A Phase 1 interventional study of N-Acetyl Cysteine (NAC) in Retinitis Pigmentosa, sponsored by Johns Hopkins University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-09-19.
Sponsored by Johns Hopkins University · Phase 1, Interventional, and Treatment
Retinitis Pigmentosa (RP) is a devastating eye disease and at present there are no known treatment options that can alter the rate of vision loss. In a series of studies in animal models, the effects of exposing cones in the periphery of the retina to a large excess of oxygen results in progressive oxidative damage to cone photoreceptors and cone cell death. Compared to control patients, those with RP showed significant reduction in the reduced to oxidized glutathione ratio (GSH/GSSG) in aqueous humor and a significant increase in protein carbonyl content. This demonstration of oxidative stress and oxidative damage in the eyes of patients with RP, suggests that oxidative damage-induced cone cell death in animal models of RP may translate to humans with RP and support the hypotheses that (1) potent antioxidants will promote cone survival and function in patients with RP and (2) aqueous GSH/GSSG ratio and carbonyl content on proteins provide useful biomarkers of disease activity in this patient population. Orally administered N-Acetylcysteine (NAC) has been found to be a particularly effective antioxidant that promotes prolonged cone survival and maintenance of cone function in a mouse model of RP. There is good rationale to test the effect of NAC in patients with RP. The first step is to test different dosing regimens to identify the lowest dose that is able to restore aqueous GSH/GSSG ratio and reduce carbonyl adducts on aqueous proteins.
In patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis, polymorphisms within the TOLLIP gene were found to influence outcomes of NAC-treated patients. The product of the TOLLIP gene, toll-interacting protein, is an inhibitory adaptor protein downstream of toll-like receptors, mediators of innate and adaptive immunity. The identification of the influence of TOLLIP polymorphisms on the effect of NAC in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis provides the rationale for collecting DNA and genotyping the same single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the current trial. In addition to this candidate gene genetic analysis, patient RNA will be collected and banked for future transcriptome analysis. The rationale for this is to identify gene expression changes that modify disease progression in RP. There is substantial variability in the rate of progression among patients with RP. A patient who loses all vision early in life can have a sibling with the same mutation who maintains vision into advanced age. This suggests that modifier genes can have a major impact on cone survival. This study will test the hypothesis that the level of expression of gene products that contribute to the antioxidant defense system may influence cone cell death and hence the rate of loss of visual field. It is also possible that gene expression differences may contribute to differences in response to NAC. For these reasons collecting RNA samples from patients will allow next-generation sequencing in the future to understand the transcriptome background on which the study intervention has been performed.
250 studies on the registry are indexed under Retinitis; 28 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 30 is close to the median of 31 across 158 interventional studies indexed under Retinitis.
Browse Retinitis studies →Johns Hopkins University is the lead sponsor of 1,783 studies on the registry; 313 are open to participants now.
Of its 203 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 140 (69%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
All subjects must meet the following criteria to be eligible for study entry:
Exclusion Criteria:
Subjects who meet any of the following criteria will be ineligible for study entry:
Subjects with RP will be enrolled in the experimental arm if they have a high carbonyl content (\>0.6) and a reduced GSH/GSSG ratio (\<3.0) in the aqueous.
Drug: N-Acetyl Cysteine (NAC)
Subjects with RP who don't have a high carbonyl content (\>0.6) and a reduced GSH/GSSG ratio (\<3.0) but otherwise are good candidates for the study will be enrolled in the exploratory arm.
Drug: N-Acetyl Cysteine (NAC)
Oral tablets of N-acetyl-cysteine
Assessment of safety and tolerability of N-Acetylcysteine including incidence and severity of systemic and ocular adverse events (AEs) and changes from baseline vital signs and physical examination.
Assessment of safety and tolerability of N-Acetylcysteine including incidence and severity of systemic and ocular adverse events (AEs) and changes from baseline vital signs and physical examination.
Time frame: Up to 10 months
Change from baseline aqueous and serum carbonyl content and GSH/GSSG ratio at 1 month after initiation of N-Acetylcysteine .
Time frame: 1 month after initiation of N-Acetylcysteine
Change from baseline aqueous and serum carbonyl content and GSH/GSSG ratio at 2 months after initiation of N-Acetylcysteine .
Time frame: 2 months after initiation of N-Acetylcysteine
Change from baseline aqueous and serum carbonyl content and GSH/GSSG ratio at 3 months after initiation of N-Acetylcysteine .
Time frame: 3 months after initiation of N-Acetylcysteine
Change from baseline aqueous and serum carbonyl content and GSH/GSSG ratio at 4 months after initiation of N-Acetylcysteine .
Time frame: 4 months after initiation of N-Acetylcysteine
Change from baseline aqueous and serum carbonyl content and GSH/GSSG ratio at 5 months after initiation of N-Acetylcysteine .
Time frame: 5 months after initiation of N-Acetylcysteine
Change from baseline aqueous and serum carbonyl content and GSH/GSSG ratio at 6 months after initiation of N-Acetylcysteine .
Time frame: 6 months after initiation of N-Acetylcysteine
Change from baseline aqueous and serum carbonyl content and GSH/GSSG ratio at 7 months after initiation of N-Acetylcysteine .
Time frame: 7 months after initiation of N-Acetylcysteine
Change from baseline aqueous and serum carbonyl content and GSH/GSSG ratio at 8 months after initiation of N-Acetylcysteine .
Time frame: 8 months after initiation of N-Acetylcysteine
Change from baseline aqueous and serum carbonyl content and GSH/GSSG ratio at 9 months after initiation of N-Acetylcysteine .
Time frame: 9 months after initiation of N-Acetylcysteine
Change from baseline best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) 6 months after initiation of N-Acetylcysteine
Time frame: 6 months after initiation of N-Acetylcysteine
Change from baseline central retinal sensitivity by microperimetry 3 months after initiation of N-Acetylcysteine
Time frame: 3 months after initiation of N-Acetylcysteine
Change from baseline central retinal sensitivity by microperimetry 6 months after initiation of N-Acetylcysteine
Time frame: 6 months after initiation of N-Acetylcysteine
Change from baseline central retinal sensitivity by microperimetry 9 months after initiation of N-Acetylcysteine
Time frame: 9 months after initiation of N-Acetylcysteine
Change from baseline ellipsoid zone (EZ) width by spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) 6 months after initiation of N-Acetylcysteine
Time frame: 6 months after initiation of N-Acetylcysteine
Change from baseline aqueous levels of N-Acetylcysteine
Time frame: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9 months after initiation of N-Acetylcysteine
Change from baseline plasma levels of N-Acetylcysteine
Time frame: 3 and 6 months after initiation of N-Acetylcysteine
Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.
Plan to share: Undecided
This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Johns Hopkins University