CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03088306IPaROUpdated Oct 16, 2018

Improving Pain and Reducing Opioid Use (IPaRO) in Lumbar Spine Surgery Patients

An Early Phase 1 interventional study of Standard analgesia use [Oxygen] and Standard analgesia use [Hydromorphone] in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis, Lumbar Spinal Instability and Lumbar Spine Degeneration, sponsored by Johns Hopkins University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 100 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-10-16.

Sponsored by Johns Hopkins University · Early Phase 1, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was May 2018, 8 years 4 months ago, and no results have been posted to the registry.
Phase
Early Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
49
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 100 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Patients presenting for lumbar spine surgery experience pain related to their spine condition. Following surgery, these patients also experience surgical pain resulting from disruption of skin, muscle tissue, vertebrae, intervertebral discs, and facet joints. This pain is often treated with opioid medications - with roughly 40% of patient experiencing sub-optimal pain management. Adequate pain control has become a top priority among professional societies, healthcare systems, and accrediting agencies. The current proposal will provide this critical evidence of feasibility and acceptability of a multi-modal pain management plan for patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery. Additionally, this study will provide critical preliminary data to compare the effectiveness of protocol-driven multi-modal pain management to control post-operative pain, reduce opioid medication use, and improve physical activity, sleep, and health.

Read the detailed description

Patients presenting for lumbar spine surgery experience pain related to their spine condition. Following surgery, these patients also experience surgical pain resulting from disruption of skin, muscle tissue, vertebrae, intervertebral discs, and facet joints. Proper pain management is necessary to reduce pain-related and medication side effects and to promote rehabilitation. This pain is often treated with opioid medications - with roughly 40% of patient experiencing sub-optimal pain management. Adequate pain control has become a top priority among professional societies, healthcare systems, and accrediting agencies.

Multi-modal pain management strategies have been proposed to (1) control pre-operative pain related to spine pathology; (2) employ non-opioid medication peri-operatively to pre-empt post-operative surgical pain; and (3) monitor and control pain intensity before and after surgery. There is a demonstrated lack of evidence regarding optimal post-operative protocols and pathways. The investigators have planned a randomized clinical trial to compare the effectiveness of two methods of peri-operative pain management to reduce post-operative pain and opioid use among patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery.

Prior to submission to National Institutes of Health (NIH), Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), or Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI), it is necessary to demonstrate the feasibility and acceptability of the trial protocol. The current proposal will provide this critical evidence of feasibility and acceptability of a multi-modal pain management plan for patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery. Additionally, this study will provide critical preliminary data to compare the effectiveness of protocol-driven multi-modal pain management to control post-operative pain, reduce opioid medication use, and improve physical activity, sleep, and health.

02

Conditions studied

  • Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
  • Lumbar Spinal Instability
  • Lumbar Spine Degeneration

Browse trials for

03

In context

Spinal Stenosis

459 studies on the registry are indexed under Spinal Stenosis; 103 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 49 is below the median of 80 across 283 interventional studies indexed under Spinal Stenosis.

Browse Spinal Stenosis studies →

Lead sponsor

Johns Hopkins University is the lead sponsor of 1,783 studies on the registry; 313 are open to participants now.

Of its 203 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 140 (69%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 100 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Eligible participants will be English-speaking adults who are presenting to a spine surgeon (orthopaedic or neurosurgeon) for surgical treatment of a lumbar degenerative condition (spinal stenosis, spondylosis with or without myelopathy, and degenerative spondylolisthesis) using laminectomy with or without arthrodesis (i.e. fusion).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • A microsurgical technique as the primary procedure, such as an isolated laminotomy or microdiscectomy.
  • Spinal deformity as the primary indication for surgery.
  • Spine surgery secondary to pseudarthrosis, trauma, infection, or tumor.
  • Back and/or lower extremity pain \< 3 months indicating no history of sub-acute or chronic pain.
  • History of neurological disorder or disease, resulting in moderate to severe movement dysfunction.
  • Presence of schizophrenia or other psychotic disorder.
  • Patient refusal to participate.
  • Known allergic reactions to any of the study medications
  • Surgery under a workman's compensation claim.
  • Not able to return to clinic for standard follow-up visits with surgeon.
  • Unable to provide a stable address and access to a telephone.
05

Study design

Phase
Early Phase 1
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Care provider, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
49 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Standard analgesia use

    A strategy to manage pain in the peri-operative period that is in common clinical use.

    Drug: Standard analgesia use [Oxygen] · Drug: Standard analgesia use [Hydromorphone] · Drug: Standard analgesia use [Volatile Anesthesia] · Drug: Standard analgesia use [Fentanyl]

  • Active comparator
    Multi-modal pain management

    A strategy to manage pain in the peri-operative period that is in common clinical use that is designed to reduce the need for post-operative opioid medication.

    Drug: Multi-modal pain management [Acetaminophen + Gabapentin] · Drug: Multi-modal pain management [Fentanyl] · Drug: Multi-modal pain management [Intravenous Ketamine] · Drug: Multi-modal pain management [Valium + Gabapentin]

Interventions

  • DrugStandard analgesia use [Oxygen]

    A protocol directed and clinically appropriate post-operative analgesia. In this study, standard post-operative analgesia is defined as: oxygen, volatile anesthesia, fentanyl, hydromorphone.

  • DrugStandard analgesia use [Hydromorphone]

    A protocol directed and clinically appropriate post-operative analgesia. In this study, standard post-operative analgesia is defined as: oxygen, volatile anesthesia, fentanyl, hydromorphone.

  • DrugStandard analgesia use [Volatile Anesthesia]

    A protocol directed and clinically appropriate post-operative analgesia. In this study, standard post-operative analgesia is defined as: oxygen, volatile anesthesia, fentanyl, hydromorphone.

  • DrugStandard analgesia use [Fentanyl]

    A protocol directed and clinically appropriate post-operative analgesia. In this study, standard post-operative analgesia is defined as: oxygen, volatile anesthesia, fentanyl, hydromorphone.

  • DrugMulti-modal pain management [Acetaminophen + Gabapentin]

    Administration of acetaminophen (1 gm po) plus gabapentin (600-1200 mg po) in the preparation area prior to surgery; pre-induction opioid titration with fentanyl until pain is relieved and/or respiratory depression ensues; intravenous ketamine (1 mg/kg load prior to incision then 10 mcg/kg/min) during surgery; acetaminophen, valium plus gabapentin during hospitalization; and prescription for acetaminophen, valium plus gabapentin at discharge.

  • DrugMulti-modal pain management [Fentanyl]

    Administration of acetaminophen (1 gm po) plus gabapentin (600-1200 mg po) in the preparation area prior to surgery; pre-induction opioid titration with fentanyl until pain is relieved and/or respiratory depression ensues; intravenous ketamine (1 mg/kg load prior to incision then 10 mcg/kg/min) during surgery; acetaminophen, valium plus gabapentin during hospitalization; and prescription for acetaminophen, valium plus gabapentin at discharge.

  • DrugMulti-modal pain management [Intravenous Ketamine]

    Administration of acetaminophen (1 gm po) plus gabapentin (600-1200 mg po) in the preparation area prior to surgery; pre-induction opioid titration with fentanyl until pain is relieved and/or respiratory depression ensues; intravenous ketamine (1 mg/kg load prior to incision then 10 mcg/kg/min) during surgery; acetaminophen, valium plus gabapentin during hospitalization; and prescription for acetaminophen, valium plus gabapentin at discharge.

  • DrugMulti-modal pain management [Valium + Gabapentin]

    Administration of acetaminophen (1 gm po) plus gabapentin (600-1200 mg po) in the preparation area prior to surgery; pre-induction opioid titration with fentanyl until pain is relieved and/or respiratory depression ensues; intravenous ketamine (1 mg/kg load prior to incision then 10 mcg/kg/min) during surgery; acetaminophen, valium plus gabapentin during hospitalization; and prescription for acetaminophen, valium plus gabapentin at discharge.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of participants undergoing lumbar spine surgery with complete follow-up

    Number of participants undergoing lumbar spine surgery with complete follow-up

    Time frame: 52 week

Secondary outcomes

  1. Patient controlled analgesia (PCA) pump use

    Total morphine equivalent of opioids administered by the PCA pump

    Time frame: during surgical hospitalization, up to 12 weeks

  2. Opioid medication use

    How many patients were prescribed and using opioid medication over the 90 days after hospital discharge?

    Time frame: up to 90 days

  3. Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain

    Measure of pain intensity; Range 0 - 100; Population mean 50, standard deviation 10

    Time frame: at 6 and 12 weeks

  4. PROMIS Physical Function

    Measure of physical function; Range 0 - 100; Population mean 50, standard deviation 10

    Time frame: at 6 and 12 weeks

  5. PROMIS Fatigue

    Measure of fatigue; Range 0 - 100; Population mean 50, standard deviation 10

    Time frame: at 6 and 12 weeks

  6. PROMIS Anxiety

    Measure of anxiety; Range 0 - 100; Population mean 50, standard deviation 10

    Time frame: at 6 and 12 weeks

  7. PROMIS Depression

    Measure of depression; Range 0 - 100; Population mean 50, standard deviation 10

    Time frame: at 6 and 12 weeks

  8. PROMIS Sleep Disturbance

    Measure of sleep disturbance; Range 0 - 100; Population mean 50, standard deviation 10

    Time frame: at 6 and 12 weeks

  9. PROMIS Satisfaction with Social Roles

    Measure of satisfaction with social roles; Range 0 - 100; Population mean 50, standard deviation 10

    Time frame: at 6 and 12 weeks

  10. Health status (Medical Outcome Study Short Form 12, version 2)

    Measure of physical and mental health; Range 0 - 100; Population mean 50, standard deviation 10

    Time frame: at 6 and 12 weeks

  11. Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)

    Measure of pain-related disability; Range 0% - 100%; Scores greater than 30% indicative of moderate pain-related disability

    Time frame: at 6 and 12 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
    Baltimore, Maryland 21287, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 16, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03088306
Lead sponsor
Johns Hopkins University
Collaborators
North American Spine Society
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 23, 2017
Start date
Jul 1, 2017
Primary completion
May 31, 2018
Completion
Aug 31, 2018
Last update
Oct 16, 2018

Study contacts

Richard L Skolasky, ScD
principal investigator · Johns Hopkins University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion