ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03123406ACTIVEUpdated Apr 29, 2024

Efficacy and Safety of Cinacalcet in Ca, P and iPTH Levels in Patients With Mild, Moderate and Severe SHPT

A Phase 4 interventional study of Cinacalcet HCl in Hyperparathyroidism; Secondary, Renal, sponsored by Kyowa Kirin China Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.. Completed at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-04-29.

Primary conditionHyperparathyroidism, SecondaryRegistry: HyperparathyroidismReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Hyperparathyroidism — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Hyperparathyroidism, Secondary
Why
  1. The study's title name Hyperparathyroidism, Secondary, a narrower term within Hyperparathyroidism.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own title. Of 46 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 72% were exactly right and 89% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 4% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by Kyowa Kirin China Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (formerly part of Kyowa Kirin Co., Ltd.) · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
750
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 28 studies testing cinacalcet in Hyperparathyroidism, Secondary — none open to participants now, none under way, none of them phase 3. Cinacalcet · Hyperparathyroidism, Secondary.

Enrollment
2nd of 27
750 · median 71
Started
2017
the only one that year
Phase 4
13 of 28
none open now
Registered
28th of 28
by date
Lead sponsor
1 of 28
Kyowa Kirin China Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.

Among the 28 studies testing cinacalcet in Hyperparathyroidism, Secondary, this one is the 2nd largest by enrollment of the 27 interventional ones, is the only one that started in 2017, is one of 13 in phase 4, and was the 28th registered.

By phase

28 studies; the count open now beside each. This study's row is marked.

Phase 4this study13 · 0 open
Phase 37 · 0 open
Phase 25 · 0 open
Phase 11 · 0 open
Phase 1/21 · 0 open
Phase 2/31 · 0 open

By the year they started

First in 2001; this study’s year is marked. 1 started in 2017.

Tested beside cinacalcet

Size and results

Median enrollment 71 across the 27 interventional studies. Of the 27 that completed or were terminated, 14 (52%) have results posted.

Download CSVWith an account: the 28 studies testing cinacalcet in Hyperparathyroidism, Secondary as a file.
02

Study summary

  1. To evaluate achievement ratio of iPTH,Calcium and phosphorus after taking Cinacalcet HCL in hemodialysis subjects with mild, moderate and severe SHPT;
  2. To explore the impact of Cinacalcet HCL using on the combined use of drugs;
  3. To explore the difference of patients who continued or discontinued Cinacalcet HCL in real-world period from 33rd to 52nd week.
03

Conditions studied

  • Hyperparathyroidism; Secondary, Renal

Keywords

  • cinacalcet
  • secondary hyperparathyroidism
  • calcimimetics
  • CKD-MBD
04

In context

Hyperparathyroidism, Secondary Reclassified

188 studies on the registry are indexed under Hyperparathyroidism, Secondary; 15 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 750 is above the median of 62 across 146 interventional studies indexed under Hyperparathyroidism, Secondary.

Browse Hyperparathyroidism, Secondary studies →

Lead sponsor

Kyowa Kirin China Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. is the lead sponsor of 4 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

First submitted before Kyowa Kirin China Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. left Kyowa Kirin Co., Ltd..

Compared within Hyperparathyroidism, Secondary, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Hyperparathyroidism. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

05

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Parents/guardians must sign ;

Must be males or females whose age are 18 to 75 years old;

Clinical diagnosis of chronic kidney disease on maintenance hemodialysis with secondary hyperparathyroidism;

iPTH must be equal or higher than 300Pg/ml;

Must not have received Calcimimetics(for example, Cinacalcet) within 6 months prior to enrollment;

Must have been on maintenance hemodialysis 3 times weekly (TIW) for at least 3 months(12 weeks) prior to enrollment and must be expected to remain on hemodialysis for the duration of the study;

Over 2-year .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Hypocalcemia [Corrected serum calcium level less than 2.1mmol/L(8.4mg/dL);

History of gastrointestinal bleeding or peptic ulcer disease and possibility of deterioration or recurrence;

Severe heart disease;

Epilepsy risk or history of epilepsy;

to Cinacalcet;

Drug abuse/addiction;

Plan to receive renal transplantation within 52 weeks;

Pregnant or lactating women;

Pregnancy plan within 1 years, or no guarantee on taking effective measures within 1 year after enrollment;

Participated in other clinical trials within 4 weeks prior to enrollment;

Received parathyroidectomy within 24 weeks prior to enrollment;

Investigator judgment that patients are not suitable to enroll.

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

06

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
750 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Severe SHPT

    Administer Cinacalcet HCL to subjects whose iPTH\>900 pg/ml from 1st to 32nd week.

    Drug: Cinacalcet HCl

  • Experimental
    Moderate SHPT

    Administer Cinacalcet HCL to subjects whose 600≤iPTH\<900 pg/ml from 1st to 32nd week.

    Drug: Cinacalcet HCl

  • Experimental
    Mild SHPT

    Administer Cinacalcet HCL to subjects whose 300≤iPTH\<600 pg/ml from 1st to 32nd week.

    Drug: Cinacalcet HCl

Interventions

  • Administer Cinacalcet HCL to all subjects from 1st to 32nd week. Subjects choose to buy and take Cinacalcet HCL in real-world period from 33rd to 52nd week.

    Also known as: Regpara

07

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Compared with baseline data, the proportion of subjects reaching iPTH target at 20th week

    blood test

    Time frame: 20 weeks

  2. Compared with baseline data, the proportion of subjects reaching iPTH target at 32nd week

    blood test

    Time frame: 32 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Compared with baseline data, the proportion of patients reaching Ca & P target simultaneously at 32nd week

    blood test

    Time frame: 32 weeks

  2. Compared with baseline data, the proportion of patients with ≥ 30% reduction in iPTH level at 20th week

    blood test

    Time frame: 20 weeks

  3. Compared with baseline data, the proportion of patients with ≥ 30% reduction in iPTH level at 32nd week

    blood test

    Time frame: 32 weeks

  4. The proportion of patients once reaching iPTH target during 1st~32nd week

    blood test

    Time frame: 32 weeks

  5. The proportion of patients once reaching iPTH target during 33rd~52nd week

    blood test

    Time frame: 52 weeks

  6. Compared with baseline data, the change of Ca × P at 20th week

    blood test

    Time frame: 20 weeks

  7. Compared with baseline data, the change of Ca × P at 32nd week

    blood test

    Time frame: 32 weeks

  8. Compared with baseline data, the change of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) at 20th week

    blood test

    Time frame: 20 weeks

  9. Compared with baseline data, the change of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) at 32nd week

    blood test

    Time frame: 32 weeks

  10. Compared with baseline data, the change of fibroblast growth factor 23(FGF23) at 20th week

    blood test

    Time frame: 20 weeks

  11. Compared with baseline data, the change of fibroblast growth factor 23(FGF23) at 32nd week

    blood test

    Time frame: 32 weeks

  12. Compared with baseline data, the adjustment (type or amount) of calcium agents at 20th week

    medication evaluation

    Time frame: 20 weeks

  13. Compared with baseline data, the adjustment (type or amount) of calcium agents at 32nd week

    medication evaluation

    Time frame: 32 weeks

  14. Compared with baseline data, the adjustment (type or amount) of phosphate binders at 20th week

    medication evaluation

    Time frame: 20 weeks

  15. Compared with baseline data, the adjustment (type or amount) of phosphate binders at 32nd week

    medication evaluation

    Time frame: 32 weeks

  16. Compared with baseline data, the adjustment (type or amount) of vitamin D and its analogues at 20th week

    medication evaluation

    Time frame: 20 weeks

  17. Compared with baseline data, the adjustment (type or amount) of vitamin D and its analogues at 32nd week

    medication evaluation

    Time frame: 32 weeks

  18. Compared with baseline data, the adjustment (type or amount) of diphosphonic acid salts at 20th week

    medication evaluation

    Time frame: 20 weeks

  19. Compared with baseline data, the adjustment (type or amount) of diphosphonic acid salts at 32nd week

    medication evaluation

    Time frame: 32 weeks

  20. Compared with the data at 32nd week, the proportional change of patients reaching iPTH target at 52nd week who continue Cinacalcet treatment during 20-week real world period

    blood test

    Time frame: 52 weeks

  21. Compared with the data at 32nd week, the proportional change of patients reaching iPTH target at 52nd week who discontinue Cinacalcet treatment after 20-week real world period

    blood test

    Time frame: 52 weeks

  22. Compared with the data at 32nd week, the proportional change of patients reaching Ca target at 52nd week who continue Cinacalcet treatment after 20-week real world period

    blood test

    Time frame: 52 weeks

  23. Compared with the data at 32nd week, the proportional change of patients reaching Ca target at 52nd week who discontinue Cinacalcet treatment after 20-week real world period

    blood test

    Time frame: 52 weeks

  24. Compared with the data at 32nd week, the proportional change of patients reaching P target at 52nd week who continue Cinacalcet treatment after 20-week real world period

    blood test

    Time frame: 52 weeks

  25. Compared with the data at 32nd week, the proportional change of patients reaching P target at 52nd week who discontinue Cinacalcet treatment after 20-week real world period

    blood test

    Time frame: 52 weeks

  26. Compared with the data at 32nd week, the proportional change of patients reaching Ca × P target at 52nd week who continue Cinacalcet treatment after 20-week real world period

    blood test

    Time frame: 52 weeks

  27. Compared with the data at 32nd week, the proportional change of patients reaching Ca × P target at 52nd week who discontinue Cinacalcet treatment after 20-week real world period

    blood test

    Time frame: 52 weeks

  28. The dose change of calcium agents which were used by patients for chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder(CKD-MBD) treatment during 20-week real world period

    medication evaluation

    Time frame: 20 weeks

  29. The dose change of phosphate binders which were used by patients for chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder(CKD-MBD) treatment during 20-week real world period

    medication evaluation

    Time frame: 20 weeks

  30. The dose change of vitamin D and its analogues which were used by patients for chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder(CKD-MBD) treatment during 20-week real world period

    medication evaluation

    Time frame: 20 weeks

  31. The dose change of diphosphonic acid salts which were used by patients for chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder(CKD-MBD) treatment during 20-week real world period

    medication evaluation

    Time frame: 20 weeks

  32. The reasons of patients discontinuing Cinacalcet in 20-week real world

    List presentation

    Time frame: 20 weeks

08

Study locations

1 site
  • Nanjing Jinling Hospital
    Nanjing, Jiangsu 210002, China
09

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 29, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03123406
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 21, 2017
Start date
Apr 19, 2017
Primary completion
Apr 20, 2019
Completion
Sep 6, 2019
Last update
Apr 29, 2024

Study contacts

Zhihong Liu
study chair · Jinling Hospital, China
Zhaohui Ni
principal investigator · RenJi Hospital
Zhangsuo Liu
principal investigator · The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University
Jiazhuang Lou
principal investigator · The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University
Guanqing Xiao
principal investigator · First People's Hospital of Foshan
Li Hao
principal investigator · The Second Hospital of Anhui Medial University
Ping Fu
principal investigator · West China Hopsital, Sichuan University
Yisheng Ling
principal investigator · Zhongshan Hospital Xiamen University
Xuemei Li
principal investigator · Peking Union Medical College Hospital
Shixiang Wang
principal investigator · Beijing Chao Yang Hospital
Aihua Zhang
principal investigator · Peking University Third Hospital
Xiaonong Chen
principal investigator · Ruijin Hospital
Jing Chen
principal investigator · Huashan Hospital
Li Zuo
principal investigator · Peking University People's Hospital
Aili Jiang
principal investigator · Tianjin Medical University Second Hospital
Guohua Ding
principal investigator · Hubei General Hospital
Jianying Niu
principal investigator · The Fifth People's Hospital of Shanghai, Fudan University
Yonghui Mao
principal investigator · Beijing Hospital
Qiang He
principal investigator · Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital
Chaosheng Chen
principal investigator · First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University
Hong Liu
principal investigator · Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University
Junwei Yang
principal investigator · Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University
Jianming Ye
principal investigator · The First People's Hospital of Kunshan

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Cinacalcet

Start the discussion