ClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT03072953Updated Jun 11, 2021Results posted

Efficacy and Safety of APD334 in Patients With Pyoderma Gangrenosum

A Phase 2 interventional study of APD334 in Pyoderma Gangrenosum, sponsored by Arena Pharmaceuticals. Terminated at 6 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-06-11.

Sponsored by Arena Pharmaceuticals (part of Pfizer) · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Terminated \[Sponsor decision to terminate the study\]
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
2
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this Phase 2a, open label, proof-of-concept clinical study is to assess the efficacy and safety of etrasimod (APD334) in patients with Pyoderma Gangrenosum.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pyoderma Gangrenosum

Browse trials for

03

In context

Pyoderma Gangrenosum

36 studies on the registry are indexed under Pyoderma Gangrenosum; 7 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 2 is below the median of 10 across 26 interventional studies indexed under Pyoderma Gangrenosum.

Browse Pyoderma Gangrenosum studies →

Lead sponsor

Arena Pharmaceuticals is the lead sponsor of 17 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Of its 9 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 8 (89%) have results posted.

First submitted before Arena Pharmaceuticals became part of Pfizer.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Male or female (18-80 years).
  2. Able to provide a signed prior to any study related procedure being conducted.
  3. Diagnosis of PG with active, non-healing ulcer.
  4. Considered to be in stable health in the opinion of the investigator as determined by:

    1. A screening physical examination with no abnormalities unrelated to PG.
    2. Vital signs at screening: pulse rate ≥ 55 bpm, systolic blood pressure ≥ 90 mmHg, and diastolic blood pressure ≥ 55 mmHg.
    3. Liver function tests (/aspartate aminotransferase, and alkaline phosphatase) \< 2x the .
    4. All other pre-study clinical laboratory findings within normal range, or if outside of the normal range are not deemed clinically significant in the opinion of the investigator with exemption to leucopenia and lymphopenia - please refer to exclusion criterion 24.
    5. No clinical abnormalities noted in the12-lead in the opinion of the investigator (Refer also to exclusion criterion 13).
    6. No evidence of macular edema in an ophthalmology evaluation (performed by an ophthalmologist), supported with optical coherence tomography, where available (dependent on site capability) at screening.
  5. Eligible male and female participants must agree not to participate in a conception process (i.e. active attempt to let female partner to become pregnant or to impregnate, sperm donation, oocyte donation, in vitro fertilization) for at least 30 days after the last dose of study drug.

Non-sterile participants who are sexually active must take adequate measures.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. infection as judged by the investigator with an end date less than 6-weeks prior to treatment start (Day 1). In case of infection requiring hospitalization or intravenous antimicrobial therapy, or opportunistic infection, this infection must have ended at least 8 weeks prior to Day 1.
  2. Infection with virus anytime in the past; confirmed active infection with virus at screening.
  3. History of severe renal or severe hepatic impairment.
  4. Current active or latent tuberculosis (TB).
  5. A positive diagnostic TB test at screening.
  6. Exposure to B-cell or T-cell targeted therapies (such as natalizumab, rituximab, abatacept) within 5 half-lives prior to Day 1.
  7. Exposure to other , immunomodulating or antineoplastic agents.
  8. Receipt of any agent within 30 days or 5 half lives (whichever is longer), prior to Day 1.
  9. Use of moderate to strong inhibitors of CYP2C9.
  10. Abnormal (FEV1) or forced vital capacity (FVC).
  11. Any known history of congenital or acquired immuno-deficiency.
  12. Recent history (within 6 months of screening visit) of cardio- or cerebrovascular disease, acute coronary syndrome, myocardial infarction, unstable angina, cerebro-vascular accident, including .
  13. History or presence of cardiac arrhythmia, conduction system disease, or use of Class Ia or Class III anti arrhythmic agents, or baseline ≥ 500 msec.
  14. Congestive heart failure ( III or NYHA IV)
  15. Any surgical procedure requiring general anesthesia within 30 days prior to Day 1 or plans to undergo major surgery during the study period.
  16. History of retinal macular edema.
  17. History of or signs and symptoms of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) as assessed by the PML checklist at screening.
  18. History of more than one episode of herpes zoster or any episode of disseminated zoster.
  19. Participants without documented positive varicella zoster virus (VZV) IgG antibody status or participants who have not completed VZV vaccination within 6 weeks prior to Day 1.
  20. Receipt of within 6 weeks prior to Day 1.
  21. History of lymphoproliferative disorder, lymphoma, leukemia, myeloproliferative disorder, or multiple myeloma.
  22. History of except for adequately treated basal cell skin cancer and in situ carcinoma of the cervix of the uterus that have been completely excised with documented, clear margins.
  23. History of severe allergic or anaphylactic reactions requiring medical attention.
  24. Leukopenia or lymphopenia at screening.
  25. Current or recent history (within 1 year prior to Day 1) of alcohol dependence or illicit drug use.
  26. Active psychiatric problems that, in the investigator's opinion, may interfere with compliance with the study procedures.
  27. History of any other clinically significant medical condition that, in the investigator's opinion, would preclude participant from safe participation in the study.
  28. Inability to attend all the study visits or comply with study procedures.
  29. Prior exposure to etrasimod (APD334) or prior participation in any study of etrasimod (APD334).
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(17)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

Bilirubin

A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.

Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

ECG (electrocardiogram)

A recording of the heart’s electrical activity, taken with stickers on the chest, arms and legs. It takes a few minutes and does not hurt.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Hepatitis C tests

Hepatitis C is a virus that infects the liver. An HCV antibody test can stay positive after an infection has cleared (and is occasionally positive without one); an HCV RNA test shows whether the virus is there now.

After treatment, hepatitis C counts as cured when HCV RNA is still undetectable 12 weeks or more after the treatment ended. Studies often accept people cured this way.

Hepatitis B tests

Hepatitis B is a virus that infects the liver. These are separate tests: HBsAg positive usually means a current infection (a recent vaccination can briefly cause it too); total anti-HBc (HBcAb) positive means an infection now or in the past; HBV DNA measures how much virus is in the blood.

Some studies accept a past infection if HBV DNA is undetectable, sometimes with antiviral medicine during the study. Check what this study allows.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

FEV1

From a breathing test (spirometry): how much air you can blow out in the first second. Often given as a percentage of what is expected for your age, height and sex.

TIA (transient ischaemic attack)

A “mini-stroke”: temporary stroke-like symptoms caused by reduced blood flow to part of the brain, spinal cord or eye, without signs of a new stroke on a scan.

Stroke symptoms need emergency care at once, even if they go away.

QT and QTc

On an ECG, the QT interval is the time the heart’s lower chambers take to activate electrically and recover in each beat. QTc is that time adjusted for heart rate (QTcF by Fridericia’s formula, QTcB by Bazett’s). Some medicines lengthen it, and a long QTc can raise the risk of a dangerous heart rhythm.

The study may name a correction formula and a limit in milliseconds, often around 450–480.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

Live vaccines

Vaccines made with a weakened form of the germ, such as measles–mumps–rubella (MMR), chickenpox and yellow fever. They can be risky when the immune system is weakened. Flu injections are not live; the nasal flu spray is.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
2 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    APD334

    APD334 active treatment for 12 weeks.

    Drug: APD334

Interventions

  • DrugAPD334

    APD334 active treatment

    Also known as: Etrasimod

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Exploratory Endpoint - Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessments for Active Skin Manifestations

    The physician's global assessment for active skin manifestations recorded the number of ulcers, target lesion noted for endpoint evaluation, diameters of each target lesion and score of evaluation at each visit. The scores ranged from 0 (total resolution) to 4 (no evidence of healing).

    Time frame: Week 12

  2. Exploratory Endpoint - Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessments for Active Skin Manifestations

    The patient global assessment for active skin manifestation recorded the disease and pain severity using a visual analogue to mark the participant's score. Participants were asked to rate their disease severity from "not severe" to "extremely severe" and pain levels from "no pain at all' to "worst pain imaginable" in the past one week.

    Time frame: Week 12

  3. Exploratory Endpoint - Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score

    The DLQI questionnaire assessed how much a participant's life is affected through their skin problem in the last week, and includes the following parameters: symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure and sport activities, work or school activities, personal relationships and treatment- related feelings. Participants responded to the 10 questions on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much) with a total score ranging from 0 to 30. Higher scores indicated that the skin problem had an extremely large effect on the participant's life whereas lower scores indicated that the disease has minimal to no effect at all.

    Time frame: Week 12

  4. Exploratory Endpoint - Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein Levels

    Time frame: Week 12

  5. Exploratory Endpoint - Assessments of Target Lesions

    Changes in surface area

    Time frame: Week 12

  6. Exploratory Endpoint - Assessment of Punch Biopsies

    Changes in histology.

    Time frame: Week 12

Other outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Adverse Events and Clinically Significant (CS) Safety Measurements

    Safety was assessed by monitoring and recording all adverse events, clinical laboratory tests (including hematology, serum chemistry, coagulation, and urinalysis), physical and neurological examinations, vital sign measurements, and 12-lead electrocardiograms. The number of participants with adverse events and CS safety measures have been reported.

    Time frame: Up to approximately 12 weeks

07

Results

Posted Jun 11, 2021
Limitations and caveats
Due to limited enrollment (N=2), this clinical trial was terminated by the Sponsor and no efficacy analyses were conducted. To protect the participant's privacy, demography and efficacy data are not reported.

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneAPD334
Started2
Completed2
Not completed0

Outcome measures

PrimaryExploratory Endpoint - Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessments for Active Skin Manifestations

The physician's global assessment for active skin manifestations recorded the number of ulcers, target lesion noted for endpoint evaluation, diameters of each target lesion and score of evaluation at each visit. The scores ranged from 0 (total resolution) to 4 (no evidence of healing).

Time frame:
Week 12

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

PrimaryExploratory Endpoint - Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessments for Active Skin Manifestations

The patient global assessment for active skin manifestation recorded the disease and pain severity using a visual analogue to mark the participant's score. Participants were asked to rate their disease severity from "not severe" to "extremely severe" and pain levels from "no pain at all' to "worst pain imaginable" in the past one week.

Time frame:
Week 12

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

PrimaryExploratory Endpoint - Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score

The DLQI questionnaire assessed how much a participant's life is affected through their skin problem in the last week, and includes the following parameters: symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure and sport activities, work or school activities, personal relationships and treatment- related feelings. Participants responded to the 10 questions on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much) with a total score ranging from 0 to 30. Higher scores indicated that the skin problem had an extremely large effect on the participant's life whereas lower scores indicated that the disease has minimal to no effect at all.

Time frame:
Week 12

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

PrimaryExploratory Endpoint - Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein Levels
Time frame:
Week 12

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

PrimaryExploratory Endpoint - Assessments of Target Lesions

Changes in surface area

Time frame:
Week 12

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

PrimaryExploratory Endpoint - Assessment of Punch Biopsies

Changes in histology.

Time frame:
Week 12

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

Other pre-specifiedNumber of Participants With Adverse Events and Clinically Significant (CS) Safety Measurements

Safety was assessed by monitoring and recording all adverse events, clinical laboratory tests (including hematology, serum chemistry, coagulation, and urinalysis), physical and neurological examinations, vital sign measurements, and 12-lead electrocardiograms. The number of participants with adverse events and CS safety measures have been reported.

Time frame:
Up to approximately 12 weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Adverse Events and Clinically Significant (CS) Safety Measurements
ParticipantsAPD334
Adverse events2
CS clinical laboratory values0
CS physical & neurological examinations0
CS vital sign measurements0
CS 12-lead ECG measurements0

Adverse events

Collected over Up to approximately 12 weeks. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
APD3340/2 (0%)0/2 (0%)2/2 (100%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventAPD334
DiarrheaGastrointestinal disorders1/2
headacheNervous system disorders1/2
PruritusSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders1/2
Sore hipInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/2

Baseline characteristics

Age, Customized
Age, Customized(Participants)APD334
Between 18 to 80 years2
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)APD334
FemaleNA
MaleNA
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)APD334
Hispanic or LatinoNA
Not Hispanic or LatinoNA
Unknown or Not ReportedNA
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)APD334
American Indian or Alaska Native0
Asian0
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
Black or African American0
White2
More than one race0
Unknown or Not Reported0
08

Study locations

6 sites
  • Westmead Hospital
    Westmead, New South Wales 2145, Australia
  • Veracity Clinical Research
    Woolloongabba, Queensland 4102, Australia
  • Eastern Clinical Research Unit
    Box Hill, Victoria 3128, Australia
  • Royal Melbourne Hospital
    Parkville, Victoria 3050, Australia
  • Fremantle Dermatology
    Fremantle, Western Australia 6160, Australia
  • Braemar Day Hospital
    Hamilton, New Zealand
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 11, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03072953
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 8, 2017
Start date
Jun 7, 2017
Primary completion
May 22, 2018
Completion
May 22, 2018
Results posted
Jun 11, 2021
Last update
Jun 11, 2021

Study contacts

Arena CT.gov Administrator
study director · Arena Pharmaceuticals

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in May 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Etrasimod

Start the discussion