ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03055806Updated Oct 7, 2019Results posted

IX-01 Effect on Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT), Patient Reported Outcomes and Safety in Men With Premature Ejaculation (PE)

A Phase 2 interventional study of IX-01 400 mg and Placebo in Premature Ejaculation, sponsored by Ixchelsis Limited. Completed at 29 sites in United States. Open to male participants aged 18 Years to 60 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-10-07.

Sponsored by Ixchelsis Limited · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
239
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 60 Years
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

A Phase 2b, 8-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group study to evaluate the effect of 3 different dose levels of IX-01 on IELT and patient-reported outcome in men with lifelong PE.

Men with self-reported lifelong PE (International Society for Sexual Medicine (ISSM) definition) and in stable heterosexual relationship will undergo a 4-week run-in period during which they will be asked to attempt intercourse at least 4 times. Men with IELT ≤ 1 minute on at least 75% of attempts at intercourse during the no-treatment run-in period will be randomized for the double-blind phase of the study.

In the double-blind phase of the study, men will be asked to take study drug 1 to 6 hours prior to sexual activity. Men and partners will be asked to attempt intercourse a minimum of 8 times during the 8 week double-blind study treatment. The patient or partner will record the IELT on each occasion by use of a stopwatch.

02

Conditions studied

  • Premature Ejaculation

Keywords

  • Sex
  • Sexual Dysfunction
  • IX-01
03

In context

Premature Ejaculation

106 studies on the registry are indexed under Premature Ejaculation; 17 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 239 is above the median of 84 across 89 interventional studies indexed under Premature Ejaculation.

Browse Premature Ejaculation studies →

Lead sponsor

Ixchelsis Limited is the lead sponsor of 6 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Men aged ≥18 years and ≤60 years in stable (≥6 months) heterosexual relationship and who have lifelong PE.
  2. Premature ejaculation ≤1 minute on ≥75% attempts at sexual intercourse during the run-in period.
  3. Meets other aspects of ISSM definition.
  4. Patient and partner willing to attempt intercourse at least 4 times during the run-in period and at least 8 additional times during the double-blind part of the study.
  5. Partner not planning pregnancy and willing to use (unless not of , e.g, surgically sterilized).
  6. Willing to limit use of alcohol on days in which he takes study drug.
  7. Capable of giving written .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. IELT value >2 minutes during the run-in period.
  2. \<4 attempts at sexual intercourse during the run-in period.
  3. Any patient who rates his control of ejaculation as fair, good, or very good.
  4. Any patient who rates his ejaculation-related "personal distress" as "not at all" or "a little bit".
  5. Erectile Dysfunction.
  6. Concomitant use of phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitors, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRIs)/selective serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SSNRIs), monoamine oxidase inhibitors, alpha blockers, 5-alpha reductase inhibitors, topical anesthetics, and/or tramadol.
  7. History (last 6 months) of use of Botox or similar product to treat PE.
  8. Has received IX-01 in a previous clinical study.
  9. Unwilling to stop other treatments for PE (including but not limited to pharmacological, sex therapy, psychotherapy multiple condoms, and prior masturbation).
  10. Any other sexual disorder of patient or partner that could interfere with results.
  11. Any current sexually transmitted disease.
  12. Any major medical condition of patient that could interfere with ability to have sexual activity and/or require hospital treatment.
  13. (BMI) >40 kg/m2 or weight \<60 kg.
  14. Participation in a clinical drug study anytime during the 30 days prior to screening.
  15. (HIV), .
  16. History of prostate disease or prostate disease.
  17. History of myocardial infarction, coronary bypass surgery, coronary artery angioplasty, unstable angina, clinically evident congestive heart failure, cardiac pacemaker, or cerebrovascular accident.
  18. Known or suspected history of significant cardiac arrhythmias.
  19. History of drug-induced allergic reactions including skin reactions.
  20. Significant psychiatric disease and/or risk of suicidal tendency.
  21. History of or other evidence of recent alcohol or drug abuse.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(7)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Hepatitis B tests

Hepatitis B is a virus that infects the liver. These are separate tests: HBsAg positive usually means a current infection (a recent vaccination can briefly cause it too); total anti-HBc (HBcAb) positive means an infection now or in the past; HBV DNA measures how much virus is in the blood.

Some studies accept a past infection if HBV DNA is undetectable, sometimes with antiviral medicine during the study. Check what this study allows.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
239 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    IX-01 1200 mg

    1200 mg dose comprising three 400 mg caplets administered orally at least 1 hour before or after food and 1-6 hours prior to sexual activity

    Drug: IX-01 1200 mg

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Three placebo caplets administered orally at least 1 hour before or after food and 1-6 hours prior to sexual activity

    Drug: Placebo

  • Experimental
    IX-01 800 mg

    800 mg dose comprising two 400 mg caplets and one placebo caplet administered orally at least 1 hour before or after food and 1-6 hours prior to sexual activity

    Drug: Placebo · Drug: IX-01 800 mg

  • Experimental
    IX-01 400 mg

    400 mg dose comprising one 400 mg caplet and two placebo caplets administered orally at least 1 hour before or after food and 1-6 hours prior to sexual activity

    Drug: IX-01 400 mg · Drug: Placebo

Interventions

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Geometric Mean (GM) Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT) Over the Treatment Assessment Period

    Intravaginal ejaculatory latency time (IELT) was defined as the time from the initiation of sexual intercourse (penetration) until ejaculation occurred and was recorded by the patient or partner using the stopwatch provided.

    Time frame: Last 4 weeks of treatment compared to baseline

Secondary outcomes

  1. Fold Change From Baseline in Geometric Mean (GM) IELT Over the Treatment Assessment Period Compared With Baseline

    Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT) was defined as the time from the initiation of sexual intercourse (penetration) until ejaculation occurred and was recorded using the stopwatch provided.

    Time frame: Last 4 weeks of treatment compared to baseline

  2. Proportion of Patients With ≥2.5-fold Increase in Geometric Mean (GM) Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT) Over the Treatment Assessment Period Compared With Baseline

    Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT) was defined as the time from the initiation of sexual intercourse (penetration) until ejaculation occurred and was measured using the stopwatch provided.

    Time frame: Last 4 weeks of treatment compared to baseline

  3. Proportion of Patients Rating Their Premature Ejaculation (PE) as Improved Per the Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) Questionnaire

    7 point scale ranging from much worse (-3) to much better (3). The proportion refers to the proportion of patients who had the best 2 possible responses \[better (2) or much better (3)\] on this scale.

    Time frame: Baseline to the end of treatment (approximately 8 weeks)

  4. Proportion of Patients Achieving Mean Change in Category of ≥1 or ≥2 on Control of Timing of Ejaculation on the Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP) Questionnaire.

    Reported in electronic diary and based on the Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP). PEP is scored on a 5 point scale with the scores ranging from 0 (worst answer) to 4 (best answer). A mean change in category of ≥1 or ≥2 corresponds to improving control from 'very poor' to 'fair', 'good', or 'very good'; or from 'poor' to 'fair', 'good', or 'very good'.

    Time frame: Baseline to the end of treatment (approximately 8 weeks)

  5. Proportion of Patients Achieving Mean Change in Category of ≥1 or ≥2 in Ejaculation-related Personal Distress on the Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP) Questionnaire

    Reported in e-diary. Based on Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP). Scale ranges from 'extremely' (0) to 'not at all' (4). An increase in score from baseline indicates improvement. A change in category of ≥1 or ≥2 corresponds to improving distress from 'extremely' to 'moderately', 'a little bit' or 'not at all'; or from 'quite a bit' to 'moderately', 'a little bit' or 'not at all'; or from 'moderately' to 'a little bit' or 'not at all'.

    Time frame: Baseline to the end of treatment (approximately 8 weeks)

  6. Proportion of Patients Achieving Change in Category of ≥2 on Control of Timing of Ejaculation and Achieving Change in Category of ≥1 in Ejaculation-related Personal Distress at End of Treatment

    Reported in electronic diary and based on the Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP). PEP is scored on a 5 point scale with the scores ranging from 0 (worst answer) to 4 (best answer).

    Time frame: Baseline to the end of treatment (approximately 8 weeks)

  7. Mean Change From Baseline in Score on Control of Ejaculation

    Reported in electronic diary and based on the Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP). PEP question on control of timing is scored on a 5 point scale with the scores ranging from very poor (this is the worst answer scored as 0) to very good (this is the best answer scored as 4).

    Time frame: Last 4 weeks of treatment compared to baseline

  8. Mean Change From Baseline in Score on Ejaculation-related Personal Distress

    Based on Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP). Scale ranges from 'extremely' (0) to 'not at all' (4). An increase in score from baseline indicates improvement.

    Time frame: Last 4 weeks of treatment compared to baseline

07

Results

Posted Oct 7, 2019

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePlaceboIX-01 400 mgIX-01 800 mgIX-01 1200 mg
Started48487172
Completed42415857
Not completed671315
Withdrew: Adverse event0011
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up0367
Withdrew: Physician decision1001
Withdrew: Protocol violation1000
Withdrew: Withdrawal of consent to continue drug1120
Withdrew: Withdrawal of consent to continue study2346
Withdrew: Partner not willing to try intercourse1000

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange From Baseline in Geometric Mean (GM) Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT) Over the Treatment Assessment Period

Intravaginal ejaculatory latency time (IELT) was defined as the time from the initiation of sexual intercourse (penetration) until ejaculation occurred and was recorded by the patient or partner using the stopwatch provided.

Time frame:
Last 4 weeks of treatment compared to baseline
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Seconds
Change From Baseline in Geometric Mean (GM) Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT) Over the Treatment Assessment Period
SecondsPlaceboIX-01 400 mgIX-01 800 mgIX-01 1200 mg
Change From Baseline in Geometric Mean (GM) Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT) Over the Treatment Assessment Period42.6 ± 10.939.7 ± 10.644.5 ± 9.029.2 ± 9.1
SecondaryFold Change From Baseline in Geometric Mean (GM) IELT Over the Treatment Assessment Period Compared With Baseline

Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT) was defined as the time from the initiation of sexual intercourse (penetration) until ejaculation occurred and was recorded using the stopwatch provided.

Time frame:
Last 4 weeks of treatment compared to baseline
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Fold change
Fold Change From Baseline in Geometric Mean (GM) IELT Over the Treatment Assessment Period Compared With Baseline
Fold changePlaceboIX-01 400 mgIX-01 800 mgIX-01 1200 mg
Fold Change From Baseline in Geometric Mean (GM) IELT Over the Treatment Assessment Period Compared With Baseline1.77 ± 0.111.56 ± 0.111.79 ± 0.091.54 ± 0.09
SecondaryProportion of Patients With ≥2.5-fold Increase in Geometric Mean (GM) Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT) Over the Treatment Assessment Period Compared With Baseline

Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT) was defined as the time from the initiation of sexual intercourse (penetration) until ejaculation occurred and was measured using the stopwatch provided.

Time frame:
Last 4 weeks of treatment compared to baseline
Reported as:
Number · Proportion of participants
Proportion of Patients With ≥2.5-fold Increase in Geometric Mean (GM) Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT) Over the Treatment Assessment Period Compared With Baseline
Proportion of participantsPlaceboIX-01 400 mgIX-01 800 mgIX-01 1200 mg
Proportion of Patients With ≥2.5-fold Increase in Geometric Mean (GM) Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT) Over the Treatment Assessment Period Compared With Baseline0.300.200.260.20
SecondaryProportion of Patients Rating Their Premature Ejaculation (PE) as Improved Per the Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) Questionnaire

7 point scale ranging from much worse (-3) to much better (3). The proportion refers to the proportion of patients who had the best 2 possible responses \[better (2) or much better (3)\] on this scale.

Time frame:
Baseline to the end of treatment (approximately 8 weeks)
Reported as:
Number · Proportion of participants
Proportion of Patients Rating Their Premature Ejaculation (PE) as Improved Per the Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) Questionnaire
Proportion of participantsPlaceboIX-01 400 mgIX-01 800 mgIX-01 1200 mg
Better0.120.050.070.07
Much better00.020.120
SecondaryProportion of Patients Achieving Mean Change in Category of ≥1 or ≥2 on Control of Timing of Ejaculation on the Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP) Questionnaire.

Reported in electronic diary and based on the Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP). PEP is scored on a 5 point scale with the scores ranging from 0 (worst answer) to 4 (best answer). A mean change in category of ≥1 or ≥2 corresponds to improving control from 'very poor' to 'fair', 'good', or 'very good'; or from 'poor' to 'fair', 'good', or 'very good'.

Time frame:
Baseline to the end of treatment (approximately 8 weeks)
Reported as:
Number · Proportion of participants
Proportion of Patients Achieving Mean Change in Category of ≥1 or ≥2 on Control of Timing of Ejaculation on the Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP) Questionnaire.
Proportion of participantsPlaceboIX-01 400 mgIX-01 800 mgIX-01 1200 mg
Proportion of Patients Achieving Mean Change in Category of ≥1 or ≥2 on Control of Timing of Ejaculation on the Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP) Questionnaire.0.350.180.330.18
SecondaryProportion of Patients Achieving Mean Change in Category of ≥1 or ≥2 in Ejaculation-related Personal Distress on the Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP) Questionnaire

Reported in e-diary. Based on Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP). Scale ranges from 'extremely' (0) to 'not at all' (4). An increase in score from baseline indicates improvement. A change in category of ≥1 or ≥2 corresponds to improving distress from 'extremely' to 'moderately', 'a little bit' or 'not at all'; or from 'quite a bit' to 'moderately', 'a little bit' or 'not at all'; or from 'moderately' to 'a little bit' or 'not at all'.

Time frame:
Baseline to the end of treatment (approximately 8 weeks)
Reported as:
Number · Proportion of participants
Proportion of Patients Achieving Mean Change in Category of ≥1 or ≥2 in Ejaculation-related Personal Distress on the Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP) Questionnaire
Proportion of participantsPlaceboIX-01 400 mgIX-01 800 mgIX-01 1200 mg
Proportion of Patients Achieving Mean Change in Category of ≥1 or ≥2 in Ejaculation-related Personal Distress on the Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP) Questionnaire0.370.250.390.23
SecondaryProportion of Patients Achieving Change in Category of ≥2 on Control of Timing of Ejaculation and Achieving Change in Category of ≥1 in Ejaculation-related Personal Distress at End of Treatment

Reported in electronic diary and based on the Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP). PEP is scored on a 5 point scale with the scores ranging from 0 (worst answer) to 4 (best answer).

Time frame:
Baseline to the end of treatment (approximately 8 weeks)
Reported as:
Number · Proportion of participants
Proportion of Patients Achieving Change in Category of ≥2 on Control of Timing of Ejaculation and Achieving Change in Category of ≥1 in Ejaculation-related Personal Distress at End of Treatment
Proportion of participantsPlaceboIX-01 400 mgIX-01 800 mgIX-01 1200 mg
Proportion of Patients Achieving Change in Category of ≥2 on Control of Timing of Ejaculation and Achieving Change in Category of ≥1 in Ejaculation-related Personal Distress at End of Treatment0.130.110.250.08
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in Score on Control of Ejaculation

Reported in electronic diary and based on the Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP). PEP question on control of timing is scored on a 5 point scale with the scores ranging from very poor (this is the worst answer scored as 0) to very good (this is the best answer scored as 4).

Time frame:
Last 4 weeks of treatment compared to baseline
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Mean Change From Baseline in Score on Control of Ejaculation
score on a scalePlaceboIX-01 400 mgIX-01 800 mgIX-01 1200 mg
Mean Change From Baseline in Score on Control of Ejaculation0.55 ± 0.9380.46 ± 0.8370.58 ± 0.8680.32 ± 0.619
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in Score on Ejaculation-related Personal Distress

Based on Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP). Scale ranges from 'extremely' (0) to 'not at all' (4). An increase in score from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame:
Last 4 weeks of treatment compared to baseline
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Mean Change From Baseline in Score on Ejaculation-related Personal Distress
score on a scalePlaceboIX-01 400 mgIX-01 800 mgIX-01 1200 mg
Mean Change From Baseline in Score on Ejaculation-related Personal Distress0.73 ± 1.1390.38 ± 1.0360.58 ± 0.9330.51 ± 0.898

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Placebo0/46 (0%)0/46 (0%)12/46 (26.1%)
IX-01 400 mg0/48 (0%)0/48 (0%)8/48 (16.7%)
IX-01 800 mg0/68 (0%)0/68 (0%)12/68 (17.6%)
IX-01 1200 mg0/69 (0%)0/69 (0%)18/69 (26.1%)
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 53
Most frequent other events
EventPlaceboIX-01 400 mgIX-01 800 mgIX-01 1200 mg
HeadacheNervous system disorders3/462/482/682/69
Upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations2/460/481/680/69
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations1/461/481/682/69
Oropharyngeal painRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/460/480/682/69
ParosmiaNervous system disorders1/460/480/680/69
Abnormal dreamsPsychiatric disorders1/460/480/681/69
Depressed moodPsychiatric disorders1/460/480/680/69
Blood pressure increasedInvestigations1/460/480/680/69
ConcussionInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/460/480/680/69
Skin abrasionInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/460/480/680/69

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)PlaceboIX-01 400 mgIX-01 800 mgIX-01 1200 mgTotal
Mean40.2 ± 9.1341.8 ± 9.2840.1 ± 9.7843.8 ± 8.6341.6 ± 9.29
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)PlaceboIX-01 400 mgIX-01 800 mgIX-01 1200 mgTotal
Female00000
Male46486869231
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)PlaceboIX-01 400 mgIX-01 800 mgIX-01 1200 mgTotal
Hispanic or Latino75111942
Not Hispanic or Latino39435750189
Unknown or Not Reported00000
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)PlaceboIX-01 400 mgIX-01 800 mgIX-01 1200 mgTotal
Race — White40355857190
Race — Black or African American487827
Race — Asian12227
Race — American Indian or Alaska Native00101
Race — Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander00000
Race — Other13026
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)PlaceboIX-01 400 mgIX-01 800 mgIX-01 1200 mgTotal
United States46486869231
08

Study locations

29 sites
  • Coastal Clinical Research Inc
    Mobile, Alabama 36608, United States
  • Radiant Research, Inc. - Phoenix SE
    Chandler, Arizona 85224, United States
  • Desert Clinical Research, LLC - Radiant
    Mesa, Arizona 85213, United States
  • Family Practice Specialists - Radiant
    Phoenix, Arizona 85018, United States
  • San Diego Sexual Medicine
    San Diego, California 92120, United States
  • Columbine Family Practice - Radiant
    Littleton, Colorado 80128, United States
  • South Florida Medical Research Inc.
    Aventura, Florida 33180, United States
  • A G A Clinical Trials
    Hialeah, Florida 33012, United States
  • Clinical Research Center of Florida
    Pompano Beach, Florida 33060, United States
  • Center for Marital and Sexual Health of South Florida
    West Palm Beach, Florida 33401, United States
  • Northwest Behavioral Research Center
    Roswell, Georgia 30076, United States
  • Boston Clinical Trials Inc
    Boston, Massachusetts 02131, United States
  • Mens Health Boston
    Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts 02467, United States
  • Center For Pharmaceutical Research
    Kansas City, Missouri 64114, United States
  • Clifford J Molin MD LTD - Radiant
    Las Vegas, Nevada 89128, United States
  • Accumed Research Associates
    Garden City, New York 11530-1664, United States
  • Drug Trials America
    Hartsdale, New York 10530, United States
  • Manhattan Medical Research
    New York, New York 10016, United States
  • Radiant Research, Inc. - Akron
    Akron, Ohio 44311, United States
  • Radiant Research, Inc. - Cincinnati
    Cincinnati, Ohio 45236, United States
  • Radiant Research, Inc. - Columbus
    Columbus, Ohio 43212, United States
  • Urologic Consultants of Southeastern Pennsylvania
    Bala-Cynwyd, Pennsylvania 19004, United States
  • Miriam Hospital / The Men's Health Center
    Providence, Rhode Island 02906, United States
  • Radiant Research, Inc. - Anderson
    Anderson, South Carolina 29621, United States
  • Radiant Research, Inc. - Greer
    Greer, South Carolina 29650, United States
  • Radiant Research, Inc. - Dallas
    Dallas, Texas 75231, United States
  • Clinical Trials of Texas Incorporated
    San Antonio, Texas 78229, United States
  • Radiant Research Inc - San Antonio
    San Antonio, Texas 78229, United States
  • Radiant Research, Inc. - Salt Lake City
    Murray, Utah 84123, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Althof S, Osterloh IH, Muirhead GJ, George K, Girard N; PEDRIX Multi-Centre Study Group. The Oxytocin Antagonist Cligosiban Fails to Prolong Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency in Men with Lifelong Premature Ejaculation: Results of a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase IIb trial (PEDRIX). J Sex Med. 2019 Aug;16(8):1188-1198. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.05.015. PubMed 31351660 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 7, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03055806
Lead sponsor
Ixchelsis Limited
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 16, 2017
Start date
Feb 28, 2017
Primary completion
Nov 17, 2017
Completion
Dec 6, 2017
Results posted
Oct 7, 2019
Last update
Oct 7, 2019

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: IX-01

Start the discussion