ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03099733textingUpdated Apr 27, 2022

Concussion Texting Study

An interventional study of text message in Concussion, sponsored by Wake Forest University Health Sciences. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 12 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-04-27.

Sponsored by Wake Forest University Health Sciences · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
12 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This will be a prospective study of the implementation of a real-time assessment and intervention of a text messaging tool in mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) patients post-discharge from the emergency department.

Read the detailed description

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in children, resulting in an estimated 173,000 emergency department (ED) visits and 14,000 hospitalizations each year in the US. The estimated rate of TBI visits increased 57% from 2001-2009, and in 2010 there were more than 2.5 million TBI-related ED visits. Most patients are discharged from the ED and diagnosed with a closed head injury, minor head injury, concussion, or other unspecified head injury. After discharge, patients, family members, and other care partners may report certain mTBI symptoms that may lead to unnecessary utilization of healthcare services.

Novel, effective, and cost-effective solutions for mTBI symptom management post ED discharge are needed to improve the patient's understanding about their symptoms after discharge. Use of mobile technology to interact with mTBI patients may: 1) extend the reach of clinicians, 2) offer patients diagnosed with a mTBI a form of ongoing tailored clinical support, and 3) contribute to improved health outcomes and optimization of health care utilization. Previous research shows high compliance with text-message based interventions, measurable change in behavior, and prolonged adherence to clinical guidance. A recent randomized trial of mTBI patients showed high-compliance with text-message assessments following ED discharge, and a trend towards fewer and less severe post-mTBI symptoms in the intervention group. The investigators propose to develop and pilot a novel mobile phone text-messaging platform to perform real-time assessment and intervention of mTBI patients discharged from the ED. This intervention will empower patients to actively participate in the management of their condition. Use of this technology with the mTBI patient population is feasible and cost-effective. Over 90% of Americans own a cell phone or smartphone, and 80% send and receive text-messages.

The first objective of this research study is to develop and pilot the novel use of an existing technology, mobile phone text-messaging, to perform real-time assessment and feedback regarding symptoms of mTBI patients post-discharge from the ED. A second objective is to assess the effect of a brief, real-time, tailored intervention designed to impact patient and caregiver understanding of their mTBI related symptoms. The overarching goal of this proposal is to build on the work of Dr. Hirsch, et al. who found that: 1) mTBI patients report a poor understanding of concussion; 2) mTBI patients reported insufficient communication with clinicians regarding their symptoms following ED discharge (e.g., balance and sleep); and 3) mTBI patients reported poor care coordination, poor follow-up, and limited access to specialist physicians post-discharge.

Hypothesis: Based on prior work, implementation of a text-based tool for assessment and intervention of mTBI patients post-discharge from the CMC-Main \& LCH EDs will improve patient engagement related to mTBI. It is anticipated that 50% of potential study subjects will elect to receive text messages and that the differences in characteristics of enrolled participants versus non-participants will not be statistically significant. It is anticipated that > 75% of participants will respond/comply with the symptom assessment messages.

02

Conditions studied

  • Concussion

Browse trials for

03

In context

Brain Concussion

550 studies on the registry are indexed under Brain Concussion; 154 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 40 is below the median of 64 across 376 interventional studies indexed under Brain Concussion.

Browse Brain Concussion studies →

Lead sponsor

Wake Forest University Health Sciences is the lead sponsor of 1,345 studies on the registry; 198 are open to participants now.

Of its 328 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 249 (76%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
12 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 12 or greater and diagnosed with a concussion or closed head injury with intent to discharge from the ED
  • Blunt trauma mechanism of injury
  • GCS 14 or greater upon arrival to the ED
  • The patient or caregiver owns a cell phone with text messaging capability

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Penetrating trauma mechanism of injury
  • The patient or caregiver does not own a cell phone with text messaging capability or is unwilling to receive text messages
  • If the patient has a condition that makes him/her unable to communicate via text message
  • Known unavailability (travel, planned surgery, etc.) during the follow-up period
  • Planned admission to the hospital
  • Abnormal CT, if obtained
  • Social issues that preclude follow-up
  • Alcoholism
  • Major psychiatric or personality disorder
  • Incarceration or arrest
  • Baseline cognitive impairment
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
40 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    concussion

    patients who present to ED with concussion

    Other: text message

Interventions

  • Othertext message

    Participants will receive text message assessment and tailored intervention messages daily over the 14-day/two-week study period.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Feasibility assessment

    The intervention will be determined to be feasible if the majority of subjects respond to the text messages and complete follow-up, and if the majority of subjects that are approached agree to participate. The demographic and baseline characteristics of participants and non-participants will be assessed for significant differences that may have influenced the feasibility assessment.

    Time frame: Study duration (one year, anticipated)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Identify obstacles associated with the text messaging instrument

    Qualitative interview with participants by phone - participants will be asked about their thought and feelings related to the study assessment tool, relationships with the study physicians, text messaging impact on care and recommended changes.

    Time frame: 14 days

  2. Healthcare utilization

    To gauge the safety and effectiveness of the intervention, we will determine if there are patient level factors that increase the rate of follow-up and decrease direct cost of care.

    Time frame: 3 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Carolinas Medical Center
    Charlotte, North Carolina 28203, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Feb 2017 to primary completion in Feb 2018, 12 months.

Of 222 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Brain Concussion, half reached primary completion within 28 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 19 and three quarters within 48. This study's 12 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 236 studies reached it within 28 months; a quarter within 19 and three quarters within 48.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 6, 2017
First posted
Apr 4, 2017
StartActual
Feb 6, 2017
Primary completionActual
Feb 9, 2018
CompletionActual
Feb 9, 2018
Last update
Apr 27, 2022
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 27, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03099733
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 4, 2017
Start date
Feb 6, 2017
Primary completion
Feb 9, 2018
Completion
Feb 9, 2018
Last update
Apr 27, 2022

Study contacts

Chad Scarboro, MD
principal investigator · Carolinas Medical Center/Atrium Health

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion