CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT03063905Updated Mar 21, 2018

The Effects of Opioid Taper on Opioid-Induced Hyperalgesia

An observational study in Buprenorphine and Pain, sponsored by Georgetown University. Terminated at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 50 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-03-21.

Sponsored by Georgetown University · Observational

Why this study was terminated
funding expired
Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Other
Enrollment
15
Ages
18 Years to 50 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Evidence to support the effectiveness of ongoing opioid therapy for the treatment of chronic non-malignant pain is lacking. In fact, data suggest that patient outcomes improve when tapered off opioid analgesics. To better understand the role opioid therapy plays in the experience of pain, we will study measured pain sensitivity in opioid dependent patients over the course of and 3 months following a standardized opioid taper. By isolating the effect of opioid taper in patients without pain, preliminary evidence of effect size can be used to guide clinicians treating patients with chronic pain.

Read the detailed description

Chronic pain impacts the daily lives of fully one-third of Americans over the age of 45, with prevalence expected to increase as the population ages. In well-intended and industry-driven efforts to provide relief to chronic pain sufferers, the prescription of opioids has increased dramatically since the turn of the century, such that it is currently estimated that between 5 and 8 million Americans use opioids on a daily basis for chronic pain management. Yet, prescription opioid therapy for chronic pain is not an evidence-based intervention. In fact, as evaluation data accumulate, it is becoming clear that outcomes are often poorer for patients on opioid therapy, and that improvements are appreciated when tapered off the medications. In the midst of an "epidemic of prescription drug abuse" it is critical that opioid prescription practices be evidence-based and delivered "in the best possible manner that maximizes effectiveness and minimizes harm".

A theorized explanation for poorer outcomes (functionality, quality of life) for patients on opioid therapy is the phenomenon of opioid-induced hyperalgesia (OIH). Well-demonstrated in animal and inferred in patients, ongoing opioid use results in increased sensitivity to experimental pain, which, in the case of the chronic pain patient, is believed to interfere with (if not preclude) desired pain relief outcomes. However, the causal relationship between opioid discontinuation and OIH has received little empirical attention, such that it is not clear the degree to which opioid taper improves pain responses and outcomes, if at all. Evidence supporting that prescription opioids makes the pain experience worse for chronic pain patients would support a sea change in current practice of chronic opioid therapy.

Studying the direct effects of an opioid taper on pain responses in chronic pain patients is challenging; complicated by the reemergence of pain, variable compliance with taper and concomitant increased use of non-opioid pain medications, a controlled examination of pain responses during and following opioid detoxification is not immediately tenable in this patient population. Thus, funded is a proof-of concept trial to identify and characterize the direct effects of opioid detoxification on experimental pain responses in opioid-dependent patients without chronic pain to establish if, in fact, a notable effect size can be discerned. If supported, these findings will provide a foundation upon which to predict efficacy in patients with the more complicated picture of chronic pain.

Specifically, in a well-characterized sample of men and women seeking addiction treatment in a residential setting, experimental pain responses will be serially described over the course of and for three months following a standard observed opioid (buprenorphine) taper, and compared to those of matched control patients initiated on buprenorphine maintenance therapy. Pain responses will be measured with two valid and reliable experimental pain induction techniques commonly used to measure OIH (cold-pressor, quantitative sensory testing), and subject-level predictors of response identified.

02

Conditions studied

  • Buprenorphine
  • Pain

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Opioid related disorders
  • Narcotic abuse
03

In context

Hyperalgesia

152 studies on the registry are indexed under Hyperalgesia; 13 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 15 is below the median of 53 across 20 observational studies indexed under Hyperalgesia.

Browse Hyperalgesia studies →

Lead sponsor

Georgetown University is the lead sponsor of 286 studies on the registry; 42 are open to participants now.

Of its 28 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 20 (71%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 50 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Men and women seeking addiction treatment in a residential or outpatient setting

Inclusion criteria

  1. between ages of 18-50
  2. able to provide a positive urine toxicology test for heroin, morphine and/or methadone (and free of other drugs of abuse) upon treatment admission
  3. without known background disease, including chronic or acute pain
  4. otherwise in good physical and mental health, or in the care of a physician who is willing to take responsibility for such treatment
  5. able to understand the purpose and instructions of the study, and provide informed consent as approved by the Western and Georgetown University Institutional Review Boards

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. meet diagnostic criteria for an active substance use disorder other than opioids and nicotine
  2. be acutely psychotic, severely depressed, and/or in need of inpatient psychiatric treatment
  3. have a neurological (i.e. Raynaud's syndrome or symptomatic cold neuropathy) or psychiatric illness that would affect pain responses
  4. have a history of heart disease, stroke, or a pacemaker or uncontrolled high blood pressure. Good cardiovascular health is stipulated to ensure subjects can tolerate the sympathetic nervous system responses associated with the pain induction procedures.
  5. have sensory deficits at pain testing site resulting from medical conditions such as diabetes, alcoholic neuropathy, AIDS neuropathy, severe thyroid, and liver or kidney diseases
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Other
Enrollment
15 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Opioid Taper

    Patients tapering off their buprenorphine treatment

    Drug: Buprenorphine

  • Opioid Maintenance

    Patients starting their buprenorphine treatment

    Drug: Buprenorphine

Interventions

  • DrugBuprenorphine

    Patients taking buprenorphine to wean off an opiate addiction

    Also known as: Suboxone

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain Threshold Response (in seconds) - Cold Pressor Test

    To compare the effects of opioid taper with initiating buprenorphine maintenance therapy by undergoing experimentally induced cold-pressor test (measured in seconds). Cold pain threshold responses will be compared within-subject in the taper group and between the two groups.

    Time frame: 3 months

  2. Pain Tolerance Response (in seconds) - Cold Pressor Test

    To compare the effects of opioid taper with initiating buprenorphine maintenance therapy by undergoing experimentally induced cold-pressor test (measured in seconds). Cold pain tolerance responses will be compared within-subject in the taper group and between the two groups.

    Time frame: 3 months

  3. Pain Threshold Response (in seconds) - Quantitative Sensory Test

    To compare the effects of opioid taper with initiating buprenorphine maintenance therapy by undergoing experimentally induced quantitative sensory test pain (measured in seconds). Heat pain threshold responses will be compared within-subject in the taper group and between the two groups.

    Time frame: 3 months

  4. Pain Tolerance Response (in seconds) - Quantitative Sensory Test

    To compare the effects of opioid taper with initiating buprenorphine maintenance therapy by undergoing experimentally induced quantitative sensory test pain (measured in seconds). Heat pain tolerance responses will be compared within-subject in the taper group and between the two groups.

    Time frame: 3 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Improvement in opioid taper

    A sub-aim of the project is to study how the degree of improvement related to opioid taper in experimental pain responses is related to socio-demographic, psychological, and opioid use history characteristic of the subject.

    Time frame: 3 months

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • Avery Road Treatment Center
    Rockville, Maryland 20853, United States
  • Kolmac Clinic
    Silver Spring, Maryland 20910, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Johannes CB, Le TK, Zhou X, Johnston JA, Dworkin RH. The prevalence of chronic pain in United States adults: results of an Internet-based survey. J Pain. 2010 Nov;11(11):1230-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2010.07.002. Epub 2010 Aug 25. PubMed 20797916 ↗
  • Chou R, Deyo R, Devine B, Hansen R, Sullivan S, Jarvik JG, Blazina I, Dana T, Bougatsos C, Turner J. The Effectiveness and Risks of Long-Term Opioid Treatment of Chronic Pain. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2014 Sep;(218):1-219. doi: 10.23970/AHRQEPCERTA218. PubMed 30313000 ↗
  • Von Korff MR. Long-term use of opioids for complex chronic pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2013 Oct;27(5):663-72. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2013.09.011. Epub 2013 Oct 5. PubMed 24315147 ↗
  • Deyo RA, Dworkin SF, Amtmann D, Andersson G, Borenstein D, Carragee E, Carrino J, Chou R, Cook K, DeLitto A, Goertz C, Khalsa P, Loeser J, Mackey S, Panagis J, Rainville J, Tosteson T, Turk D, Von Korff M, Weiner DK. Report of the NIH Task Force on Research Standards for Chronic Low Back Pain. Int J Ther Massage Bodywork. 2015 Sep 1;8(3):16-33. doi: 10.3822/ijtmb.v8i3.295. eCollection 2015 Sep. PubMed 26388962 ↗
  • The Management of Opioid Therapy for Chronic Pain Working Group. (2010). VA/DOD Clinical Practice Guideline for Management of Opioid Therapy for Chronic Pain. Dept of Veterans Affairs, Department of Defense.
  • Nuckols TK, Anderson L, Popescu I, Diamant AL, Doyle B, Di Capua P, Chou R. Opioid prescribing: a systematic review and critical appraisal of guidelines for chronic pain. Ann Intern Med. 2014 Jan 7;160(1):38-47. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-160-1-201401070-00732. PubMed 24217469 ↗
  • Executive Office of the President of the United States of America. (2011). Epidemic: Responding to America's Prescription Drug Abuse. Retrieved January 18, 2016, from White House Website: https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/ondcp/policy-and-research/rx_abuse_plan.pdf.
  • Silverman SM. Opioid induced hyperalgesia: clinical implications for the pain practitioner. Pain Physician. 2009 May-Jun;12(3):679-84. PubMed 19461836 ↗
  • Brush DE. Complications of long-term opioid therapy for management of chronic pain: the paradox of opioid-induced hyperalgesia. J Med Toxicol. 2012 Dec;8(4):387-92. doi: 10.1007/s13181-012-0260-0. PubMed 22983894 ↗
  • Angst MS, Clark JD. Opioid-induced hyperalgesia: a qualitative systematic review. Anesthesiology. 2006 Mar;104(3):570-87. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200603000-00025. PubMed 16508405 ↗
  • Mao J. Opioid-induced abnormal pain sensitivity: implications in clinical opioid therapy. Pain. 2002 Dec;100(3):213-217. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(02)00422-0. No abstract available. PubMed 12467992 ↗
  • Compton P, Charuvastra VC, Kintaudi K, Ling W. Pain responses in methadone-maintained opioid abusers. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2000 Oct;20(4):237-45. doi: 10.1016/s0885-3924(00)00191-3. PubMed 11027904 ↗
  • Compton P, Charuvastra VC, Ling W. Pain intolerance in opioid-maintained former opiate addicts: effect of long-acting maintenance agent. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2001 Jul 1;63(2):139-46. doi: 10.1016/s0376-8716(00)00200-3. PubMed 11376918 ↗
  • Doverty M, White JM, Somogyi AA, Bochner F, Ali R, Ling W. Hyperalgesic responses in methadone maintenance patients. Pain. 2001 Feb 1;90(1-2):91-6. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3959(00)00391-2. PubMed 11166974 ↗
  • Eyler EC. Chronic and acute pain and pain management for patients in methadone maintenance treatment. Am J Addict. 2013 Jan;22(1):75-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1521-0391.2013.00308.x. PubMed 23398230 ↗
  • Pud D, Cohen D, Lawental E, Eisenberg E. Opioids and abnormal pain perception: New evidence from a study of chronic opioid addicts and healthy subjects. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2006 May 20;82(3):218-23. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2005.09.007. Epub 2005 Oct 17. PubMed 16229972 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 21, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03063905
Lead sponsor
Georgetown University
Collaborators
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 24, 2017
Start date
Jan 2017
Primary completion
Feb 28, 2018
Completion
Feb 28, 2018
Last update
Mar 21, 2018

Study contacts

Peggy Compton, RN, PhD
principal investigator · Georgetown University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Mar 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion