ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03091153Updated Jul 22, 2019

Deprescribing in a Long Term Care Facility

An interventional study of Medication Review in Polypharmacy, sponsored by Memorial University of Newfoundland. Completed at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 65 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-07-22.

Sponsored by Memorial University of Newfoundland · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
67
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
65 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study will develop, implement and evaluate a deprescribing initiative at a Canadian Long Term Care (LTC) Facility. Residents currently undergo an annual medication review as part of the clinical pharmacy services provided in the LTC facility. For this study, eligible residents will be randomized to receive either a deprescribing focused medication review or usual care.

The deprescribing focused medication therapy assessments will be done on half of the 143 residents residing on the second and third floors of the facility. The other half of residents will serve as the control group and continue to receive their annual medication review and regular care from the attending physicians and nurses.

The deprescribing intervention will be delivered by final year pharmacy students completing their practice experiences, under the supervision of clinical pharmacists at the LTC facility and clinical pharmacists from Memorial University's Medication Therapy Services (MTS) Clinic. Currently the clinic has a well developed procedure for providing in depth medication therapy reviews for residents of the community, upon referral by their primary care physician. Students will adapt this model of medication review to have a stronger deprescribing focus and be applicable to elderly residents of a LTC facility. The intervention will consist of an in depth medication therapy review with a focus on identifying any medications that may no longer be required or are deemed to be inappropriate or potentially unsafe in the elderly based on currently guidelines/criteria. The students will work closely with members of the resident's care team on a daily basis, as well as the resident and their family, to develop and implement a deprescribing plan.

02

Conditions studied

  • Polypharmacy
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Memorial University of Newfoundland is the lead sponsor of 49 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
65 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Over 65 years of age
  2. Reside in St. Patrick's Mercy Home (2nd or 3rd floor units)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria (any of the following):

  1. Do not take any regularly scheduled medications
  2. Are receiving palliative care
  3. Resident's physician or nursing team do not support participation
  4. Resident or their substitute decision maker decline participation
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
67 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Control

    Standard care. Annual medication review

  • Experimental
    Intervention

    In depth medication review with a focus on deprescribing

    Other: Medication Review

Interventions

  • OtherMedication Review

    In depth medication review with a focus on deprescribing

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in number of medications taken daily by residents

    Measured using facility medication logs and patient health records

    Time frame: 3 and 6 months after receiving intervention

Secondary outcomes

  1. All cause mortality rate

    Measured using patient health records

    Time frame: 3 and 6 months after receiving the intervention

  2. Instance of falls in the last 30 days

    Measured using facility fall report logs

    Time frame: 3 and 6 months after receiving the intervention

  3. Frequency of emergency room visits, unplanned hospital admission and/or unplanned GP visits

    Measured using patient health records

    Time frame: 3 and 6 months after receiving the intervention

  4. Cognitive function score

    Measured using Cognitive Performance Scale (CPS) obtained from Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) MDS 2.0

    Time frame: 3 and 6 months after receiving the intervention

  5. Bowel function

    Measured using bowel chart data for the 14 days prior to the assessment date

    Time frame: baseline, 3 and 6 months after receiving the intervention

  6. Independence in activities of daily living

    Measured using the Activities of Daily Living Scale (ADL) obtained from RAI MDS 2.0

    Time frame: 3 and 6 months after receiving the intervention

  7. Changes in general health

    Measured using the Changes in Health, End-Stage Disease and Signs and Symptoms (CHESS) Score obtained from RAI MDS 2.0

    Time frame: 3 and 6 months after receiving the intervention

  8. Social engagement

    Measured using Index of Social Engagement (ISE) Score obtained from RAI MDS 2.0

    Time frame: 3 and 6 months after receiving the intervention

  9. Aggressive behaviour

    Measured using the Aggressive Behaviour Scale (ABS) obtained from RAI MDS 2.0

    Time frame: 3 and 6 months after receiving the intervention

  10. Frequency of pain

    Measured using the Pain Scale obtained from RAI MDS 2.0

    Time frame: 3 and 6 months after receiving the intervention

07

Study locations

1 site
  • St Patrick's Mercy Home
    St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Mar 2017 to primary completion in Dec 2018, 21 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 21, 2017
First posted
Mar 27, 2017
StartActual
Mar 30, 2017
Primary completionActual
Dec 31, 2018
CompletionActual
Jun 1, 2019
Last update
Jul 22, 2019
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 22, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03091153
Lead sponsor
Memorial University of Newfoundland
Collaborators
Eastern Health
Responsible party
Deborah Kelly (Associate Professor, Memorial University of Newfoundland) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 27, 2017
Start date
Mar 30, 2017
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2018
Completion
Jun 1, 2019
Last update
Jul 22, 2019

Study contacts

Deborah Kelly, PharmD
principal investigator · Memorial University of Newfoundland

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion