CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03040128Updated Feb 2, 2017

Use of Minocycline in Intracerebral Hemorrhage

A Phase 1/2 interventional study of Minocycline and normal saline infusion in Intracerebral Hemorrhage, sponsored by University of Tennessee. Completed. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-02-02.

Sponsored by University of Tennessee · Phase 1/2, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was Nov 2016, 9 years 10 months ago, and no results have been posted to the registry.
  • Registered 3 years 6 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jun 2013, registered Jan 2017).
Phase
Phase 1/2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

To date, no neuroprotective drugs have demonstrated clinical efficacy in intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). This study will use intravenous (IV) minocycline in ICH to evaluate for (1) safety/ tolerability and (2) evaluate for clinical efficacy

Read the detailed description

Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) remains a devastating neurological disorder with high mortality and poor prognosis with unchanged mortality rates (53-59%). Acute treatment options for ICH remain supportive with no available effective drug or surgical therapy. All trials so far have failed to improve clinical outcome in randomized, double-blinded trials. However, one area of interest has been maintaining the integrity of the blood-brain-barrier (BBB) and preventing the growth of vasogenic edema. Matrix metalloproteinases (MMP) are a family of ubiquitous zinc-dependent endopeptidase enzymes whose primary function is the digestion of collagen type IV, laminin, and fibronectin for the purpose of remodeling extracellular basal lamina. Elevated MMP-9 as a pathological process associated with larger hematoma volume, larger perihematomal edema, and poorer clinical outcome in intracerebral hemorrhage is well documented in animal models and patients. One particular MMP-9 inhibitor gaining usage in cerebrovascular disease is minocycline. Normally FDA-approved for bacterial infection and acne vulgaris, minocycline has also been found to be both a safe and effective treatment in ischemic stroke; its potential role as a neuroprotectant in ischemic stroke is currently being tested in a large, randomized, double-blinded trial. Minocycline's beneficial role as a neuroprotectant may also extend to ICH. By inhibiting MMP-9, minocycline may decrease BBB permeability, resulting in less perihematomal edema and decreased mass effect. Although numerous animal ICH models support minocycline's role as an inhibitor of MMP-9 and neuroprotectant, its use has never been studied in humans with ICH.

02

Conditions studied

  • Intracerebral Hemorrhage
03

In context

Cerebral Hemorrhage

476 studies on the registry are indexed under Cerebral Hemorrhage; 181 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 20 is below the median of 100 across 287 interventional studies indexed under Cerebral Hemorrhage.

Browse Cerebral Hemorrhage studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Tennessee is the lead sponsor of 139 studies on the registry; 21 are open to participants now.

Of its 7 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 2 (29%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age 18-80 yo
  2. Acute neurological deficit with corresponding ICH noted on head CT
  3. Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) > 8
  4. Onset of symptoms within 12 hrs
  5. \< 30 ml of blood noted on initial CTH (30 ml hematoma volume is a noted independent marker between good and poor clinical outcome)
  6. ICH score \< 3
  7. English/ Spanish speaking

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Allergy to tetracycline and tetracycline analogues
  2. Pregnancy or suspected pregnancy
  3. Hepatic and/or renal insufficiency (LFTs 3x greater than upper limit of normal; creatinine > 2 mg/dL)
  4. Thrombocytopenia (plt count \< 75,000)
  5. History of intolerance to minocycline
  6. Baseline modified Rankin score > 1
  7. Stuporous or comatose (GCS \< 8)
  8. Presence of concomitant serious illness that would confound study, including serious psychiatric disease or prior suicide attempts.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
20 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Placebo comparator
    placebo

    normal saline infusion

    Other: normal saline infusion

  • Experimental
    minocycline

    intravenous minocycline

    Drug: Minocycline

Interventions

  • DrugMinocycline

    high-dose, intravenous minocycline

  • Othernormal saline infusion
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of patients with Treatment-related Adverse Effects

    Treatment-related adverse effects as noted by package insert: fever, nausea, vomiting, C-diff, hepatic toxicity, dermatitis, anaphylaxis, renal injury)

    Time frame: day 90

Secondary outcomes

  1. Volume (ml) of Perihematomal Edema

    Volumetric analysis (ml) computed from computed tomography head

    Time frame: Change from baseline perihematomal edema volume to chronic (day 5-11) perihematomal edema volume

  2. modified Rankin score

    modified Rankin score (points ranging from 0 to 6)

    Time frame: day 90

  3. Barthel Index

    Barthel Index score (points ranging from 0 to 100)

    Time frame: day 90

  4. National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale Score

    National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale Score (points ranging from 0 to 42)

    Time frame: day 90

  5. Glasgow Coma Score

    Glasgow Coma Score (points ranging from 3 to 15)

    Time frame: day 90

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 2, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03040128
Lead sponsor
University of Tennessee
Collaborators
University of Southern California
Responsible party
Jason Chang (Principal Investigator, University of Tennessee) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 2, 2017
Start date
Jun 27, 2013
Primary completion
Nov 30, 2016
Completion
Nov 30, 2016
Last update
Feb 2, 2017

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion