ClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT03066739Updated Jun 4, 2026Results posted

Effect of Ultra-low Dose Naloxone on Remifentanil-Induced Hyperalgesia

A Phase 2 interventional study of Remifentanil and Remifentanil+ Placebo in Hyperalgesia, sponsored by University of California, Irvine. Terminated at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-04.

Sponsored by University of California, Irvine · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Study terminated early due to low enrollment. Only 8 participants enrolled out of the target 105.
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
8
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether using ultra-low dose naloxone, an opioid antagonist, has the potential to block remifentanil-induced hyperalgesia and tolerance following surgery.

There are 3 study groups: (1) low dose remifentanil (LO, 0.1 micrograms/kg/mL), (2) high dose remifentanil (0.4 mg) combined with placebo (HI, 0.4 micrograms/kg/mL), or (3) high dose remifentanil (0.4 mg) combined with ultra-low dose naloxone (HN, 0.004 micrograms/kg/mL naloxone).

The hypothesis of the study is that occurrence of remifentanil-induced hyperalgesia (low score in mechanical pain threshold) in the HN group will be lower than in the HI group.

Read the detailed description

Purpose:

Opioid antagonists at ultra-low doses have been used with opioid agonists to prevent or limit opioid tolerance. Remifentanil, a rapid onset/offset opioid that is often used as an anesthesia adjunct intraoperatively, has been associated with the development of hyperalgesia and opioid tolerance postoperatively. Opioid-induced hyperalgesia (OIH) induced by remifentanil intraoperatively may be a factor contributing to an increase in postoperative pain as well as difficulty in controlling such pain. The purpose of this study will be to evaluate whether an ultra-low dose of naloxone, an opioid antagonist, could block remifentanil-induced hyperalgesia and tolerance following surgery.

This research will help elucidate the degree of OIH after surgeries involving remifentanil and determine if a new technique can be employed to decrease remifentanil-induced OIH. By mitigating OIH, patients should have a decrease in postoperative pain and an increase in patient satisfaction at UCI and other hospitals where such a technique is employed.

There are 3 study groups: (1) low dose remifentanil (LO, 0.1 micrograms/kg/mL), (2) high dose remifentanil (0.4 mg) combined with placebo (HI, 0.4 micrograms/kg/mL), or (3) high dose remifentanil (0.4 mg) combined with ultra-low dose naloxone (HN, 0.004 micrograms/kg/mL naloxone).

Background:

Opioid-induced hyperalgesia is a paradoxical increase in pain sensitivity following opioid exposure. The mechanism for this is likely due to an alteration in opioid receptor signaling with disruption of G-protein coupling and opioid-induced activation and hypertrophy of spinal glial cells (gliosis). Opioid-induced hyperalgesia has been noted with many different opioids, and the most well documented hyperalgesic effect is with remifentanil.

Various agents have been used in an attempt to reduce the development hyperalgesia following remifentanil. While there are few reports on the effect of ultra-low dose naloxone on opioid-induced hyperalgesia, recent evidence is emerging regarding its use in pain management. Ultra-low dose naloxone has been shown to prevent remifentanil-induced pain hypersensitivities (allodynia and hyperalgesia) in rats. However, there are little to no studies on reducing the adverse effects of remifentanil with naloxone in human subjects.

Existing knowledge and previous research:

Attempts have been made with various agents to reduce the development of tolerance and hyperalgesia following remifentanil. Postoperative hyperalgesia and its prevention has been studied with ketamine , Magnesium , Gabapentin, Clonidine, Lornoxicam , Dextromethorphan , Paracetamol , Morphine , Dexmedetomidine , Adenosine, COX inhibitors , Amantadine , Nitrous oxide, Fentanyl, Pregabalin , Buprenorphine, Midazolam, Dexamethasone. Relevant to our current hypothesis is the report that concomitant administration of ultra-low dose naloxone and naltrexone with remifentanil prevented OIH. However, there are no studies on reducing the adverse effects of remifentanil with ultra-low dose naloxone in human subjects.

While the traditional role of opiate antagonists have been in cases of opioid overmedication, recent evidence is emerging regarding their use in pain management. Gan et al. 1997 used an ultra-low dose naloxone infusion (0.00025 mg/kg/h or 0.001 mg/kg/h) in postoperative patients receiving IV morphine via a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device. Good pain relief was experienced in all groups, however consumption of PCA morphine was significantly reduced in patients that received the lowest infusion of naloxone and opioid-induced side effects (nausea, vomiting, pruritus) were reduced by naloxone at both dose.

Naloxone and/or naltrexone at ultra-low doses may enhance the analgesic effects of opioids, enhance the antinociceptive effects of methadone, and decrease or block the development of opioid tolerance in rodents. The combination of oxycodone with an ultra-low dose of the antagonist naltrexone as a singular oral medication, Oxytrex, has been developed to prevent the development of tolerance in the treatment of moderate to severe chronic pain.

Aguado et. al. 2013 recently evaluated the effects of the opioid antagonist, naloxone, on remifentanil-induced tolerance or hyperalgesia in rats. Hyperalgesia was considered to be a decrease in mechanical nociceptive thresholds (von Frey), while opioid tolerance was considered to be a decrease in sevoflurane MAC reduction by remifentanil. An ultra-low dose of naloxone was able to block remifentanil-induced hyperalgesia and the MAC increase associated with hyperalgesia, but did not change opioid tolerance under inhaled anesthesia.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hyperalgesia

Browse trials for

03

In context

Hyperalgesia

166 studies on the registry are indexed under Hyperalgesia; 14 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 8 is below the median of 50 across 142 interventional studies indexed under Hyperalgesia.

Browse Hyperalgesia studies →

Lead sponsor

University of California, Irvine is the lead sponsor of 476 studies on the registry; 98 are open to participants now.

Of its 41 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 30 (73%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Subjects who provide written .
  • Age 18 years old or older (no upper age limit for inclusion)
  • Gender: male or female.
  • Surgery: Posterior spinal fusions

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Allergy to opiates
  • Chronic pain other than the primary indication for surgery
  • Psychiatric illness
  • History of substance abuse problem including alcohol \&/or cannabis
  • > 35
  • Subjects under 18 years of age.
  • Subject without the capacity to give written . 8. Female subjects who are pregnant
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator)
Enrollment
8 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    LO-low dose remifentanil

    low dose remifentanil (LO, 0.1 micrograms/kg/mL),

    Drug: Remifentanil

  • Active comparator
    HI-high dose remifentanil with placebo

    high dose remifentanil (0.4 mg) combined with placebo (HI, 0.4 micrograms/kg/mL)

    Drug: Remifentanil+ Placebo

  • Active comparator
    HN-high dose remifentanil with ultra-low dose naloxone

    high dose remifentanil (0.4 mg) combined with ultra-low dose naloxone (HN, 0.004 micrograms/kg/mL naloxone).

    Drug: Remifentanil +ultra-low dose naloxone

Interventions

  • 0.1 micrograms/kg/mL

    Also known as: LO

  • DrugRemifentanil+ Placebo

    high dose remifentanil (0.4 mg) combined with placebo (HI, 0.4 micrograms/kg/mL)

    Also known as: HI

  • DrugRemifentanil +ultra-low dose naloxone

    high dose remifentanil (0.4 mg) combined with ultra-low dose naloxone (HN, 0.004 micrograms/kg/mL naloxone

    Also known as: HN

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Occurrence of Opioid-induced Hyperalgesia (OIH)

    Mechanical Pain Threshold-determined by von Frey filaments around the incision site. The force required to elicit a pain response was recorded in grams. Higher values indicate higher pain thresholds (i.e., less hyperalgesia), while lower values indicate greater pain sensitivity.

    Time frame: 24 hr Post-surgery

  2. Occurrence of Opioid-induced Hyperalgesia (OIH)

    Mechanical Pain Threshold-determined by von Frey filaments around the incision site.The force required to elicit a pain response was recorded in grams. Higher values indicate higher pain thresholds (i.e., less hyperalgesia), while lower values indicate greater pain sensitivity.

    Time frame: 48 hr Post-surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Opioid Consumption

    Opioid consumption required to control pain by Oral morphine equivalents

    Time frame: 24 hr post surgery

  2. Opioid Consumption

    Opioid consumption required to control pain by Oral morphine equivalents

    Time frame: 48 hrs post surgery

  3. Cold Pressure Test

    Pain threshold and pain tolerance were assessed using the Cold Pressor Test. Pain threshold was defined as the time to first pain sensation, and pain tolerance as the total duration the participant kept the hand immersed in cold water. Time was recorded in seconds. Higher values indicate greater pain tolerance and lower pain sensitivity.

    Time frame: 24 hr post surgery

  4. Cold Pressure Test

    Pain Threshold and Pain tolerance

    Time frame: 48 hrs post surgery

  5. Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Scores

    Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores are measured tp represent the severity of symptoms from 0 "no symptoms" to 10 "very severe symptoms." Its use is standard-of-care and is measured prior to surgery and at 4, 8 and 12h after extubation and again at 24h and 48h post-operatively.

    Time frame: Baseline, 4, 8 and 12h after extubation and again at 24h and 48h post-operatively

  6. McGill Short Form Questionnaire

    The Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire Total Score (SF-MPQ PRI-T) is a validated patient-reported outcome measure assessing pain quality and intensity. The total score (PRI-T) is calculated by summing the 11 sensory descriptor scores (range 0-33) and the 4 affective descriptor scores (range 0-12), resulting in a total score range of 0-45. Each descriptor is rated on a 4-point intensity scale: 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe. Higher scores indicate worse pain outcomes, and lower scores indicate less pain.

    Time frame: Baseline

  7. Brief Pain Inventory - Average Pain Severity

    Brief Pain Inventory assesses both pain intensity and pain unpleasantness (the emotional component of pain is considered to be a better metric of subject satisfaction and quality of life).Average pain severity was assessed using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI). Participants rated their average pain during the past 24 hours on a numeric rating scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine).

    Time frame: Baseline

07

Results

Posted Jun 4, 2026

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneLO-low Dose RemifentanilHI-high Dose Remifentanil With PlaceboHN-high Dose Remifentanil With Ultra-low Dose Naloxone
Started116
Completed114
Not completed002
Withdrew: Protocol violation001
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject001

Outcome measures

PrimaryOccurrence of Opioid-induced Hyperalgesia (OIH)

Mechanical Pain Threshold-determined by von Frey filaments around the incision site. The force required to elicit a pain response was recorded in grams. Higher values indicate higher pain thresholds (i.e., less hyperalgesia), while lower values indicate greater pain sensitivity.

Time frame:
24 hr Post-surgery
Reported as:
Mean · force in grams
Occurrence of Opioid-induced Hyperalgesia (OIH)
force in gramsLO-low Dose RemifentanilHI-high Dose Remifentanil With PlaceboHN-high Dose Remifentanil With Ultra-low Dose Naloxone
Occurrence of Opioid-induced Hyperalgesia (OIH)300 ± 0300 ± 089.5 ± 137.6
PrimaryOccurrence of Opioid-induced Hyperalgesia (OIH)

Mechanical Pain Threshold-determined by von Frey filaments around the incision site.The force required to elicit a pain response was recorded in grams. Higher values indicate higher pain thresholds (i.e., less hyperalgesia), while lower values indicate greater pain sensitivity.

Time frame:
48 hr Post-surgery
Reported as:
Mean · force in grams
Occurrence of Opioid-induced Hyperalgesia (OIH)
force in gramsLO-low Dose RemifentanilHI-high Dose Remifentanil With PlaceboHN-high Dose Remifentanil With Ultra-low Dose Naloxone
Occurrence of Opioid-induced Hyperalgesia (OIH)300 ± 06 ± 0117.3 ± 158.2
SecondaryOpioid Consumption

Opioid consumption required to control pain by Oral morphine equivalents

Time frame:
24 hr post surgery
Reported as:
Mean · milligram morphine equivalents (MME)
Opioid Consumption
milligram morphine equivalents (MME)LO-low Dose RemifentanilHI-high Dose Remifentanil With PlaceboHN-high Dose Remifentanil With Ultra-low Dose Naloxone
Opioid Consumption47.678.936.4 ± 9.2
SecondaryOpioid Consumption

Opioid consumption required to control pain by Oral morphine equivalents

Time frame:
48 hrs post surgery
Reported as:
Mean · milligram morphine equivalents (MME)
Opioid Consumption
milligram morphine equivalents (MME)LO-low Dose RemifentanilHI-high Dose Remifentanil With PlaceboHN-high Dose Remifentanil With Ultra-low Dose Naloxone
Opioid Consumption74.8109.663.4 ± 5.8
SecondaryCold Pressure Test

Pain threshold and pain tolerance were assessed using the Cold Pressor Test. Pain threshold was defined as the time to first pain sensation, and pain tolerance as the total duration the participant kept the hand immersed in cold water. Time was recorded in seconds. Higher values indicate greater pain tolerance and lower pain sensitivity.

Time frame:
24 hr post surgery
Reported as:
Mean · seconds
Cold Pressure Test
secondsLO-low Dose RemifentanilHI-high Dose Remifentanil With PlaceboHN-high Dose Remifentanil With Ultra-low Dose Naloxone
first pain sensation50 ± 060 ± 023.5 ± 27.7
Pain tolerance54 ± 076 ± 032.3 ± 27
SecondaryCold Pressure Test

Pain Threshold and Pain tolerance

Time frame:
48 hrs post surgery
Reported as:
Mean · seconds
Cold Pressure Test
secondsLO-low Dose RemifentanilHI-high Dose Remifentanil With PlaceboHN-high Dose Remifentanil With Ultra-low Dose Naloxone
first pain sensation60 ± 025 ± 045.5 ± 36.9
Pain Tolerance180 ± 038 ± 055 ± 45
SecondaryVisual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Scores

Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores are measured tp represent the severity of symptoms from 0 "no symptoms" to 10 "very severe symptoms." Its use is standard-of-care and is measured prior to surgery and at 4, 8 and 12h after extubation and again at 24h and 48h post-operatively.

Time frame:
Baseline, 4, 8 and 12h after extubation and again at 24h and 48h post-operatively
Reported as:
Mean · Scores on a Scale
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Scores
Scores on a ScaleLO-low Dose RemifentanilHI-high Dose Remifentanil With PlaceboHN-high Dose Remifentanil With Ultra-low Dose Naloxone
baseline8 ± 05.5 ± 06.9 ± 1.6
4 hours6 ± 05 ± 06.8 ± 2.4
8 hours7 ± 05 ± 05 ± 1
12 hours7 ± 06 ± 06.3 ± 1.5
24 hours7 ± 06 ± 07.3 ± 1.5
48 hours6 ± 00 ± 07.8 ± 2.2
SecondaryMcGill Short Form Questionnaire

The Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire Total Score (SF-MPQ PRI-T) is a validated patient-reported outcome measure assessing pain quality and intensity. The total score (PRI-T) is calculated by summing the 11 sensory descriptor scores (range 0-33) and the 4 affective descriptor scores (range 0-12), resulting in a total score range of 0-45. Each descriptor is rated on a 4-point intensity scale: 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe. Higher scores indicate worse pain outcomes, and lower scores indicate less pain.

Time frame:
Baseline
Reported as:
Mean · points
McGill Short Form Questionnaire
pointsLO-low Dose RemifentanilHI-high Dose Remifentanil With PlaceboHN-high Dose Remifentanil With Ultra-low Dose Naloxone
McGill Short Form Questionnaire21 ± 06 ± 017.2 ± 14.4
SecondaryBrief Pain Inventory - Average Pain Severity

Brief Pain Inventory assesses both pain intensity and pain unpleasantness (the emotional component of pain is considered to be a better metric of subject satisfaction and quality of life).Average pain severity was assessed using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI). Participants rated their average pain during the past 24 hours on a numeric rating scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine).

Time frame:
Baseline
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Brief Pain Inventory - Average Pain Severity
score on a scaleLO-low Dose RemifentanilHI-high Dose Remifentanil With PlaceboHN-high Dose Remifentanil With Ultra-low Dose Naloxone
Brief Pain Inventory - Average Pain Severity7 ± 02 ± 05.4 ± 2.7

Adverse events

Collected over From study enrollment (day of surgery) through 48 hours post-surgery.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
LO-low Dose Remifentanil0/1 (0%)0/1 (0%)0/1 (0%)
HI-high Dose Remifentanil With Placebo0/1 (0%)0/1 (0%)0/1 (0%)
HN-high Dose Remifentanil With Ultra-low Dose Naloxone0/4 (0%)0/4 (0%)1/4 (25%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventLO-low Dose RemifentanilHI-high Dose Remifentanil With PlaceboHN-high Dose Remifentanil With Ultra-low Dose Naloxone
Participant found ineligible after enrollmentSocial circumstances0/10/11/4

Baseline characteristics

Eight participants were enrolled. One participant withdrew before completing baseline assessments, and one participant was later determined to meet an exclusion criterion (undisclosed history of substance use disorder) and was removed from all analyses. Therefore, baseline analysis includes the six participants who completed baseline assessments and met eligibility criteria.

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)LO-low Dose RemifentanilHI-high Dose Remifentanil With PlaceboHN-high Dose Remifentanil With Ultra-low Dose NaloxoneTotal
<=18 years0000
Between 18 and 65 years0022
>=65 years1124
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)LO-low Dose RemifentanilHI-high Dose Remifentanil With PlaceboHN-high Dose Remifentanil With Ultra-low Dose NaloxoneTotal
Mean73 ± 068 ± 065 ± 12.7566.83 ± 10.41
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)LO-low Dose RemifentanilHI-high Dose Remifentanil With PlaceboHN-high Dose Remifentanil With Ultra-low Dose NaloxoneTotal
Female1124
Male0022
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)LO-low Dose RemifentanilHI-high Dose Remifentanil With PlaceboHN-high Dose Remifentanil With Ultra-low Dose NaloxoneTotal
Hispanic or Latino0000
Not Hispanic or Latino0000
Unknown or Not Reported1146
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)LO-low Dose RemifentanilHI-high Dose Remifentanil With PlaceboHN-high Dose Remifentanil With Ultra-low Dose NaloxoneTotal
United States1146
Cold Pressor Pain Threshold
Cold Pressor Pain Threshold(seconds)LO-low Dose RemifentanilHI-high Dose Remifentanil With PlaceboHN-high Dose Remifentanil With Ultra-low Dose NaloxoneTotal
Mean80 ± 0100 ± 010.25 ± 8.5436.83 ± 36.83
08

Study locations

1 site
  • UC Irvine Medical Center
    Orange, California 92868, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Bekhit MH. Opioid-induced hyperalgesia and tolerance. Am J Ther. 2010 Sep-Oct;17(5):498-510. doi: 10.1097/MJT.0b013e3181ed83a0. PubMed 20844348 ↗
  • Lin SL, Tsai RY, Shen CH, Lin FH, Wang JJ, Hsin ST, Wong CS. Co-administration of ultra-low dose naloxone attenuates morphine tolerance in rats via attenuation of NMDA receptor neurotransmission and suppression of neuroinflammation in the spinal cords. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2010 Aug;96(2):236-45. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2010.05.012. Epub 2010 May 15. PubMed 20478329 ↗
  • King T, Ossipov MH, Vanderah TW, Porreca F, Lai J. Is paradoxical pain induced by sustained opioid exposure an underlying mechanism of opioid antinociceptive tolerance? Neurosignals. 2005;14(4):194-205. doi: 10.1159/000087658. PubMed 16215302 ↗
  • Vinik HR, Kissin I. Rapid development of tolerance to analgesia during remifentanil infusion in humans. Anesth Analg. 1998 Jun;86(6):1307-11. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199806000-00033. PubMed 9620525 ↗
  • Guignard B, Bossard AE, Coste C, Sessler DI, Lebrault C, Alfonsi P, Fletcher D, Chauvin M. Acute opioid tolerance: intraoperative remifentanil increases postoperative pain and morphine requirement. Anesthesiology. 2000 Aug;93(2):409-17. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200008000-00019. PubMed 10910490 ↗
  • Hansen EG, Duedahl TH, Romsing J, Hilsted KL, Dahl JB. Intra-operative remifentanil might influence pain levels in the immediate post-operative period after major abdominal surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2005 Nov;49(10):1464-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2005.00861.x. PubMed 16223391 ↗
  • Ma JF, Huang ZL, Li J, Hu SJ, Lian QQ. [Cohort study of remifentanil-induced hyperalgesia in postoperative patients]. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2011 Apr 12;91(14):977-9. Chinese. PubMed 21609550 ↗
  • Cahill CM, Holdridge SV, Morinville A. Trafficking of delta-opioid receptors and other G-protein-coupled receptors: implications for pain and analgesia. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2007 Jan;28(1):23-31. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2006.11.003. Epub 2006 Dec 5. PubMed 17150262 ↗
  • Holdridge SV, Armstrong SA, Taylor AM, Cahill CM. Behavioural and morphological evidence for the involvement of glial cell activation in delta opioid receptor function: implications for the development of opioid tolerance. Mol Pain. 2007 Mar 12;3:7. doi: 10.1186/1744-8069-3-7. PubMed 17352824 ↗
  • Yalcin N, Uzun ST, Reisli R, Borazan H, Otelcioglu S. A comparison of ketamine and paracetamol for preventing remifentanil induced hyperalgesia in patients undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy. Int J Med Sci. 2012;9(5):327-33. doi: 10.7150/ijms.4222. Epub 2012 Jun 20. PubMed 22745573 ↗
  • Joly V, Richebe P, Guignard B, Fletcher D, Maurette P, Sessler DI, Chauvin M. Remifentanil-induced postoperative hyperalgesia and its prevention with small-dose ketamine. Anesthesiology. 2005 Jul;103(1):147-55. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200507000-00022. PubMed 15983467 ↗
  • Song JW, Lee YW, Yoon KB, Park SJ, Shim YH. Magnesium sulfate prevents remifentanil-induced postoperative hyperalgesia in patients undergoing thyroidectomy. Anesth Analg. 2011 Aug;113(2):390-7. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31821d72bc. Epub 2011 May 19. PubMed 21596876 ↗
  • Aguado D, Abreu M, Benito J, Garcia-Fernandez J, Gomez de Segura IA. Effects of naloxone on opioid-induced hyperalgesia and tolerance to remifentanil under sevoflurane anesthesia in rats. Anesthesiology. 2013 May;118(5):1160-9. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3182887526. PubMed 23407105 ↗
  • Kraemer WJ, Joseph MF, Volek JS, Hoffman JR, Ratamess NA, Newton RU, Fragala MS, French DN, Rubin MA, Scheett TP, McGuigan MR, Thomas GA, Gomez AL, Hakkinen K, Maresh CM. Endogenous opioid peptide responses to opioid and anti-inflammatory medications following eccentric exercise-induced muscle damage. Peptides. 2010 Jan;31(1):88-93. doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2009.09.031. Epub 2009 Oct 2. PubMed 19800931 ↗
  • Luginbuhl M, Gerber A, Schnider TW, Petersen-Felix S, Arendt-Nielsen L, Curatolo M. Modulation of remifentanil-induced analgesia, hyperalgesia, and tolerance by small-dose ketamine in humans. Anesth Analg. 2003 Mar;96(3):726-732. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000048086.58161.18. PubMed 12598253 ↗
  • Sen H, Sizlan A, Yanarates O, Emirkadi H, Ozkan S, Dagli G, Turan A. A comparison of gabapentin and ketamine in acute and chronic pain after hysterectomy. Anesth Analg. 2009 Nov;109(5):1645-50. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181b65ea0. PubMed 19843803 ↗
  • Xuerong Y, Yuguang H, Xia J, Hailan W. Ketamine and lornoxicam for preventing a fentanyl-induced increase in postoperative morphine requirement. Anesth Analg. 2008 Dec;107(6):2032-7. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181888061. PubMed 19020155 ↗
  • Lopez-Alvarez S, Mayo-Moldes M, Zaballos M, Iglesias BG, Blanco-Davila R. Esmolol versus ketamine-remifentanil combination for early postoperative analgesia after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Can J Anaesth. 2012 May;59(5):442-8. doi: 10.1007/s12630-012-9684-x. Epub 2012 Mar 2. PubMed 22383085 ↗
  • Koppert W, Sittl R, Scheuber K, Alsheimer M, Schmelz M, Schuttler J. Differential modulation of remifentanil-induced analgesia and postinfusion hyperalgesia by S-ketamine and clonidine in humans. Anesthesiology. 2003 Jul;99(1):152-9. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200307000-00025. PubMed 12826855 ↗
  • Engelhardt T, Zaarour C, Naser B, Pehora C, de Ruiter J, Howard A, Crawford MW. Intraoperative low-dose ketamine does not prevent a remifentanil-induced increase in morphine requirement after pediatric scoliosis surgery. Anesth Analg. 2008 Oct;107(4):1170-5. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e318183919e. PubMed 18806023 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Feb 2023 to primary completion in Dec 2024, 21 months.

Results were first posted in Jun 2026, 1 year 5 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 21, 2017
First posted
Feb 28, 2017
StartActual
Feb 25, 2023
Primary completionActual
Dec 10, 2024
CompletionActual
Dec 1, 2025
Results first posted
Jun 4, 2026
Last update
Jun 4, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 4, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03066739
Responsible party
Ariana M. Nelson (Associate Clinical Professor, University of California, Irvine) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 28, 2017
Start date
Feb 25, 2023
Primary completion
Dec 10, 2024
Completion
Dec 1, 2025
Results posted
Jun 4, 2026
Last update
Jun 4, 2026

Study contacts

Ariana Nelson, MD
principal investigator · Associate Clinical Professor

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in May 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Remifentanil

Start the discussion