CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03075488Updated Feb 1, 2019

Ultrasound Prescan vs Conventional Landmark-guided Technique in Spinal Anesthesia in Orthopedic Obese Patients

An interventional study of Accuro and cutaneous landmarks in Ultrasonography, Anesthesia, Spinal and Body Mass Index, sponsored by Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli. Completed at 1 site in Italy. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-02-01.

Sponsored by Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was Apr 2018, 8 years 6 months ago, and no results have been posted to the registry.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
130
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The study is aimed at evaluating whether ultrasound pre-procedural scan with Accuro may reduce needle redirections when performing spinal injection in patients with BMI = or > 30 in orthopedic surgery

Read the detailed description

This is a open-label randomised controlled study.

90 patients will be recruited and divided into two groups of 45 patients per group.

Patient recruitment will be performed by patient visit and checking inclusions and exclusion criteria. After written informed consent, every single patient will be allocated in one of the two groups following a computer generated randomization list.

Patients in both groups will undergo:

  • standard monitoring with Non Invasive Blood Pressure (NIBP) cuff, three-lead electrocardiography (ECG) and Pulse-oximetry (SpO2).
  • Peripheral intravenous access
  • Sedation (as prescribed by the OR anesthesiologist)
  • Spinal anesthesia performed by anesthesiologists skilled in both techniques (conventional landmark technique or Accuro guided) at the L3-L4, L4-L5 or L5-S1 level, with a 25 or 27 Gauge needle, with the surgical side declive or proclive according to the baricity of the local anesthetic used (sitting position, when needed, will be reported in the CRF)

In both groups an observer will monitor and register spinal procedure duration (starting point: anesthesiologist wearing sterile gloves, ending point: end of local anesthetic injection).

Control group (landmark technique):

The anesthesiologist will identify lumbar spinous processes with traditional landmark palpation. Once the correct interspinous level and the mid-line will be identified, the anesthesiologist will proceed with needle insertion and spinal injection.

Treatment group (ultrasound pre-procedural scan with Accuro):

By using Accuro US probe the anesthesiologist will perform a pre-procedural lumbar spine scan to detect the needle entry site. After image optimization, the Accuro probe will be aligned with the spine mid-line, as indicated by a dashed red-line on the screen. After that the interlaminar space at the desired intervertebral level will be detected, as indicated by orange overlay in the screen. The depth and the device angle used to detect the interlaminar space will be annotated. The anesthesiologist will then disengage the Accuro Locator needle guide and press gently against the skin. Then the probe will be removed and the spinal injection will be performed.

02

Conditions studied

  • Ultrasonography
  • Anesthesia, Spinal
  • Body Mass Index
  • Obesity
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli is the lead sponsor of 298 studies on the registry; 102 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age between 18 and 75 years
  • BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists' (ASA) classification I-III
  • Orthopedic surgery to be performed under spinal anesthesia
  • Able to understand and to sign informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Local anaesthetic allergy
  • Serious spine deformities
  • Previous spine surgery
  • Inability to express informed consent
  • Contraindications to spinal anaesthesia
  • Pregnancy
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
130 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Conventional landmark-guided technique

    In this arm spinal anesthesia will be performed by using conventional cutaneous landmarks

    Procedure: cutaneous landmarks

  • Experimental
    Accuro device guided technique

    In this arm spinal anesthesia will be performed only after having detected the intralaminar space, the mid-line, the depth and the orientation for spinal needle insertion with pre-procedural scan performed with Accuro device

    Device: Accuro

Interventions

  • DeviceAccuro

    spinal anesthesia injection based on identification of entry site with pre-procedural ultrasound scan with Accuro device

  • Procedurecutaneous landmarks

    spinal anesthesia injection based on identification of entry site with palpation of cutaneous landmarks

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Needle redirections

    To evaluate if there is a significant difference about numbers of needle redirections between conventional landmark guided technique and Accuro device guided technique

    Time frame: duration of spinal injection procedure

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of needle insertions

    Number of needle insertions through the skin

    Time frame: duration of spinal injection procedure

  2. Procedure duration

    Procedure duration from steril gloves wearing to the end of the spinal anesthetic injection

    Time frame: duration of spinal injection procedure

  3. Side effects and complications

    To check if present side effects and complications during the procedure

    Time frame: 36 months

  4. Procedure failure

    To check eventually procedure failure and the need of using alternative anesthesia technique

    Time frame: duration of surgical procedure

  5. Patient satisfaction

    Evaluation of patient satisfaction and procedure-related pain 24 hours after spinal injection

    Time frame: 24 hours

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli
    Bologna, 40136, Italy
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Ghisi D, Tomasi M, Giannone S, Luppi A, Aurini L, Toccaceli L, Benazzo A, Bonarelli S. A randomized comparison between Accuro and palpation-guided spinal anesthesia for obese patients undergoing orthopedic surgery. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2019 Oct 25:rapm-2019-100538. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2019-100538. Online ahead of print. PubMed 31653795 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 1, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03075488
Lead sponsor
Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli
Responsible party
Daniela Ghisi (principal investigator, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 9, 2017
Start date
Mar 31, 2017
Primary completion
Apr 3, 2018
Completion
Apr 3, 2018
Last update
Feb 1, 2019

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion