An interventional study of Early Loading and Conventional Loading in Jaw, Edentulous, Partially, sponsored by Universidad de Granada. Completed at 1 site in Spain. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-05-23.
Sponsored by Universidad de Granada · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
The trial is designed as a consecutive enrollment prospective one-center study. A minimum of 30 patients will be included in the study. At implant installation, the implant will be randomized to one of the groups (Control: conventional loading, 8 weeks; Test: early loading, 4 weeks). Samples of peri-implant crevicular fluid (PICF) and intrasulcular plaque will be collected at -14, 0 (Baseline: prosthesis delivery), 7 days and 1, 3, 6, 12 months. Prosthesis will be fabricated and delivered as usual, i.e., approximately two weeks after the impressions are taken.
171 studies on the registry are indexed under Jaw, Edentulous; 24 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 34 is close to the median of 33 across 146 interventional studies indexed under Jaw, Edentulous.
Browse Jaw, Edentulous studies →Universidad de Granada is the lead sponsor of 241 studies on the registry; 41 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Implant early loading: prosthesis delivery 4 weeks after implant placement
Procedure: Early Loading
Implant conventional loading: prosthesis delivery 8 weeks after implant placement
Procedure: Conventional Loading
The procedure in this group will consist on placing implant-supported restorations over the implants placed 4 weeks earlier. The device (dental implant) is of the same type in both groups.
The procedure in this group will consist on placing implant-supported restorations over the implants placed 8 weeks earlier. The device (dental implant) is of the same type in both groups.
Clinical success of B+-treated dental implants after conventional or early loading protocol as described by the International Congress of Oral Implantologists, Pisa Consensus Conference, 2007
Time frame: 12 months
Change in marginal bone level around B+-treated implants after conventional or early loading protocol
Time frame: 0 (Baseline: prosthesis delivery), 3, 6, and 12 months
Change in inflammatory markers in peri-implant crevicular fluid around B+-treated implants after conventional or early loading protocol
Time frame: -14, 0 (Baseline: prosthesis delivery), 7 days and 1, 3, 6, 12 months
Change in the microbiological profile around B+-treated implants after conventional or early loading protocol
Time frame: -14 (before impressions), 0 (Baseline: prosthesis delivery), 7 days and 1, 3, 6, 12 months
This study is completed, as verified in May 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Universidad de Granada