CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT03063203Updated Jun 2, 2022Results posted

Single Agent Decitabine in TP53 Mutated Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia

A Phase 2 interventional study of Decitabine and Bone marrow biopsy/aspirate in Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Relapsed, Adult, sponsored by Washington University School of Medicine. Terminated at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-06-02.

Sponsored by Washington University School of Medicine · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Futility
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
17
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

In this study, the investigators seek to determine whether decitabine therapy can improve outcomes, specifically overall survival this selected subset of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients with the poorest prognosis based on refractoriness to induction treatment and high risk genetic mutations.

02

Conditions studied

  • Acute Myeloid Leukemia
  • Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Relapsed, Adult
03

In context

Leukemia

5,441 studies on the registry are indexed under Leukemia; 637 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 17 is below the median of 38 across 4,248 interventional studies indexed under Leukemia.

Browse Leukemia studies →

Lead sponsor

Washington University School of Medicine is the lead sponsor of 1,765 studies on the registry; 271 are open to participants now.

Of its 324 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 212 (65%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • TP53 mutant AML. The presence of a TP53 mutation should be determined by Genoptix (or institutional preferred equivalent assay). Detection of a TP53 mutation at the time of initial diagnosis is sufficient for enrollment at the time of relapsed/refractory disease. Detection of a TP53 mutation in either the peripheral blood or bone marrow is adequate for enrollment. Alternatively, patients who have not had TP53 mutation analysis performed, but who have > 20% TP53 positive cells by immunohistochemistry detected on a bone marrow aspirate may also be enrolled,29 provided that mutation analysis is requested at the time of enrollment.
  • Relapsed/refractory AML following 7+3 (or similar cytarabine containing induction chemotherapy for AML) disease detected by one of the following methods:

    • bone marrow blasts > 5%, or
    • Hematologics flow cytometry assay (threshold > 0.5%) (alternative equivalent assay may be substituted), or
    • Persistent cytogenetic abnormality (e.g. del5, del17p, etc), by FISH or conventional karotyping, or
    • Persistent TP53 mutation (at least 5 variant reads with at least 50x coverage) determined by Genoptix (or institutional preferred equivalent assay).
  • Patients with > 10% blasts on a day +14 bone marrow biopsy following 7+3 may either be enrolled or may be treated with a course of standard re-induction (e.g. 5+2 or similar) and then re-evaluated for response. Eligible patients will meet any of the above criteria on a subsequent biopsy.
  • Bone marrow and organ function as defined below:

    • Peripheral white blood cell count \< 50,000/mcl (patients may receive hydroxyurea as necessary for cytoreduction),
    • Total bilirubin \< 1.5 x upper limit of normal,
    • AST and ALT \< 2.5 x upper limit of normal,
    • Serum creatinine \< 2.0 x upper limit of normal, and,
  • At least 18 years of age.
  • Women of childbearing potential and men must agree to use adequate contraception (hormonal or barrier method of birth control, abstinence) prior to study entry and for the duration of study participation. Should a woman become pregnant or suspect she is pregnant while participating in this study, she must inform her treating physician immediately
  • Ability to understand and willingness to sign an IRB approved written informed consent document (or that of legally authorized representative, if applicable
  • Performance status ≤ 3

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior treatment with either decitabine or azacitidine or an investigational agent
  • Acute promyelocytic leukemia with PML-RARA or t(15;17).
  • History of HIV, Hepatitis B, or Hepatitis C infection.
  • Concurrent illness including, but not limited to, ongoing uncontrolled infection, symptomatic NYHA class 3 or 4 congestive heart failure, unstable angina pectoris, or cardiac arrhythmia.
  • Radiation therapy within 14 days of enrollment.
  • Chemotherapy administration in the 7 days preceding enrollment with the exception of hydroxyurea, which can be continued until Cycle 2. A washout period for oral tyrosine kinase inhibitors (e.g. Jakafi, etc) is not required, although tyrosine kinase inhibitors therapy must be discontinued prior to enrollment.
  • Malignancies (other than AML) requiring active therapy or diagnosed within the last year, with the exception of non-melanoma skin cancer which can be treated or in situ malignancies (such as cervical, breast, prostate, etc.)
  • Currently receiving any other investigational agents.
  • Known central nervous system (CNS) leukemia or testicular involvement of leukemia
  • A history of allergic reactions attributed to compounds of similar chemical or biologic composition to decitabine or other agents used in the study.
  • Pregnant and/or breastfeeding. Women of childbearing potential must have a negative urine pregnancy test within 7 days of study entry.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
17 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Decitabine

    * Cycle 1: All patients will receive decitabine 20 mg/m\^2 IV infusion per day over one hour on Days 1-10 of a 28-day cycle * Cycle 2: Patients with bone marrow blast counts \< 5% may receive decitabine 20 mg/m\^2 IV infusion per day over one hour on Days 1-5 of a 28-day cycle. All other patients will receive decitabine 20 mg/m\^2 IV infusion per day over one hour on Days 1-10 of a 28-day cycle. * Cycle 3 and subsequent cycles: All patients will receive 20 mg/m\^2 IV infusion per day over one hour on Days 1-5 of the 28-day cycle

    Drug: Decitabine · Procedure: Bone marrow biopsy/aspirate · Procedure: Peripheral blood draw · Procedure: Skin biopsy · Procedure: Buccal swab

Interventions

  • DrugDecitabine

    * After 2 cycles, patients with progressive disease or relapse (a clear progression with at least \>20% bone marrow blasts and an increase of at least 50% from prior biopsy) should be removed from protocol and proceed to salvage treatment according to center preference * Transplant eligible patients who achieve CR, CRc, or CRi, after 3 cycles with a suitable donor will proceed to conditioning regimen and transplant * Transplant eligible patients with PR after 3 cycles may be removed from protocol and proceed to salvage treatment according to center preference * Transplant eligible patients with a suitable donor who achieve mLFS, CR, CRc, or CRi, may proceed to transplant after at 3 cycles * Transplant ineligible patients with (CR, CRc or CRi, PR) will continue on maintenance doses * Transplant ineligible patient with SD after cycle 4 may be removed from protocol and proceed to alternative treatment or continue on protocol according to treating physician's preference.

    Also known as: 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine

  • ProcedureBone marrow biopsy/aspirate

    * Baseline, Cycle 1 Day 10, Cycle 1 Day 28, Cycle 2 Day 28, Cycle 3 Day 28, and Progression or relapse * Biopsy/aspirate on Cycle 1 Day 10 is for participants enrolled at Washington University only * Biopsy/aspirate on Cycle 2 Day 28 is at the discretion of the treating physician

  • ProcedurePeripheral blood draw

    -Baseline, Cycle 1 Day 10, Cycle 1 Day 28, Cycle 2 Day 28, Cycle 3 Day 28, and Progression/Relapse

  • ProcedureSkin biopsy

    * Optional but if refuse skin biopsy then participant can provided buccal swab * There is no required time frame for this sample - it may have been collected months or even years prior to the first dose of decitabine * If WBC at time of enrollment is \>30,000/µl, skin biopsy should be collected at the time of C1D28 bone marrow biopsy or thereafter

  • ProcedureBuccal swab

    -Baseline (if skin biopsy declined) and Cycle 2 Day 28

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Overall Survival of Participants With TP53 Mutation

    * Overall survival (OS) is defined as the time from enrollment to death due to any cause. For a patient who is not known to be alive at the end of study follow up, observation of OS is censored on the date the patient was last known to be alive * To be evaluable for this outcome measure the participant would have to have received at least one dose of decitabine

    Time frame: 1 year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Responding TP53 Mutated Patients (CR, CRi)

    * Complete remission (CR) - Defined as bone marrow blasts \<5%; absence of circulating blasts and blasts with Auer rods; absence of extramedullary disease; absolute neutrophil count \>1.0 x 109/L (1,000/μL); platelet count \>100 x 109/L (100,000/μL). * Complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi): All CR criteria except for residual neutropenia - \<1.0 x 109/L (1,000/μL) or thrombocytopenia -\<100 x 109/L (100,000/μL)

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  2. Time to Stem Cell Transplant Among Participants Who Are Suitable Candidates for Transplant and Have an Identified Donor

    * Document the number of days that it takes each participant to reach transplant * Transplant eligible participants are those who achieve complete remission (CR), cytogenetic complete remission (CRc), complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi), or morphologic leukemia free state (mLFS) per 2017 ELN AML Recommendations.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  3. Median Time to Leukemia Relapse (TTLR) in Non-transplant Patients

    -Recurrence/morphologic relapse - Defined as relapse following complete remission is defined as reappearance of blasts in the blood or the finding of ≥ 5% blasts in the bone marrow, not attributable to any other cause. New dysplastic changes is considered relapse. If there are no blasts in the peripheral blood and 5-20% blasts in the bone marrow, bone marrow biopsy should be repeated in \> 1 week to confirm relapse.

    Time frame: 2 years

  4. Event-free Survival (EFS)

    -Event-free survival is defined as the interval from the date of first dose of study drug to date of treatment failure, recurrence, death due to any cause, or loss to follow up.

    Time frame: 2 year

  5. Average Number of Hospital Days

    -Document number of hospital days that each participant stays and obtain average for all evaluable participants

    Time frame: During cycles 1 and 2 (60 days)

  6. Response Compared Between Patients With Morphologically Evident Disease Versus Patients With Molecularly Detected Disease at the Time of Enrollment

    * Morphologically evident disease (\>5% blasts by cytomorphology) * Molecularly detected disease (disease detected with flow cytometry, cytogenetic, or mutational analysis if ≤ 5% blasts by cytomorphology) * Response will be assessed according to the 2017 European LeukemiaNet (ELN) Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) recommendations

    Time frame: Through 12 weeks

  7. Survival Compared Between Patients With Morphologically Evident Disease Versus Patients With Molecularly Detected Disease at the Time of Enrollment

    * Morphologically evident disease (\>5% blasts by cytomorphology) * Molecularly detected disease (disease detected with flow cytometry, cytogenetic, or mutational analysis with ≤ 5% blasts by cytomorphology)

    Time frame: 2 years

  8. Response Compared Between Patients With de Novo AML Versus Patients With Secondary AML Versus Patients With Treatment-related AML

    -Response will be assessed according to the 2017 European LeukemiaNet (ELN) Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) recommendations

    Time frame: Through 12 weeks

  9. Survival Compared Between Patients With de Novo AML Versus Patients With Secondary AML Versus Patients With Treatment-related AML

    Time frame: 2 years

  10. Response Compared Between Patients With Presence of Cytogenetic Abnormalities in Addition to TP53 Mutations Versus Patients With Absence of Cytogenetic Abnormalities in Addition to TP53 Mutations

    -Response will be assessed according to the 2017 European LeukemiaNet (ELN) Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) recommendations

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  11. Survival Compared Between Patients With Presence of Cytogenetic Abnormalities in Addition to TP53 Mutations Versus Patients With Absence of Cytogenetic Abnormalities in Addition to TP53 Mutations

    Time frame: 2 years

  12. Median Number of Hospital Stays

    -Document number of hospital days that each participant stays and obtain median for all evaluable participants

    Time frame: During cycles 1 and 2 (60 days)

07

Results

Posted Mar 18, 2022

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneDecitabine
Started17
Completed3
Not completed14
Withdrew: Chose alternative therapy3
Withdrew: Death2
Withdrew: Disease progression4
Withdrew: Physician decision5

Outcome measures

PrimaryOverall Survival of Participants With TP53 Mutation

* Overall survival (OS) is defined as the time from enrollment to death due to any cause. For a patient who is not known to be alive at the end of study follow up, observation of OS is censored on the date the patient was last known to be alive * To be evaluable for this outcome measure the participant would have to have received at least one dose of decitabine

Time frame:
1 year
Reported as:
Median · days
Overall Survival of Participants With TP53 Mutation
daysDecitabine
Overall Survival of Participants With TP53 Mutation244 (116 to 390)
SecondaryPercentage of Responding TP53 Mutated Patients (CR, CRi)

* Complete remission (CR) - Defined as bone marrow blasts \<5%; absence of circulating blasts and blasts with Auer rods; absence of extramedullary disease; absolute neutrophil count \>1.0 x 109/L (1,000/μL); platelet count \>100 x 109/L (100,000/μL). * Complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi): All CR criteria except for residual neutropenia - \<1.0 x 109/L (1,000/μL) or thrombocytopenia -\<100 x 109/L (100,000/μL)

Time frame:
12 weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Percentage of Responding TP53 Mutated Patients (CR, CRi)
ParticipantsDecitabine
Percentage of Responding TP53 Mutated Patients (CR, CRi)5
SecondaryTime to Stem Cell Transplant Among Participants Who Are Suitable Candidates for Transplant and Have an Identified Donor

* Document the number of days that it takes each participant to reach transplant * Transplant eligible participants are those who achieve complete remission (CR), cytogenetic complete remission (CRc), complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi), or morphologic leukemia free state (mLFS) per 2017 ELN AML Recommendations.

Time frame:
12 weeks
Reported as:
Median · days
Time to Stem Cell Transplant Among Participants Who Are Suitable Candidates for Transplant and Have an Identified Donor
daysDecitabine
Time to Stem Cell Transplant Among Participants Who Are Suitable Candidates for Transplant and Have an Identified Donor117 (77 to 163)
SecondaryMedian Time to Leukemia Relapse (TTLR) in Non-transplant Patients

-Recurrence/morphologic relapse - Defined as relapse following complete remission is defined as reappearance of blasts in the blood or the finding of ≥ 5% blasts in the bone marrow, not attributable to any other cause. New dysplastic changes is considered relapse. If there are no blasts in the peripheral blood and 5-20% blasts in the bone marrow, bone marrow biopsy should be repeated in \> 1 week to confirm relapse.

Time frame:
2 years
Reported as:
Median · days
Median Time to Leukemia Relapse (TTLR) in Non-transplant Patients
daysDecitabine
Median Time to Leukemia Relapse (TTLR) in Non-transplant Patients308 (64 to 374)
SecondaryEvent-free Survival (EFS)

-Event-free survival is defined as the interval from the date of first dose of study drug to date of treatment failure, recurrence, death due to any cause, or loss to follow up.

Time frame:
2 year
Reported as:
Median · days
Event-free Survival (EFS)
daysDecitabine
Event-free Survival (EFS)227 (64 to 354)
SecondaryAverage Number of Hospital Days

-Document number of hospital days that each participant stays and obtain average for all evaluable participants

Time frame:
During cycles 1 and 2 (60 days)
Reported as:
Mean · days
Average Number of Hospital Days
daysDecitabine
Average Number of Hospital Days10.3 (2 to 28)
SecondaryResponse Compared Between Patients With Morphologically Evident Disease Versus Patients With Molecularly Detected Disease at the Time of Enrollment

* Morphologically evident disease (\>5% blasts by cytomorphology) * Molecularly detected disease (disease detected with flow cytometry, cytogenetic, or mutational analysis if ≤ 5% blasts by cytomorphology) * Response will be assessed according to the 2017 European LeukemiaNet (ELN) Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) recommendations

Time frame:
Through 12 weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Response Compared Between Patients With Morphologically Evident Disease Versus Patients With Molecularly Detected Disease at the Time of Enrollment
ParticipantsMorphologically Evident DiseaseMolecularly Detected Disease
Complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi)32
Morphologic leukemia free state (mLFS)01
Stable Disease (SD)24
Progressive disease (PD)11
SecondarySurvival Compared Between Patients With Morphologically Evident Disease Versus Patients With Molecularly Detected Disease at the Time of Enrollment

* Morphologically evident disease (\>5% blasts by cytomorphology) * Molecularly detected disease (disease detected with flow cytometry, cytogenetic, or mutational analysis with ≤ 5% blasts by cytomorphology)

Time frame:
2 years
Reported as:
Median · days
Survival Compared Between Patients With Morphologically Evident Disease Versus Patients With Molecularly Detected Disease at the Time of Enrollment
daysMorphologically Evident DiseaseMolecularly Detected Disease
Survival Compared Between Patients With Morphologically Evident Disease Versus Patients With Molecularly Detected Disease at the Time of Enrollment215 (58 to 390)336 (61 to 557)
SecondaryResponse Compared Between Patients With de Novo AML Versus Patients With Secondary AML Versus Patients With Treatment-related AML

-Response will be assessed according to the 2017 European LeukemiaNet (ELN) Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) recommendations

Time frame:
Through 12 weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Response Compared Between Patients With de Novo AML Versus Patients With Secondary AML Versus Patients With Treatment-related AML
ParticipantsPatients With de Novo AMLPatients With Secondary AMLPatients With Treatment Related AML
Complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi)302
Morphologic leukemia free state (mLFS)001
Stable Disease (SD)312
Progressive disease (PD)011
SecondarySurvival Compared Between Patients With de Novo AML Versus Patients With Secondary AML Versus Patients With Treatment-related AML
Time frame:
2 years
Reported as:
Median · days
Survival Compared Between Patients With de Novo AML Versus Patients With Secondary AML Versus Patients With Treatment-related AML
daysPatients With de Novo AMLPatients With Secondary AMLPatients With Treatment Related AML
Survival Compared Between Patients With de Novo AML Versus Patients With Secondary AML Versus Patients With Treatment-related AML246 (106 to 557)235 (116 to 354)244 (58 to 454)
SecondaryResponse Compared Between Patients With Presence of Cytogenetic Abnormalities in Addition to TP53 Mutations Versus Patients With Absence of Cytogenetic Abnormalities in Addition to TP53 Mutations

-Response will be assessed according to the 2017 European LeukemiaNet (ELN) Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) recommendations

Time frame:
12 weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Response Compared Between Patients With Presence of Cytogenetic Abnormalities in Addition to TP53 Mutations Versus Patients With Absence of Cytogenetic Abnormalities in Addition to TP53 Mutations
ParticipantsPresence of Cytogenetic Abnormalities in Addition to TP53 MutationsAbsence of Cytogenetic Abnormalities in Addition to TP53 Mutations
Complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi)50
Morphologic leukemia free state (mLFS)10
Stable Disease (SD)51
Progressive disease (PD)20
SecondarySurvival Compared Between Patients With Presence of Cytogenetic Abnormalities in Addition to TP53 Mutations Versus Patients With Absence of Cytogenetic Abnormalities in Addition to TP53 Mutations
Time frame:
2 years
Reported as:
Median · days
Survival Compared Between Patients With Presence of Cytogenetic Abnormalities in Addition to TP53 Mutations Versus Patients With Absence of Cytogenetic Abnormalities in Addition to TP53 Mutations
daysPresence of Cytogenetic Abnormalities in Addition to TP53 MutationsAbsence of Cytogenetic Abnormalities in Addition to TP53 Mutations
Survival Compared Between Patients With Presence of Cytogenetic Abnormalities in Addition to TP53 Mutations Versus Patients With Absence of Cytogenetic Abnormalities in Addition to TP53 Mutations254 (116 to 390)NA (NA to NA)
SecondaryMedian Number of Hospital Stays

-Document number of hospital days that each participant stays and obtain median for all evaluable participants

Time frame:
During cycles 1 and 2 (60 days)
Reported as:
Median · days
Median Number of Hospital Stays
daysDecitabine
Median Number of Hospital Stays9 (2 to 28)

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse events were collected from time of consent until 30 days after last dose of therapy (may continue until time of transplantation or disease progression - estimated time of 3-6 months). All-cause mortality was collected from time of consent through completion of follow-up (for 2 years after last dose of decitabine or until the patient is lost to follow-up or dies).. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Decitabine15/17 (88.2%)4/17 (23.5%)17/17 (100%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventDecitabine
Febrile neutropeniaInfections and infestations2/17
Bacteremia streptococcusInfections and infestations1/17
Facial cellulitisInfections and infestations1/17
SinusitisInfections and infestations1/17
Thromboembolic eventVascular disorders1/17
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 83
Most frequent other events
EventDecitabine
Lymphocyte count decreasedInvestigations9/17
White blood cell decreasedInvestigations7/17
Neutrophil count decreasedInvestigations6/17
Platelet count decreasedInvestigations5/17
HyponatremiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders5/17
Febrile neutropeniaInfections and infestations4/17
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders4/17
FatigueGeneral disorders4/17
Alanine aminotransferase increasedInvestigations4/17
Aspartate aminotransferase increasedInvestigations4/17

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Decitabine
Median61 (43 to 74)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Decitabine
Female6
Male11
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Decitabine
Hispanic or Latino0
Not Hispanic or Latino17
Unknown or Not Reported0
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Decitabine
American Indian or Alaska Native0
Asian0
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
Black or African American1
White16
More than one race0
Unknown or Not Reported0
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Decitabine
United States17
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Washington University School of Medicine
    Saint Louis, Missouri 63110, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Oct 1, 2020
  • Informed consent form · Dec 2, 2020

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 2, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03063203
Lead sponsor
Washington University School of Medicine
Collaborators
Janssen Pharmaceuticals, National Institutes of Health (NIH), National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 24, 2017
Start date
Jul 14, 2017
Primary completion
Feb 13, 2021
Completion
Mar 16, 2022
Results posted
Mar 18, 2022
Last update
Jun 2, 2022

Study contacts

John Welch, M.D., Ph.D.
principal investigator · Washington University School of Medicine

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in May 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion