted Beetroot JuiceNitrate Depleted Beetroot Juice, Then, Beetroot JuiceTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American101
White101222
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)Beetroot Juice, Then, Nitrate Depleted Beetroot JuiceNitrate Depleted Beetroot Juice, Then, Beetroot JuiceTotal
United Kingdom111223
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Department of Sport and Exercise Science
    Portsmouth, Hampshire PO1 2ER, United Kingdom
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Aug 15, 2017

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — There is no plan to release IPD, until all avenues of further funding have been exhausted.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 10, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03129178
Lead sponsor
University of Portsmouth
Collaborators
Loughborough University, University of Exeter
Responsible party
Ant Shepherd (Lecturer, University of Portsmouth) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 26, 2017
Start date
Jul 1, 2017
Primary completion
Jul 1, 2018
Completion
Oct 1, 2018
Results posted
Feb 10, 2020
Last update
Feb 10, 2020

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion