ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03065660MifeMisoUpdated Apr 9, 2020

Mifepristone and Misoprostol Versus Misoprostol Alone in the Medical Management of Missed Miscarriage

A Phase 3 interventional study of Mifepristone, Oral, 200 Mg and Placebo Oral Tablet in Missed Miscarriage, sponsored by University of Birmingham. Completed at 28 sites in United Kingdom. Open to female participants aged 16 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-04-09.

Sponsored by University of Birmingham · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
711
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
16 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Miscarriage is the most common complication of pregnancy. As many as 15-25% of pregnancies end in miscarriage, and the number of miscarriages in England is estimated to be approximately 125,000 per year. Miscarriage often brings not only physical pain, bleeding and risks of infection, but also psychological impacts on women and their families. This study will focus on women whose pregnancy sac remains inside the womb (known as a missed miscarriage) and opt for medical management of their miscarriage up to 13+6 weeks of pregnancy. NICE currently recommends that a drug called misoprostol (a vaginal pessary or oral tablet that makes the womb contract) should be used in the medical treatment of miscarriage. However, there is evidence to suggest that combining this drug with mifepristone (an oral tablet that reduces pregnancy hormones) may be more effective in treating miscarriage. Therefore, to test this in a clinical trial, participants will be allocated at random to receive either mifepristone followed by misoprostol, or a dummy drug (placebo) followed by misoprostol. Neither the participants nor the researchers will know what allocation is decided, which is necessary to test the treatments fairly. The main outcome of interest will be whether miscarriage is complete within 7 days of randomisation. If miscarriage is not complete then further treatment (more tablets or surgery) will be offered. A number of other key outcomes, such as the need for an operation, will also be assessed. We will also study the views and experience of the participants regarding the tablet treatment.

We anticipate that 710 women will be required to take part in the study to answer this question with confidence. We estimate that we would be able to recruit this many women in two years.

Read the detailed description

Aim: To investigate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of MifeMiso combination (mifepristone and misoprostol) versus misoprostol alone in the management of missed miscarriage.

Primary clinical objective: To test the hypothesis that treatment with mifepristone plus misoprostol is superior to misoprostol alone for the resolution of miscarriage within 7 days in women diagnosed with missed miscarriage by pelvic ultrasound scan in the first 13+6 weeks of pregnancy.

Key secondary objective:To test the hypothesis that the addition of mifepristone reduces the need for surgical intervention to resolve the miscarriage.

Other secondary objectives:

  1. To evaluate if the addition of mifepristone reduces the need for further doses of misoprostol.
  2. To evaluate if the addition of mifepristone improves other clinical outcomes including surgical intervention up to and including 7 days post-randomisation and after 7 days post-randomisation, duration of bleeding, infection, negative pregnancy test at 21 days post-randomisation, time from randomisation to discharge from EPU care, side effects and complications.
  3. To evaluate if the addition of mifepristone improves patient satisfaction
  4. To assess the cost-effectiveness of the combination of mifepristone and misoprostol in the medical management of missed miscarriage.

Economic objectives: To assess the cost-effectiveness of the combination of mifepristone and misoprostol in the medical management of missed miscarriage based on an outcome of additional cost per additional successfully managed miscarriage and additional cost per additional quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). Using a model-based economic evaluation we will further explore the cost-effectiveness of the medical management of missed miscarriage, as explored in the proposed trial, with alternative management strategies, such as surgical and expectant, based on available secondary sources.

Mixed-method evaluation objectives: To explore the satisfaction of patients who complete the trial protocol. The results of the satisfaction survey (CSQ-8) will act as a sampling frame to conduct semi-structured interviews to further investigate patient experiences and satisfaction with medical management of missed miscarriage.

02

Conditions studied

  • Missed Miscarriage

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Missed miscarriage
  • Mifepristone
  • Misoprostol
  • Medical management
03

In context

Abortion, Incomplete

24 studies on the registry are indexed under Abortion, Incomplete; 5 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 711 is above the median of 311 across 21 interventional studies indexed under Abortion, Incomplete.

Browse Abortion, Incomplete studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Birmingham is the lead sponsor of 182 studies on the registry; 29 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
16 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Women diagnosed with missed miscarriage by pelvic ultrasound scan in the first 13+6 weeks of pregnancy that choose to have medical management of miscarriage.
  • Age 16 years and over
  • Willing and able to give .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Women opting for alternative methods of miscarriage management (expectant or surgical)
  • Diagnosis of incomplete miscarriage.
  • Life threatening bleeding.
  • to mifepristone or misoprostol use for example chronic adrenal failure, known to either drug, haemorrhagic disorders and anticoagulant therapy, prosthetic heart valve or history of endocarditis, existing cardiovascular disease, severe asthma uncontrolled by therapy or inherited porphyria.
  • Participation in any other blinded, placebo-controlled trials of medicinal products in pregnancy.
  • Previous participation in the MifeMiso trial
  • Woman not able to attend for day 6-7 ultrasound scan
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator)
Enrollment
711 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Mifepristone

    A single dose of oral mifepristone 200mg, followed by a single dose of vaginal, oral or sublingual misoprostol 800mcg 2 days later

    Drug: Mifepristone, Oral, 200 Mg

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Oral placebo tablet followed by a single dose of vaginal, oral or sublingual misoprostol 800mcg 2 days later.

    Drug: Placebo Oral Tablet

Interventions

  • The Investigational Medicinal Product (IMP) is a single dose of 200mg mifepristone to be taken orally after confirmation of missed miscarriage by pelvic ultrasound scan.

    Also known as: Mifegyne

  • DrugPlacebo Oral Tablet

    The placebo will be an oral tablet in the same form as the IMP, and identical in appearance.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Failure to spontaneously pass the gestational sac within 7 days after randomisation

    To test the hypothesis that treatment with mifepristone plus misoprostol is superior to misoprostol alone for the resolution of miscarriage within 7 days in women diagnosed with missed miscarriage by pelvic ultrasound scan in the first 13+6 weeks of pregnancy.

    Time frame: Within 7 days after randomisation

Secondary outcomes

  1. Surgical intervention to resolve the miscarriage (collected up to discharge from EPU care)

    Surgical intervention to resolve the miscarriage

    Time frame: From randomisation until discharge from EPU care; assessed up to approximately 8 weeks

  2. Surgical intervention to resolve the miscarriage up to and including day 7 post-randomisation

    Surgical intervention to resolve the miscarriage

    Time frame: From randomisation until day 7 post-randomisation

  3. Surgical intervention to resolve the miscarriage after day 7 post-randomisation to discharge from EPU care

    Surgical intervention to resolve the miscarriage

    Time frame: From day 8 post-randomisation until discharge from EPU care; assessed up to approximately 8 weeks

  4. Need for further doses of misoprostol up to day 7 post-randomisation

    Need for further doses of misoprostol up to day 7 post-randomisation

    Time frame: After initial 800mcg dose of misoprostol at day 2 until day 7 post-randomisation

  5. Need for further doses of misoprostol up to discharge from EPU care

    Need for further doses of misoprostol up to discharge from EPU care

    Time frame: After initial 800mcg dose of misoprostol at day 2 until discharge from EPU care; assessed up to approximately 8 weeks

  6. Overall patient satisfaction score (measured using the CSQ-8 questionnaire and collected upon discharge from EPU care).

    Overall patient satisfaction score (measured using the CSQ-8 questionnaire and collected upon discharge from EPU care).

    Time frame: Within 6 weeks of discharge from EPU care

  7. Patient quality of life (Index value and overall health status measured using the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire

    Patient quality of life (Index value and overall health status measured using the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire and collected on date of randomisation, day 6-7 post-randomisation or day of follow-up USS if different to day 6-7 and day 21 +/- 2 days post-randomisation. If a woman obtains an initial positive pregnancy test result at day 21 +/- 2 days post-randomisation then a further EQ-5D-5L questionnaire is collected upon discharge from EPU care).

    Time frame: Completion on date of randomisation, day 6-7 post-randomisation or day of follow-up USS if different to day 6-7 and day 21 +/- 2 days post-randomisation. Completion of all patient quality of life assessments up to approximately 8 weeks post-randomisation

  8. Duration of bleeding reported by woman (days). (collected up to discharge from EPU care)

    Duration of bleeding reported by woman (days). (collected up to discharge from EPU care)

    Time frame: From randomisation until discharge from EPU care; assessed up to approximately 8 weeks

  9. Diagnosis of infection associated with miscarriage requiring outpatient antibiotic treatment (collected up to discharge from EPU care)

    Diagnosis of infection associated with miscarriage requiring outpatient antibiotic treatment (collected up to discharge from EPU care)

    Time frame: From randomisation until discharge from EPU care; assessed up to approximately 8 weeks

  10. Diagnosis of infection associated with miscarriage requiring inpatient antibiotic treatment (collected up to discharge from EPU care)

    Diagnosis of infection associated with miscarriage requiring inpatient antibiotic treatment (collected up to discharge from EPU care)

    Time frame: From randomisation until discharge from EPU care; assessed up to approximately 8 weeks

  11. Negative pregnancy test result 21 days (± 2 days) after randomisation.

    Negative pregnancy test result 21 days (± 2 days) after randomisation.

    Time frame: 21 days (± 2 days) after randomisation.

  12. Time from randomisation to discharge from EPU care (described using summary statistics only)

    Time from randomisation to discharge from EPU care.

    Time frame: Time from randomisation to discharge from EPU care; assessed up to approximately 8 weeks

  13. Blood transfusion required (collected up to discharge from EPU care)

    Blood transfusion required (collected up to discharge from EPU care)

    Time frame: From randomisation until discharge from EPU care; assessed up to approximately 8 weeks

  14. Side effects (collected up to discharge from EPU care)

    Side effects (collected up to discharge from EPU care)

    Time frame: From randomisation until discharge from EPU care; assessed up to approximately 8 weeks

  15. Death (collected up to discharge from EPU care)

    Death (collected up to discharge from EPU care)

    Time frame: From randomisation until discharge from EPU care; assessed up to approximately 8 weeks

  16. Any serious complications (collected up to discharge from EPU care)

    Any serious complications (collected up to discharge from EPU care)

    Time frame: From randomisation until discharge from EPU care; assessed up to approximately 8 weeks

Other outcomes

  1. Outpatient or emergency visits

    Number of outpatient or emergency visits

    Time frame: From randomisation until discharge from EPU care; assessed up to approximately 8 weeks

  2. Inpatient admissions (nights in hospital)

    Number of inpatient admissions (nights in hospital)

    Time frame: From randomisation until discharge from EPU care; assessed up to approximately 8 weeks

07

Study locations

28 sites
  • Birmingham Heartlands Hospital
    Birmingham, United Kingdom
  • Birmingham Women's Hospital
    Birmingham, United Kingdom
  • Southmead Hospital
    Bristol, United Kingdom
  • St Michael's Hospital
    Bristol, United Kingdom
  • Burnley General Hospital
    Burnley, United Kingdom
  • University Hospital Coventry
    Coventry, United Kingdom
  • Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh
    Edinburgh, United Kingdom
  • Epsom Hospital
    Epsom, United Kingdom
  • St Helier Hospital
    Epsom, United Kingdom
  • Glasgow Royal Infirmary
    Glasgow, United Kingdom
  • Queen Elizabeth University Hospital
    Glasgow, United Kingdom
  • Liverpool Women's Hospital
    Liverpool, United Kingdom
  • Chelsea and Westminster Hospital
    London, United Kingdom
  • Kings College Hospital
    London, United Kingdom
  • Newham University Hospital
    London, United Kingdom
  • Royal London Hospital
    London, United Kingdom
  • St Thomas' Hospital
    London, United Kingdom
  • University College Hospital London
    London, United Kingdom
  • West Middlesex Hospital
    London, United Kingdom
  • Whipps Cross University Hospital
    London, United Kingdom
  • Royal Victoria Infirmary
    Newcastle, United Kingdom
  • Queen's Medical Centre
    Nottingham, United Kingdom
  • Queen Alexandra Hospital
    Portsmouth, United Kingdom
  • Princess Anne Hospital
    Southampton, United Kingdom
  • Sunderland Royal Hospital
    Sunderland, United Kingdom
  • Princess of Wales Hospital
    Swansea, United Kingdom
  • Singleton Hospital
    Swansea, United Kingdom
  • Princess Royal Hospital
    Telford, United Kingdom
08

References and documents

Related links

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Sep 2017 to primary completion in Jan 2020, 27 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 10, 2017
First posted
Feb 28, 2017
StartActual
Sep 20, 2017
Primary completionActual
Jan 9, 2020
CompletionActual
Jan 9, 2020
Last update
Apr 9, 2020
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 9, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03065660
Collaborators
Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Royal Victoria Infirmary, City Hospitals Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust, The Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Barts & The London NHS Trust, Queen's Medical Center, Heart of England NHS Trust, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, St Mary's Hospital, London, University College London Hospitals, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, King's College Hospital NHS Trust, University of Edinburgh, University of Nottingham, Queen Mary University of London, University of Warwick, University of Southampton
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 28, 2017
Start date
Sep 20, 2017
Primary completion
Jan 9, 2020
Completion
Jan 9, 2020
Last update
Apr 9, 2020

Study contacts

Arri Coomarasamy
principal investigator · University of Birmingham

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Mifepristone

Start the discussion