ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03057951Updated Jun 6, 2022Results posted

EMPagliflozin outcomE tRial in Patients With chrOnic heaRt Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction (EMPEROR-Preserved)

A Phase 3 interventional study of Empagliflozin and Placebo in Heart Failure, sponsored by Boehringer Ingelheim. Completed at 619 sites in 23 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-06-06.

Sponsored by Boehringer Ingelheim · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
5,988
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a study in adults with chronic heart failure. People with chronic heart failure may need to be hospitalised for their condition. Some people with chronic heart failure may eventually die from their condition. The purpose of the study is to find out whether a medicine called empagliflozin lowers the chances of patients having to go to hospital for heart failure and whether it improves their survival. The study is open to patients with a type of chronic heart failure called chronic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Participants stay in the study until researchers have enough information about how effective empagliflozin is. It is expected that participants who enter at the very beginning of the enrolment period may be in the study for over 3 years, while participants who enter near the end of the enrolment period may be in the study for less than 2 years. The participants are put into 2 groups. It is decided by chance who gets into which group. One group gets empagliflozin tablets every day and the other group gets placebo tablets every day. Placebo tablets look like empagliflozin tablets but contain no medicine.

Participants visit the doctors regularly. During these visits, the doctors collect information about the participant's health. The doctors want to know how many patients had to go to hospital because of heart failure or who died from cardiovascular disease.

02

Conditions studied

  • Heart Failure

Browse trials for

03

In context

Heart Failure

5,803 studies on the registry are indexed under Heart Failure; 1,222 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 5,988 is above the median of 72 across 3,790 interventional studies indexed under Heart Failure.

Browse Heart Failure studies →

Lead sponsor

Boehringer Ingelheim is the lead sponsor of 2,297 studies on the registry; 56 are open to participants now.

Of its 166 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 121 (73%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Male or female patient, age >= 18 years at screening. For Japan only: Age >=20 years at screening
  • Patients with chronic HF (Chronic Heart Failure) NYHA (New York Heart Association classification) class II-IV and preserved EF (Ejection Fraction)(LVEF (Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction) > 40 %) and elevated NT-proBNP (N-terminal of the prohormone brain natriuretic peptide) > 300 pg/ml for patients without AF, OR > 900 pg/ml for patients with AF, analysed at the Central laboratory at Visit 1
  • Structural heart disease within 6 months prior to Visit 1, OR documented HHF (Hospitalisation for Heart Failure) within 12 months prior to Visit 1
  • Stable dose of oral diuretics, if prescribed
  • Signed and dated written ICF (informed consent form)
  • Further inclusion criteria apply

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

  • Myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass graft surgery or other major cardiovascular surgery, stroke or TIA (Transient Ischaemic Attack) in past 90 days prior to Visit 1
  • Heart transplant recipient or listed for heart transplant
  • Acute decompensated HF (Heart Failure)
  • Systolic blood pressure (SBP) >= 180 mmHg at Visit 2.
  • Symptomatic hypotension and/or a SBP \< 100 mmHg
  • Indication of liver disease,
  • Impaired renal function, defined as eGFR (Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate) \< 20 mL/min/1.73 m2 (CKD-EPI (Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration Equation))cr or requiring dialysis
  • History of ketoacidosis
  • Current use or prior use of a SGLT (Sodium-glucose co-transporter) -2 inhibitor or combined SGLT-1 and 2 inhibitor
  • Currently enrolled in another investigational device or drug trial
  • Known allergy or hypersensitivity to empagliflozin or other SGLT-2 inhibitors
  • Women who are pregnant, nursing, or who plan to become pregnant while in the trial
  • Further exclusion criteria may apply
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
5,988 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    10 mg Empagliflozin

    Drug: Empagliflozin

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • once daily

    Also known as: JARDIANCE, JARDIANZ, GIBTULIO

  • DrugPlacebo

    once daily

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Time to First Event of Adjudicated Cardiovascular (CV) Death or Adjudicated Hospitalisation for Heart Failure (HHF)

    Failure with preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF). The incidence rate per 100 patient years (pt-yrs) is presented and calculated as followed: Incidence rate per 100 pt-yrs = 100 \* number of patients with event / time at risk \[years\]. Time at risk \[years\] = Sum of time at risk \[days\] over all patients in a treatment group / 365.25. Patients without a specific endpoint event were censored at the last date the patient was known to be free of the event or at the end of the planned treatment period, whichever was earlier.

    Time frame: From randomization until completion of the planned treatment phase, up to 1403 days.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Occurrence of Adjudicated Hospitalisation for Heart Failure (HHF) (First and Recurrent)

    Reported is the total number of adjudicated HHF events (first and recurrent) which occurred.

    Time frame: From randomization until completion of the planned treatment phase, up to 1403 days.

  2. eGFR (CKD-EPI) cr Slope of Change From Baseline

    Glomerular filtration rate estimated by the chronic kidney disease epidemiology collaboration formula with serum creatinine measurement (eGFR(CKD-EPI)cr) slope of change from baseline. Available on-treatment change-from-baseline data were used. The slope represents the long term effect of eGFR change from baseline and provides the yearly rate of decline. Timepoints after baseline were included in calculation of slope of change from baseline. The slope per patient was calculated using a random coefficient model with terms for treatment, region, baseline status of diabetes, age, sex, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and glomerular filtration rate estimated by the chronic kidney disease epidemiology collaboration formula (eGFR (CKD-EPI)cr) at baseline and in addition the factors "time", "treatment-by-time interaction", and "baseline eGFR (CKD-EPI)cr-by-time interaction".

    Time frame: At baseline, week 4, 12, 32, 52, 76, 100, 124, 148, 172 and week 196, up to 1043 days.

  3. Time to the First Event in the Composite Renal Endpoint: Chronic Dialysis, Renal Transplant, or Sustained Reduction in eGFR (CKD-EPI)cr

    Chronic dialysis was defined as dialysis with a frequency of twice per week or more for at least 90 days. Sustained was determined by two or more consecutive post-baseline central laboratory measurement separated by at least 30 days. Reduction in glomerular filtration rate estimated by the chronic kidney disease epidemiology collaboration formula with serum creatinine measurement (eGFR (CKD-EPI)cr) was defined as reduction in eGFR from baseline ≥40%, eGFR \<15 mL/min/1.73 m\^2 for patients with baseline eGFR ≥30 mL/min/1.73 m\^2, or eGFR \<10 mL/min/1.73 m\^2 for patients with baseline eGFR \<30 mL/min/1.73 m\^2. The incidence rate per 100 patient years (100 \* number of patients with event / time at risk \[years\]) is reported. Time at risk \[year\] is calculated as: Sum of time at risk \[days\] over all patients in a treatment group / 365.25. Abbreviation: Patient-years (pt-yrs).

    Time frame: From randomization until completion of the planned treatment phase, up to 1403 days.

  4. Time to First Adjudicated Hospitalisation for Heart Failure (HHF)

    Time to first adjudicated HHF. The incidence rate per 100 patient years (pt-yrs) is presented and calculated as followed: Incidence rate per 100 pt-yrs = 100 \* number of patients with event / time at risk \[years\]. Time at risk \[years\] = Sum of time at risk \[days\] over all patients in a treatment group / 365.25. Patients without a specific endpoint event were censored at the last date the patient was known to be free of the event or at the end of the planned treatment period, whichever was earlier.

    Time frame: From randomization until completion of the planned treatment phase, up to 1403 days.

  5. Time to Adjudicated Cardiovascular (CV) Death

    Time to adjudicated CV death. The incidence rate per 100 patient years (pt-yrs) is presented and calculated as followed: Incidence rate per 100 pt-yrs = 100 \* number of patients with event / time at risk \[years\]. Time at risk \[years\] = Sum of time at risk \[days\] over all patients in a treatment group / 365.25. Patients without a specific endpoint event were censored at the last date the patient was known to be free of the event or at the end of the planned treatment period, whichever was earlier.

    Time frame: From randomization until completion of the planned treatment phase, up to 1403 days.

  6. Time to All-cause Mortality

    Time to all-cause mortality. The incidence rate per 100 patient years (pt-yrs) is presented and calculated as followed: Incidence rate per 100 pt-yrs = 100 \* number of patients with event / time at risk \[years\]. Time at risk \[years\] = Sum of time at risk \[days\] over all patients in a treatment group / 365.25. Patients without a specific endpoint event were censored at the last date the patient was known to be free of the event or at the end of the planned treatment period, whichever was earlier.

    Time frame: From randomization until completion of the planned treatment phase, up to 1403 days.

  7. Time to Onset of Diabetes Mellitus (DM) in Patients With Pre-DM

    Time to onset of DM (defined as HbA1c ≥6.5% or as diagnosed by the investigator) in patients with pre-DM. Pre-DM was defined as no history of DM and no HbA1c ≥6.5% before treatment, and a pre-treatment HbA1c value of ≥5.7% and \<6.5%. The incidence rate per 100 patient years (pt-yrs) is presented and calculated as followed: Incidence rate per 100 pt-yrs = 100 \* number of patients with event / time at risk \[years\]. Time at risk \[years\] = Sum of time at risk \[days\] over all patients in a treatment group / 365.25. Patients without a specific endpoint event were censored at the last date the patient was known to be free of the event or at the end of the planned treatment period, whichever was earlier.

    Time frame: From randomization until completion of the planned treatment phase, to 1403 days.

  8. Change From Baseline in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionaire (KCCQ) Clinical Summary Score at Week 52

    The KCCQ is a 23-item self-administered questionnaire designed to evaluate physical limitations, symptoms (frequency, severity, and changes over time), social limitations, self-efficacy, and quality of life in patients with Heart Failure. The KCCQ-clinical summary score comprises the following domains: Symptom frequency, symptom burden and physical limitation. The score is calculated by summing domain responses and then transforming scores to a 0-100 unit scale with higher scores indicating better health status. For patients who died, a worst score (score of 0) was imputed for the score at all subsequent scheduled visits after the date of death where the score would have been assessed. Change from baseline in KCCQ-score at week 52 was modeled using a MMRM with visit (week 12, 32 and 52) as repeated measures, adjusted mean (standard error) at week 52 is reported.

    Time frame: At baseline and at week 12, week 32 and week 52.

  9. Occurrence of All-cause Hospitalisation (First and Recurrent)

    Occurrence of all-cause hospitalisation (first and recurrent). Total number of all cause hospitalisations is reported.

    Time frame: From randomization until completion of the planned treatment phase, up to 1403 days.

07

Results

Posted Jun 6, 2022

Participant flow

A randomised, double-blind trial to demonstrate superiority of empagliflozin versus placebo in patients with symptomatic, chronic heart failure and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF\>40%) under stable treatment of heart failure symptoms.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePlacebo10 mg Empagliflozin
Started29912997
Treated29892996
Completed20462051
Not completed945946
Withdrew: Adverse event553575
Withdrew: Protocol violation3024
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up616
Withdrew: Patient refusal to continue, not due to ae304284
Withdrew: Study drug stopped, reason missing61
Withdrew: Medical advice62
Withdrew: Due to covid-19 pandemic28
Withdrew: Investigator decision20
Withdrew: Patient decision52
Withdrew: Not attending study visits30
Withdrew: Patient moved away34
Withdrew: Other reason than stated above2329
Withdrew: Not treated21

Outcome measures

PrimaryTime to First Event of Adjudicated Cardiovascular (CV) Death or Adjudicated Hospitalisation for Heart Failure (HHF)

Failure with preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF). The incidence rate per 100 patient years (pt-yrs) is presented and calculated as followed: Incidence rate per 100 pt-yrs = 100 \* number of patients with event / time at risk \[years\]. Time at risk \[years\] = Sum of time at risk \[days\] over all patients in a treatment group / 365.25. Patients without a specific endpoint event were censored at the last date the patient was known to be free of the event or at the end of the planned treatment period, whichever was earlier.

Time frame:
From randomization until completion of the planned treatment phase, up to 1403 days.
Reported as:
Number · Patients with event/100 pt-yrs at risk
Time to First Event of Adjudicated Cardiovascular (CV) Death or Adjudicated Hospitalisation for Heart Failure (HHF)
Patients with event/100 pt-yrs at riskPlacebo10 mg Empagliflozin
Time to First Event of Adjudicated Cardiovascular (CV) Death or Adjudicated Hospitalisation for Heart Failure (HHF)8.67 (7.94 to 9.44)6.86 (6.22 to 7.54)
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs 10 mg Empagliflozin · Regression, Cox · p = 0.0003 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.79 · 95.03% CI 0.69 to 0.90Comparison vs. Placebo \[T/P\]
SecondaryOccurrence of Adjudicated Hospitalisation for Heart Failure (HHF) (First and Recurrent)

Reported is the total number of adjudicated HHF events (first and recurrent) which occurred.

Time frame:
From randomization until completion of the planned treatment phase, up to 1403 days.
Reported as:
Number · HHF events
Occurrence of Adjudicated Hospitalisation for Heart Failure (HHF) (First and Recurrent)
HHF eventsPlacebo10 mg Empagliflozin
Occurrence of Adjudicated Hospitalisation for Heart Failure (HHF) (First and Recurrent)541407
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs 10 mg Empagliflozin · Joint frailty model · p = 0.0009 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.73 · 95.03% CI 0.61 to 0.88Comparison vs. Placebo \[T/P\]
SecondaryeGFR (CKD-EPI) cr Slope of Change From Baseline

Glomerular filtration rate estimated by the chronic kidney disease epidemiology collaboration formula with serum creatinine measurement (eGFR(CKD-EPI)cr) slope of change from baseline. Available on-treatment change-from-baseline data were used. The slope represents the long term effect of eGFR change from baseline and provides the yearly rate of decline. Timepoints after baseline were included in calculation of slope of change from baseline. The slope per patient was calculated using a random coefficient model with terms for treatment, region, baseline status of diabetes, age, sex, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and glomerular filtration rate estimated by the chronic kidney disease epidemiology collaboration formula (eGFR (CKD-EPI)cr) at baseline and in addition the factors "time", "treatment-by-time interaction", and "baseline eGFR (CKD-EPI)cr-by-time interaction".

Time frame:
At baseline, week 4, 12, 32, 52, 76, 100, 124, 148, 172 and week 196, up to 1043 days.
Reported as:
Mean · mL/min/ 1.73 meters squared/year
eGFR (CKD-EPI) cr Slope of Change From Baseline
mL/min/ 1.73 meters squared/yearPlacebo10 mg Empagliflozin
eGFR (CKD-EPI) cr Slope of Change From Baseline-2.616 ± 0.108-1.253 ± 0.108
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs 10 mg Empagliflozin · Random intercept random coeff. model · p = <0.0001 · Treatment by time interaction: 1.363 · 99.9% CI 0.861 to 1.865Empa 10 mg vs. Placebo slope \[/year\]
SecondaryTime to the First Event in the Composite Renal Endpoint: Chronic Dialysis, Renal Transplant, or Sustained Reduction in eGFR (CKD-EPI)cr

Chronic dialysis was defined as dialysis with a frequency of twice per week or more for at least 90 days. Sustained was determined by two or more consecutive post-baseline central laboratory measurement separated by at least 30 days. Reduction in glomerular filtration rate estimated by the chronic kidney disease epidemiology collaboration formula with serum creatinine measurement (eGFR (CKD-EPI)cr) was defined as reduction in eGFR from baseline ≥40%, eGFR \<15 mL/min/1.73 m\^2 for patients with baseline eGFR ≥30 mL/min/1.73 m\^2, or eGFR \<10 mL/min/1.73 m\^2 for patients with baseline eGFR \<30 mL/min/1.73 m\^2. The incidence rate per 100 patient years (100 \* number of patients with event / time at risk \[years\]) is reported. Time at risk \[year\] is calculated as: Sum of time at risk \[days\] over all patients in a treatment group / 365.25. Abbreviation: Patient-years (pt-yrs).

Time frame:
From randomization until completion of the planned treatment phase, up to 1403 days.
Reported as:
Number · Patients with event /100 pt-yrs at risk
Time to the First Event in the Composite Renal Endpoint: Chronic Dialysis, Renal Transplant, or Sustained Reduction in eGFR (CKD-EPI)cr
Patients with event /100 pt-yrs at riskPlacebo10 mg Empagliflozin
Time to the First Event in the Composite Renal Endpoint: Chronic Dialysis, Renal Transplant, or Sustained Reduction in eGFR (CKD-EPI)cr2.23 (1.84 to 2.66)2.13 (1.74 to 2.54)
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs 10 mg Empagliflozin · Regression, Cox · p = 0.7243 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.95 · 95% CI 0.73 to 1.24Comparison vs Placebo \[T/P\]
SecondaryTime to First Adjudicated Hospitalisation for Heart Failure (HHF)

Time to first adjudicated HHF. The incidence rate per 100 patient years (pt-yrs) is presented and calculated as followed: Incidence rate per 100 pt-yrs = 100 \* number of patients with event / time at risk \[years\]. Time at risk \[years\] = Sum of time at risk \[days\] over all patients in a treatment group / 365.25. Patients without a specific endpoint event were censored at the last date the patient was known to be free of the event or at the end of the planned treatment period, whichever was earlier.

Time frame:
From randomization until completion of the planned treatment phase, up to 1403 days.
Reported as:
Number · Patients with event /100 pt-yrs at risk
Time to First Adjudicated Hospitalisation for Heart Failure (HHF)
Patients with event /100 pt-yrs at riskPlacebo10 mg Empagliflozin
Time to First Adjudicated Hospitalisation for Heart Failure (HHF)5.97 (5.37 to 6.62)4.28 (3.78 to 4.82)
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs 10 mg Empagliflozin · Regression, Cox · p = <0.0001 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.71 · 95% CI 0.60 to 0.83Comparison vs. Placebo \[T/P\]
SecondaryTime to Adjudicated Cardiovascular (CV) Death

Time to adjudicated CV death. The incidence rate per 100 patient years (pt-yrs) is presented and calculated as followed: Incidence rate per 100 pt-yrs = 100 \* number of patients with event / time at risk \[years\]. Time at risk \[years\] = Sum of time at risk \[days\] over all patients in a treatment group / 365.25. Patients without a specific endpoint event were censored at the last date the patient was known to be free of the event or at the end of the planned treatment period, whichever was earlier.

Time frame:
From randomization until completion of the planned treatment phase, up to 1403 days.
Reported as:
Number · Patients with event /100 pt-yrs at risk
Time to Adjudicated Cardiovascular (CV) Death
Patients with event /100 pt-yrs at riskPlacebo10 mg Empagliflozin
Time to Adjudicated Cardiovascular (CV) Death3.81 (3.35 to 4.31)3.42 (2.98 to 3.89)
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs 10 mg Empagliflozin · Regression, Cox · p = 0.2951 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.91 · 95% CI 0.76 to 1.09Comparison vs. Placebo \[T/P\]
SecondaryTime to All-cause Mortality

Time to all-cause mortality. The incidence rate per 100 patient years (pt-yrs) is presented and calculated as followed: Incidence rate per 100 pt-yrs = 100 \* number of patients with event / time at risk \[years\]. Time at risk \[years\] = Sum of time at risk \[days\] over all patients in a treatment group / 365.25. Patients without a specific endpoint event were censored at the last date the patient was known to be free of the event or at the end of the planned treatment period, whichever was earlier.

Time frame:
From randomization until completion of the planned treatment phase, up to 1403 days.
Reported as:
Number · Patients with event /100 pt-yrs at risk
Time to All-cause Mortality
Patients with event /100 pt-yrs at riskPlacebo10 mg Empagliflozin
Time to All-cause Mortality6.67 (6.05 to 7.32)6.60 (5.98 to 7.24)
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs 10 mg Empagliflozin · Regression, Cox · p = 0.9893 · Hazard ratio (hr): 1.00 · 95% CI 0.87 to 1.15Comparison vs. Placebo \[T/P\]
SecondaryTime to Onset of Diabetes Mellitus (DM) in Patients With Pre-DM

Time to onset of DM (defined as HbA1c ≥6.5% or as diagnosed by the investigator) in patients with pre-DM. Pre-DM was defined as no history of DM and no HbA1c ≥6.5% before treatment, and a pre-treatment HbA1c value of ≥5.7% and \<6.5%. The incidence rate per 100 patient years (pt-yrs) is presented and calculated as followed: Incidence rate per 100 pt-yrs = 100 \* number of patients with event / time at risk \[years\]. Time at risk \[years\] = Sum of time at risk \[days\] over all patients in a treatment group / 365.25. Patients without a specific endpoint event were censored at the last date the patient was known to be free of the event or at the end of the planned treatment period, whichever was earlier.

Time frame:
From randomization until completion of the planned treatment phase, to 1403 days.
Reported as:
Number · Patients with event /100 pt-yrs at risk
Time to Onset of Diabetes Mellitus (DM) in Patients With Pre-DM
Patients with event /100 pt-yrs at riskPlacebo10 mg Empagliflozin
Time to Onset of Diabetes Mellitus (DM) in Patients With Pre-DM7.39 (6.21 to 8.68)6.12 (5.07 to 7.26)
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs 10 mg Empagliflozin · Regression, Cox · p = 0.1539 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.84 · 95% CI 0.65 to 1.07Comparison vs. Placebo \[T/P\]
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionaire (KCCQ) Clinical Summary Score at Week 52

The KCCQ is a 23-item self-administered questionnaire designed to evaluate physical limitations, symptoms (frequency, severity, and changes over time), social limitations, self-efficacy, and quality of life in patients with Heart Failure. The KCCQ-clinical summary score comprises the following domains: Symptom frequency, symptom burden and physical limitation. The score is calculated by summing domain responses and then transforming scores to a 0-100 unit scale with higher scores indicating better health status. For patients who died, a worst score (score of 0) was imputed for the score at all subsequent scheduled visits after the date of death where the score would have been assessed. Change from baseline in KCCQ-score at week 52 was modeled using a MMRM with visit (week 12, 32 and 52) as repeated measures, adjusted mean (standard error) at week 52 is reported.

Time frame:
At baseline and at week 12, week 32 and week 52.
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionaire (KCCQ) Clinical Summary Score at Week 52
Score on a scalePlacebo10 mg Empagliflozin
Change From Baseline in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionaire (KCCQ) Clinical Summary Score at Week 523.18 ± 0.314.51 ± 0.31
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs 10 mg Empagliflozin · Mixed Model Repeated Measures (MMRM) · p = 0.0028 · Adjusted mean difference: 1.32 · 95% CI 0.45 to 2.19Comparison vs Placebo \[T-P\]
SecondaryOccurrence of All-cause Hospitalisation (First and Recurrent)

Occurrence of all-cause hospitalisation (first and recurrent). Total number of all cause hospitalisations is reported.

Time frame:
From randomization until completion of the planned treatment phase, up to 1403 days.
Reported as:
Number · Events of all-cause hospitialisations
Occurrence of All-cause Hospitalisation (First and Recurrent)
Events of all-cause hospitialisationsPlacebo10 mg Empagliflozin
Occurrence of All-cause Hospitalisation (First and Recurrent)27692566
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs 10 mg Empagliflozin · Joint frailty model · p = 0.1012 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.93 · 95% CI 0.85 to 1.01Comparison vs. Placebo \[T/P\]

Adverse events

Collected over [All-cause Mortality]: From study start until end of study, up to 1438 days. [Serious adverse events (AE) and other AE]:From time of the first drug intake until 7 days (Residual Effect Period) after the last drug intake, up to 1410 days.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Placebo427/2,991 (14.3%)1,543/2,989 (51.6%)1,274/2,989 (42.6%)
10 mg Empagliflozin422/2,997 (14.1%)1,436/2,996 (47.9%)1,191/2,996 (39.8%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 1,067
Most frequent serious events
EventPlacebo10 mg Empagliflozin
Cardiac failureCardiac disorders594/2989448/2996
PneumoniaInfections and infestations119/2989100/2996
Acute kidney injuryRenal and urinary disorders107/298981/2996
Atrial fibrillationCardiac disorders80/298992/2996
Cardiac failure congestiveCardiac disorders66/298957/2996
DeathGeneral disorders38/298956/2996
Acute myocardial infarctionCardiac disorders48/298950/2996
COVID-19Infections and infestations47/298949/2996
Renal impairmentRenal and urinary disorders42/298938/2996
Ischaemic strokeNervous system disorders35/298942/2996
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventPlacebo10 mg Empagliflozin
HypertensionVascular disorders248/2989212/2996
HypotensionVascular disorders176/2989212/2996
HyperuricaemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders208/2989131/2996
Urinary tract infectionInfections and infestations160/2989207/2996
Diabetes mellitusMetabolism and nutrition disorders200/2989139/2996
HyperkalaemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders194/2989170/2996
FallInjury, poisoning and procedural complications193/2989189/2996
Renal impairmentRenal and urinary disorders181/2989177/2996
AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders164/2989119/2996
Atrial fibrillationCardiac disorders156/2989137/2996

Baseline characteristics

Randomised Set (RS), including all randomised patients.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)Placebo10 mg EmpagliflozinTotal
Mean71.9 ± 9.671.8 ± 9.371.9 ± 9.4
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Placebo10 mg EmpagliflozinTotal
Female133813382676
Male165316593312
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Placebo10 mg EmpagliflozinTotal
Hispanic or Latino7547701524
Not Hispanic or Latino223622274463
Unknown or Not Reported101
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Placebo10 mg EmpagliflozinTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native10490194
Asian411413824
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander191433
Black or African American125133258
White225622864542
More than one race7560135
Unknown or Not Reported112
08

Study locations

619 sites
  • Pinnacle Research Group, LLC
    Anniston, Alabama 36207, United States
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham
    Birmingham, Alabama 35249, United States
  • Heart Center Research, LLC
    Huntsville, Alabama 35801, United States
  • University of California San Francisco
    Fresno, California 93701, United States
  • La Mesa Cardiac Center
    La Mesa, California 91942, United States
  • Purushotham, Akther & Roshan Kotha, MD Inc.
    La Mesa, California 91942, United States
  • Long Beach Center for Clinical Research
    Long Beach, California 90807, United States
  • VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System
    Los Angeles, California 90073, United States
  • Merced Vein and Vascular Center
    Merced, California 95340, United States
  • Valley Clinical Trials, Inc.
    Northridge, California 91325, United States
  • University of California Irvine
    Orange, California 92865, United States
  • Covigilant Research, LLC
    Riverside, California 92506, United States
  • University of California San Francisco
    San Francisco, California 94143, United States
  • University of California
    Torrance, California 90502, United States
  • Orange County Research Center
    Tustin, California 92780, United States
  • Blue Coast Cardiology
    Vista, California 92083, United States
  • South Denver Cardiology Associates, PC
    Littleton, Colorado 80120, United States
  • Integrated Heart Care
    Boca Raton, Florida 33434, United States
  • Southeast Clinical Research, LLC
    Chiefland, Florida 32626, United States
  • Morton Plant Mease Health Care
    Clearwater, Florida 33756, United States
  • Accel Research Sites
    DeLand, Florida 32720, United States
  • Integrative Research Associates
    Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33312, United States
  • Nature Coast Clinical Research
    Inverness, Florida 34452, United States
  • East Coast Institute for Research, LLC
    Jacksonville, Florida 32216, United States
  • Jacksonville Center for Clinical Research
    Jacksonville, Florida 32216, United States
  • Elite Clinical Research
    Miami, Florida 33144, United States
  • Cardiovascular Research Center of South Florida
    Miami, Florida 33173, United States
  • Orlando Health Inc.
    Orlando, Florida 32806, United States
  • Peninsula Research, Inc.
    Ormond Beach, Florida 32174, United States
  • Clearwater Cardiovascular Consultants
    Safety Harbor, Florida 34695, United States
  • Sarasota Memorial Hospital
    Sarasota, Florida 34239, United States
  • University of South Florida
    Tampa, Florida 33606, United States
  • Advent Health Medical Group
    Tampa, Florida 33613, United States
  • Grady Clinical Research Center
    Atlanta, Georgia 30303, United States
  • Columbus Regional Research Institute
    Columbus, Georgia 31904, United States
  • Cardiovascular Group PC
    Lawrenceville, Georgia 30046, United States
  • Meridian Clinical Research, LLC
    Savannah, Georgia 31406, United States
  • Atlanta Heart Specialists, LLC
    Tucker, Georgia 30084, United States
  • Northwest Heart Clinical Research, LLC
    Arlington Heights, Illinois 60005, United States
  • Mount Sinai Hospital
    Chicago, Illinois 60608, United States
  • Advocate Health and Hospitals Corporation
    Naperville, Illinois 60540, United States
  • Captain James A. Lovell Federal Health Care Center
    North Chicago, Illinois 60064, United States
  • Rockford Cardiovascular Associates
    Rockford, Illinois 61107, United States
  • Midwest Cardiovascular Research and Education Foundation
    Elkhart, Indiana 46514, United States
  • St. Francis Medical Group-Indiana Heart Physicians, Inc
    Indianapolis, Indiana 46237, United States
  • Reid Hospital
    Richmond, Indiana 47374, United States
  • Beacon Medical Group Clinical Research
    South Bend, Indiana 46601, United States
  • Iowa Heart Center
    Des Moines, Iowa 50314, United States
  • Norton Heart Specialists
    Louisville, Kentucky 40202, United States
  • Research Integrity, LLC
    Owensboro, Kentucky 42303, United States
  • Grace Research, LLC
    Bossier City, Louisiana 71111, United States
  • Clinical Trials of America, LLC
    Monroe, Louisiana 71201, United States
  • LSU Health Sciences Center
    New Orleans, Louisiana 70112, United States
  • Maine Research Associates
    Lewiston, Maine 04240, United States
  • Anne Arundel Medical Center
    Annapolis, Maryland 21401, United States
  • Maryland Cardiovascular Specialists
    Baltimore, Maryland 21229, United States
  • MedStar Health Research Institute
    Baltimore, Maryland 21237, United States
  • Metropolitan Cardiovascular Consultants
    Beltsville, Maryland 20705, United States
  • MD Medical Research
    Oxon Hill, Maryland 20745, United States
  • Tufts Medical Center
    Boston, Massachusetts 02111, United States
  • Massachusetts General Hospital
    Boston, Massachusetts 02114, United States
  • East Mountain Medical Associates, PC
    Great Barrington, Massachusetts 01230, United States
  • Alpena General Hospital
    Alpena, Michigan 49707, United States
  • McLaren Northern Michigan Hospital
    Petoskey, Michigan 49770, United States
  • Regions Hospital
    Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101, United States
  • Jackson Heart Clinic, P.A.
    Jackson, Mississippi 39216, United States
  • Saint Luke's Hospital of Kansas City
    Kansas City, Missouri 64111, United States
  • Saint Louis University
    St Louis, Missouri 63110, United States
  • St. Louis Center for Clinical Research
    St Louis, Missouri 63128, United States
  • St. Louis Heart and Vascular, P.C.
    St Louis, Missouri 63136, United States
  • Deaconess Billings Clinic Research Center
    Billings, Montana 59101, United States
  • Bozeman Health Clinical Research
    Bozeman, Montana 59718, United States
  • Nebraska Heart Institute
    Grand Island, Nebraska 68803, United States
  • CHI Health Midlands
    Papillion, Nebraska 68046, United States
  • Healthcare Partners LLC
    Las Vegas, Nevada 89109, United States
  • Palm Research Center
    Las Vegas, Nevada 89128, United States
  • Advanced Heart Care, LLC
    Bridgewater, New Jersey 08807, United States
  • Garden State Heart Care, PC
    Manalapan, New Jersey 07726, United States
  • Capital Cardiology Associates, PC
    Albany, New York 12211, United States
  • Trinity Medical WNY, PC
    Cheektowaga, New York 14227, United States
  • North Shore University Hospital
    Manhasset, New York 11030, United States
  • Long Island Cardiovascular Consultants
    New Hyde Park, New York 11042, United States
  • Mount Sinai - PRIME
    New York, New York 10025, United States
  • Harlem Cardiology
    New York, New York 10035, United States
  • Laurelton Heart Specialist, PC
    Rosedale, New York 11422, United States
  • Saratoga Clinical Research, LLC
    Saratoga Springs, New York 12866, United States
  • Northwell Health
    Southampton, New York 11968, United States
  • Stony Brook University Medical Center
    Stony Brook, New York 11794, United States
  • CHEAR Center LLC
    The Bronx, New York 10455, United States
  • Cardiac Care and Vascular Medicine, PLLC
    The Bronx, New York 10469, United States
  • Asheville Cardiology Associates
    Asheville, North Carolina 28803, United States
  • Kernodle Clinic West
    Burlington, North Carolina 27215, United States
  • The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
    Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-5021, United States
  • Novant Health Heart and Vascular Institute
    Charlotte, North Carolina 28204, United States
  • Clinical Research of Gastonia
    Gastonia, North Carolina 28054, United States
  • Clinical Trials of America, Inc
    Lenoir, North Carolina 28645, United States
  • VA Northeast Ohio Healthcare System
    Cleveland, Ohio 44104-1702, United States
  • Rama Research LLC
    Marion, Ohio 43302, United States
  • South Oklahoma Heart Research Group
    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73135, United States
  • Doylestown Health Cardiology
    Doylestown, Pennsylvania 18901, United States

Showing the first 100 of 619 sites across 23 countries.

09

References and documents

Publications

  • Ferreira JP, Packer M, Butler J, Vasques-Novoa F, Marques P, Pocock S, Filippatos G, Zannad F, Anker SD. Serum Magnesium, Outcomes, and the Effect of Empagliflozin in Heart Failure With Mildly Reduced and Preserved Ejection Fraction: Findings From EMPEROR-Preserved. JACC Heart Fail. 2026 Feb;14(2):102889. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2025.102889. Epub 2026 Jan 5. PubMed 41493412 ↗
  • Carson P, Teerlink JR, Komajda M, Anand I, Packer M, Butler J, Doehner W, Ferreira JP, Filippatos G, Haass M, Miller A, Pehrson S, Pocock SJ, Iwata T, Brueckmann M, Gasior T, Zannad F, Anker SD. Comparison of Investigator-Reported and Centrally Adjudicated Heart Failure Outcomes in the EMPEROR-Preserved Trial. JACC Heart Fail. 2025 May;13(5):710-721. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2024.10.021. Epub 2025 Jan 29. PubMed 39895437 ↗
  • Natale P, Tunnicliffe DJ, Toyama T, Palmer SC, Saglimbene VM, Ruospo M, Gargano L, Stallone G, Gesualdo L, Strippoli GF. Sodium-glucose co-transporter protein 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors for people with chronic kidney disease and diabetes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 May 21;5(5):CD015588. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015588.pub2. PubMed 38770818 ↗
  • Talha KM, Green J, Filippatos G, Pocock S, Zannad F, Brueckmann M, Schueler E, Ofstad AP, Ferreira JP, Anker SD, Butler J, Rosenstock J, Packer M. Impact of empagliflozin on insulin needs in patients with heart failure and diabetes: An EMPEROR-Pooled analysis. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2024 Jul;26(7):2578-2587. doi: 10.1111/dom.15572. Epub 2024 Apr 1. PubMed 38558314 ↗
  • Ferreira JP, Packer M, Sattar N, Butler J, Pocock SJ, Anker SD, Maldonado SG, Panova-Noeva M, Sumin M, Masson S, Zannad F, Januzzi JL. Carbohydrate antigen 125 concentrations across the ejection fraction spectrum in chronic heart failure: The EMPEROR programme. Eur J Heart Fail. 2024 Apr;26(4):788-802. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.3166. Epub 2024 Mar 4. PubMed 38439582 ↗
  • Coats AJS, Butler J, Tsutsui H, Doehner W, Filippatos G, Ferreira JP, Bohm M, Chopra VK, Verma S, Nordaby M, Iwata T, Nitta D, Ponikowski P, Zannad F, Packer M, Anker SD. Efficacy of empagliflozin in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction according to frailty status in EMPEROR-Preserved. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2024 Feb;15(1):412-424. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.13393. Epub 2023 Dec 29. PubMed 38158636 ↗
  • Ferreira JP, Butler J, Anker SD, Januzzi JL, Panova-Noeva M, Reese-Petersen AL, Sattar N, Schueler E, Pocock SJ, Filippatos G, Packer M, Sumin M, Zannad F; EMPEROR Committees and Investigators. Effects of empagliflozin on collagen biomarkers in patients with heart failure: Findings from the EMPEROR trials. Eur J Heart Fail. 2024 Feb;26(2):274-284. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.3101. Epub 2023 Dec 28. PubMed 38037709 ↗
  • Zannad F, Macari S. Drug treatment with empagliflozin was beneficial in people with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: plain language summary of the EMPEROR-Preserved study. Future Cardiol. 2023 Nov;19(14):671-677. doi: 10.2217/fca-2023-0091. Epub 2023 Nov 9. PubMed 37942723 ↗
  • Packer M, Butler J, Zeller C, Pocock SJ, Brueckmann M, Ferreira JP, Filippatos G, Usman MS, Zannad F, Anker SD. Blinded Withdrawal of Long-Term Randomized Treatment With Empagliflozin or Placebo in Patients With Heart Failure. Circulation. 2023 Sep 26;148(13):1011-1022. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.065748. Epub 2023 Aug 24. PubMed 37621153 ↗
  • Butler J, Usman MS, Filippatos G, Ferreira JP, Bohm M, Brueckmann M, Januzzi JL, Kaul S, Pina IL, Ponikowski P, Senni M, Sumin M, Verma S, Zaremba-Pechmann L, Pocock SJ, Packer M, Anker S. Safety and Efficacy of Empagliflozin and Diuretic Use in Patients with Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Post Hoc Analysis of the EMPEROR-Preserved Trial. JAMA Cardiol. 2023 Jul 1;8(7):640-649. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2023.1090. PubMed 37223933 ↗
  • Bhm M, Anker S, Mahfoud F, Lauder L, Filippatos G, Ferreira JP, Pocock SJ, Brueckmann M, Saloustros I, Schler E, Wanner C, Zannad F, Packer M, Butler J. Empagliflozin, irrespective of blood pressure, improves outcomes in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: the EMPEROR-Preserved trial. Eur Heart J. 2023 Feb 1;44(5):396-407. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac693. PubMed 36478225 ↗
  • Ferreira JP, Zannad F, Butler J, Filippatos G, Pocock SJ, Brueckmann M, Steubl D, Schueler E, Anker SD, Packer M. Association of Empagliflozin Treatment With Albuminuria Levels in Patients With Heart Failure: A Secondary Analysis of EMPEROR-Pooled. JAMA Cardiol. 2022 Nov 1;7(11):1148-1159. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2022.2924. PubMed 36129693 ↗
  • Butler J, Filippatos G, Siddiqi TJ, Ferreira JP, Brueckmann M, Bocchi E, Bohm M, Chopra VK, Giannetti N, Iwata T, Januzzi JL, Kaul S, Pina IL, Ponikowski P, Rauch-Krohnert U, Shah SJ, Senni M, Sumin M, Verma S, Zhang J, Pocock SJ, Zannad F, Packer M, Anker SD. Effects of Empagliflozin in Women and Men With Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction. Circulation. 2022 Oct 4;146(14):1046-1055. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.059755. Epub 2022 Sep 13. PubMed 36098051 ↗
  • Zannad F, Ferreira JP, Butler J, Filippatos G, Januzzi JL, Sumin M, Zwick M, Saadati M, Pocock SJ, Sattar N, Anker SD, Packer M. Effect of empagliflozin on circulating proteomics in heart failure: mechanistic insights into the EMPEROR programme. Eur Heart J. 2022 Dec 21;43(48):4991-5002. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac495. PubMed 36017745 ↗
  • Filippatos G, Butler J, Farmakis D, Zannad F, Ofstad AP, Ferreira JP, Green JB, Rosenstock J, Schnaidt S, Brueckmann M, Pocock SJ, Packer M, Anker SD; EMPEROR-Preserved Trial Committees and Investigators. Empagliflozin for Heart Failure With Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction With and Without Diabetes. Circulation. 2022 Aug 30;146(9):676-686. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.059785. Epub 2022 Jun 28. PubMed 35762322 ↗
  • Ferreira JP, Zannad F, Butler J, Filipattos G, Ritter I, Schuler E, Kraus BJ, Pocock SJ, Anker SD, Packer M. Empagliflozin and serum potassium in heart failure: an analysis from EMPEROR-Pooled. Eur Heart J. 2022 Aug 14;43(31):2984-2993. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac306. PubMed 35687107 ↗
  • Januzzi JL Jr, Butler J, Zannad F, Filippatos G, Ferreira JP, Pocock SJ, Sattar N, Verma S, Vedin O, Iwata T, Brueckmann M, Packer M, Anker SD; EMPEROR-Preserved Trial Study Group. Prognostic Implications of N-Terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide and High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin T in EMPEROR-Preserved. JACC Heart Fail. 2022 Jul;10(7):512-524. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2022.05.004. Epub 2022 Jun 1. PubMed 35670067 ↗
  • Vaduganathan M, Claggett BL, Inciardi RM, Fonarow GC, McMurray JJV, Solomon SD. Estimating the Benefits of Combination Medical Therapy in Heart Failure With Mildly Reduced and Preserved Ejection Fraction. Circulation. 2022 Jun 7;145(23):1741-1743. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.058929. Epub 2022 May 23. No abstract available. PubMed 35603667 ↗
  • Ferreira JP, Butler J, Zannad F, Filippatos G, Schueler E, Steubl D, Zeller C, Januzzi JL, Pocock S, Packer M, Anker SD. Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists and Empagliflozin in Patients With Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Mar 29;79(12):1129-1137. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.01.029. PubMed 35331406 ↗
  • Butler J, Filippatos G, Jamal Siddiqi T, Brueckmann M, Bohm M, Chopra VK, Pedro Ferreira J, Januzzi JL, Kaul S, Pina IL, Ponikowski P, Shah SJ, Senni M, Vedin O, Verma S, Peil B, Pocock SJ, Zannad F, Packer M, Anker SD. Empagliflozin, Health Status, and Quality of Life in Patients With Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction: The EMPEROR-Preserved Trial. Circulation. 2022 Jan 18;145(3):184-193. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.057812. Epub 2021 Nov 15. PubMed 34779658 ↗
  • Kanie T, Mizuno A, Takaoka Y, Suzuki T, Yoneoka D, Nishikawa Y, Tam WWS, Morze J, Rynkiewicz A, Xin Y, Wu O, Providencia R, Kwong JS. Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists and sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors for people with cardiovascular disease: a network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 25;10(10):CD013650. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013650.pub2. PubMed 34693515 ↗
  • Anker SD, Butler J, Filippatos G, Ferreira JP, Bocchi E, Bohm M, Brunner-La Rocca HP, Choi DJ, Chopra V, Chuquiure-Valenzuela E, Giannetti N, Gomez-Mesa JE, Janssens S, Januzzi JL, Gonzalez-Juanatey JR, Merkely B, Nicholls SJ, Perrone SV, Pina IL, Ponikowski P, Senni M, Sim D, Spinar J, Squire I, Taddei S, Tsutsui H, Verma S, Vinereanu D, Zhang J, Carson P, Lam CSP, Marx N, Zeller C, Sattar N, Jamal W, Schnaidt S, Schnee JM, Brueckmann M, Pocock SJ, Zannad F, Packer M; EMPEROR-Preserved Trial Investigators. Empagliflozin in Heart Failure with a Preserved Ejection Fraction. N Engl J Med. 2021 Oct 14;385(16):1451-1461. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2107038. Epub 2021 Aug 27. PubMed 34449189 ↗
  • Nassif ME, Kosiborod M. Effects of sodium glucose cotransporter type 2 inhibitors on heart failure. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019 Apr;21 Suppl 2:19-23. doi: 10.1111/dom.13678. PubMed 31081589 ↗

Related links

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Nov 9, 2016
  • Statistical analysis plan · Feb 21, 2017

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Mar 2017 to primary completion in Apr 2021, 49 months.

Results were first posted in Jun 2022, 1 year 1 month after primary completion.

Of 65 industry-sponsored phase 3 interventional studies under Heart Failure, half reached primary completion within 32 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 19 and three quarters within 44. This study's 49 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 143 studies reached it within 39 months; a quarter within 25 and three quarters within 57.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 16, 2017
First posted
Feb 20, 2017
StartActual
Mar 2, 2017
Primary completionActual
Apr 26, 2021
CompletionActual
Apr 26, 2021
Results first posted
Jun 6, 2022
Last update
Jun 6, 2022
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 6, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03057951
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 20, 2017
Start date
Mar 2, 2017
Primary completion
Apr 26, 2021
Completion
Apr 26, 2021
Results posted
Jun 6, 2022
Last update
Jun 6, 2022

Study contacts

Boehringer Ingelheim
study chair · Boehringer Ingelheim

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Empagliflozin

Start the discussion