CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03123406ACTIVEUpdated Apr 29, 2024

Efficacy and Safety of Cinacalcet in Ca, P and iPTH Levels in Patients With Mild, Moderate and Severe SHPT

A Phase 4 interventional study of Cinacalcet HCl in Hyperparathyroidism; Secondary, Renal, sponsored by Kyowa Kirin China Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.. Completed at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-04-29.

Sponsored by Kyowa Kirin China Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
750
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

  1. To evaluate achievement ratio of iPTH,Calcium and phosphorus after taking Cinacalcet HCL in hemodialysis subjects with mild, moderate and severe SHPT;
  2. To explore the impact of Cinacalcet HCL using on the combined use of drugs;
  3. To explore the difference of patients who continued or discontinued Cinacalcet HCL in real-world period from 33rd to 52nd week.
02

Conditions studied

  • Hyperparathyroidism; Secondary, Renal

Keywords

  • cinacalcet
  • secondary hyperparathyroidism
  • calcimimetics
  • CKD-MBD
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Parents/guardians must sign informed consent;

Must be males or females whose age are 18 to 75 years old;

Clinical diagnosis of chronic kidney disease on maintenance hemodialysis with secondary hyperparathyroidism;

iPTH must be equal or higher than 300Pg/ml;

Must not have received Calcimimetics(for example, Cinacalcet) within 6 months prior to enrollment;

Must have been on maintenance hemodialysis 3 times weekly (TIW) for at least 3 months(12 weeks) prior to enrollment and must be expected to remain on hemodialysis for the duration of the study;

Over 2-year life expectancy.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Hypocalcemia [Corrected serum calcium level less than 2.1mmol/L(8.4mg/dL);

History of gastrointestinal bleeding or peptic ulcer disease and possibility of deterioration or recurrence;

Severe heart disease;

Epilepsy risk or history of epilepsy;

Hypersensitivity to Cinacalcet;

Drug abuse/addiction;

Plan to receive renal transplantation within 52 weeks;

Pregnant or lactating women;

Pregnancy plan within 1 years, or no guarantee on taking effective contraceptive measures within 1 year after enrollment;

Participated in other clinical trials within 4 weeks prior to enrollment;

Received parathyroidectomy within 24 weeks prior to enrollment;

Investigator judgment that patients are not suitable to enroll.

04

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
750 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Severe SHPT

    Administer Cinacalcet HCL to subjects whose iPTH\>900 pg/ml from 1st to 32nd week.

    Drug: Cinacalcet HCl

  • Experimental
    Moderate SHPT

    Administer Cinacalcet HCL to subjects whose 600≤iPTH\<900 pg/ml from 1st to 32nd week.

    Drug: Cinacalcet HCl

  • Experimental
    Mild SHPT

    Administer Cinacalcet HCL to subjects whose 300≤iPTH\<600 pg/ml from 1st to 32nd week.

    Drug: Cinacalcet HCl

Interventions

  • DrugCinacalcet HCl

    Administer Cinacalcet HCL to all subjects from 1st to 32nd week. Subjects choose to buy and take Cinacalcet HCL in real-world period from 33rd to 52nd week.

    Also known as: Regpara

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Compared with baseline data, the proportion of subjects reaching iPTH target at 20th week

    blood test

    Time frame: 20 weeks

  2. Compared with baseline data, the proportion of subjects reaching iPTH target at 32nd week

    blood test

    Time frame: 32 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Compared with baseline data, the proportion of patients reaching Ca & P target simultaneously at 32nd week

    blood test

    Time frame: 32 weeks

  2. Compared with baseline data, the proportion of patients with ≥ 30% reduction in iPTH level at 20th week

    blood test

    Time frame: 20 weeks

  3. Compared with baseline data, the proportion of patients with ≥ 30% reduction in iPTH level at 32nd week

    blood test

    Time frame: 32 weeks

  4. The proportion of patients once reaching iPTH target during 1st~32nd week

    blood test

    Time frame: 32 weeks

  5. The proportion of patients once reaching iPTH target during 33rd~52nd week

    blood test

    Time frame: 52 weeks

  6. Compared with baseline data, the change of Ca × P at 20th week

    blood test

    Time frame: 20 weeks

  7. Compared with baseline data, the change of Ca × P at 32nd week

    blood test

    Time frame: 32 weeks

  8. Compared with baseline data, the change of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) at 20th week

    blood test

    Time frame: 20 weeks

  9. Compared with baseline data, the change of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) at 32nd week

    blood test

    Time frame: 32 weeks

  10. Compared with baseline data, the change of fibroblast growth factor 23(FGF23) at 20th week

    blood test

    Time frame: 20 weeks

  11. Compared with baseline data, the change of fibroblast growth factor 23(FGF23) at 32nd week

    blood test

    Time frame: 32 weeks

  12. Compared with baseline data, the adjustment (type or amount) of calcium agents at 20th week

    medication evaluation

    Time frame: 20 weeks

  13. Compared with baseline data, the adjustment (type or amount) of calcium agents at 32nd week

    medication evaluation

    Time frame: 32 weeks

  14. Compared with baseline data, the adjustment (type or amount) of phosphate binders at 20th week

    medication evaluation

    Time frame: 20 weeks

  15. Compared with baseline data, the adjustment (type or amount) of phosphate binders at 32nd week

    medication evaluation

    Time frame: 32 weeks

  16. Compared with baseline data, the adjustment (type or amount) of vitamin D and its analogues at 20th week

    medication evaluation

    Time frame: 20 weeks

  17. Compared with baseline data, the adjustment (type or amount) of vitamin D and its analogues at 32nd week

    medication evaluation

    Time frame: 32 weeks

  18. Compared with baseline data, the adjustment (type or amount) of diphosphonic acid salts at 20th week

    medication evaluation

    Time frame: 20 weeks

  19. Compared with baseline data, the adjustment (type or amount) of diphosphonic acid salts at 32nd week

    medication evaluation

    Time frame: 32 weeks

  20. Compared with the data at 32nd week, the proportional change of patients reaching iPTH target at 52nd week who continue Cinacalcet treatment during 20-week real world period

    blood test

    Time frame: 52 weeks

  21. Compared with the data at 32nd week, the proportional change of patients reaching iPTH target at 52nd week who discontinue Cinacalcet treatment after 20-week real world period

    blood test

    Time frame: 52 weeks

  22. Compared with the data at 32nd week, the proportional change of patients reaching Ca target at 52nd week who continue Cinacalcet treatment after 20-week real world period

    blood test

    Time frame: 52 weeks

  23. Compared with the data at 32nd week, the proportional change of patients reaching Ca target at 52nd week who discontinue Cinacalcet treatment after 20-week real world period

    blood test

    Time frame: 52 weeks

  24. Compared with the data at 32nd week, the proportional change of patients reaching P target at 52nd week who continue Cinacalcet treatment after 20-week real world period

    blood test

    Time frame: 52 weeks

  25. Compared with the data at 32nd week, the proportional change of patients reaching P target at 52nd week who discontinue Cinacalcet treatment after 20-week real world period

    blood test

    Time frame: 52 weeks

  26. Compared with the data at 32nd week, the proportional change of patients reaching Ca × P target at 52nd week who continue Cinacalcet treatment after 20-week real world period

    blood test

    Time frame: 52 weeks

  27. Compared with the data at 32nd week, the proportional change of patients reaching Ca × P target at 52nd week who discontinue Cinacalcet treatment after 20-week real world period

    blood test

    Time frame: 52 weeks

  28. The dose change of calcium agents which were used by patients for chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder(CKD-MBD) treatment during 20-week real world period

    medication evaluation

    Time frame: 20 weeks

  29. The dose change of phosphate binders which were used by patients for chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder(CKD-MBD) treatment during 20-week real world period

    medication evaluation

    Time frame: 20 weeks

  30. The dose change of vitamin D and its analogues which were used by patients for chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder(CKD-MBD) treatment during 20-week real world period

    medication evaluation

    Time frame: 20 weeks

  31. The dose change of diphosphonic acid salts which were used by patients for chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder(CKD-MBD) treatment during 20-week real world period

    medication evaluation

    Time frame: 20 weeks

  32. The reasons of patients discontinuing Cinacalcet in 20-week real world

    List presentation

    Time frame: 20 weeks

06

Study locations

1 site
  • Nanjing Jinling Hospital
    Nanjing, Jiangsu 210002, China
07

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03123406
Lead sponsor
Kyowa Kirin China Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 21, 2017
Start date
Apr 19, 2017
Primary completion
Apr 20, 2019
Completion
Sep 6, 2019
Last update
Apr 29, 2024

Study contacts

Zhihong Liu
study chair · Jinling Hospital, China
Zhaohui Ni
principal investigator · RenJi Hospital
Zhangsuo Liu
principal investigator · The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University
Jiazhuang Lou
principal investigator · The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University
Guanqing Xiao
principal investigator · First People's Hospital of Foshan
Li Hao
principal investigator · The Second Hospital of Anhui Medial University
Ping Fu
principal investigator · West China Hopsital, Sichuan University
Yisheng Ling
principal investigator · Zhongshan Hospital Xiamen University
Xuemei Li
principal investigator · Peking Union Medical College Hospital
Shixiang Wang
principal investigator · Beijing Chao Yang Hospital
Aihua Zhang
principal investigator · Peking University Third Hospital
Xiaonong Chen
principal investigator · Ruijin Hospital
Jing Chen
principal investigator · Huashan Hospital
Li Zuo
principal investigator · Peking University People's Hospital
Aili Jiang
principal investigator · Tianjin Medical University Second Hospital
Guohua Ding
principal investigator · Hubei General Hospital
Jianying Niu
principal investigator · The Fifth People's Hospital of Shanghai, Fudan University
Yonghui Mao
principal investigator · Beijing Hospital
Qiang He
principal investigator · Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital
Chaosheng Chen
principal investigator · First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University
Hong Liu
principal investigator · Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University
Junwei Yang
principal investigator · Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University
Jianming Ye
principal investigator · The First People's Hospital of Kunshan

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion