ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03046706Updated Mar 12, 2020

The Role of Vocal Rest After Removal of Benign Lesions From Vocal Cord

An interventional study of post operative voice rest and No voice rest in Vocal Fold Polyp and Vocal Cord Dysfunction, sponsored by Rambam Health Care Campus. Completed at 1 site in Israel. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 99 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-03-12.

Sponsored by Rambam Health Care Campus · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 99 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The accepted recommendation after removal of vocal cord lesion is voice rest.This recommendation leads to great tension among the patients, loss of working days and need to practice speech therapy.The investigators hypothesize that voice rest after surgery does not affect the quality of the patient's voice. The investigators will divide the patients into 2 groups: the first group will be instructed for a postoperative voice rest and the second group will not. Later the investigators will compare the results and conclude whether voice rest had any significance.

Read the detailed description

The prevailing view among laryngologists is that voice rest after laryngeal surgery is important to ensure a good recovery of the epithelium and lamina propria layers of the vocal cord. Speaking immediately after surgery leads to the formation of an irregular collagen in large quantities of the vocal cords - namely the creation scar tissue. The scarred vocal cords leads to a decrease in its elasticity, which is reflected in poor speech quality. Although this theory, not many works were published in the literature proving the necessity for voice rest after vocal cord surgery.

Several studies have been recently published which claim that there is no need for vocal rest and stress the importance of a moderate voice effort straight after surgery. This need is based on the idea that early mobilization of tissue after surgery led to the creation of a healthy soft tissue architecture.

The investigators hypothesize that there is no role for vocal rest after surgery to remove benign lesions from the vocal cords.

Patients candidate for laryngeal surgery that include removal of a benign vocal cord lesion will be divided into two groups:

  1. Patients instructed for the conventional post operative voice rest, namely absolute voice rest for a week and another week of relative voice rest (speaking is allowed for 20 minutes a day).
  2. Patients instructed to speak freely without restrictions after the surgery. those are the study phases: * first visit- preoperative visit.

    • First the investigators prove by fiber optic examination that the patient suffers from the scourge of benign vocal cord lesion. Then the patient gets an explanation of the study, fill a demographic questionnaire. Next the patient fills the VHI (voice handicap index) questionnaire - a questionnaire which assesses the impact of the patient voice by 3 measures:emotional,functional and psychosocial. The questionnaire contains 30 questions. Any question dotted between 0-4 by the patient so that a higher score means more bad sound.
    • Optical fiber testing is performed. Vocal cords including the lesion are photographed and video files are saved . Stroboscopic test for determining the quality of vibration, movement and closure of the vocal cords.The patient voice is recorded for future determination of the GRBAS (Grade,Roughness, breathiness, asthenia,strain). this index, scored by the laryngologists assesses the patient's voice according to five factors- grade, roughness, breathiness, asthenia,strain. Each parameter dotted between 0-3 so a higher score means more bad sound.The last test is objective. The voice recording will undergo computer analysis which determine the following voice objectives : fundamental frequency, jitter, shimmer, harmonic to noise ratio.

Lastly the patient is randomized (by block randomization) to determine to which group the patient belongs.

Patients belonging to the control group (standard post operative voice rest) receive a form where they annotate every day whether they kept on the instructed sound regime. This log will allow the investigators to track the compliance of the patients belonging to the voice rest group.

  • Second visit- 3 days post operative

    • Execute an optical fiber examination for description and evaluation of the recovery process of the vocal cord.
    • Vocal cords including the lesion will be photographed and video files are saved. stroboscopic test for future determination of the quality of vibration, movement and closure of the vocal cods.
  • Third visit- 14 days post operative

Same examination as the second visit are performed plus:

- The patient voice will be recorded to determine the GRBAS Index by the laryngologist. recording of the patient's voice for an objective voice analysis evaluation using a computer.

  • Forth visit- 1 months post operative. Same examinations as the second visit are performed.
  • Fifth visit- 3 months post operative. Same examinations as the second visit are performed plus patient fills VHI questionnaire.
  • Sixth visit- 6 months post operative. Same examinations as the fifth visit are performed.
02

Conditions studied

  • Vocal Fold Polyp
  • Vocal Cord Dysfunction

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • voice rest
  • laryngeal surgery
  • glottic polyp
  • glottic cyst
03

In context

Vocal Cord Dysfunction

20 studies on the registry are indexed under Vocal Cord Dysfunction; 4 are open to participants now.

Browse Vocal Cord Dysfunction studies →

Lead sponsor

Rambam Health Care Campus is the lead sponsor of 466 studies on the registry; 34 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 99 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient Over 18 years old suffers a benign vocal cord lesion and candidate for surgical removal . Recruitment will take place in the voice and Swallowing Clinic. Rambam medical center. Israel.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • A patient under 18.
  • Demented patient.
  • Deaf patient.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
100 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    standard voice rest

    This group maintains postoperative voice rest. Namely, absolute voice rest for a week, followed by a week of relative voice rest sound (talking is allowed for 20 minutes a day). post operative voice rest

    Behavioral: post operative voice rest

  • Experimental
    no voice rest

    This group has no limitations regarding post operative speech. Members can talk indefinitely after surgery with no special restrictions.

    Behavioral: No voice rest

Interventions

  • Behavioralpost operative voice rest

    After surgery, a week of total silence. In the second week after surgery talking is allowed for 20 minutes a day.

  • BehavioralNo voice rest

    No limitations regarding post operative speech. Members can talk indefinitely after surgery with no special restrictions

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Patient's evaluation of his own voice

    VHI questionnaire score

    Time frame: 1 month post operative

  2. Patient's evaluation of his own voice

    VHI questionnaire score

    Time frame: 3 months post operative

  3. Patient's evaluation of his own voice

    VHI questionnaire score

    Time frame: 6 months post operative

  4. doctors evaluation of the patient's voice

    GRABS scale score

    Time frame: 1 month post operative

  5. doctors evaluation of the patient's voice

    GRABS scale score

    Time frame: 3 month post operative

  6. doctors evaluation of the patient's voice

    GRABS scale score

    Time frame: 6 month post operative

  7. voice analysis by a software

    jitter score, shrimmer score, harmonic to noise ration

    Time frame: 1 month post operative

  8. voice analysis by a software

    jitter score, shrimmer score, harmonic to noise ration

    Time frame: 3 month ost operative

  9. voice analysis by a software

    jitter score, shrimmer score, harmonic to noise ration

    Time frame: 6 month post operative

Secondary outcomes

  1. Testing the effect of various regimens voice rest on the healing process of vocal cords. the parameters the will be tested are : edema, hyperemia, epithelization, other (presence of granuloma/web)

    The next parameters will be evaluated in each visit: 1\. edema- scoring the edema severity .score 1= mild edema .score 2= moderate edema score 3= severe edema hyperemia- scoring the hyperemia severity .score 1= mild hyperemia .score 2= moderate hyperemia score 3= severe hyperemia epithelization degree: 1 =up to 20% 2= up to 50% 3= up to 75% 4- complete epithelization other findings: 1= granuloma 2= web. The final score of each visit includes the sum of all scores separately and will be reported as a single value.

    Time frame: 3 days post operative

  2. Testing the effect of various regimens voice rest on the healing process of vocal cords. the parameters the will be tested are : edema, hyperemia, epithelization, other (presence of granuloma/web)

    The next parameters will be evaluated in each visit: 1\. edema- scoring the edema severity .score 1= mild edema .score 2= moderate edema score 3= severe edema hyperemia- scoring the hyperemia severity .score 1= mild hyperemia .score 2= moderate hyperemia score 3= severe hyperemia epithelization degree: 1 =up to 20% 2= up to 50% 3= up to 75% 4- complete epithelization other findings: 1= granuloma 2= web. The final score of each visit includes the sum of all scores separately and will be reported as a single value.

    Time frame: 2 weeks post operative

  3. Testing the effect of various regimens voice rest on the healing process of vocal cords. the parameters the will be tested are : edema, hyperemia, epithelization, other (presence of granuloma/web)

    The next parameters will be evaluated in each visit: 1\. edema- scoring the edema severity .score 1= mild edema .score 2= moderate edema score 3= severe edema hyperemia- scoring the hyperemia severity .score 1= mild hyperemia .score 2= moderate hyperemia score 3= severe hyperemia epithelization degree: 1 =up to 20% 2= up to 50% 3= up to 75% 4- complete epithelization other findings: 1= granuloma 2= web. The final score of each visit includes the sum of all scores separately and will be reported as a single value.

    Time frame: 1 month post operative

  4. Testing the effect of various regimens voice rest on the healing process of vocal cords. the parameters the will be tested are : edema, hyperemia, epithelization, other (presence of granuloma/web)

    The next parameters will be evaluated in each visit: 1\. edema- scoring the edema severity .score 1= mild edema .score 2= moderate edema score 3= severe edema hyperemia- scoring the hyperemia severity .score 1= mild hyperemia .score 2= moderate hyperemia score 3= severe hyperemia epithelization degree: 1 =up to 20% 2= up to 50% 3= up to 75% 4- complete epithelization other findings: 1= granuloma 2= web. The final score of each visit includes the sum of all scores separately and will be reported as a single value.

    Time frame: 3 month post operative

  5. Testing the effect of various regimens voice rest on the healing process of vocal cords. the parameters the will be tested are : edema, hyperemia, epithelization, other (presence of granuloma/web)

    The next parameters will be evaluated in each visit: 1\. edema- scoring the edema severity .score 1= mild edema .score 2= moderate edema score 3= severe edema hyperemia- scoring the hyperemia severity .score 1= mild hyperemia .score 2= moderate hyperemia score 3= severe hyperemia epithelization degree: 1 =up to 20% 2= up to 50% 3= up to 75% 4- complete epithelization other findings: 1= granuloma 2= web. The final score of each visit includes the sum of all scores separately and will be reported as a single value.

    Time frame: 6 month post operative

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Rambam medical center
    Haifa, 43654, Israel
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Behrman A, Sulica L. Voice rest after microlaryngoscopy: current opinion and practice. Laryngoscope. 2003 Dec;113(12):2182-6. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200312000-00026. PubMed 14660924 ↗
  • Ishikawa K, Thibeault S. Voice rest versus exercise: a review of the literature. J Voice. 2010 Jul;24(4):379-87. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2008.10.011. Epub 2009 Aug 5. PubMed 19660903 ↗
  • Kiagiadaki D, Remacle M, Lawson G, Bachy V, Van der Vorst S. The effect of voice rest on the outcome of phonosurgery for benign laryngeal lesions: preliminary results of a prospective randomized study. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2015 May;124(5):407-12. doi: 10.1177/0003489414560583. Epub 2014 Nov 20. PubMed 25416241 ↗
  • Rousseau B, Gutmann ML, Mau T, Francis DO, Johnson JP, Novaleski CK, Vinson KN, Garrett CG. Randomized controlled trial of supplemental augmentative and alternative communication versus voice rest alone after phonomicrosurgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015 Mar;152(3):494-500. doi: 10.1177/0194599814566601. Epub 2015 Jan 20. PubMed 25605690 ↗
  • Kaneko M, Shiromoto O, Fujiu-Kurachi M, Kishimoto Y, Tateya I, Hirano S. Optimal Duration for Voice Rest After Vocal Fold Surgery: Randomized Controlled Clinical Study. J Voice. 2017 Jan;31(1):97-103. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.02.009. Epub 2016 Aug 1. PubMed 27492336 ↗
  • J. A. Koufman, P.D Blalock. Is voice rest never indicated? J. voice Vol 3, No. 1 87-91

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Jun 2017 to primary completion in Feb 2019, 19 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 29, 2017
First posted
Feb 8, 2017
StartActual
Jun 20, 2017
Primary completionActual
Feb 1, 2019
CompletionActual
Feb 1, 2019
Last update
Mar 12, 2020
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 12, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03046706
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 8, 2017
Start date
Jun 20, 2017
Primary completion
Feb 1, 2019
Completion
Feb 1, 2019
Last update
Mar 12, 2020

Study contacts

ziv gil, MD
study director · Head of ear nose throat department Rambam medical center Israel

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion