A Phase 1 interventional study of Anti CS6 BSIgG product (Lot PD1601105CS) and Anti B7A BSIgG product (Lot PD1601132ET) in Healthy Volunteer, sponsored by Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 50 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-06-14.
Sponsored by Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health · Phase 1, Interventional, and Treatment
Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) is a major cause of diarrhea worldwide. Vaccines and therapeutics are under development to prevent ETEC disease in children and travelers. One approach is to use passive protection (antibodies) to prevent infection. The purpose of this study are to assess the safety of serum-derived bovine immunoglobulins in healthy adult subjects when orally administered and to estimate protective efficacy of those preparations against moderate-severe diarrhea upon challenge with the ETEC strain B7A.
Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) is one of the most common causes of infectious diarrhea in children in resource limited countries, and is also a frequent cause of traveler's diarrhea in civilian and military travelers to endemic countries. ETEC strains express a variety of colonization factors (CF) that help them attach to the intestinal wall. Each colonization factor has one or more surface antigens (CS). One of the major surface antigens of ETEC is CS6 (Coli surface antigen 6).
Vaccines and treatments to prevent ETEC disease are under development. Some of these target specific enterotoxins or colonization factors. For over 40 years, we have used ETEC human challenge studies to understand the ETEC disease process, immune response, and more recently, to determine whether treatments or vaccines are protective or effective in mitigating disease. B7A is the only CS6 expressing ETEC challenge strain currently used.
A modality that has shown some success in the prevention of diarrhea is passive, oral administration of bovine milk IgG with specific activity against viral, bacterial and parasitic enteropathogens. Passive oral administration of Bovine Serum Immunoglobulins (BSIgG) may protect against ETEC-mediated infectious diarrhea. The hypothesized mechanism of protection stems from the passive administration of bovine anti-tip adhesion or fimbriae antibodies preventing their adherence in the human small intestine (the initial step in pathogenesis), thereby preventing downstream pathogenic processes and symptomatic illness. This study will establish the foundation for evaluating BSIgG products against numerous ETEC CFs.
This study will explore if anti-B7A and anti- CS6 BSIgG provides protection against oral challenge with B7A in healthy adult volunteers. There will be two inpatient admissions of approximately 30 subjects (up to 60 total). They will receive one of three investigational products (IP) three times daily following meals beginning 2 days prior to challenge. Each volunteer will be challenged with CS6 expressing ETEC B7A on Day 0. The investigational product/placebo will be administered for a total of 7 days, or until antibiotic treatment has been administered. The investigators hypothesize that anti-CS6 BSIgG will provide protection against B7A mediated moderate to severe diarrhea upon challenge.
97 studies on the registry are indexed under Escherichia coli Infections; 17 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 60 is below the median of 80 across 59 interventional studies indexed under Escherichia coli Infections.
Browse Escherichia coli Infections studies →Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health is the lead sponsor of 369 studies on the registry; 41 are open to participants now.
Of its 5 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 3 (60%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
General health criteria
Research-related exclusions applicable to challenge
Study-specific Exclusion Criteria (potential increased risk or complicating outcome ascertainment)
Anti-CS6 BSIgG and challenge strain CS6-expressing ETEC (B7A)
Biological: Anti CS6 BSIgG product (Lot PD1601105CS) · Biological: B7A- CS6-expressing ETEC challenge strain
Anti- whole cell B7A (killed) BSIgG and challenge strain CS6-expressing ETEC (B7A)
Biological: Anti B7A BSIgG product (Lot PD1601132ET) · Biological: B7A- CS6-expressing ETEC challenge strain
Negative Control (Nonhyperimmune BSIgG placebo) and challenge strain CS6-expressing ETEC (B7A)
Biological: Bovine Immunoglobin Negative Control (Lot PD161071NC) · Biological: B7A- CS6-expressing ETEC challenge strain
Safety of Serum Derived Bovine Immunoglobulins (BSIgG)
Number of Participants with adverse events in groups receiving B7A- and CS6- hyperimmune (BSIgG) compared with the group receiving the nonhyperimmune product.
Time frame: 28 days
Efficacy of B7A and CS6- Hyperimmune Bovine Serum Immunoglobin to Protect Against Moderate to Severe Diarrhea After Challenge With the CS6 Expressing ETEC Strain B7A
Comparison of the number and percentage of volunteers in the arms receiving the B7A- and CS6 BSIgG vs the arm receiving the nonhyperimmune BSIgG who develop moderate to severe diarrhea.
Time frame: 28 days
Sixty healthy adult naive subjects enrolled and received one of the three BSIgG products. Fifty-nine of those subjects were challenged with ETEC strain B7A.
| Milestone | Anti-CS6 Group | Anti-whole Cell B7A | Control Immunoglobulin Group |
|---|---|---|---|
| Started | 20 | 20 | 20 |
| Completed | 19 | 20 | 20 |
| Not completed | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Number of Participants with adverse events in groups receiving B7A- and CS6- hyperimmune (BSIgG) compared with the group receiving the nonhyperimmune product.
| Participants | Anti-CS6 Group | Anti-whole Cell B7A | Control Immunoglobulin Group |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abdominal Distension | 1 | 2 | 0 |
| Abdominal Pain | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| Defecation Urgency | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Flatulence | 3 | 4 | 2 |
| Headache | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| Nausea | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| None | 14 | 11 | 16 |
Comparison of the number and percentage of volunteers in the arms receiving the B7A- and CS6 BSIgG vs the arm receiving the nonhyperimmune BSIgG who develop moderate to severe diarrhea.
| Participants | Anti-CS6 Group | Anti-whole Cell B7A | Control Immunoglobulin Group |
|---|---|---|---|
| Efficacy of B7A and CS6- Hyperimmune Bovine Serum Immunoglobin to Protect Against Moderate to Severe Diarrhea After Challenge With the CS6 Expressing ETEC Strain B7A | 12 | 7 | 14 |
Collected over 6 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anti-CS6 Group | 0/20 (0%) | 0/20 (0%) | 19/20 (95%) |
| Anti-whole Cell B7A | 0/20 (0%) | 0/20 (0%) | 17/20 (85%) |
| Control Immunoglobulin Group | 0/20 (0%) | 0/20 (0%) | 20/20 (100%) |
| Event | Anti-CS6 Group | Anti-whole Cell B7A | Control Immunoglobulin Group |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abdominal PainGastrointestinal disorders | 12/20 | 7/20 | 12/20 |
| Decreased appetiteGastrointestinal disorders | 10/20 | 4/20 | 10/20 |
| Abdominal DistentionGastrointestinal disorders | 2/20 | 2/20 | 9/20 |
| Defecation UrgencyGastrointestinal disorders | 9/20 | 4/20 | 9/20 |
| Abdominal tendernessGastrointestinal disorders | 5/20 | 0/20 | 7/20 |
| ChillsImmune system disorders | 7/20 | 0/20 | 5/20 |
| ArthraligiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | 2/20 | 0/20 | 5/20 |
| Abdominal Pain lowerGastrointestinal disorders | 0/20 | 0/20 | 1/20 |
| Apthous ulcerImmune system disorders | 0/20 | 0/20 | 1/20 |
| Back painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | 0/20 | 0/20 | 1/20 |
| Age, Continuous(years) | Anti-CS6 Group | Anti-whole Cell B7A | Control Immunoglobulin Group | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median | 33.5 (25.0 to 37.5) | 35.0 (31.0 to 43.0) | 35.5 (26.8 to 41.8) | 34 (26.8 to 42) |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | Anti-CS6 Group | Anti-whole Cell B7A | Control Immunoglobulin Group | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 9 | 4 | 9 | 22 |
| Male | 11 | 16 | 11 | 38 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants) | Anti-CS6 Group | Anti-whole Cell B7A | Control Immunoglobulin Group | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hispanic or Latino | 3 | 1 | 3 | 7 |
| Not Hispanic or Latino | 17 | 19 | 17 | 53 |
| Unknown or Not Reported | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants) | Anti-CS6 Group | Anti-whole Cell B7A | Control Immunoglobulin Group | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Asian | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Black or African American | 15 | 18 | 15 | 48 |
| White | 5 | 2 | 3 | 10 |
| More than one race | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Unknown or Not Reported | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Region of Enrollment(participants) | Anti-CS6 Group | Anti-whole Cell B7A | Control Immunoglobulin Group | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 20 | 20 | 20 | 60 |
Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.
Plan to share: Undecided
Ran from Jan 2017 to primary completion in Apr 2017, 3 months.
Results were first posted in Jun 2019, 2 years 2 months after primary completion.
Of 12 phase 1 interventional studies under Escherichia coli Infections, half reached primary completion within 14 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 7 and three quarters within 30. This study's 3 months is below that.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health →