CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03111875PROTECTUpdated Aug 1, 2023Results posted

Perioperative Hypothermia and Myocardial Injury After Non-cardiac Surgery

An interventional study of aggressive warming and routine thermal management in Perioperative Care, Surgery--Complications and Hypothermia; Anesthesia, sponsored by The Cleveland Clinic. Completed at 11 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 45 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-08-01.

Sponsored by The Cleveland Clinic · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
5,056
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
45 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

We propose to test the hypothesis that aggressive warming reduces the incidence of major cardiovascular complications, compared to routine care. Half of the participants will be randomly assigned to routine care (core temperature ≈35.5°C), while the other half will receive aggressive warming (>37°C core temperature) in a multi-center trial.

Read the detailed description

Hypothermia increases sympathetic activation, promotes tachycardia, and causes hypertension - all of which may increase the risk of myocardial injury. Moderate perioperative hypothermia is now uncommon, but mild hyperthermia (≈35.5°C) remains common. Whether aggressive warming to a truly normothermic level (≈37°C) improves outcomes remains unknown.

02

Conditions studied

  • Perioperative Care
  • Surgery--Complications
  • Hypothermia; Anesthesia
  • Myocardial Injury

Keywords

  • Hypothermia
  • Intraoperative warming
  • non-cardiac surgery
  • myocardial injury
03

In context

Hypothermia

499 studies on the registry are indexed under Hypothermia; 54 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 5,056 is above the median of 80 across 351 interventional studies indexed under Hypothermia.

Browse Hypothermia studies →

Lead sponsor

The Cleveland Clinic is the lead sponsor of 818 studies on the registry; 118 are open to participants now.

Of its 89 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 72 (81%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
45 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Scheduled for major noncardiac surgery expected to last 2-6 hours;
  • Having general anesthesia;
  • Expected to require at least overnight hospitalization;
  • Expected to have >50% of the anterior skin surface available for warming;
  • Have at least one of the following risk factors:

    a. Age over 65 years; b. History of peripheral vascular surgery; c. History of coronary artery disease; d. History of stroke or transient ischemic attack; e. Serum creatinine >175 µmal/L (>2.0 mg/dl); f. Diabetes requiring medication; e. Hypertension requiring medication; g. Current smoking.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Have a clinically important coagulopathy in the judgement of the attending anesthesiologist;
  • Are septic (clinical diagnosis by the attending anesthesiologist);
  • Body mass index exceeding 30 kg/m2;
  • End-stage renal disease requiring dialysis;
  • Surgeon believes patient to be at particular infection risk.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
5,056 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Routine thermal management

    Patients assigned to routine thermal management will not be pre-warmed and ambient intraoperative temperature will be maintained near 20°C per routine. Only transfused blood will be warmed. An Multi-Position Upper Body Warming Blanket forced-air cover will be positioned over an appropriate non-operative site, but will not initially be activated. Should core temperature decrease to 35.5°C, the warmer will be activated as necessary to prevent core temperature from decreasing further.

    Device: routine thermal management

  • Experimental
    Aggressive thermal management

    Patients assigned to aggressive warming will be pre-warmed with a full-body Bair Hugger or Bair Paws cover for ≈30 minutes before induction of anesthesia. The warmer will initially be set to "high" which corresponds to ≈43°C. It will be subsequently adjusted to make patients feel warm, but not uncomfortably so. Patients will be aggressively warmed during surgery to a target intraoperative core temperature between 37 and 37.5°C, using an Multi-Position Upper Body and Full Access Underbody Warming Blankets forced-air covers when clinically practical. All intravenous fluids will be warmed to body temperature.

    Device: aggressive warming

Interventions

  • Deviceaggressive warming

    Patients will be pre-warming 30 minutes before induction of anesthesia and aggressively warmed during surgery to a target intraoperative core temperature between 37 and 37.5°C.

  • Deviceroutine thermal management

    A forced-air cover will be positioned but will not initially be activated. The warmer will be activated when core temperature decrease to 35.5°C.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With a Composite Outcome Consisted of Myocardial Injury After Non-cardiac Surgery (MINS), Non-fatal Cardiac Arrest, and All-cause Mortality

    The primary outcome was a composite of myocardial injury after non-cardiac surgery, non-fatal cardiac arrest, and all-cause mortality within 30 days of surgery. Myocardial injury was diagnosed when available troponin concentrations exceeded generation-specific and type-specific thresholds and were apparently of ischaemic origin (ie, no other obvious cause for artifactual elevation). We used the following thresholds based on available literature at time of adjudication: 1) non-high-sensitivity (fourth-generation) troponin T ≥0.03 ng/ml2; 2) high-sensitivity troponin T ≥65 ng/L; or high-sensitivity troponin T 20-64 ng/L and an increase ≥5 ng/L from baseline3; 3) high-sensitivity troponin I (Abbott assay) is ≥75 ng/L4; 4) high-sensitivity troponin I (Siemens assay) is ≥60 ng/L5; or, 5) troponin I (other assays) greater than local 99th percentiles. Myocardial infarction diagnosis required both troponin elevation and at least one diagnostic symptom or sign.

    Time frame: From the end of surgery to 30 days after surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Deep or Organ-space Surgical Site Infection

    Surgical site infection is defined by US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria. It is consisted of superficial infection, deep infection, and organ-space infection. Superficial infection: Infection involves only skin or subcutaneous tissue of the incision. Deep infection: Infection appears to be related to the operation and infection involves deep soft tissues (e.g., fascial and muscle layers) of the incision. Organ-space infection: Infection involves any part of the anatomy (e.g., organs or spaces), other than the incision, which was opened or manipulated during an operation.

    Time frame: From the end of surgery to 30 days after surgery

  2. Number of Patients Requiring Intraoperative Transfusion

    intraoperative transfusion will be yes if this patient received more than 0 unit of red blood cells.

    Time frame: From surgery start to surgery end

  3. Duration of Hospitalization

    The length of hospital stay in days, censored at 30 days

    Time frame: From the day of surgery to the day of discharge, or 30 days after surgery if the patients is still hospitalized

  4. Readmission

    Readmission to a hospital within a month of surgery

    Time frame: From the end of surgery to 30 days after surgery

07

Results

Posted Aug 1, 2023

Participant flow

4 more patients were enrolled due to potential withdrawal.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneRoutine Thermal ManagementAggressive Thermal Management
Started25292527
Completed25062507
Not completed2320

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Participants With a Composite Outcome Consisted of Myocardial Injury After Non-cardiac Surgery (MINS), Non-fatal Cardiac Arrest, and All-cause Mortality

The primary outcome was a composite of myocardial injury after non-cardiac surgery, non-fatal cardiac arrest, and all-cause mortality within 30 days of surgery. Myocardial injury was diagnosed when available troponin concentrations exceeded generation-specific and type-specific thresholds and were apparently of ischaemic origin (ie, no other obvious cause for artifactual elevation). We used the following thresholds based on available literature at time of adjudication: 1) non-high-sensitivity (fourth-generation) troponin T ≥0.03 ng/ml2; 2) high-sensitivity troponin T ≥65 ng/L; or high-sensitivity troponin T 20-64 ng/L and an increase ≥5 ng/L from baseline3; 3) high-sensitivity troponin I (Abbott assay) is ≥75 ng/L4; 4) high-sensitivity troponin I (Siemens assay) is ≥60 ng/L5; or, 5) troponin I (other assays) greater than local 99th percentiles. Myocardial infarction diagnosis required both troponin elevation and at least one diagnostic symptom or sign.

Time frame:
From the end of surgery to 30 days after surgery
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With a Composite Outcome Consisted of Myocardial Injury After Non-cardiac Surgery (MINS), Non-fatal Cardiac Arrest, and All-cause Mortality
ParticipantsRoutine Thermal ManagementAggressive Thermal Management
Number of Participants With a Composite Outcome Consisted of Myocardial Injury After Non-cardiac Surgery (MINS), Non-fatal Cardiac Arrest, and All-cause Mortality239246
Statistical analysis
  • Routine Thermal Management vs Aggressive Thermal Management · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.69 · Risk ratio (rr): 1.04 · 95.6% CI 0.87 to 1.24
  • Routine Thermal Management vs Aggressive Thermal Management · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.10 · Risk ratio (rr): 0.68 · 95.6% CI 0.43 to 1.08
SecondaryDeep or Organ-space Surgical Site Infection

Surgical site infection is defined by US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria. It is consisted of superficial infection, deep infection, and organ-space infection. Superficial infection: Infection involves only skin or subcutaneous tissue of the incision. Deep infection: Infection appears to be related to the operation and infection involves deep soft tissues (e.g., fascial and muscle layers) of the incision. Organ-space infection: Infection involves any part of the anatomy (e.g., organs or spaces), other than the incision, which was opened or manipulated during an operation.

Time frame:
From the end of surgery to 30 days after surgery
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Deep or Organ-space Surgical Site Infection
ParticipantsRoutine Thermal ManagementAggressive Thermal Management
Deep or Organ-space Surgical Site Infection157178
Statistical analysis
  • Routine Thermal Management vs Aggressive Thermal Management · log-binomial models · p = 0.25 · Risk ratio (rr): 1.13 · 98.75% CI 0.87 to 1.47The relative risk was estimated using a GEE model to adjust for within-patient correlation across components and log link (to estimate relative risk).
SecondaryNumber of Patients Requiring Intraoperative Transfusion

intraoperative transfusion will be yes if this patient received more than 0 unit of red blood cells.

Time frame:
From surgery start to surgery end
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Patients Requiring Intraoperative Transfusion
ParticipantsRoutine Thermal ManagementAggressive Thermal Management
Number of Patients Requiring Intraoperative Transfusion236254
Statistical analysis
  • Routine Thermal Management vs Aggressive Thermal Management · log-binomial models · p = 0.41 · Risk ratio (rr): 1.07 · 98.75% CI 0.87 to 1.33The relative risk was estimated using a GEE model to adjust for within-patient correlation across components and log link (to estimate relative risk)
SecondaryDuration of Hospitalization

The length of hospital stay in days, censored at 30 days

Time frame:
From the day of surgery to the day of discharge, or 30 days after surgery if the patients is still hospitalized
Reported as:
Median · days
Duration of Hospitalization
daysRoutine Thermal ManagementAggressive Thermal Management
Duration of Hospitalization8 (6 to 12)8 (6 to 12)
SecondaryReadmission

Readmission to a hospital within a month of surgery

Time frame:
From the end of surgery to 30 days after surgery
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Readmission
ParticipantsRoutine Thermal ManagementAggressive Thermal Management
Readmission135161

Adverse events

Collected over from end of surgery to postoperative 30 days. Non-serious events are listed at a 0.003% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Routine Thermal Management24/2,506 (1%)30/2,506 (1.2%)24/2,506 (1%)
Aggressive Thermal Management18/2,507 (0.7%)17/2,507 (0.7%)22/2,507 (0.9%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventRoutine Thermal ManagementAggressive Thermal Management
InjuryInjury, poisoning and procedural complications10/25067/2507
hypotensionCardiac disorders6/25064/2507
respiratory disorderRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders5/25062/2507
Acute kidney injuryRenal and urinary disorders4/25061/2507
diarrhea or iluesGastrointestinal disorders2/25060/2507
vascular disorderVascular disorders0/25062/2507
blood transfusion issueBlood and lymphatic system disorders1/25060/2507
Intraoperative liver rupture, abdominal bleedingHepatobiliary disorders1/25060/2507
infectionInfections and infestations1/25061/2507
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventRoutine Thermal ManagementAggressive Thermal Management
Injury, poisoning and procedural complicationsInjury, poisoning and procedural complications10/25068/2507
Cardiac disordersCardiac disorders5/25065/2507
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disordersRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders4/25062/2507
General disordersGeneral disorders1/25063/2507
Gastrointestinal disordersGastrointestinal disorders2/25060/2507
Infections and infestationsInfections and infestations1/25062/2507
Vascular disordersVascular disorders1/25060/2507
Nervous system disordersNervous system disorders0/25061/2507
Renal and urinary disordersRenal and urinary disorders0/25061/2507

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Routine Thermal ManagementAggressive Thermal ManagementTotal
Mean67.2 ± 867.4 ± 867.3 ± 8
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Routine Thermal ManagementAggressive Thermal ManagementTotal
Female8018361637
Male170116683369
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)Routine Thermal ManagementAggressive Thermal ManagementTotal
Count of participants——0
Body mass index, kg/m^2
Body mass index, kg/m^2(kg/m^2)Routine Thermal ManagementAggressive Thermal ManagementTotal
Mean23.2 ± 323.4 ± 323.3 ± 3
Type of surgery
Type of surgery(Participants)Routine Thermal ManagementAggressive Thermal ManagementTotal
Orthopaedic4956105
Laparoscopic130113132614
Open abdominal6136101223
Neurosurgical89126215
Urological138138276
Other312261573
Unknown437
Type of troponin
Type of troponin(Participants)Routine Thermal ManagementAggressive Thermal ManagementTotal
Low-sensitivity T199200399
High-sensitivity T8258231648
Low-sensitivity I148214842966
Timing of surgery
Timing of surgery(Participants)Routine Thermal ManagementAggressive Thermal ManagementTotal
Elective243224404872
Urgent or emergent7064134
Unknown437
Risk of surgical site infection
Risk of surgical site infection(Participants)Routine Thermal ManagementAggressive Thermal ManagementTotal
Any infection risk141414212835
Colon resection392376768
Rectal resection344378722
Other abdominal surgeries407397804
Contaminated or dirty-infected wound438429867

2 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

11 sites
  • Cleveland Clinic Foundation
    Cleveland, Ohio 44195, United States
  • PUMCH
    Beijing, China
  • West China Hospital Sichuan Univeristy
    Chengdu, China
  • Guangdong General Hospital
    Guangzhou, China
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong
    Hong Kong, China
  • Queen Mary Hospital
    Hong Kong, China
  • Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital
    Nanjing, China
  • FDSCC (Fudan University Shanghai
    Shanghai, China
  • Shanghai Chest Hospital
    Shanghai, China
  • Shanghai Oriental Hospital
    Shanghai, China
  • Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital
    Shanghai, China
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Sessler DI, Pei L, Li K, Cui S, Chan MTV, Huang Y, Wu J, He X, Bajracharya GR, Rivas E, Lam CKM; PROTECT Investigators. Aggressive intraoperative warming versus routine thermal management during non-cardiac surgery (PROTECT): a multicentre, parallel group, superiority trial. Lancet. 2022 May 7;399(10337):1799-1808. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00560-8. Epub 2022 Apr 4. PubMed 35390321 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Feb 1, 2021

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Investigators are welcome to propose collaborative analyses.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Icf

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 1, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03111875
Lead sponsor
The Cleveland Clinic
Responsible party
d sessler (Principal Investigator, The Cleveland Clinic) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 13, 2017
Start date
Mar 27, 2017
Primary completion
Mar 16, 2021
Completion
May 17, 2022
Results posted
Aug 1, 2023
Last update
Aug 1, 2023

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion