CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03048149Updated Jan 25, 2018

Clinical and Biological Efficacy of Hazelnut Oral Immunotherapy

An observational study in Allergy, sponsored by Lille Catholic University. Completed at 1 site in France. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-01-25.

Sponsored by Lille Catholic University · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
100
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study is retrospective. It focuses on hazelnut allergic patients with a clinical history and a positive specific immunoglobulin E (sIgE) against hazelnut and its recombinants that have followed a hazelnut oral tolerance induction at the allergy Unit of Saint Vincent Hospital of Lille (France) since 2011.

Read the detailed description

Prevalence of food allergy is in perpetual progression since several years. It has been multiply by three in 10 to 15 years. Hazelnut allergy can lead to severe anaphylactic shock, particularly in children. It is a long lasting condition with less than 10% of natural healing.

Increasing the threshold reactive dose of hazelnut of the patients, i.e. the minimal dose of hazelnut that trigger an allergic reaction, is of primary importance because it allows to avoid severe anaphylactic reaction that can happen even with the consumption of low allergen doses. Those reactions can occur even with an elimination diet. This increase also allows the reintegration of the patients in the community, and has a beneficial impact on their quality of life.

The increase of the threshold reactive dose is possible by the introduction of an oral tolerance induction (OTI) protocol. It consists in a regular consumption of low controlled doses of hazelnuts that are progressively increased. Thus a protocol is conducted at the allergy Unit of Saint Vincent Hospital of Lille (France) in standard care since 2006, but there are very few data published on tree nuts, especially in France. Most of the data are on peanut, although the consumption of tree nuts is high in France.

For this OTI protocol, an oral food challenge (OFC) is performed. This OFC allows the determination of the threshold reactive dose, i.e. the minimum dose of allergen that induces an allergic reaction. A safe dose of hazelnut that will be regularly eaten by the patient is then determined. Every 6 months, a new OFC is performed and thus a new threshold reactive dose is measured, and the dose to be eaten by the patient updated. The protocol is followed until the patient reaches an ideal dose of 11766 mg of hazelnut proteins. Of course, the protocol can also be ended if the patient decided so.

The main objective of this study is to study the clinical efficiency of hazelnut OTI by measuring the evolution of the patient threshold reactive dose.

The secondary objective is to study the biological efficiency of hazelnut OTI by measuring the evolution of the dosage of sIgE against hazelnut proteins and the evolution of the size of the prick tests.

As the OFC and the IgE dosage are a standard part of the OTI protocol, all the data are obtained from the medical records. The study is retrospective and thus observational.

02

Conditions studied

  • Allergy

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • hazelnut allergy
03

In context

Hypersensitivity

1,916 studies on the registry are indexed under Hypersensitivity; 265 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 100 is below the median of 115 across 479 observational studies indexed under Hypersensitivity.

Browse Hypersensitivity studies →

Lead sponsor

Lille Catholic University is the lead sponsor of 111 studies on the registry; 26 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Hazelnut allergic patients that have followed a hazelnut oral tolerance induction protocol at the allergy Unit of Saint Vincent Hospital of Lille (France) since 2011

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with clinical symptoms when consuming hazelnuts, such as urticaria, asthma, angioedema, atopic dermatitis, dermo-respiratory syndrome or anaphylactic shock.
  • Positive sIgE against hazelnut, r Cor a 1, 8, 9 or 14
  • Patients that had followed a hazelnut oral tolerance induction

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • No clinical symptoms or biological confirmation of a hazelnut allergy
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
100 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Evolution of the threshold reactive dose in milligrams

    During the OTI protocol, an oral food challenge is performed every 6 months. The dose that induce the first allergic reaction is reported. The protocol is followed until the patients get a threshold reactive dose of 11 766mg of hazelnut protein, or until the patient decide to end it.

    Time frame: At inclusion, then every 6 months until a threshold reactive dose of 11 766mg of hazelnut protein is reached (up to 5 years)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Evolution of IgE dosages against hazelnut proteins, r Cor a 1, 8, 9 or 14

    Dosage of the specific IgE against hazelnut proteins and its recombinant r Cor a 1, 8, 9 or 14, that are performed every 6 months during the standard follow-up of the patients. The measures are done with ImmunoCAP laboratory system, Phadia, Uppsala, Sweden.

    Time frame: At inclusion, then every 6 months until a threshold reactive dose of 11 766mg of hazelnut protein is reached (up to 5 years)

  2. Evolution of the size of the prick test

    Hazelnut prick test (the allergen is put in contact with the skin and the size of the reaction is measured) are performed every 6 months during the standard follow-up of the patients.

    Time frame: At inclusion, then every 6 months until a threshold reactive dose of 11 766mg of hazelnut protein is reached (up to 5 years)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • GHICL
    Lomme, 59462, France
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 25, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03048149
Lead sponsor
Lille Catholic University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 9, 2017
Start date
Dec 1, 2016
Primary completion
Mar 8, 2017
Completion
Mar 8, 2017
Last update
Jan 25, 2018

Study contacts

Tomas Moraly
principal investigator · GHICL

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion