An observational study in Low Back Pain, sponsored by KU Leuven. Completed at 1 site in Belgium. Open to participants aged 20 Years to 50 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-02-05.
Sponsored by KU Leuven · Observational
This project aims to elucidate neural correlates of proprioceptive deficits in patients with recurrent non-specific low back pain, by studying whether brain activation patterns during the processing of proprioceptive signals from the ankle muscles and lower back muscles are altered compared to healthy control subjects.
Low back pain is a highly prevalent health condition, with a reported lifetime prevalence of up to 84% worldwide. Currently, it induces more disability than any other health condition, such as depression, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or other musculoskeletal disorders. Approximately 85% of all low back pain complaints are non-specific, meaning that the pain cannot be attributed to a recognizable specific pathology such as an infection or vertebral fracture. While many patients with low back pain recover within a month, a large number of patients report a recurrence within one year. Current treatment interventions often remain unsuccessful, which highlights the current lack of knowledge on the underlying mechanisms of non-specific low back pain.
Postural control deficits have been identified as a key factor in the development and recurrence of non-specific low back pain. To achieve optimal postural control, the central nervous system needs to process, integrate and weigh proprioceptive signals from different body regions (e.g. ankle muscles and lower back muscles) with vestibular and visual inputs. Several studies have shown that patients with non-specific low back pain have a decreased ability to optimally weigh proprioceptive signals during standing, which leads to reduced postural robustness compared to pain-free individuals. More specifically, patients with low back pain dominantly rely more on proprioceptive signals from the ankle muscles and are not able to up-weigh proprioceptive signals from the lower back muscles when needed. This might be due to an impaired central processing of proprioceptive signals. However, up to now no studies have investigated central proprioceptive processing in patients with recurrent non-specific low back pain.
Therefore, this project aims to elucidate whether patients with recurrent non-specific low back pain showed altered brain activation patterns during the processing of proprioceptive signals from the ankle muscles and lower back muscles compared to healthy controls, by applying local muscle vibration during functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI).
2,373 studies on the registry are indexed under Back Pain; 284 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 40 is below the median of 100 across 357 observational studies indexed under Back Pain.
Browse Back Pain studies →KU Leuven is the lead sponsor of 358 studies on the registry; 62 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Leuven and surrounding area
Inclusion Criteria for individuals with recurrent non-specific low back pain:
Inclusion Criteria for healthy individuals
Exclusion Criteria for both groups:
Individuals with recurrent non-specific low back pain
Healthy individuals without low back pain
Brain activation during the processing of proprioceptive signals originating in the ankle muscles and lumbar paraspinal muscles
Brain activation during the processing of proprioceptive signals originating in the ankle muscles (soleus muscle) and lumbar paraspinal muscles (multifidus muscles) is studied by applying muscle vibration to these muscles during fMRI. The test subjects participate in one scanning session, during which three fMRI runs with ankle muscle vibration and three fMRI runs with lumbar paraspinal muscles vibration are made in alternating order. Each fMRI run consists of three conditions: 'muscle vibration at 60 Hz' that stimulates muscle proprioceptors and vibrotactile skin receptors, 'muscle vibration at 20 Hz' that stimulates vibrotactile skin receptors (serves as a control condition) and 'rest'. During each fMRI run, the two 'vibration' conditions are presented three times during 18s-long blocks. Each' vibration' block is followed by a 18s-long 'rest' block.
Time frame: One time point, immediately after inclusion in the study
Proprioceptive use during postural control
Mean center-of-pressure displacement in response to soleus muscle and/or multifidus muscle vibration (60 Hz, 0.5 mm) during upright standing on two support surfaces. Condition A: stable support surface: * Upright standing, vision occluded (20s) - bilateral soleus and multifidus muscle vibration (15s) - upright standing (20s) * Upright standing, vision occluded (20s) - bilateral soleus muscle vibration (15s) - upright standing (20s) * Upright standing, vision occluded (20s) - bilateral multifidus muscle vibration (15s) - upright standing (20s) Condition B: unstable support surface (Airex balance pad elite): * Upright standing, vision occluded (20s) - bilateral soleus and multifidus muscle vibration (15s) - upright standing (20s) * Upright standing, vision occluded (20s) - bilateral soleus muscle vibration (15s) - upright standing (20s) * Upright standing, vision occluded (20s) - bilateral multifidus muscle vibration (15s) - upright standing (20s)
Time frame: One time point, immediately after inclusion in the study
Plan to share: No
This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
KU Leuven